Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

LT4 Cam In A LO3?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-09-2003, 01:01 PM
  #1  
Max
Member

Thread Starter
 
Max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Madison, WI USA
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '89 Camaro Convertible
Engine: LB9 Heads/LT1 Cam Holley 670 Carb
Transmission: T5 Manual
Axle/Gears: 3.73
LT4 Cam In A LO3?

I'm planning a cam swap this spring. From what I understand it looks like the LT4 production cam may be a wise choice for my combination.

Now that I have 3.73 gears and the tunability of a Holley carb I'm thinking that a cam this size would be a good choice.

203 I / 210 E @.050
.476" I / .480" E Lift with 1.6 rockers

The lift would of course be less if I were to reuse my stock 1.5 rockers.

The questions I have are:

1. Can the stock LO3 heads handle that much lift without any interference problems?

I would probably upgrade to the heavier factory Z28 valve springs.

2. Can the cam be used with the original 1.5 rockers?

In the product description it says designed for use with 1.6 rockers. It also describes the cam as:

"an excellent power adder for 1987-95 TBI pick-ups and TBI/TPI cars"

3. Would this provide a good bang for the buck at $173?


I know that the stock LO3 heads will be the limiting factor in my combination but for right now that's what I plan on using.

Any advice will be appreciated.
Old 03-09-2003, 06:30 PM
  #2  
Max
Member

Thread Starter
 
Max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Madison, WI USA
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '89 Camaro Convertible
Engine: LB9 Heads/LT1 Cam Holley 670 Carb
Transmission: T5 Manual
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Just wanted to move this back to the top of the page.
Old 03-09-2003, 11:52 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

 
Sitting Bull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Republic of Western Canada
Posts: 3,238
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1986 Sport Coupé
Engine: 305-4v
Transmission: 700R4 and TransGo2
Those specs sound like an LT1 cam, not the LT4.

Lt1s are supposed to work very well, even with the stock computer programing. But you should upgrade the valve springs to whatever Crane or Comp would recommend.
Old 03-10-2003, 09:56 AM
  #4  
Max
Member

Thread Starter
 
Max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Madison, WI USA
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '89 Camaro Convertible
Engine: LB9 Heads/LT1 Cam Holley 670 Carb
Transmission: T5 Manual
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Those are the specs for the LT4 production cam not the LT4 Hot Cam. It is milder than the Hot Cam and is similar to LT1 cam specs.

So you don't think that it has too much lift for the LO3 heads?
Old 03-10-2003, 05:10 PM
  #5  
Max
Member

Thread Starter
 
Max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Madison, WI USA
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '89 Camaro Convertible
Engine: LB9 Heads/LT1 Cam Holley 670 Carb
Transmission: T5 Manual
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Anyone else care to offer an opinion?
Old 03-10-2003, 05:17 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

 
Sitting Bull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Republic of Western Canada
Posts: 3,238
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1986 Sport Coupé
Engine: 305-4v
Transmission: 700R4 and TransGo2
Originally posted by Black '89 RS Convertible
Those are the specs for the LT4 production cam not the LT4 Hot Cam. It is milder than the Hot Cam and is similar to LT1 cam specs.

So you don't think that it has too much lift for the LO3 heads?
Only if you use the 1.5 rockers. 1.6 will cause collisions
Old 03-10-2003, 06:03 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member

 
ME Leigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Valley of the Sun
Posts: 3,852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: Al LT1 headed LG4 305
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi with spacer
You need much better springs, stock suck.
Old 03-10-2003, 06:13 PM
  #8  
Max
Member

Thread Starter
 
Max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Madison, WI USA
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '89 Camaro Convertible
Engine: LB9 Heads/LT1 Cam Holley 670 Carb
Transmission: T5 Manual
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Thanks. So, if the LT4 production cam has:

.476" I and .480" E lift when installed with 1.6 rockers
(as it is described in the GMPP catalog)

Then I suppose it would have:

.446" I and .450 E Lift when installed with 1.5 rockers

Do you think that this is just about the maximum amount of lift I can use with the stock LO3 heads without interference?

Also, do you mean that any more lift would cause the valves to impact the pistons or are you suggesting that there would be another sort of interference problem?

I appreciate you help.
Old 03-11-2003, 08:30 AM
  #9  
Max
Member

Thread Starter
 
Max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Madison, WI USA
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '89 Camaro Convertible
Engine: LB9 Heads/LT1 Cam Holley 670 Carb
Transmission: T5 Manual
Axle/Gears: 3.73
just wanted to move this up to the top of the page
Old 03-11-2003, 12:26 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member

 
Sitting Bull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Republic of Western Canada
Posts: 3,238
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1986 Sport Coupé
Engine: 305-4v
Transmission: 700R4 and TransGo2
Not valve to piston but coil bind. So just 1.5 rockers and new springs.
Old 03-11-2003, 01:44 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member

 
NTChrist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: St. Catharines, ON
Posts: 1,516
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I know the coils won't bind at that low of a lift (there are guys running LT1 cams with 1.6 rockers on L03s no problem) with the stock springs, BUT it's definitely not optimal.
I imagine valve float interferes with any higher RPM hp pretty badly.
And to answer your q's from your first post:
1) Yes
2) Yes
3) Yes. But, keep in mind that a used LT1 cam usually goes for about $100 USD.
I managed to pick mine up for $90 USD and it came with the roller lifters out of the LT1, too. Just something to keep in mind if you're on a budget.
Old 03-12-2003, 12:11 AM
  #12  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
BronYrAur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro RS Convertible
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42
If you plan on sticking with the 1.5 rockers why not just run the LT1 cam it actuallly will have higher lift than the LT4 cam will running 1.5's. I've also heard that the LT4 cam will not work to its potentiall using 1.5 rockers because it is designed to use the higher life that 1.6's give it, just my .02.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jorlain
Tech / General Engine
6
10-08-2015 01:57 AM
tommy z-28
Cooling
5
10-06-2015 10:58 PM
customblackbird
Power Adders
71
10-01-2015 04:30 PM
64Chief
Transmissions and Drivetrain
4
09-12-2015 08:05 AM
Stroopwafel
Tech / General Engine
7
09-11-2015 06:38 AM



Quick Reply: LT4 Cam In A LO3?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:51 AM.