TBI Throttle Body Injection discussion and questions. L03/CFI tech and other performance enhancements.

Dyno'd the Peanut cammed 350 today

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-10-2006, 06:36 PM
  #1  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 10,081
Received 403 Likes on 345 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Dyno'd the Peanut cammed 350 today

I just had a nearly stock TBI engine dyno'd today. 177 HP @ 4,200 and 261 ft/lbs @ 3,600, the lowest speed tested. This engine has pulled over 320 RWTQ down around 2,300 rpm on a different dyno and in cooler weather. Keep in mind that the IAT readings were around 120-130* and the shop was 106* inside. The coolant was even above 200*. This is on E10 gasoline and in fully street legal form.

Stock 350 HD Shortblock (8.5:1 compression)
810 Swirl ports with light port cleanup
Stock Peanut 305 Roller cam with 1.6:1 roller rockers
1.5" x 3" flowtech cheapy headers
2.5-3" Y-pipe, Single 3" cat, 3" single in, Dual 2 1/2" out turbo muffler, dual 2 1/2" pipes
Edelbrock 3704 Intake
1" open center TBI spacer
Stock sized TBI unit with ultimate TBI mods
RBob's EBL with custom tuning
61 lb/hr injectors @ 17 PSI

This engine does everything that I need it to, including getting 15-17 MPG CITY!
Attached Thumbnails Dyno'd the Peanut cammed 350 today-dynojet-dyno-sheet.jpg  
Old 08-10-2006, 06:40 PM
  #2  
Supporter/Moderator

iTrader: (7)
 
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 0
Received 405 Likes on 309 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
This basically backs the GM rating of 170/255 for the smaller 305 LO3. I assume this was an engine dyno? Cool stuff.
Old 08-10-2006, 06:52 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 10,081
Received 403 Likes on 345 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally Posted by ShiftyCapone
This basically backs the GM rating of 170/255 for the smaller 305 LO3. I assume this was an engine dyno? Cool stuff.
Nope, it was measured at the wheels through a 700r4 with a 2,800 stall Yank converter, 2 piece driveshaft, and 8.5" 10 bolt rear (3.73s)

Anybody that is looking for a chassis dyno in the DFW area should check them out. $65.00 for 3 pulls with an A/F mixture probe in the pipe.

Speedtek Performance specializing in high performance parts and service.

Also keep in mind that the stock Caprice 350 with the same cam is rated at 180 FWHP and 300 FWTQ.

Last edited by Fast355; 08-10-2006 at 07:04 PM.
Old 08-10-2006, 07:02 PM
  #4  
Member
 
TierAngst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 78 Caprice Coupe
Engine: 355
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Why such a high stall TC?
Old 08-10-2006, 07:03 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

 
DM91RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ga
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Fast....... what kind of mileage do do you think is possible with 3:73's with a T5 with a .63 OD gear? This is a 305 with Vortecs, LT4 cam, Headers and full exhaust running the EBL. Going up from 3:08's.

DM
Old 08-10-2006, 07:22 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 10,081
Received 403 Likes on 345 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally Posted by TierAngst
Why such a high stall TC?
Becuase it was already sandwiched between the engine and transmission. Plus it makes it jump out of a stoplight like it has more power than it really does.

DM- I think you should be able to average 20 MPG with non-aggressive driving.
Old 08-10-2006, 07:25 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member

 
DM91RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ga
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally Posted by Fast355
DM- I think you should be able to average 20 MPG with non-aggressive driving.
Kool.......thanks. The mpg is one reason that I have been delaying the change.
Old 08-10-2006, 07:36 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 10,081
Received 403 Likes on 345 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally Posted by DM91RS
Kool.......thanks. The mpg is one reason that I have been delaying the change.
Just to double check, we are not talking the HOT cam are we? I saw LT4 cam and have production LT4 cam in mind. With the HOT cam you will see around 15-17 depending on the tuning.
Old 08-11-2006, 03:35 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member

 
DM91RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ga
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally Posted by Fast355
Just to double check, we are not talking the HOT cam are we? I saw LT4 cam and have production LT4 cam in mind. With the HOT cam you will see around 15-17 depending on the tuning.

No.........just std for now. I planned on the HOT cam when I changed back to the 350 but I already have a ZZ4 and just may use it to save some cash. Will the ZZ4 be a little better on gas than the HOT cam?
Old 08-11-2006, 04:12 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 10,081
Received 403 Likes on 345 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally Posted by DM91RS
No.........just std for now. I planned on the HOT cam when I changed back to the 350 but I already have a ZZ4 and just may use it to save some cash. Will the ZZ4 be a little better on gas than the HOT cam?
I would have to calculate the overlap, static compression ratio, and dynamic compression ratio to tell you for sure. They would be pretty similar. The LT4 hotcam should make more vacuum since it is obviously EFI biased from the start.
Old 08-11-2006, 04:17 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member

 
DM91RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ga
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally Posted by Fast355
I would have to calculate the overlap, static compression ratio, and dynamic compression ratio to tell you for sure. They would be pretty similar. The LT4 hotcam should make more vacuum since it is obviously EFI biased from the start.
The Hot cam would make more vacuum than the ZZ4? Hmmm

Right now I'm heading out to the shop to change the 3.08 to the 3.73. I guess real world mpg is in the future.

Thanks Chris


DM
Old 08-12-2006, 10:16 AM
  #12  
Supreme Member

 
Dominic Sorresso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Bartlett, IL
Posts: 1,994
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 92 ZR-1
Engine: LT-5
Transmission: ZF-6
Axle/Gears: SuperDana 44 4.10
Fast,

What AFR curve are you using for your WOT runs? I'm finding that my motor seems to like somewhere around 12.7:1. I'm using the EBL Dump File and looking at the acceleration curve for each second of WOT.
Old 08-12-2006, 02:12 PM
  #13  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 10,081
Received 403 Likes on 345 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally Posted by Dominic Sorresso
Fast,

What AFR curve are you using for your WOT runs? I'm finding that my motor seems to like somewhere around 12.7:1. I'm using the EBL Dump File and looking at the acceleration curve for each second of WOT.
It starts at 12.5:1 and decays down to 11.5:1 after several seconds @ WOT. Stoich on E10 is theoretically 14.1:1 and therefore when I was running 12.9:1, it was too lean. I am making more power at 12.5:1 than I was at 12.9:1, and 11.5:1 may sound very rich, but in reality on this fuel it is not.
Old 08-29-2006, 08:31 PM
  #14  
Member
 
Blazin4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Chevy silverado K5
Engine: 350 bored .030, crane cams hyd bluprint l-79 cam 447 lift 272 dur, camel hump heads port and polished 1.94 1.50, afterburner headers and y pipe, holley 670 cfm tbi, holley projection dual plane manifold, accel high pressure fuel pump, 3 inch exhaust
Transmission: 700 r4 with corvette servo and shift kit.
E10 is ethanol?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MustangBeater20
TBI
11
10-29-2022 09:20 PM
1984HO
LTX and LSX
20
03-19-2021 11:59 AM
Jake_92RS
Tech / General Engine
8
01-28-2020 10:37 PM
Reborn756
Tech / General Engine
142
09-04-2015 03:42 AM
camaro71633
Tech / General Engine
39
09-01-2015 10:24 AM



Quick Reply: Dyno'd the Peanut cammed 350 today



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:31 AM.