Good cam choice for stock heads?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 78 Caprice Coupe
Engine: 355
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Good cam choice for stock heads?
http://www.lingenfelter.com/Merchant...Category_Code=
Specs are as follows with 1.5 rockers.
213/219 .462/.471 112 1600-5200
Trying to overcome the lack of egr with a decent cam and stock heads, would this be what I'm looking for? If this is a good choice what springs should I get to match it?
Specs are as follows with 1.5 rockers.
213/219 .462/.471 112 1600-5200
Trying to overcome the lack of egr with a decent cam and stock heads, would this be what I'm looking for? If this is a good choice what springs should I get to match it?
#3
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 78 Caprice Coupe
Engine: 355
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Originally posted by brodyscamaro
i personally think that that cam is too small...
i personally think that that cam is too small...
#4
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CC, TX
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
****, there are a billion choices. And Im so gone I can barely focus on the screen - I'll reply tomorrow..
#6
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Re: Good cam choice for stock heads?
Originally posted by TierAngst
http://www.lingenfelter.com/Merchant...Category_Code=
Specs are as follows with 1.5 rockers.
213/219 .462/.471 112 1600-5200
Trying to overcome the lack of egr with a decent cam and stock heads, would this be what I'm looking for? If this is a good choice what springs should I get to match it?
http://www.lingenfelter.com/Merchant...Category_Code=
Specs are as follows with 1.5 rockers.
213/219 .462/.471 112 1600-5200
Trying to overcome the lack of egr with a decent cam and stock heads, would this be what I'm looking for? If this is a good choice what springs should I get to match it?
What is your ultimate goal with your setup?
#7
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 78 Caprice Coupe
Engine: 355
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Ultimate goal:
383 forged internals (8.2-8.5:1)
Roots blower (single carb setup)
Holley 4bbl tbi system
Trans good for at least 600hp
2400-2600 Stall TC
3.42 gears and posi of course
I think most of that doesn't apply here because it will be about a year and a half before I get the blown stroker so I'm looking for a bit of power to hold me over until then. I will be doing my ultimate goal in reverse order of what I posted so it'll all stand up to the motor. I'd say gears will be in next spring, TC shortly after.
383 forged internals (8.2-8.5:1)
Roots blower (single carb setup)
Holley 4bbl tbi system
Trans good for at least 600hp
2400-2600 Stall TC
3.42 gears and posi of course
I think most of that doesn't apply here because it will be about a year and a half before I get the blown stroker so I'm looking for a bit of power to hold me over until then. I will be doing my ultimate goal in reverse order of what I posted so it'll all stand up to the motor. I'd say gears will be in next spring, TC shortly after.
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
That cam would probably be ok. Might be a little more then you want with stock heads, maybe something with around 206 or so of duration at the intake. The tbi heads are going to be the limiting factor as they barely flow at all in stock form. None the less, it would be good practice to tune it with your current ecm before putting in the 383 so you have some experience with how tuning with a computer works. The presentation will be different with the holley ecu but the same basic principals will apply.
#9
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 78 Caprice Coupe
Engine: 355
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Well right now I'm looking to add 20hp and 3mpg (what I lost removing egr) with a cam swap. I know the stock heads don't flow all that great without being ported but will it make something like an LT4 cam or the lingenfelter cam completely worthless to put in or would I meet my goal of 20hp? Pretty much as long as it doesn't slow the car down with the stock gears and TC I'll be happy, since those will be replaced soon enough.
#10
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
Get a Lunati 206/216 cam. That is basicly the same cam I am running in my car, with headers, and an intake, with that cam, it is a good 70hp increase over stock.
--John
--John
#11
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 10,119
Received 428 Likes
on
368 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
I have a Crane HR276 in my closet ready for mine!
I have already put one in my little brothers 1995 Tahoe 350 TBI, with the nearly STOCK swirl ports (CUT for LIFT ONLY and GOOD springs) it will pull to 6,000 rpm without any trouble.
http://www.cranecams.com/?show=brows...tType=camshaft
I have already put one in my little brothers 1995 Tahoe 350 TBI, with the nearly STOCK swirl ports (CUT for LIFT ONLY and GOOD springs) it will pull to 6,000 rpm without any trouble.
http://www.cranecams.com/?show=brows...tType=camshaft
#12
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 78 Caprice Coupe
Engine: 355
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Originally posted by Dewey316
Get a Lunati 206/216 cam. That is basicly the same cam I am running in my car, with headers, and an intake, with that cam, it is a good 70hp increase over stock.
--John
Get a Lunati 206/216 cam. That is basicly the same cam I am running in my car, with headers, and an intake, with that cam, it is a good 70hp increase over stock.
