dynoed my 383, questions w/in
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Hayward, CA
Posts: 893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 camaro
Engine: 383
Transmission: T56
dynoed my 383, questions w/in
I took my new 383 setup to be dyno-tuned (with about 700 miles on the motor) and here's the numbers I came up with:
320 RWHP @ 4600 RPM
417 RWTQ @ 3400 RPM
The hp numbers were a bit disappointing, although I realize peak hp numbers are not always indicitave of how fast a car is. Example: I have a buddy with a 383 who runs 11.98 in the 1/4, mainly because he has so much torque and a VERY flat HP curve.
Anyway, the thing that confuses me the most about my numbers is why I made my peak HP so low. I'm wondering if something is choking the motor up high. Here's my setup:
I realize I've got a few parts, such as the TB and exhaust that could use a little upgrading, but could they really be choking the motor that much? With a decent flowing set of heads, ZZ9 cam, and Superram, I'd expect my hp to peak around 5200 or so, not 4600. Ideas or suggestions?
320 RWHP @ 4600 RPM
417 RWTQ @ 3400 RPM
The hp numbers were a bit disappointing, although I realize peak hp numbers are not always indicitave of how fast a car is. Example: I have a buddy with a 383 who runs 11.98 in the 1/4, mainly because he has so much torque and a VERY flat HP curve.
Anyway, the thing that confuses me the most about my numbers is why I made my peak HP so low. I'm wondering if something is choking the motor up high. Here's my setup:
I realize I've got a few parts, such as the TB and exhaust that could use a little upgrading, but could they really be choking the motor that much? With a decent flowing set of heads, ZZ9 cam, and Superram, I'd expect my hp to peak around 5200 or so, not 4600. Ideas or suggestions?
#2
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Edmonton AB Canada
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 86 Firebird
Engine: 355 4 bbl
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: 3.73 L/S
Wow, that's a mountain of torque. Must be fun to drive.
I would think that an engine like yours has a serious capacity to pump air and the exhaust system isn't big enough for that volume. Perhaps trying a pressure gauge in the exhaust system - maybe where the 02 sensor bung is?
I think a stroker like yours could use 1 3/4 headers and at least a 3 inch mandrel-bent cat-back system with a capable muffler.
I was surprised to see the torque peak under 5000 RPM too, but that's all I can think of - no experience with modding TPI.
I would think that an engine like yours has a serious capacity to pump air and the exhaust system isn't big enough for that volume. Perhaps trying a pressure gauge in the exhaust system - maybe where the 02 sensor bung is?
I think a stroker like yours could use 1 3/4 headers and at least a 3 inch mandrel-bent cat-back system with a capable muffler.
I was surprised to see the torque peak under 5000 RPM too, but that's all I can think of - no experience with modding TPI.
#3
Yeah I like your torque numbers. Now it is true that you have a stock throttle body, but I honestly dont think it would make your numbers do that. I am perplexed. If you have money, try putting another thorttle body on. BTW, the run was made with the exhaust attached right? If you want to mess with it, it would be interesting to see what would happen to that hp number and the RPMs with just headers. Btw, one more thing. Stock ignition? Good luck man,
#4
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Think those 1 5/8 headers are hurting your top end? Maybe some 1 3/4 could help out up top.
And you definately will benefit from a 3'' I pipe.
And you definately will benefit from a 3'' I pipe.
#5
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: kentucky
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: manual/t56
you said those heads were ported but how much? I have always heard L98 aluminum heads were good but not the best. Also what are the specs for the cam? Are there any tuning issues that still need to be addressed(timing, chip tuning etc.) I don't think the tb is much of an issue but the exhaust might be. Slp's website says they recommend 1 3/4 primaries for 350 and larger engines. What compression ratio are you running? With my trick flows I'm running 10 to1. It sounds like just some minor tuning issues. All in all you've got a pretty stout combo.
