High Rev 301 ci

Closed Thread Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

12-02-2003 | 05:07 PM

#51

formularpm

Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2002

Posts: 845

Likes: 12

From: Nebraska

Car: '89 Formula

Engine: 355

Transmission: 700R4

Axle/Gears: 9 bolt

If more displacement didnt make more power and if any of this small-stroke nonsense was true, racing classes wouldnt set a maximum displacement limit, but a minimum stroke limit.

12-02-2003 | 05:30 PM

#52

Ed Maher

Supreme Member

Joined: Sep 1999

Posts: 3,197

Likes: 6

From: Manassas VA

Car: 04 GTO

Engine: LS1

Transmission: M12 T56

Quote:

Originally posted by Rage13
thanks for the name calling... i would have hoped a mod would be more grown up then that oh and heres the race i'm building the car for http://www.silverstateclassic.com/
and i know what everyone is saying about bigger ci for cheaper power, but i want something different (also something i don't have to worry about running out of gas before the in of the race with..), i'm even toying with the idea of putting a rotory engine in, but seeing as how almost everyone flamed the last guy that brought that up i wasn't going to bother...
i know this project will work, i was coming here hoping to find help and other ideas to make it easier (and thank you to all that have done so). and not everything has to have big ci to win, last week my friend handed my *** to me with his stock I-4 MX6

Yeah i'm familiar with that race. Thanks for the link, made it easy to verify that the record was in fact well under your pie in the sky 255 goal. And if you don't understand that it will take into 4 digits of HP to run that kind of MPH, i am pretty sure you're still racing in one of the peanut classes, if you even really have a car at all.