--John
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: MA
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Car: 93 GM300 platforms
Engine: LO3, LO5
Transmission: MD8 x2
Originally posted by TierAngst
Well right now I'm looking to add 20hp and 3mpg (what I lost removing egr) with a cam swap. I know the stock heads don't flow all that great without being ported but will it make something like an LT4 cam or the lingenfelter cam completely worthless to put in or would I meet my goal of 20hp? Pretty much as long as it doesn't slow the car down with the stock gears and TC I'll be happy, since those will be replaced soon enough.
Well right now I'm looking to add 20hp and 3mpg (what I lost removing egr) with a cam swap. I know the stock heads don't flow all that great without being ported but will it make something like an LT4 cam or the lingenfelter cam completely worthless to put in or would I meet my goal of 20hp? Pretty much as long as it doesn't slow the car down with the stock gears and TC I'll be happy, since those will be replaced soon enough.
If you are looking to do a 383 later on, then IMO you should spend as little real money as you can (to save for the 383) -- so that means you ought to ONLY do cheap stuff to the engine you have now.
Cam swap: LT1 Bcar cam (probably free) or LT1 F/Y cam ($25)
92-93 9C1 Caprice Ypipe OR add the full N10 duals from a 94-96 car NOW because you'll need it for the 383.
One of the DIY cold air // filter set ups.
Put the EGR back on.
Copcar injectors/chip.
In effect you duplicate the 92-93 LO5 copcar engine, then add to it. There's more than 20 hp listed above, and you should be able to get the mileage back. HTH.
#14
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 78 Caprice Coupe
Engine: 355
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42
I was thinking LT4 cam because I'll be able to run the car without EGR just as the LT4's did. Why is it that the F-body cam being so similar to the LT4 couldn't run without EGR? My egr system was shot so its not going back on, it would cost more to replace it than it would to do the $115 cam I posted (which I don't get why is such a bad buy). I did find a LT4 cam for $50 shipped, should I grab that or get something different? Sure I can get a b-body cam free, or an f-body cam for super cheap but I'm trying to avoid the whole egr problems with those cams.
As for the exhaust I've got headers and duals on the way.
I've got an open element K&N (EDL-4222)
Does anyone have a pair of the cop injectors sitting on a shelf somewhere, I've been looking for some?
As for the exhaust I've got headers and duals on the way.
I've got an open element K&N (EDL-4222)
Does anyone have a pair of the cop injectors sitting on a shelf somewhere, I've been looking for some?
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: MA
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Car: 93 GM300 platforms
Engine: LO3, LO5
Transmission: MD8 x2
IIRC the LT4 was a one-year-only option in the Ycar. Aside from the larger-port heads with the hollow-stem intake and sodium-filled exhaust stem, the main differences between the LT4 and LT1 were:
1. LT4 cam had a 115 deg LSA (lobe sep anagle); Fcar had 117.
2. both cams had similar lift, but the LT4 engine used 1.6 rockers so the valve lift was greater, and that effectively decreases the LSA.
Items 1 & 2 together mean there is more overlap between the intake valve opening (IVO) and exhaust valve closure (EVC) , so some of the exhaust can get temporarily pushed past the intake valve, only to get summarily pulled back into the cylinder. That's how the exhaust gas recirculates in the engine.
That can happen on any engine that has overlap between IVO and EVC (including the LT1) but apparently there wasn't enough of it to do the job on the LT1 so it needed some external source for EGR.
So if you want to reproduce the conditions for it (in the LT4 sense) then you probably need a cam that's at least close to the production LT4 and a similar amount of valve lift. You'll also have to shutoff the EGR functions in the EPROM. The mpg will only come back to the earlier values if you can reduce friction enough, and the main one to correct would be air pumping friction through the stock factory exhaust.
1. LT4 cam had a 115 deg LSA (lobe sep anagle); Fcar had 117.
2. both cams had similar lift, but the LT4 engine used 1.6 rockers so the valve lift was greater, and that effectively decreases the LSA.
Items 1 & 2 together mean there is more overlap between the intake valve opening (IVO) and exhaust valve closure (EVC) , so some of the exhaust can get temporarily pushed past the intake valve, only to get summarily pulled back into the cylinder. That's how the exhaust gas recirculates in the engine.
That can happen on any engine that has overlap between IVO and EVC (including the LT1) but apparently there wasn't enough of it to do the job on the LT1 so it needed some external source for EGR.
So if you want to reproduce the conditions for it (in the LT4 sense) then you probably need a cam that's at least close to the production LT4 and a similar amount of valve lift. You'll also have to shutoff the EGR functions in the EPROM. The mpg will only come back to the earlier values if you can reduce friction enough, and the main one to correct would be air pumping friction through the stock factory exhaust.
#16
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 78 Caprice Coupe
Engine: 355
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42
I've already got a new chip so all thats good. So the LT4 cam won't work with the 1.5 rockers? What about the cam originally listed (213/219 .462/.471 112 1600-5200)? So should the headers/duals help out with mileage a lot (should be on within a month)?
