350 4bbl HP?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Fond du Lac, WI
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28 Clone
Engine: 350 w/TBI
Transmission: WC T-5
Axle/Gears: Spicer 3:73 Auburn Posi
350 4bbl HP?
I know there are about a million different versions of this engine, but i am curious how much HP the engine i have was designed for. What HP variations were there? lowest and highest? Were are the tags on the engine to identify which one it is?
Basically i bought the car with this engine, someone put it in there, so i just wanted to know what platform i am working with. It has a Q-Jet carb, and thats about all i know that varied on these engines. Any and all input is appreciated!
thanks
Basically i bought the car with this engine, someone put it in there, so i just wanted to know what platform i am working with. It has a Q-Jet carb, and thats about all i know that varied on these engines. Any and all input is appreciated!
thanks
#2
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: B'ville, WV
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2002 Formula Firebird
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.23
There is 1 million different versions...probably a million different HP ratings to...Your gonna have to get the specs.
#3
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Loveland, OH, US
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes
on
15 Posts
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
I know there are about a million different versions of this engine, but i am curious how much HP the engine i have was designed for
For what it's worth, from 73 up, they were all about the same; 180 HP or thereabouts. They pretty much all had dished pistons, 76cc crap heads, and the 929 cam. Didn't matter whether it was 2- or 4-barrle, whethere they were in a truck or an Impala or a Vette, they were basically all the same.
Before that, it gets real hard to compare them, because they changed the HP "rating" system starting in 72. To give you some idea, the motor that was "300 HP" in 71 was "200 HP" in 72. Earlier ones might have had double-hump heads of one sort or another, and some would even have had the solid cam. It's probably a safe bet that you don't have one of those but I can't see it real clearly from here so I can't say for sure.
If someone "put it there", it might or might not be any one of those versions; it might be better, it might even be worse. It would all depend on what they did to it in the process of "putting it there".
Look at the pistons and see if they're flat-tops or dished. Get the head casting numbers, those are the single most important thing. If you're rebuilding it, you'll throw away the pistons and the cam, so they don't matter. If the heads are the typical 882 or 624 or 993 castings, you might as well throw those away too, unless you want to duplicate one of those mighty 180 HP wonders.
#4
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Fond du Lac, WI
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28 Clone
Engine: 350 w/TBI
Transmission: WC T-5
Axle/Gears: Spicer 3:73 Auburn Posi
Originally posted by RB83L69
That would depend on which version you have.
For what it's worth, from 73 up, they were all about the same; 180 HP or thereabouts. They pretty much all had dished pistons, 76cc crap heads, and the 929 cam. Didn't matter whether it was 2- or 4-barrle, whethere they were in a truck or an Impala or a Vette, they were basically all the same.
Before that, it gets real hard to compare them, because they changed the HP "rating" system starting in 72. To give you some idea, the motor that was "300 HP" in 71 was "200 HP" in 72. Earlier ones might have had double-hump heads of one sort or another, and some would even have had the solid cam. It's probably a safe bet that you don't have one of those but I can't see it real clearly from here so I can't say for sure.
If someone "put it there", it might or might not be any one of those versions; it might be better, it might even be worse. It would all depend on what they did to it in the process of "putting it there".
Look at the pistons and see if they're flat-tops or dished. Get the head casting numbers, those are the single most important thing. If you're rebuilding it, you'll throw away the pistons and the cam, so they don't matter. If the heads are the typical 882 or 624 or 993 castings, you might as well throw those away too, unless you want to duplicate one of those mighty 180 HP wonders.
That would depend on which version you have.
For what it's worth, from 73 up, they were all about the same; 180 HP or thereabouts. They pretty much all had dished pistons, 76cc crap heads, and the 929 cam. Didn't matter whether it was 2- or 4-barrle, whethere they were in a truck or an Impala or a Vette, they were basically all the same.
Before that, it gets real hard to compare them, because they changed the HP "rating" system starting in 72. To give you some idea, the motor that was "300 HP" in 71 was "200 HP" in 72. Earlier ones might have had double-hump heads of one sort or another, and some would even have had the solid cam. It's probably a safe bet that you don't have one of those but I can't see it real clearly from here so I can't say for sure.
If someone "put it there", it might or might not be any one of those versions; it might be better, it might even be worse. It would all depend on what they did to it in the process of "putting it there".
