Removing cats = messed up air/fuel ratio??
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: South Florida
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 Formula 350
Engine: 350 L98
Transmission: 700R4
Removing cats = messed up air/fuel ratio??
Okay, this is a long shot, but a mechanic today told me that this could be possible, and I'm looking for some verification.
First of all: I have an '89 Formula 350 (L98) that runs poorly at low RPMs (1000-1300). It stumbles and sputters a lot, especially when you're at low throttle trying to go slow in a residential area. It also smells of gasoline and gets horrible mileage, so I think the ECM is enriching the mixture for some reason. My BLMs are in the 145-150 range all the time, indicating lean, so that would seem to suggest that the ECM would be trying to add fuel. I do not have a fuel press gauge, but I do not believe that there is a fuel delivery problem since the additional fuel is making it quite rich. (Not rich enough for any black smoke, but enough to smell it strongly.) I also have brand new 22# injectors, and this problem has been going on since before I installed them.
Here's the deal. A mechanic told me this morning that I might be having this problem because both of my dual catalytic converters were removed (by the previous owner). The lack of cats would somehow keep the air/fuel ratio from ever being optimal. I have not yet investigated what has happened to the AIR pump and tubes that used to run to the cats, but does anyone think this could have anything to do with my problem? I know that the target A/F ratio of 14.7 is set because that's what the converters like best, but I've not heard the argument that removing the cats will foul it up. Is that even possible, since they're downstream from all the sensors and such?
I have replaced the O2 sensor and it didn't help. I've checked the TPS and it is working correctly and seems to be properly adjusted.
Any ideas?
First of all: I have an '89 Formula 350 (L98) that runs poorly at low RPMs (1000-1300). It stumbles and sputters a lot, especially when you're at low throttle trying to go slow in a residential area. It also smells of gasoline and gets horrible mileage, so I think the ECM is enriching the mixture for some reason. My BLMs are in the 145-150 range all the time, indicating lean, so that would seem to suggest that the ECM would be trying to add fuel. I do not have a fuel press gauge, but I do not believe that there is a fuel delivery problem since the additional fuel is making it quite rich. (Not rich enough for any black smoke, but enough to smell it strongly.) I also have brand new 22# injectors, and this problem has been going on since before I installed them.
Here's the deal. A mechanic told me this morning that I might be having this problem because both of my dual catalytic converters were removed (by the previous owner). The lack of cats would somehow keep the air/fuel ratio from ever being optimal. I have not yet investigated what has happened to the AIR pump and tubes that used to run to the cats, but does anyone think this could have anything to do with my problem? I know that the target A/F ratio of 14.7 is set because that's what the converters like best, but I've not heard the argument that removing the cats will foul it up. Is that even possible, since they're downstream from all the sensors and such?
I have replaced the O2 sensor and it didn't help. I've checked the TPS and it is working correctly and seems to be properly adjusted.
Any ideas?
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: South Florida
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 Formula 350
Engine: 350 L98
Transmission: 700R4
Nope, no codes. Timing is good. Plugs look fine. Distributor cap and plug wires are new.
I think I'd be on to something if I could figure out why the BLMs are so high, but that's what's getting me.
I think I'd be on to something if I could figure out why the BLMs are so high, but that's what's getting me.
#4
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes
on
34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
This sticky on the Exhaust forum may relate to your issues. https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=213310
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: South Florida
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 Formula 350
Engine: 350 L98
Transmission: 700R4
Thanks five7kid, I am going to get out my Helm manual and see what I can learn about the AIR pump and its hose routing. Hey, the more I read of that sticky, the more interesting it gets.
I forgot to mention that the symptoms I'm having only occur when the car is warm. If I start it up stone cold and drive it, it's absolutely 100% perfect. I'm guessing that the problem is related to something that goes into effect or is monitored in closed loop. According to my DataMaster recording, that's right where my problems seem to start.
I forgot to mention that the symptoms I'm having only occur when the car is warm. If I start it up stone cold and drive it, it's absolutely 100% perfect. I'm guessing that the problem is related to something that goes into effect or is monitored in closed loop. According to my DataMaster recording, that's right where my problems seem to start.
Last edited by BanditWS6; 01-28-2004 at 01:48 PM.