#17
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ga
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Yes the LT4 will work with 1.5 rockers.
The Lingenfelter cam is expensive isn't it?
Of course it would work as long as you have the correct springs and..... retainer to seal clearance is in the safe zone. I would rather have it than the LT4 stock cam as I have it and its rather mild on a 305.
Headers and better flowing exhaust system helped my mileage IIRC. It was 10 years ago.
Oh yeah............no EGR here.
What are the cop car injectors rated at?
DM
The Lingenfelter cam is expensive isn't it?
Of course it would work as long as you have the correct springs and..... retainer to seal clearance is in the safe zone. I would rather have it than the LT4 stock cam as I have it and its rather mild on a 305.
Headers and better flowing exhaust system helped my mileage IIRC. It was 10 years ago.
Oh yeah............no EGR here.
What are the cop car injectors rated at?
DM
#18
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 78 Caprice Coupe
Engine: 355
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Originally posted by DM91RS
Yes the LT4 will work with 1.5 rockers.
The Lingenfelter cam is expensive isn't it?
Of course it would work as long as you have the correct springs and..... retainer to seal clearance is in the safe zone. I would rather have it than the LT4 stock cam as I have it and its rather mild on a 305.
Headers and better flowing exhaust system helped my mileage IIRC. It was 10 years ago.
Oh yeah............no EGR here.
What are the cop car injectors rated at?
DM
Yes the LT4 will work with 1.5 rockers.
The Lingenfelter cam is expensive isn't it?
Of course it would work as long as you have the correct springs and..... retainer to seal clearance is in the safe zone. I would rather have it than the LT4 stock cam as I have it and its rather mild on a 305.
Headers and better flowing exhaust system helped my mileage IIRC. It was 10 years ago.
Oh yeah............no EGR here.
What are the cop car injectors rated at?
DM
The cop injectors are either 65 or 68pph I forget.
#19
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ga
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by TierAngst
The lingenfelter cam is $115 shipped, not bad at all.
The cop injectors are either 65 or 68pph I forget.
The lingenfelter cam is $115 shipped, not bad at all.
The cop injectors are either 65 or 68pph I forget.
#21
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,345
Likes: 0
Received 425 Likes
on
326 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by TierAngst
I've already got a new chip so all thats good.
I've already got a new chip so all thats good.
#22
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 78 Caprice Coupe
Engine: 355
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42
I plan on getting another chip after my next bit of mods. Will be doing cam, manifold, bored out TB, and bigger injectors at the same time. The only thing between now and then will be my exhaust.
So whats the final thoughts on this lingenfelter cam? Would this be a better choice than a LT4 cam?
So whats the final thoughts on this lingenfelter cam? Would this be a better choice than a LT4 cam?
#23
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
I just realised this is on a 350
The LPE cam, wouldn't be bad. I think the 219/219 might be a very good LPE cam choice in your car, given the rest of the mods fit, and YOU are willing to put in the time to properly tune it. When you start talking about cams like this, a mail-order tune will not cut it.
The LPE cam, wouldn't be bad. I think the 219/219 might be a very good LPE cam choice in your car, given the rest of the mods fit, and YOU are willing to put in the time to properly tune it. When you start talking about cams like this, a mail-order tune will not cut it.
#24
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 78 Caprice Coupe
Engine: 355
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42
The cam I picked out happens to be half as much as the rest of them. $115 shipped, I emailed them about the price said they ordered a ton of them to get them cheap because it was the last time they were ever getting those cams in. The rest are $250+ not including shipping. I wouldn't really be willing to spend more than $150 on a cam right now since its not going to be a permanent solution, just something to throw in for a year and a half while I save up for the 383. I think the 213/219 would have better torque than the 219/219 anyways, a must have with a 5000 pound boat.
#25
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
You dont want to use alot of duration with those heads, anyway. They flow less then 180 at the intake and the power curve will likely level off before the engine reaches the cams upper powerband.
#27
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
I think youll be ok with that cam. Anything over that could likely be counterproductive with the crappy stock heads. It would defintely make more power with better heads.
Last edited by dimented24x7; 12-05-2005 at 08:20 PM.
#28
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
IMPO, though, id consider going with less with those heads if the cost is comprable for another roller. Its sort of in that grey area. For the price, though, its definatly worth it. If I could afford the link style retrofit lifters id like to run it or something similar with my vortec heads.
Last edited by dimented24x7; 12-05-2005 at 08:24 PM.
#29
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 78 Caprice Coupe
Engine: 355
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Well lets hope I get lucky on this
Wonder if I should start a new thread on picking out a manifold to match, if you don't think so you can post your suggestions here.
Wonder if I should start a new thread on picking out a manifold to match, if you don't think so you can post your suggestions here.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
theshackle
Tech / General Engine
4
03-05-2017 06:37 PM