ANTT vs. ANLU Bin
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brampton
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28 Vert
Engine: 305
Transmission: TKO
Axle/Gears: 3.55 10-bolt
ANTT vs. ANLU Bin
Guys....I am just sorta going through some stuff in TunerPro...really just the constants and trying to identify the differences between these bins as I am learning this stuff. For the most part they look very similar with some differences....can anyone provide me with some insight into what the following means/what the difference in the #'s represents...Keep in mind I am just learning this stuff.
Max rpm for Slope SA: 4000 in ANTT vs 4800 in ANLU....what does this difference mean...and in simplistic terms what does the effect?
Slope Added spark deg/1000rpm: 8.02 in ANTT vs 3.52 in ANLU....what does this difference mean...and in simplistic terms what does the effect?
BLM enable min MAP Threshold.....13.35 in ANTT vs 17.78 in ANTTwhat does this difference mean...and in simplistic terms what does the effect?
Any help/guidance guys.....I am just trying to understand what the differences are between these two bins with respect to these constants I identified in TunerPro.
Dave
Max rpm for Slope SA: 4000 in ANTT vs 4800 in ANLU....what does this difference mean...and in simplistic terms what does the effect?
Slope Added spark deg/1000rpm: 8.02 in ANTT vs 3.52 in ANLU....what does this difference mean...and in simplistic terms what does the effect?
BLM enable min MAP Threshold.....13.35 in ANTT vs 17.78 in ANTTwhat does this difference mean...and in simplistic terms what does the effect?
Any help/guidance guys.....I am just trying to understand what the differences are between these two bins with respect to these constants I identified in TunerPro.
Dave
#2
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
I'm not much of an assembly reader....
But here is the code I found.
SA Slope adder, I really can't read much, other than it looks like it in non PE cases, it adds the the ammount of the constant, per 1k RPMs, up to the max RPM threshold. But what confuses me, is the start of slope at 3600 RPM, Now I'm very interested, hopefully RBob, demented, or Jon will speak up here. Since I the actualy math on the others is not commented.
So in reality, I am not much more help than posting the code.
But here is the code I found.
SA Slope adder, I really can't read much, other than it looks like it in non PE cases, it adds the the ammount of the constant, per 1k RPMs, up to the max RPM threshold. But what confuses me, is the start of slope at 3600 RPM, Now I'm very interested, hopefully RBob, demented, or Jon will speak up here. Since I the actualy math on the others is not commented.
So in reality, I am not much more help than posting the code.
Code:
LE5E3: D6 1B LDAB L001B ; rpm / 25 LE5E5: C1 90 CMPB #144 ; 3600 rpm, start of slope LE5E7: 23 15 BLS LE5FE ; LE5E9: F1 D0 0A CMPB LD00A ; 192: 4800 rpm LE5EC: 23 03 BLS LE5F1 ; bra if rpm <= 4800 LE5EE: F6 D0 0A LDAB LD00A ; use as max: 4800 rpm ; LE5F1: C0 90 SUBB #144 ; slope start rpm offset LE5F3: 58 LSLB ; now rpm / 12.5 LE5F4: B6 D0 0B LDAA LD00B ; 32, 3.5 deg/1K rpm LE5F7: 3D MUL ; LE5F8: 9B 49 ADDA L0049 ; add in from main SA lookup LE5FA: 24 02 BCC LE5FE ; LE5FC: 86 FF LDAA #255 ; ; LE5FE: 16 TAB ; LE5FF: 4F CLRA ; LE600: DD 4F STD L004F ; SA so Far
#3
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
Here is the code for the BLM Enable thresholds.
I assume this is so it does not try to correct the BLMs below that MAP value. I don't know if this is for the descel enlean, or for idle purposes. But changing that might have some benifits with some large cams, so you can run without BLM corrections under a certain map value. It would def. take some driving and dataloging before I would change that value.
Hopefully someone who understands this better than I do, will speak up.
I assume this is so it does not try to correct the BLMs below that MAP value. I don't know if this is for the descel enlean, or for idle purposes. But changing that might have some benifits with some large cams, so you can run without BLM corrections under a certain map value. It would def. take some driving and dataloging before I would change that value.
Hopefully someone who understands this better than I do, will speak up.
Code:
; ---------------------- ; blm enable thresholds ; ---------------------- LD22D: FCB 189 ; 25c, min cool thres LD22E: FCB 0 ; 200c, max cool thres LD22F: FCB 20 ; 26 Kpa, min s/d map thres LD230: FCB 255 ; 100 Kpa, max s/d map thres LD231: FCB 240 ; 6000 rpm, max rpm
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Re: ANTT vs. ANLU Bin
Originally posted by tanager11
Max rpm for Slope SA: 4000 in ANTT vs 4800 in ANLU....what does this difference mean...and in simplistic terms what does the effect?
Slope Added spark deg/1000rpm: 8.02 in ANTT vs 3.52 in ANLU....what does this difference mean...and in simplistic terms what does the effect?
Max rpm for Slope SA: 4000 in ANTT vs 4800 in ANLU....what does this difference mean...and in simplistic terms what does the effect?
Slope Added spark deg/1000rpm: 8.02 in ANTT vs 3.52 in ANLU....what does this difference mean...and in simplistic terms what does the effect?
#5
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Originally posted by Dewey316
Here is the code for the BLM Enable thresholds.
I assume this is so it does not try to correct the BLMs below that MAP value. I don't know if this is for the descel enlean, or for idle purposes. But changing that might have some benifits with some large cams, so you can run without BLM corrections under a certain map value. It would def. take some driving and dataloging before I would change that value.