#7
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Originally posted by slayer2000
you said those heads were ported but how much? I have always heard L98 aluminum heads were good but not the best. Also what are the specs for the cam? Are there any tuning issues that still need to be addressed(timing, chip tuning etc.) I don't think the tb is much of an issue but the exhaust might be. Slp's website says they recommend 1 3/4 primaries for 350 and larger engines. What compression ratio are you running? With my trick flows I'm running 10 to1. It sounds like just some minor tuning issues. All in all you've got a pretty stout combo.
you said those heads were ported but how much? I have always heard L98 aluminum heads were good but not the best. Also what are the specs for the cam? Are there any tuning issues that still need to be addressed(timing, chip tuning etc.) I don't think the tb is much of an issue but the exhaust might be. Slp's website says they recommend 1 3/4 primaries for 350 and larger engines. What compression ratio are you running? With my trick flows I'm running 10 to1. It sounds like just some minor tuning issues. All in all you've got a pretty stout combo.
I agree though, the aluminum L98s from what I've read aren't the best flowing wise.
Trending Topics
#9
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The State of Hockey
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Miniram'd 383, 24X LS1 PCM
Transmission: TH700R4, 4200 stall
Axle/Gears: 9", 4.33:1
Those of you that keep saying a stock 48mm TB isn't choking that engine are just plain flat out wrong. I have seen it time and time again. People say this and that about what engines make what with just a stock 48mm TB.... And I don't know, they just seem to think that it wouldn't make any more power with a larger - or more importantly better designed TB. There is more to the TB than it's size....... A friend of mine in the MNFBC picked up 11 RWHP on his 385 LT1 going from a 48mm to a TPIS 52mm....
So, get rid of: TB, crappy headers, and that small intermediate pipe and you should see some very attractive gains..... I'm sure the heads aren't exactly setting the world on fire with their flow, but there are plenty of other things to work on before tearing back into the engine itself that will only serve to build more power with a better set of heads later.
Of course..... this is all stuff you already know . :lala:
So, get rid of: TB, crappy headers, and that small intermediate pipe and you should see some very attractive gains..... I'm sure the heads aren't exactly setting the world on fire with their flow, but there are plenty of other things to work on before tearing back into the engine itself that will only serve to build more power with a better set of heads later.
Of course..... this is all stuff you already know . :lala:
Last edited by Matt87GTA; 11-30-2002 at 04:01 PM.
#10
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: kentucky
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: manual/t56
I know that the ram jet 502 uses the 48mm L98 tb. If it can feed that I don't think it's a bad restiction. I don't mean to say that 52 isn't going to flow more air but in this case I just don't believe it will make that much difference. I still think it's more of an exhaust/tuning issue than anything. If I did my math right( and I may not have, I suck at it ) with a 20% loss of power thru the driveline I'm getting 384 hp at the crank. That's pretty close to the 400hp line for 1 5/8 tubes.
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Hayward, CA
Posts: 893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 camaro
Engine: 383
Transmission: T56
To answer a few questions here, the compression ratio is 9.9:1, a tad low for an aluminum head, but I'd prefer to be on the safe side. I doubt it's a tuning issue, as it was tuned on the dyno. It wasn't getting any knock, and the A/F ratio was close to 13.4:1. The ignition is mostly stock, just an Accel coil and MSD wires. The heads were ported a little in the valve area, but nothing that I was overly impressed with. Cam specs on the ZZ9 w/ 1.6 rockers is .516/.560 lift 214/226 duration, 112 lsa. The headers are a bit of a concern with the heads. The heads have a raised D-shaped exhaust port, and so the bolt holes are nearly 1/3 from the bottom of the port, rather than being right in the middle. Of course the headers are designed for the usual style iron L98 rectangular ports, so I have a feeling the ports are not lining up at all, and that the exaust gas may be hitting a 'wall' along the top of the port. But right now my financial situation is... ugly, to put it lightly. So I won't be buying anything for quite some time.
