TBI Throttle Body Injection discussion and questions. L03/CFI tech and other performance enhancements.

Better Flowing TBI...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-22-2004, 03:33 AM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
nidyanazo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Laguna Beach, Ca
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Gutted 92' RS TRACK ONLY / '86 Mustang gt 'vert / 1982 Yamiaha xs400 Cafe Racer
Engine: L03; TBI is IT! / 5.0HO (306) SFI / 400cc air cooled twin
Transmission: 700-r4 / WCT5/ 6-speed close ratio
I have a question. Here is my ported TBI.
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...t=ultimate+tbi
What, exactly, is the effect of radiusing the bore walls? Does this increse flow or what? I've got a lot to learn about TBI but I really love it's concept. Also when I did this porting, the motor was pretty much stock. When I put it back togeather I added the Turbo City FI spacer...Little SOTP difference.
Old 12-22-2004, 04:45 PM
  #52  
Supreme Member

 
BMmonteSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Buckhannon, WV
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears
In theory yes it does increase flow. Your smothing th path for the incoming air. The argument seems to be exactly how much it helps. Guesses are any where between .5 and 5 HP.
Old 04-24-2005, 04:15 AM
  #53  
Junior Member
 
dnot67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Covina Ca.
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 92 firebird
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: Stock Auto OD
Ok! That was fun to read! And I have to say very informative. Really! I love the tech stuff! Now, my question is, I have a stock "92" Firebird, 5.0 and is this mod on my TBI going to help me?

Much respect given!
dnot67
Old 04-24-2005, 04:38 AM
  #54  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 1,463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: A Camaro
Engine: Weak
Transmission: Weaker
Some food for thought. Using basic CFM calculators, a 305 CI Engine at 6000 rpm needs:

450 CFM at 85% VE
530 CFM at 100% VE

I doubt any of these engines are pushing even 85% VE at 6000 rpm, so considering the flow numbers of the stock TBI's and the air demands of the engine, I'd say GM didn't do too bad at selecting the throttle body size.
Old 04-24-2005, 02:11 PM
  #55  
Senior Member

 
JPrevost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by TonyC
Some food for thought. Using basic CFM calculators, a 305 CI Engine at 6000 rpm needs:

450 CFM at 85% VE
530 CFM at 100% VE

I doubt any of these engines are pushing even 85% VE at 6000 rpm, so considering the flow numbers of the stock TBI's and the air demands of the engine, I'd say GM didn't do too bad at selecting the throttle body size.
Correct, it's not air flow limited like people thought in the past. Things that keep the TBI slow are as follows; heads, exhaust, cam, emissions calibration. Change those things and you'll be fuel limited... bump up fuel pressure and start tuning at the track or find some way to measure ACTUAL performance.
Old 04-25-2005, 07:28 AM
  #56  
Senior Member

 
kdrolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: MA
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Car: 93 GM300 platforms
Engine: LO3, LO5
Transmission: MD8 x2
Originally posted by nidyanazo
I have a question. Here is my ported TBI.
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...t=ultimate+tbi
What, exactly, is the effect of radiusing the bore walls? Does this increse flow or what?
Per David Vizard's book on carbs & intake manifolds (I forgot the exact title), in one chapter he shows the effects of having, or lacking, a radiused transition inlet on airflow in a runner. A velocity stack is one example of a radiused air inlet on a pipe. This also applies to the inlet bore on a carb or throttle body.

IMS he showed that conical tapers are no better than just a straight tube. He also showed that any amount of radiusing helps the airflow by a few percent, and up to 5% can be had by a generous radiused air inlet.... i.e. rounding the bores. The highest number was 5.5% IIRC, and that seemed to be a limit based on the number of different shapes he tried.

So on a 500 cfm TB (or on a TBI that has injectors), you could expect as much as 25 cfm (5% gain from 500 cfm). This isn't a huge gain, but it is a free gain. If the engine were properly tuned, you would (in theory) likewise gain an extra 5% increase in power. BUT --- if the engine isn't tuned to cope with the extra airflow, or if you aren't close to max-ing out the airflow of the stock unported TB/TBI, then the gains will be less or even nil. That's why some people who do the mod to the TBI get very little reward for their effort.

HTH.