Here is the code for the BLM Enable thresholds.
I assume this is so it does not try to correct the BLMs below that MAP value. I don't know if this is for the descel enlean, or for idle purposes. But changing that might have some benifits with some large cams, so you can run without BLM corrections under a certain map value. It would def. take some driving and dataloging before I would change that value.
#6
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
I looked at it again. It does apear that it adds that advance at all times. It is during the total SA loop, and if PE is reached, it adds the PE advance on top of that. It looks like it is in the same loops as when it figures in coolent compensation, and TCC lock-up comp, etc.
#7
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro RS Convertible
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42
In my setup, I disabled the slope SA all together. The main spark table goes up to 3600 rpm and I don't see a need for more advance at 4000 or 4200 than at 3600. I just set my spark table to ramp up nice and I think it peaks at like 28* at 3200 and stays at that up to 3600. Then disabling the Slope SA will just keep me at 28* for however far I rev the engine.
Do you guys really think its necessary to have it slope in more SA after 3600 if you map out a good main spark table?
Do you guys really think its necessary to have it slope in more SA after 3600 if you map out a good main spark table?
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brampton
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28 Vert
Engine: 305
Transmission: TKO
Axle/Gears: 3.55 10-bolt
Owch...my head...and I thought my 1 & 2nd year statistics courses in university were complex...lol. Ok...once i slowed this down I think I "sort of" understand the SA constant varables based off some of your guys commentary etc....but those tables Dewey posed....I dont understand those at all (which is fine..I am just learning)
1) Max RPM for Slope SA: this is the maximum RPM up to which this SA will be added...correct? So in the One BIN its 4000 and the other is 4800...after that rpm is reached it does not add any more spark advance.....correct?
2) Slope Added Spark Deg/1000 rpm: This is the amount of spark which is added/1000 rpm...and it is only added up until the max rpm....over 3600 rpm...correct? Is the reason why it is programmed to add more spark is because above 3600 the ECM goes into PE mode and dumps more fuel/air...so it needs more spark to fully ignite???
I think I sort of understand these SA fields....so the main diff between the ANTT and ANLU is that in the ANLU Spark is added up until 4800 rpm and at a lesser rate than ANTT.
Seem like I am on the right track to understanding these guys based off your guidance? Thanks again.
D
1) Max RPM for Slope SA: this is the maximum RPM up to which this SA will be added...correct? So in the One BIN its 4000 and the other is 4800...after that rpm is reached it does not add any more spark advance.....correct?
2) Slope Added Spark Deg/1000 rpm: This is the amount of spark which is added/1000 rpm...and it is only added up until the max rpm....over 3600 rpm...correct? Is the reason why it is programmed to add more spark is because above 3600 the ECM goes into PE mode and dumps more fuel/air...so it needs more spark to fully ignite???
I think I sort of understand these SA fields....so the main diff between the ANTT and ANLU is that in the ANLU Spark is added up until 4800 rpm and at a lesser rate than ANTT.
Seem like I am on the right track to understanding these guys based off your guidance? Thanks again.
D
#9
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
It will slope the SA up from the man, to the max. above the max threshold, it will use the advance of the max RPM. so it doesn't just effec the 3600-4800 rpm range, it effects the 3600rpm+ range. It also looks like it is based on an offset RPM.
So in ANTT for example.
At 4000 RPM the slope added SA is
4000 - 3600 = 400
400/1000 = .4
.4 * 8.02 = 3.2* of advance.
So the SA will slope from 0* - 3.2* between 3600 and 4k, from 4k on it will add 3.2* to whatever cell it is looking up given the conditions.
Clear as mud?
So in ANTT for example.
At 4000 RPM the slope added SA is
4000 - 3600 = 400
400/1000 = .4
.4 * 8.02 = 3.2* of advance.
So the SA will slope from 0* - 3.2* between 3600 and 4k, from 4k on it will add 3.2* to whatever cell it is looking up given the conditions.
Clear as mud?
#10
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brampton
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28 Vert
Engine: 305
Transmission: TKO
Axle/Gears: 3.55 10-bolt
Nice....thanks Dewey....that aspect seems fairly clear to me now.....perfect (1 area down.....50 million more to go...lol)
But I guess the only thing is that without a WB OT sensor you cant really datalog at those higher RPM's so any adjustments to those SA nubmers in the constants has to be strictly done by the seat of the pants...
D
But I guess the only thing is that without a WB OT sensor you cant really datalog at those higher RPM's so any adjustments to those SA nubmers in the constants has to be strictly done by the seat of the pants...
D
#11
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
well,
You can output the total SA in the ALDL stream. Use that, in combination with tracktimes, dyno, g-tech, etc.
You need several tools to properly tune, a WB, and dataloging are just two of them.
You can output the total SA in the ALDL stream. Use that, in combination with tracktimes, dyno, g-tech, etc.
You need several tools to properly tune, a WB, and dataloging are just two of them.
#12
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro RS Convertible
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Tanager, just wanted to point out one thing. You mentioned something about PE mode and when it comes on. It doesn't just come on after 3600 rpm. There is a table in the bin for at what TPS% to enable PE mode. I believe in a stock bin every TPS setting is 50%, so any time you hit 50% throttle you will enter PE mode. And the other axis of the table is RPM, so you can change the TPS% at certain RPM values if you want PE mode to come on faster or later.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
UltRoadWarrior9
Transmissions and Drivetrain
3
09-02-2015 08:24 PM