Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Valvetrain geometry and rocker arm to valve spring clearance problems

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-22-2003, 03:54 PM
  #1  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
max_est's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Estonia
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '89 RS
Engine: '88 355
Transmission: TH200R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 10-bolt
Valvetrain geometry and rocker arm to valve spring clearance problems

AFR 190 heads (late style), '88 350 block, stock rocker arms, 0.51/0.52 lift hyd roller cam

I have problems with determining right length of pushrod. I started measuring pushrod legth with stock length pushrod, but rocker arm touched the valve spring before rocker tip touched the valve tip. I tried with longer pushrod and found pushrod length, when rocker tip touches the valve tip at the intake side at zero lift and moves exhaust side of valve tip at max lift (but rocker arm slot hits the rocker arm stud). Isn't it correct geometry ...or is it? I've read, that valvetrain geometry is correct, when rocker tip starts from intake side of valve tip (at zero lift), then moves to the exhaust side (at half lift) and finishes at intake side of valve tip at maximum lift.

I can't find that lenght of pushrod in my valvetrain. Is the problem in stock rocker arms? AFR says, that you can use stock rocker arms. If problem is in rockers, then should iI go with roller tip or full rollers?

Or is there problem in my method of determining right valvetrain geometry?

Have somebody experienced same problems with AFR heads and stock rocker arms?

Thanks, guys!

Last edited by max_est; 11-22-2003 at 04:37 PM.
Old 11-22-2003, 04:45 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

 
Damon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Philly, PA
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
I have used those heads with stock rockers. The stock lenght pushrods worked just fine for me. I was also pushing about .500 valve lift. Like you, with longer pushrods I was running out of travel in the rocker arm slot before getting to max lift. I kept using the stock pushrods, therefore, and have no problems to report from doing so.

Rocker geometry is one of those things where you'll get different answers from different people. I try to start the rocker tip toward the intake side, have it go as far to the exhaust side as it will go at about 2/3 max lift and them come back slightly as it reaches max lift. This setup minimizes the travel of the rocker tip across the valve tip at high lifts, where spring tension is highest.
Old 11-22-2003, 07:31 PM
  #3  
Senior Member

 
rjmcgee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Klamath Falls Or 97603
Posts: 976
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My Pro Action heads have 1.460 diameter springs and I ran into trouble with the stock rocker arms. They wouldn't clear the spring with anything resembling correct valve train geometry. Comp's magnum roller tipped rockers fixxed the problem nicely. Also used one of their length checking pushrods to determine the correct pushrod length.

I stole this picture from one of Vader's posts I found with a search, it is how I set up my valvetrain geometry.
Attached Thumbnails Valvetrain geometry and rocker arm to valve spring clearance problems-rockersetup.gif  
Old 11-23-2003, 05:50 AM
  #4  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
max_est's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Estonia
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '89 RS
Engine: '88 355
Transmission: TH200R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 10-bolt
Thanks, guys!

It seems like I should buy a set of new rockers that will clear valve springs with right valvetrain geometry.

But it's strange that nobody has practiced this kind of problem before with AFR's and stock rockers. At least search didn't give me answers.
Old 11-23-2003, 10:28 AM
  #5  
Supreme Member
 
RB83L69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Loveland, OH, US
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
AFR's and stock rockers
Surely you must be joking.... nobody in their right mind would do that. That's about as sensible as putting AFRs on a TBI 305 and leaving the stock exhaust manifolds on it.

Get those stupid worthless things off of there, and put something worthy of $1500 heads on top of them. Get your money's worth out of the heads by opening the valves. Then worry about push rod geometry. As it is, push rod geometry is a far lesser problem tnan the flaws of stock rockers.
Old 11-23-2003, 11:14 AM
  #6  
Moderator

 
Vader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 19,443
Received 240 Likes on 195 Posts
Just to expound upon that a bit, the stock rockers would likely have problems with even "perfect" length push rods, since the stud slots in the stock rockers are likely far too short for a cam with a 0.510" lifts. That's all aside from the fact that the stock "forged rubber" rockers aren't going to do the rest of the combination any justice.

And please, stop calling me "Shirley"....
Old 11-23-2003, 03:37 PM
  #7  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
max_est's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Estonia
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '89 RS
Engine: '88 355
Transmission: TH200R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 10-bolt
Will Comp Cams roller tipped Magnums be OK? Or should I step to the full rollers (Pro Magnum)?
Old 11-23-2003, 03:46 PM
  #8  
Moderator

 
Vader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 19,443
Received 240 Likes on 195 Posts
The Comp roller tips will be infinitely better than the stock rockers. However, the fact that you were using stock rockers indicates that you are not using push rod guide plates. That would mean that you would need to get self-aligning rockers. I'm not sure if the roller tips are avaialble in that design from Comp.
Old 11-24-2003, 01:21 AM
  #9  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
max_est's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Estonia
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '89 RS
Engine: '88 355
Transmission: TH200R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 10-bolt
Actually I _am_ using guideplates. My engine had non self-align rockers and guideplates (and some crappy 181? heads with 1.84/1.5 valves) when I bought it. I bought late-style AFR 190's that have guideplates also. So I'm thinking, should I buy roller tip rockers (and save some money) or go with full rollers (then I should buy also taller valvecovers). Car will be daily-driver. Cam has 0.503/510 lift (CC 08-503-8).
Old 11-24-2003, 08:44 AM
  #10  
Senior Member

 
rjmcgee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Klamath Falls Or 97603
Posts: 976
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The Comp roller tips fit fine under my stock sized valve covers.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sweet_87_iroc
Camaros for Sale
5
09-25-2015 10:01 PM
gta90
TPI
40
09-15-2015 04:00 PM
Zeek1041
Theoretical and Street Racing
6
08-21-2015 08:45 PM
86White_T/A305
LTX and LSX
0
08-17-2015 12:16 AM
1988iroc350tpi
Tech / General Engine
8
08-14-2015 07:52 PM



Quick Reply: Valvetrain geometry and rocker arm to valve spring clearance problems



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:29 PM.