EDIT: rounding the edges of an air inlet bore is also done during flowbench testing, by using buildup of clay into a smooth radius. If the radius isn't included, the airflow is always less.

Last edited by kdrolt; 04-27-2005 at 07:34 AM.
Old 06-19-2005, 10:25 PM
  #57  
Member
 
demetri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fort Myers, Florida
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
cant you lose torque when boring out the TB and not the rest of the intake?
Old 06-19-2005, 10:30 PM
  #58  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
dimented24x7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
As long as the rest of the intake remains the same, the torque shouldnt change that much if you bore out the tbi.

As far as radius goes, a lack of radius will make the bore look 'smaller' as the air will seperate from the surface since it wont be able to make the sharp turn.
Old 06-20-2005, 07:26 PM
  #59  
Senior Member
 
Crusin' 1980's's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 SC Camaro
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700-R4
Better Flowing TBI...
did you use a dremmel with a grinding bit to do that?...i thought i read that someone recommended wearing a mask when grinding down the castings....why?...b/c of sparks or smell?
Old 06-21-2005, 09:34 AM
  #60  
Supreme Member
 
Benm109's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1991 Chevy Camaro
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Originally posted by Crusin' 1980's
did you use a dremmel with a grinding bit to do that?...i thought i read that someone recommended wearing a mask when grinding down the castings....why?...b/c of sparks or smell?
To cut off the ridges, you'll probably want to use a high-speed cut-off wheel with the dremel. But, once the ridges are off, a grinding wheel or sanding drum is great for taking down the imperfections, nicks, and high or low spots that the cutting wheel made. And after that, use some sandpaper on all the areas that you cut/grinded and make it all smooth.



It was probaby one of my post that you read about wearing a mask. The reason is because of all the metal particles that starting flying around when your cutting/grinding. After a couple of hours my throat got really scratchy from inhaling all those tiny bits of metal. Although, as long as your in a well-ventilated area (I wasn't ), you shouldn't really need a mask.
Old 06-21-2005, 09:49 PM
  #61  
Senior Member
 
Crusin' 1980's's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 SC Camaro
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700-R4
After a couple of hours my throat got really scratchy from inhaling all those tiny bits of metal
that does not sound good...I'll try to be carefull if i do it
Old 06-22-2005, 08:38 AM
  #62  
Supreme Member
 
Benm109's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1991 Chevy Camaro
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Originally posted by Crusin' 1980's
that does not sound good...I'll try to be carefull if i do it
I just realized something. When I was referring to a mask, I was really referring to those cheap painter's respirators, like this:


After I reread my posts, it sounded like I was talking about a full-face mask.
Old 06-22-2005, 08:47 AM
  #63  
Supreme Member

 
Dewey316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
Goggles are a must also. A small metal shard in your eye, is not a fun way to spend an afternoon. Driving to the emergancy room, with one eye closed is not fun either...ask me how I know. ;-)
Old 06-23-2005, 01:47 PM
  #64  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Pablo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,257
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: Turbo Buick
Engine: 3.8 V6
Thanks Kdrolt, I posted something simlar to that one of the 50 or so times this thread has come up.

The throttle shaft grinding is probably one of the most flow improving mods, thats a direct impediment to air flow. Its easier if you can disassemble the unit and do the shaft with plates attached seperately.


I wanna see someone with hard data on what happens to the fuel from a tbi unit once its in the plenum at high rpm because it sure does not behave like fuel coming out of a carb. But real data is hard to come by around here. Ive posted data logs of my setup with both carb and tbi... somethings going on beyond what I can log which includes WB (except for small fluctuations of AFR at high rpm)

anyway if you guys would do some back to back testing with your tbi setup vs a properly tuned carb you may see the same thing. Maybe its my manifold combo.
Old 06-25-2005, 02:01 PM
  #65  
Moderator

iTrader: (1)
 
RBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 0
Received 225 Likes on 211 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by Pablo
. . .I wanna see someone with hard data on what happens to the fuel from a tbi unit once its in the plenum at high rpm because it sure does not behave like fuel coming out of a carb. But real data is hard to come by around here. Ive posted data logs of my setup with both carb and tbi... somethings going on beyond what I can log which includes WB (except for small fluctuations of AFR at high rpm)

anyway if you guys would do some back to back testing with your tbi setup vs a properly tuned carb you may see the same thing. Maybe its my manifold combo.
Something such as shown in this graph (see attached). Note what happens once the RPM exceeds 5,000 (50 on the Y axis). The X axis is in hours:minutes:seconds.

