Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

eagle sir rods vs pm

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-27-2003, 01:05 AM
  #1  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
 
Streetiron85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '85 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700 R4
eagle sir rods vs pm

Anyone have any opinions on which of those rods is superior?
Old 02-27-2003, 01:34 AM
  #2  
Supreme Member

 
ME Leigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Valley of the Sun
Posts: 3,852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: Al LT1 headed LG4 305
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi with spacer
The SIR rods are rebuildable, the PM are not!
Old 02-27-2003, 07:17 AM
  #3  
Supreme Member
 
jcb999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: College Station, Tex USA
Posts: 1,443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89rs
Engine: 400Sb
Transmission: Tremec 3550
rods are rarely the cause of a failure..

its normally a rod bolt or loss of oil flow (which is often associated with a bolt having insufficient preload/torque). Second important factor is the rod weight.. and im pretty sure SIRs are lighter than the 600+ gram factory rods.


Find a rod that uses a cap screw type fastener (and use bolt stretch for establishing preload during installation) as opposed to a bolt/nut and all other issues will solve themselves.

PS. i think the ^rebuildable is kind of an oversimplification. The common thing now is to bore the big-end to approx .002+ oversized and use a thicker bearing.
Old 02-27-2003, 10:48 AM
  #4  
Moderator
TGO - 10 Year Member
 
Vader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 19,447
Received 241 Likes on 196 Posts
Not to argue a whole bunch, but the factor SBC PM rods made after '94 are machined at the parting lines, so they CAN be resized...

Still, while they are good factory rods, there are better choices out there if you're planning for replacements. You'll have to go through all the balancing anyway, so you might as well start with a lighter, stronger con rod.
Old 02-27-2003, 01:25 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
 
Streetiron85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '85 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700 R4
Vader,
So for a lighter, stronger rod would the SIR be the wise choice?
Old 02-27-2003, 10:42 PM
  #6  
Senior Member

 
cp87GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: springfield,IL
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: T/A / Grand Am
Engine: 383 SBC
Transmission: glide
Axle/Gears: 9" ford 5.67
I used the sir rod in my 383. Building a 406 for my brother now, we bought scat pro I beam rods for it. They have cap screw type bolts and guide dowls. I wish I would have used them myself. Since eagle raised there price, those scat pros don't cost much more. They claim they are good to 650/700 hp.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ed1LE
Suspension and Chassis
8
09-30-2018 09:14 AM
LT1Formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
7
10-08-2015 08:34 PM
loud91rs
Camaros for Sale
7
10-05-2015 10:05 PM
skinny z
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
10-05-2015 06:23 PM
J. Chris Davis
Interior Parts Wanted
2
09-28-2015 11:55 AM



Quick Reply: eagle sir rods vs pm



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:21 PM.