#12
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Valley of the Sun
Posts: 3,852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: Al LT1 headed LG4 305
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi with spacer
I bet its your heads, the valves are to small for optimum horsepower, and the heads are small port lower flow designs. If you got heads with 2.08" intake and 1.6" exhaust valves, you would make about the same torque but lots more horsepower also. You could get pro lightnings at www.enginekits.com
#13
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 87 Buick GN
Engine: 3.8L (231 cid) V6
Transmission: 200-4R
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt G80/ 3.42
I don't think your heads are hurting you as much as everyone says. L98 heads, when properly reworked, flow really well. Lingenfelter uses them on his 383 packages and is able to coax amazing power with these heads. I don't know how good your head porter is, and without any flow numbers it's hard to say if they really are holding you back.
I agree the Edelbrock headers are probably holding you back. If you get rid of them, Hooker long tubes have been proven to add substantial gains over shorties. Good luck
EDIT: I see you're in CA, so long tubes may not be an option, smog-wise.
I agree the Edelbrock headers are probably holding you back. If you get rid of them, Hooker long tubes have been proven to add substantial gains over shorties. Good luck
EDIT: I see you're in CA, so long tubes may not be an option, smog-wise.
Last edited by IROCZZ3; 11-30-2002 at 05:50 PM.
#14
Supreme Member
Going from 219/229 @ .050 to 244/254 @ .050 moved our horsepower number up from 380 @ 4700 RPMS to 430 @ 6200 Rpms. that was number one. of course our low-speed throttle response/driveability/fuel economy/torque took a nose-dive...
but it illustrates my point. having the highest horsepower number doesnt make the car the funnest thing to drive. keeping the engine rpms below 6K can also help it live much longer.
but it illustrates my point. having the highest horsepower number doesnt make the car the funnest thing to drive. keeping the engine rpms below 6K can also help it live much longer.
#15
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Kemptville, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by slayer2000
I know that the ram jet 502 uses the 48mm L98 tb. If it can feed that I don't think it's a bad restiction. I don't mean to say that 52 isn't going to flow more air but in this case I just don't believe it will make that much difference. I still think it's more of an exhaust/tuning issue than anything. If I did my math right( and I may not have, I suck at it ) with a 20% loss of power thru the driveline I'm getting 384 hp at the crank. That's pretty close to the 400hp line for 1 5/8 tubes.
I know that the ram jet 502 uses the 48mm L98 tb. If it can feed that I don't think it's a bad restiction. I don't mean to say that 52 isn't going to flow more air but in this case I just don't believe it will make that much difference. I still think it's more of an exhaust/tuning issue than anything. If I did my math right( and I may not have, I suck at it ) with a 20% loss of power thru the driveline I'm getting 384 hp at the crank. That's pretty close to the 400hp line for 1 5/8 tubes.
ViciousZ, now that you're done(for now) your build up, drive it and enjoy it. Those numbers will get you into the 12's easy.
#16
Supreme Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Fla
Posts: 1,780
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 90 IROC
Engine: 406
Transmission: GMPP 93/4L60
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.27
Like you said you could upgrade the exhuast some. I picked up some more pull in the 5000+ rpm range. swapping from Edelbrock headers to SLPs 1 3/4 header. I also added a better flowing system from there back. I Think its the long runners of the TPI intake thats hurting your topened. Even though you have a SuperRam plenum and runners. Its still a torque based design, your horsepower and torque peaks are similar to others with the SuperRam that ive seen.
What base intake are you using? I ported my Accel base and runners out to about 1 3/4" Seemed to help the topend. I havent had the car back to the dyno to see if there was anything gained for sure though. Ive had problems with mine from the start, just found out recently that when I drilled the steam holes in the heads. Two were a little off and caused some water to leak in the cylinders.
What base intake are you using? I ported my Accel base and runners out to about 1 3/4" Seemed to help the topend. I havent had the car back to the dyno to see if there was anything gained for sure though. Ive had problems with mine from the start, just found out recently that when I drilled the steam holes in the heads. Two were a little off and caused some water to leak in the cylinders.