RBob.
Attached Thumbnails Better Flowing TBI...-fi1224y_s.jpg  
Old 06-25-2005, 04:36 PM
  #66  
Supreme Member

 
DM91RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ga
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
RBob..........what kind of software is that datalog chart from?

I don't remember seeing one like that before.

Thanks.......DM
Old 06-25-2005, 07:36 PM
  #67  
Moderator

iTrader: (1)
 
RBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 0
Received 225 Likes on 211 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by DM91RS
RBob..........what kind of software is that datalog chart from?

I don't remember seeing one like that before.

Thanks.......DM
The data was collected with a Lockers setup (17 frames of data a second), then a section of it was imported into Excel. From that I used Excel's graphing feature to get what is shown. I did cut a section of the graph out and pasted the legend back in. The second gear portion made the pic too big to post.

RBob.
Old 06-26-2005, 07:22 AM
  #68  
Supreme Member

 
DM91RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ga
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by RBob
The data was collected with a Lockers setup (17 frames of data a second), then a section of it was imported into Excel. From that I used Excel's graphing feature to get what is shown. I did cut a section of the graph out and pasted the legend back in. The second gear portion made the pic too big to post.

RBob.
Kool.........I forgot that you were the "Lockers Master".

That is the kind of information all of us need that are "trying" to tune with a C3. Besides the speed I see Wide band, spark advance and some kind of pulse width?

Sorry to get off thread but when I seen the graph and info I thought that it was

DM

Last edited by DM91RS; 06-26-2005 at 07:24 AM.
Old 06-26-2005, 07:42 AM
  #69  
Supreme Member

 
BMmonteSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Buckhannon, WV
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears
So what did you find that was causing the high RPM breakup?
Old 06-26-2005, 11:09 AM
  #70  
Moderator

iTrader: (1)
 
RBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 0
Received 225 Likes on 211 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
DM91RS, the brown line labeled sbpw is the injector pulse width. The use of 'sbpw' is a lousy name. Notice how high it goes during the initial throttle stomp. That is the AE. The code I use has the AE as synchronous pulses, not async pulses as the stock code does.

BMmonteSS, sure did, fixed it too.

RBob.
Old 06-26-2005, 01:34 PM
  #71  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
dimented24x7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Originally posted by RBob


BMmonteSS, sure did, fixed it too.
What was the cause?
Old 06-27-2005, 08:58 AM
  #72  
Supreme Member

 
BMmonteSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Buckhannon, WV
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears
LOL I have a sneaky suspicion that the "fix" is set to be released very soon. At least that's what I'm hoping for.
Old 06-28-2005, 06:47 PM
  #73  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Pablo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,257
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: Turbo Buick
Engine: 3.8 V6
Yep Rbob, just like that


makes the car run like caca


cool to hear you found the fix. I sold off my tbi stuff cause of it.

Wish I had the time and skills to figure out stuff like you do.
Old 06-29-2005, 05:13 AM
  #74  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (16)
 
Street Lethal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC / NJ
Posts: 10,473
Received 180 Likes on 157 Posts
Originally posted by RBob.BMmonteSS, sure did, fixed it too.

RBob.
Excellent work, if so!
Old 06-29-2005, 05:33 AM
  #75  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (16)
 
Street Lethal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC / NJ
Posts: 10,473
Received 180 Likes on 157 Posts
Originally posted by Pablo.I sold off my tbi stuff cause of it.
You of all people should know that it will cost you next to nothing to get that stuff back. Hehe, that is, at least until RBob's code gets released, then I foresee everyone jumping on the TBI bandwagon because of it.

Liberate yourself from Vader and the 'Darkside' Pablo (you're Grand National), and come back home to TBI (insert Yoda's voice)...

