Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

AFR 180-190 versus World Sportsman II

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-27-2003, 12:38 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
wiggy'sIROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mt. Home, ID
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 IROC
Engine: 305 going to 355
Transmission: 700R4
AFR 180-190 versus World Sportsman II

I am sure I know the opinions on this, but I have to ask. I have compared the flow numbers and there is a definate answer in those flow numbers, but what about "real world" performance? Are the AFR's really worth the $350-$400 price difference? I will have 9.5:1ish compression, XE268-XE274 cam in a 355. It will mainly be a weekend "fun" car (IROC).

THANKS!
Mark

Last edited by wiggy'sIROC; 10-27-2003 at 12:42 PM.
Old 10-27-2003, 01:25 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Free Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Dale City, VA
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 GTA and 85 IROC
Engine: 355
Transmission: gear jammer
Axle/Gears: 4.11
If your not that into racing, then I wouldn't recomend AFR's. They are great heads, but you can't get them in a 64cc chamber. Get them milled down to a 58cc chamber and it'll cost you a fortune.

For a weekend worrior that'll be happy w/ high 12's I think the world heads will do just fine.
Old 10-27-2003, 04:08 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

 
94-6spd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: W. Kentucky
Posts: 1,112
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 83 Z-28
Engine: 406
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.70
My vote is the afr's. The thing with better flow is that you can use a less radical camshaft and still have lots of power. Another good thing about more flow is if you want to upgrade the camshaft to get more power in the future you won't be limited to the sportsman II's flow. The vortec heads are a good head to compare to the sportsmans. According to Chevy High Performance Magazine the vortecs outflowed the sportsmans up to .500 lift.
Old 10-27-2003, 08:26 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member

 
88IROC350TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pitman, NJ
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: Canfield 195 headed 358ci
Transmission: TH350, Art Carr 9.5"
Axle/Gears: 3.92 Dana 44
I know a few guys with WP SPII's and their ETs dont impress me at all ...in my opinion they flat out suck.
Old 10-27-2003, 09:32 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

 
Damon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Philly, PA
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
They're worth it, in my opinion. Having bought my first set relatively recently (replacing Dart Iron Eagles) I wasn't quite convinced. I am now convinced. The few extra coins will be long forgotten a few months after you get them. They're artwork that works, and their tech guys are anxious to help you get your money's worth from them.

Few products or companies impress me enough that I would say something like that. AFR is the exception. In short, you get all of what you pay the extra money for.
Old 10-27-2003, 09:37 PM
  #6  
Member
Thread Starter
 
wiggy'sIROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mt. Home, ID
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 IROC
Engine: 305 going to 355
Transmission: 700R4
Great points to ponder on both sides. I still can't decide though. I don't need it to be a race car, it will be my weekend fun car. I would like to get into the 12.9's though. Keep the thoughts coming!

Mark
Old 10-28-2003, 03:00 PM
  #7  
Member
Thread Starter
 
wiggy'sIROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mt. Home, ID
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 IROC
Engine: 305 going to 355
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by 88IROC350TPI
I know a few guys with WP SPII's and their ETs dont impress me at all ...in my opinion they flat out suck.
Does that mean that you don't think the Sportsman's are no better than stock?

Mark
Old 10-28-2003, 04:00 PM
  #8  
pre
Member
 
pre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 Firebird
Engine: 305 LG4
Transmission: THM700R4
Originally posted by wiggy'sIROC
Does that mean that you don't think the Sportsman's are no better than stock?

Mark
They gotta be good for at least 15-25hp over stock I would think.
Old 10-28-2003, 05:39 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member

 
88IROC350TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pitman, NJ
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: Canfield 195 headed 358ci
Transmission: TH350, Art Carr 9.5"
Axle/Gears: 3.92 Dana 44
If you look at their flow numbers in comparison to Vortecs you'll see vortecs aren't all that far behind. You can pick up a set of vortecs for real cheap + buy a vortec intake and still have saved a ton of money...

I know a guy with almos the exact same combo as me (same motor size, same camshaft, same weight, same just about everything, he has a little more gearing and converter than me though) The only exception is he has SPII's ...my car is a good half second faster than his. Now, you may blame tuning on his shortcomings but this car was built by a shop that has built 8 second cars - they know how to tune. So he spent all kinds of money on those heads and I'm way faster with junkyard stock truck heads, kinda silly IMO.

Last edited by 88IROC350TPI; 10-28-2003 at 05:42 PM.
Old 10-29-2003, 04:11 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (35)
 
wesilva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1966 El Camino Custom
Engine: 350
Transmission: 200R4
Axle/Gears: 3:73 12 bolt with Brute Strength
IMHO, AFR first, Vortecs or Trick Flow Twisted Wedge G2's second because of bang for the buck with World Products not even a consideration. Just by the fact AFR's are aluminum puts them over WP. Then consider old school chamber design of the WP compared to the newer chamber design of AFR. Save for the AFR's and purchase them. You won't be sorry.
Old 10-29-2003, 09:02 PM
  #11  
Member
Thread Starter
 
wiggy'sIROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mt. Home, ID
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 IROC
Engine: 305 going to 355
Transmission: 700R4
Thank you all for your input! I guess I have some thinking to do about several heads.

Mark
Old 10-30-2003, 05:56 AM
  #12  
Junior Member
 
Cam28_boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Pontiac,Mi USA
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If your going to be racing then you should get some AFR's or some Canfield's but if your just racing around on the weekend then the sportsman II's are more than enough to get you going...I have some that are ported and they run fine...i'm very satisfied...I made other changes when I added the heads put can say that I gained more than 50hp. I have the same heads with new springs on my 406 and it definately screams, haven't been to the track yet, but i'm guarenteed that i'm running low 12 or high 11's.

I have to be honest that I have been looking at the AFR's but the price is keeping me away...the Canfields are just as nice for about the same price. The heads are the most important part of your set-up but you can make more power in another area...just my opinion.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
seiplentz
DFI and ECM
35
08-19-2019 06:02 PM
gt4373
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
3
10-08-2015 10:37 AM
oil pan 4
Fabrication
2
10-06-2015 11:56 AM
ULTM8Z
DIY PROM
12
10-02-2015 01:25 PM
Damon
Tech / General Engine
8
09-26-2015 04:29 PM



Quick Reply: AFR 180-190 versus World Sportsman II



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:13 AM.