#17
hhhhhmmmmmmmm
I have to agree with some those heads are for sure slowing you on hp, but for sure give you good torque. I have a zz4 with the same heads the small valves give you torque but kill you on high rpm hp thats why chevy sells the zz430 with fast burn heads not the same L98 heads Also ya the headers and exhaust hurt too but your exhaust can only flow what the heads flow and the heads can only flow what the throttle body lets it so I can't say anyone is wrong but for sure when you get $$ the heads will help you the most for hp gain from what I see ??? I hear ya on the money too bro I saw a set up on http://www.sdpc2000.com/cart.asp?act...=1579&pid=9010 this should scream in my 70' camaro
#18
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Chander, Arizona USA
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2006 Silverado 1500
Engine: 5.3L
Transmission: 4L60E
i'd be looking into other are's. yeah, the headers are a bit small, but not that small. exhaust isn't fantastic, but it is usable. i'd look into getting a bigger throttle body as a start. i assume this is in your camaro so your not dealing with a restricting m.a.f. sensor. do you have the air box gutted is another question. during your dyno run, did you have any detonation, was it rich, lean, etc as programming may not have been perfect either or a lack of fuel could have caused it. the numbers aren't bad though, but your right it seems like 4600 is a bit low to peak.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Indpls IN US
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: Forged 383
Transmission: Pro-built 700R4
Like others have said, a good set of heads like Dart or AFR with bigger valves =20rwhp and a set of Hooker longtubes=15+rwhp. You could be running mid to low 12's 1/4 times now and with those two upgrades, you could be high 11's. I think your numbers are pretty darn good considering your setup.
#22
Originally posted by Mark A Shields
Think those 1 5/8 headers are hurting your top end? Maybe some 1 3/4 could help out up top.
And you definately will benefit from a 3'' I pipe.
Think those 1 5/8 headers are hurting your top end? Maybe some 1 3/4 could help out up top.
And you definately will benefit from a 3'' I pipe.
Get a 58mm TB, Ditch those dinky headers, there killing ya...
1 3/4" Airborne coated Long tubes, 3" y pipe , 3" cat back, good muffler
You may want to highly consider upgrading your fuel system also... ie: injectors and pump , what do you have in there now?
Here is an exampel (fuel system)
I have a 385cid LT1 with a small Holley 119 ltr / hr in tank pump / all stock fuel lines
SVO 30 # / hr injectors
with 52 psi of rail pressure the car is still running a touch lean 13.8-1 I want too see 12.5-1 Air fuel
So the plan is to upgrade my fuel system
Last edited by 385LT1; 01-01-2003 at 04:04 PM.
#23
Supreme Member
The headers are probably what is hurting you the most. Gaining 11rwhp from a large throttle body isn't something you're going to notice as much as changing to decent headers. I'd only upgrade the tb if you find a used one for cheap, since they're way too expensive new for such a small gain(in my opinion, at least). After you've got your exhaust and whatever else you need, run it on the dyno again and you can see how well your fuel system is handling things.
#24
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The State of Hockey
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Miniram'd 383, 24X LS1 PCM
Transmission: TH700R4, 4200 stall
Axle/Gears: 9", 4.33:1
Originally posted by 385LT1
1 3/4" Airborne coated Long tubes
1 3/4" Airborne coated Long tubes
#25
Originally posted by Matt87GTA
And these are??????????
And these are??????????
_________________________________
Long tubes are 1-3/4" primary tubes. They are available either in plain black painted, or ceramic coated.
PN: 66-2210 Hooker Super Competition long tube headers, 1982-1992 265-400 $399.99
www.ThunderRacing.com
Last edited by 385LT1; 01-01-2003 at 05:31 PM.
#26
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The State of Hockey
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Miniram'd 383, 24X LS1 PCM
Transmission: TH700R4, 4200 stall
Axle/Gears: 9", 4.33:1
Ahhhh.... IC. I thought maybe they were another brand of headers. Thanks.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mickeyruder
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
3
09-02-2015 02:45 PM