Again, RBob, excellent work! Who would have thought such an exciting time (first Ben73's mid 12 second run, and now RBob's work soon to be released) for TBI would be on the horizon...
Old 07-07-2005, 05:17 AM
  #76  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
 
NEEDforSPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,036
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
just thot id add some more to this thread and a pic of my modded air cleaner, as you know TBI's suck from the sides so getting the air filter as close as i could to the base of the TBI was my goal, all also add this about cutting the ridge i doubt it picks up any HP, weather or not it does, it does increase throttle response,

all also add, some data for you guys

The following airflow tests were performed on the University of Northwestern Ohio's SuperFlow SF600 Flow Bench. All CFM values are corrected for airflow at 28 inches of water.

Stock 4.3/5.0/5.7 2bbl TBI complete -- 574.1 cfm (dry)
Stock 4.3/5.0/5.7 2bbl TBI w/o injectors -- 584.7 cfm
Attached Thumbnails Better Flowing TBI...-airc.jpg  
Old 07-08-2005, 04:41 PM
  #77  
Supreme Member

 
DM91RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ga
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
NFS.........what diameter filter is that? Looks stock size.

DM
Old 07-08-2005, 05:12 PM
  #78  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
 
NEEDforSPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,036
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
its a stock air cleaner for 96 pickup
Old 10-17-2005, 08:35 PM
  #79  
Member
 
83Chevy_Camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maine
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 1988 chevy pickup 350 TBI (rebuilt)
Transmission: 700r4- Bowtie overdrives
Axle/Gears: 2:73's
Alright, i have a 1988 5.7 chevy Truck engine in my 88 camaro, and its rebuilt it has the TBI of course, I have a very very powerful low end but after 65 It sucks and i read about the spacers and what not, and then grinding alittle bit around the edges to create more air flow, Now, I dont know what PPG means, idont know what the diffrences from a lo3 to lo5 or lg1 or any of that, id like to learn, because i really like to tinker on cars! but anyway i get 24.0 MPG i just calculated that out today and would like to gain some more HP cause right now it really bogs and rattles in the engine somewhere when its at 3/4 to WOT when trying to pass and it takes awhile for me to pass someone going 45- 50mph. anyway. can someone tell me what the best thing to do is? Which is probably "Leave it alone!!!!''
Old 10-18-2005, 10:49 PM
  #80  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
 
NEEDforSPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,036
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
if you like to tinker then go for it, you want see much power but the thorrtle well be more responsive...
Old 10-19-2005, 06:52 PM
  #81  
Member
 
83Chevy_Camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maine
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 1988 chevy pickup 350 TBI (rebuilt)
Transmission: 700r4- Bowtie overdrives
Axle/Gears: 2:73's
so what should i do? Both Spacers? or the grinding around the barrels?
Old 10-20-2005, 06:33 AM
  #82  
Supreme Member

 
BMmonteSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Buckhannon, WV
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears
It sounds like to me, you have a problem with the tune. So your not going to see any major improvment modifing your TB. You need to find out whats rattling. Are you still running the stock 305 chip? knock sensor? injectors? if so, thats where you need to start. You can still get decent milage because the ECM has a good bit of self learning built in, but all that gets ignored once you go wide open throttle.

Do some searching on swaping in a 350, if you still have questions post in one of the many 305->350 threads or start a new one.
Old 10-28-2005, 10:59 PM
  #83  
Supreme Member
 
Psycho_91Camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: THE LT1 SWAP SHALL BEGIN!!!!
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: LSD! =(
Whats the point of porting it??? if your still restricting air?? get a K&N Filter it will make a difference
Old 10-28-2005, 11:09 PM
  #84  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
 
NEEDforSPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,036
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
everything makes a difference,
Old 10-29-2005, 03:19 PM
  #85  
Supreme Member
 
vorgath's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LS1
How restricting is the stock TBI intake manifold ?

Is it even worth switching to a Performer manifold .. or are the gains marginal ?
Old 10-29-2005, 04:08 PM
  #86  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
 
NEEDforSPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,036
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i would have to say yes its worth it, the stock TBI intakes dont cut it, aftermaket is a much better pick, if i had my Edelbrock Performer RPM off the car i could compare the 2, HUGE diffrents
Old 10-29-2005, 04:55 PM
  #87  
Supreme Member
 
vorgath's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LS1
My thought was the difference between stock TBI and Performer manifold not being that tremendous .... considering one can get carb intakes flowing better ... problem is... not enough manifolds out there that have the EGR fittings



What I was getting at was... isn't one of the big reasons the Performer has been able to sell ... that it's still quite low .. so it fits underneath the stock hood ?
Old 10-29-2005, 11:13 PM
  #88  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
 
NEEDforSPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,036
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i think its a tad bite taller, infact i know it is i had to get a smaller air fillter....
Old 09-01-2008, 08:28 PM
  #89  
Member
 
tilerob79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Daytona Beach
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: automatic
Re: Better Flowing TBI...

hey im swapping my Lo3 tbi, for the GMPP 350/330 HO
If i kept my throttle body and bought one of those 30 psi regulators that they used on the 454s and raised my fuel pressure, and then put in a walbro 255 fuel pump. Would that be enough to run that motor the right way, or should i buy a whole new throttle body system, if so which one?
Old 09-02-2008, 04:06 PM
  #90  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (1)
 
Ronny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 6,879
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: Better Flowing TBI...

Originally Posted by tilerob79
hey im swapping my Lo3 tbi, for the GMPP 350/330 HO
If i kept my throttle body and bought one of those 30 psi regulators that they used on the 454s and raised my fuel pressure, and then put in a walbro 255 fuel pump. Would that be enough to run that motor the right way, or should i buy a whole new throttle body system, if so which one?
I would tune it with the stock TB unit and once you have that handled then swap in 7.4L unit with larger injectors. 55 lbs injectors at 28 lbs FP will support 320 HP at 90% DC. I have an Aeromotive FPR and it supporrts high FP or low FP based on spring supplied. Not sure if topdownsolutions has a spring that will handle 28 lbs. The GM spring from 1995-1996 7.4L TB will. But where to find one?
Old 05-21-2011, 06:50 PM
  #91  
Junior Member
 
hewdamwright's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Better Flowing TBI...

after reading all the discussions is the ultimate TB mod a big foot or lochness or is it for real is it worth the work would a TB off a 454 help me more
Old 05-21-2011, 08:48 PM
  #92  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (25)
 
UnderCover89TBI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Manteca,California. Nor Cal.
Posts: 7,260
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: SOLD IT. Mopar guy only now.
Engine: gone
Transmission: gone
Axle/Gears: gone
Re: Better Flowing TBI...

deffinately. Do not switch the 454 throttle body. not needed. ultimate tbi and adjustable fuel regulator and you'll be fine. tbi spacer not needed, injector spacer isnt a bad idea though. but before I did any of this. I would do a header and exhuast swap.
Old 06-02-2011, 06:26 PM
  #93  
Member
 
gmstrong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: williamstown,NJ
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 95 9C1,99 Sierra,90Sierra,00 sierra
Engine: TBI350,LM7,LT1,Vortec 350
Transmission: 700r4,4L60e,4L60e,4L80e
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt,14bolt,3:42,3:73,3:08,3:73.
Re: Better Flowing TBI...

anything bigger then 50mm on mild 350 is a waste of time.and or money.
Old 06-02-2011, 06:28 PM
  #94  
Member
 
gmstrong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: williamstown,NJ
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 95 9C1,99 Sierra,90Sierra,00 sierra
Engine: TBI350,LM7,LT1,Vortec 350
Transmission: 700r4,4L60e,4L60e,4L80e
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt,14bolt,3:42,3:73,3:08,3:73.
Re: Better Flowing TBI...

I think holley projection is a better flowing manifold but the edelbrock is a easy replacement
Old 06-03-2011, 11:18 AM
  #95  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (25)
 
UnderCover89TBI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Manteca,California. Nor Cal.
Posts: 7,260
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: SOLD IT. Mopar guy only now.
Engine: gone
Transmission: gone
Axle/Gears: gone
Re: Better Flowing TBI...

Yeah if you want to keep and use the egr and pass visual. only option is the performer tbi manifold really. if that wasnt the case i'd be running the perfomer rpm manifold with adapter. but im lazy and dont wanna change stuff every 2 years to pass emissions testing.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pac J
Tech / General Engine
3
05-17-2020 10:44 AM
Fireslash
Camaros for Sale
3
04-11-2016 06:43 PM
jrdturbo
Firebirds for Sale
26
03-31-2016 02:58 PM
dusterbd
TPI
0
09-29-2015 08:40 AM
84redta
Tech / General Engine
2
09-19-2015 09:58 AM



Quick Reply: Better Flowing TBI...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:25 PM.