Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

601 heads and performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-07-2004 | 12:35 PM
  #1  
92rs85berlintta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 4
From: check under the car
Car: White 25th Anniversary RS
Engine: lt1
Transmission: t56
Axle/Gears: 4:10
601 heads and performance

ok ive read alot about these heads but still come up with some questions. what roughly would the compression be on a 355 with these heads and flat tops? say i wanted to have them ported how well will these flow compaired to aftermarket iron heads? and how well would do they do with say fuel injection or a lt1 intake swap. i just found out that these are my castings and im wondering what there potential is. they are machined already for 2.02 1.60 valves screw in studs but i dont think they are ported.

thanks

im trying to make a new better matched combo with injection and a new cam and i want to get around 400hp if possible.

Last edited by 92rs85berlintta; 07-07-2004 at 12:37 PM.
Old 07-07-2004 | 02:45 PM
  #2  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 36
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Compression would be somewhere in the range of 10:1, depending upon piston valve relief volume, head gasket volume, deck clearance, and actual combustion chamber volume.

Without porting, the only advantage over say L98 heads would be the higher compression. With porting, they will flow about as well as most iron replacement heads, probably close to or better than off-the-shelf Vortecs.

With 2.02/1.60's, you'll probably have to do some chamber unshrouding if it hasn't been done already, which will increase chamber volume and reduce compression.
Old 07-07-2004 | 04:28 PM
  #3  
92rs85berlintta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 4
From: check under the car
Car: White 25th Anniversary RS
Engine: lt1
Transmission: t56
Axle/Gears: 4:10
ok i see. so pretty much im lacking alot of power from the combo in my sig because these heads arent ported or flowing near there capacity. how much of a gain could i expect if i have them fully ported. also should i have them polished ive heard that somtimes polished isnt always better.
thanks
Old 07-07-2004 | 04:41 PM
  #4  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 36
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
The gain would be hard to guess. Probably substantial, but that old-school cam is probably holding the engine back as well.

Polishing is probably marginally beneficial as far as power is concerned. The theory is the polishing keeps combustion by-products from sticking to the chambers and exhaust ports. The primary benefit is probably reduced pinging by removal of potential hot-spots on casting flash peaks and the like in the chamber, allowing you to run proper ignition advance. You don't want a mirror finish on the intake ports, though, to help avoid fuel separation on the walls.
Old 07-07-2004 | 08:39 PM
  #5  
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,111
Likes: 52
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
Originally posted by 92rs85berlintta
ok i see. so pretty much im lacking alot of power from the combo in my sig because these heads arent ported or flowing near there capacity. how much of a gain could i expect if i have them fully ported. also should i have them polished ive heard that somtimes polished isnt always better.
thanks
It's not cost effective to pay someone else to fully port these heads. You will have more wrapped up in them then the cost of new aftermarket castings. It just takes way too long.

Either port them yourself or get new heads.

i have never ported the 601 castings but have done lots of 416 castings. They are simular but not exactly the same. I get them in the mid/high 230cfm range. 170 to 190 exhaust. thats with maxporting.
Got one set to flow 242cfm.
I don't use or recommend 2.02's in these heads.
I use 1.94's and 1.60's.
It's not hard to do, just time consuming.
The edelbrock torker cam is all wrong for EFI.

Last edited by F-BIRD'88; 07-07-2004 at 08:43 PM.
Old 07-07-2004 | 09:59 PM
  #6  
92rs85berlintta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 4
From: check under the car
Car: White 25th Anniversary RS
Engine: lt1
Transmission: t56
Axle/Gears: 4:10
I don't use or recommend 2.02's in these heads.
they already have them in them. i bought them for like 500 bucks or so off ebay like two years ago. when i built the motor i knew how to put one together like a pro micrometer feeler/plasti gauges.now im gonna go fuel injection but am matching it better.

The edelbrock torker cam is all wrong for EFI.
the old school edelcrap cam is as good as gone.. im getting a new one to match my lt1 intake swap. however comp cams tech guys dont have any suggestions for me because they arent farmiliar with the lt1 gen1 swap deal.however ive been reading up on them.



It's not cost effective to pay someone else to fully port these heads. You will have more wrapped up in them then the cost of new aftermarket castings. It just takes way too long
well i guess im gonna learn my first course in head porting.just found the topic on head porting looks fun and time consuming. anything i should know? looks like i need to take alot of metal off.
thanks for the help too

Last edited by 92rs85berlintta; 07-07-2004 at 11:10 PM.
Old 07-08-2004 | 01:45 AM
  #7  
Sitting Bull's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,238
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, Alberta, Republic of Western Canada
Car: 1986 Sport Coupé
Engine: 305-4v
Transmission: 700R4 and TransGo2
Yeah, follow the link at the end of my sig for the lowdown
Old 07-08-2004 | 01:21 PM
  #8  
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,111
Likes: 52
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
Do you want a hydraulic flat tappet cam or a Hyd roller
for your LT-1 intake swap?
Old 07-08-2004 | 07:44 PM
  #9  
92rs85berlintta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 4
From: check under the car
Car: White 25th Anniversary RS
Engine: lt1
Transmission: t56
Axle/Gears: 4:10
i want to use a hydraulic cam like i have now beause i dont want to put all the money into the roller swap i would rather spend that money on the intake.how much does it cost to go roller anyway?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TreDeClaw
Theoretical and Street Racing
11
06-22-2021 08:21 PM
Reddeath210
Firebirds for Sale
14
10-06-2015 08:20 AM
gta90
TPI
40
09-15-2015 04:00 PM
theurge
TPI
7
08-21-2015 12:46 PM
TreDeClaw
Transmissions and Drivetrain
15
08-14-2015 06:58 PM



Quick Reply: 601 heads and performance



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 PM.