Look at the pistons and see if they're flat-tops or dished. Get the head casting numbers, those are the single most important thing. If you're rebuilding it, you'll throw away the pistons and the cam, so they don't matter. If the heads are the typical 882 or 624 or 993 castings, you might as well throw those away too, unless you want to duplicate one of those mighty 180 HP wonders.
Also, from people with expirience here, i want to start planning the rebuild for it, should i stick with the 4 bbl, or do a fuel injection conversion? for the money is it worth it? The end result for me is to run a 12 sec 1/4 with or without nos... i plan on running nos anyways, but thats the goal...
#5
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Loveland, OH, US
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes
on
15 Posts
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
You're not running a 12 second 1320' with anything dimly resembling a factory 70s 350. Don't even worry about what the "factory ratings" might have been; they have no connection with where you're going.
Get casting numbers and post them. Lots of us have lots of experience with which heads work for what, and which ones are useless. I'm guessing though, with that goal, you won't be using the castings you have, no matter what they are.
You'll go faster cheaper with a 4-barrel than with FI, but not the one that came on some 70s 350. You'll probably want a Holley or a Demon 750 or so. On the other hand, there are some FI systems that can compete, performance-wise; but not dollar-wise. If you have nothing related to either one, I'd recommend going toward a carb. Above all, it will be nigh on to impossible to crack into the 12s with TPI, although a few have made it, with considerable tuning experience and much $$$$ in heads and various other parts. But it's not a reasonable goal for a beginner to attempt that with that platform.
Get casting numbers and post them. Lots of us have lots of experience with which heads work for what, and which ones are useless. I'm guessing though, with that goal, you won't be using the castings you have, no matter what they are.
You'll go faster cheaper with a 4-barrel than with FI, but not the one that came on some 70s 350. You'll probably want a Holley or a Demon 750 or so. On the other hand, there are some FI systems that can compete, performance-wise; but not dollar-wise. If you have nothing related to either one, I'd recommend going toward a carb. Above all, it will be nigh on to impossible to crack into the 12s with TPI, although a few have made it, with considerable tuning experience and much $$$$ in heads and various other parts. But it's not a reasonable goal for a beginner to attempt that with that platform.
#6
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Fond du Lac, WI
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28 Clone
Engine: 350 w/TBI
Transmission: WC T-5
Axle/Gears: Spicer 3:73 Auburn Posi
Originally posted by RB83L69
You're not running a 12 second 1320' with anything dimly resembling a factory 70s 350. Don't even worry about what the "factory ratings" might have been; they have no connection with where you're going.
Get casting numbers and post them. Lots of us have lots of experience with which heads work for what, and which ones are useless. I'm guessing though, with that goal, you won't be using the castings you have, no matter what they are.
You'll go faster cheaper with a 4-barrel than with FI, but not the one that came on some 70s 350. You'll probably want a Holley or a Demon 750 or so. On the other hand, there are some FI systems that can compete, performance-wise; but not dollar-wise. If you have nothing related to either one, I'd recommend going toward a carb. Above all, it will be nigh on to impossible to crack into the 12s with TPI, although a few have made it, with considerable tuning experience and much $$$$ in heads and various other parts. But it's not a reasonable goal for a beginner to attempt that with that platform.
You're not running a 12 second 1320' with anything dimly resembling a factory 70s 350. Don't even worry about what the "factory ratings" might have been; they have no connection with where you're going.
Get casting numbers and post them. Lots of us have lots of experience with which heads work for what, and which ones are useless. I'm guessing though, with that goal, you won't be using the castings you have, no matter what they are.
You'll go faster cheaper with a 4-barrel than with FI, but not the one that came on some 70s 350. You'll probably want a Holley or a Demon 750 or so. On the other hand, there are some FI systems that can compete, performance-wise; but not dollar-wise. If you have nothing related to either one, I'd recommend going toward a carb. Above all, it will be nigh on to impossible to crack into the 12s with TPI, although a few have made it, with considerable tuning experience and much $$$$ in heads and various other parts. But it's not a reasonable goal for a beginner to attempt that with that platform.
I fully understand how a motor works and all the fundementals, i pulled mine apart plenty of times and even made my own turbo setup on my last car... just a little different now. Seems more simple, but i need to learn a few things to get back on track i guess...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post