Trending Topics
#10
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: South Florida
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 Formula 350
Engine: 350 L98
Transmission: 700R4
I've already recorded a ten-minute datalog from DataMaster, but I want to take another one since I changed the O2 sensor and drive at a larger variety of speeds and such.
I'm still new to pretty much everything here and have been learning little-by-little about how to interpret what the ECM is telling me. I'm not certain what "normal" readings are for some of these values, but the ones I do understand seem to be normal. Only thing that stood out at me, as I mentioned, is that the BLMs are always high -- like between 145-152. They never peg at 160 though. BLMs go high the instant the engine starts.
Not getting any knock counts. INT keeps toggling back and forth between rich/lean (as I believe it is supposed to do, as this is normal reaction to the O2 sensor crossing over) but tends to spend more of its time on the enrichening side of the scale. I might be able to learn more if I knew how to interpret the change in the active fuel cell, but I still don't know anything about the fuel cells yet. Looking for info on that.
I'm still new to pretty much everything here and have been learning little-by-little about how to interpret what the ECM is telling me. I'm not certain what "normal" readings are for some of these values, but the ones I do understand seem to be normal. Only thing that stood out at me, as I mentioned, is that the BLMs are always high -- like between 145-152. They never peg at 160 though. BLMs go high the instant the engine starts.
Not getting any knock counts. INT keeps toggling back and forth between rich/lean (as I believe it is supposed to do, as this is normal reaction to the O2 sensor crossing over) but tends to spend more of its time on the enrichening side of the scale. I might be able to learn more if I knew how to interpret the change in the active fuel cell, but I still don't know anything about the fuel cells yet. Looking for info on that.
#12
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: South Florida
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 Formula 350
Engine: 350 L98
Transmission: 700R4
O2 mVs are oscillating back and forth between 40ish and 900ish. Crossovers seem pretty regular. Based on what I know of how an O2 sensor works, it looks like normal operation to me.
It was a slightly chilly evening here (this is Florida, remember ) when I took the readings. Drove it for about 13 minutes and it took about 7 minutes for the coolant temp to get up to 150.4 F. Once it hit that value it climbed more slowly, eventually reaching 181 F as I sat in the driveway idling at the end of the trip. It was 9:16 PM and I'd say the ambient temp outside was somewhere around 55 degrees.
I began to wonder today if my fuel filter has been changed recently. Looking back through my records (from the previous owner) I don't see any indication of that. He changed the fuel pump due to a failure, but I got nothing on the filter. For a five dollar part, I'm sure going to get one this weekend and see if that helps any. What have I got to lose.
It was a slightly chilly evening here (this is Florida, remember ) when I took the readings. Drove it for about 13 minutes and it took about 7 minutes for the coolant temp to get up to 150.4 F. Once it hit that value it climbed more slowly, eventually reaching 181 F as I sat in the driveway idling at the end of the trip. It was 9:16 PM and I'd say the ambient temp outside was somewhere around 55 degrees.
I began to wonder today if my fuel filter has been changed recently. Looking back through my records (from the previous owner) I don't see any indication of that. He changed the fuel pump due to a failure, but I got nothing on the filter. For a five dollar part, I'm sure going to get one this weekend and see if that helps any. What have I got to lose.
#13
Kinda sounds like my problem. Does it run better once its warmed up? Mine stumbles bad and smells of gasoline too. This is until it warms up and it runs a bit better. Failed hc at emissions by about 1.20(alot).Changed everything plugs, wires, cap and rotor, o2 sensor, coolant sensor, checked tps voltage(.54). No codes! Let me know how the fuel filter went.
#16
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SillyCon Valley, CA
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 83 Z-28 (Original owner)
Engine: 305 CC-carb
Transmission: Richmond 6-speed, Rear:3.73
Do you have any exhaust leaks?
If there is a leak in the exhaust, air is pulled into the exhaust in-between pressure pulses. The O2 in this air confuses the computer into thinking it needs to add more fuel. Even a leak downstream of the sensor can work its way upstream to the sensor during “cruse” conditions.
If there is a leak in the exhaust, air is pulled into the exhaust in-between pressure pulses. The O2 in this air confuses the computer into thinking it needs to add more fuel. Even a leak downstream of the sensor can work its way upstream to the sensor during “cruse” conditions.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post