TBI Throttle Body Injection discussion and questions. L03/CFI tech and other performance enhancements.

300+ Hp 305?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-01-2004, 10:52 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
DanMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bothell, WA
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 305 V8
300+ Hp 305?

I have a 305cc TBI in my 89' bird. I want to learn the in's and outs of these car's before I go do something as drastic as attempt a motor swap.

My car is my daily driver and I have what I think are fairly modest performance goals. I wan't to get my 305 to put out 300+ hp. I mean it's a v8, it shouldn't be that hard? or should it?

Will new cams and exhaust headers do the trick? How would get get a 305 up to 300+ HP?
Old 02-02-2004, 12:29 AM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
seanof30306's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,607
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 Formula WS6
Engine: L03 305 TBI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt; 3.42 Posi
Re: 300+ Hp 305?

Originally posted by DanMac
I have a 305cc TBI in my 89' bird. I want to learn the in's and outs of these car's before I go do something as drastic as attempt a motor swap.

My car is my daily driver and I have what I think are fairly modest performance goals. I wan't to get my 305 to put out 300+ hp. I mean it's a v8, it shouldn't be that hard? or should it?

Will new cams and exhaust headers do the trick? How would get get a 305 up to 300+ HP?
dude, you sound exactly like i did a year ago when i bought my 89 firebird 305 tbi.

there is a TON of information on that in this tbi forum. i suggest you do what i did. start at the beginning of these posts, read every one that seems to be on point and take notes as you go. it's interesting as hell and you'll have a great idea as to what it'll take when you get caught up.
Old 02-02-2004, 12:40 AM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
DanMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bothell, WA
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 305 V8
Sounds like a plan, might as well get started tonight.

thanks for the reply
Old 02-02-2004, 08:05 AM
  #4  
Senior Member

 
305RSlc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: P'cola
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4 that will magically turn into a 6 speed one day.
It's gonna be more than hard to get to your goal if you stick with the crap casting swirl port heads that are on the 305. Get yourself some cheap vortecs, or even the world products 305 specific heads, a SINGLE plane intake (help you out in upper RPM) a holley adapter plate, the holley 670cfm TB, and a good cam. The LT4 hot cam it a good choice to start with or call comp cams. After that, headers and full exhaust and you should be relatively close to 300hp. I am gonna second reading as much as you can possibly read before starting anything. These boards are packed with info, and when you do something you wanna make sure you are doing it right the first time and not screwing something up.
Old 02-02-2004, 08:27 AM
  #5  
Supreme Member

 
Dewey316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
a few things.

1) start now with computer work, tune the hell out of your car stock. then do small upgrades, see how it effects things, and tune the hell out those combo's, learn how the car reacts to timing/fuel changes. you will need this information later

2) the only way to do this, is to go with a fairly 'radical' cam for this, since our cars are a MAP (speed density) system, the fueling and spark in the computer is determaned by a VE table, any change in the efficency of the engine, makes these tables not work right, changing cam and heads will make a big change to what is needed in these tables, talking about a drastic change like this will require a lot of time and effect into tuning it, thus why i suggest you start with #1

3) the rest of the car needs to be up to snuf. your stock fuel system likely won't support that HP, your going to need a good hi-flow fuel pump. the exaust also won't support that, headers and cat-back will be needed. cam/intake/head selection will be determined by your needs. do you need to pass emisions? is this a street car, a strip car, a road racer, or an auto-x car. if you plan to race it, do you have a specific class/type that you are planning on? if so, you need to look at the rules for that class, to descide what mods you can/cannot do.

4) suspension work would also be advised, along with the appropriate gears, and adding a posi unit. you need to hook up your new found power, having the power there doesn't do you any good, if it just goes into tire smoke.

5) tranny -- at high power levels, chances are a stock untouched tranny is going to be short lived. if your a manual, thing will probably go downhill fast, especialy if you drive it hard. if you have an auto, your going ot need a new torque converter. with a large cam you are going to move the power band up quite a ways, you need to change your stall speed to get you into the power quick.

that should get you started, there is alot there to consider, you need to make the whole car work as a system, you can drop 5k into an engine, to find out the computer can't handle it, the suspension sucks, and you tranny blows. that is not alot of fun to find out after you used up all your fun tickets on the new mill.
Old 02-02-2004, 09:30 AM
  #6  
Supporter/Moderator

iTrader: (7)
 
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,343
Likes: 0
Received 424 Likes on 325 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Dewey hit it right on the head. You really need to do the computer work now so that down the road you understand why your car changed the way it did. There are a lot of weak links on these cars and most of them need to be taken care of together. Once you start adding heads and cam you run out of fuel. SO then you replace the pump, re-tune, and now your stock TBI unit can no longer support the power. So now you are doing the research to get a 454 TBI or holley 670 TBI on top of your motor so that you can tune again. Now you need tradaction..... As you can see it is a never ending cylce of chaznging parts. These cars are great platforms and have the capability to accept trillions of aftermarket stuff. The stock stuff is just grabage and needs to be replaced if you want to hit your goal.
Old 02-02-2004, 11:58 AM
  #7  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
seanof30306's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,607
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 Formula WS6
Engine: L03 305 TBI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt; 3.42 Posi
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
Dewey hit it right on the head. You really need to do the computer work now so that down the road you understand why your car changed the way it did. There are a lot of weak links on these cars and most of them need to be taken care of together. Once you start adding heads and cam you run out of fuel. SO then you replace the pump, re-tune, and now your stock TBI unit can no longer support the power. So now you are doing the research to get a 454 TBI or holley 670 TBI on top of your motor so that you can tune again. Now you need tradaction..... As you can see it is a never ending cylce of chaznging parts. These cars are great platforms and have the capability to accept trillions of aftermarket stuff. The stock stuff is just grabage and needs to be replaced if you want to hit your goal.
yes. if i were starting over from scratch, i'd do chip tuning before i did anything else. one thing that stuck out when i first got on these boards was how many cars with 373 posis, headers and free flowing exhausts, intakes, lt1 cams, ultimate tbi mods, etc still ran in the 15s. i thought it was mismatched parts, but i've come to realize it's chip tuning.

if you approach this from an "old school" perspective like i did, you start with the things you understand like exhaust, intake, cam, etc., holding off on getting into the chip tuning till you absolutely have to. big mistake.

once you're able to burn those chips, you can maximize the power potential and efficiency of every change you make. someone (i believe it was dewey) started their chip tuning when the car was almost completely stock and picked up a half a second in the 1/4 mile (if i remember correctly) with that only. there was someone else who got into the 13s with the stock heads and cam .... but lots and lots of tuning.

it's hard to do. if you're a newbie without a lot of computer skills, be prepared for lots of headaches. ha ha ha. i'm just now getting ready to start datalogging. we'll see what happens.

it'd be nice if you could get them burned by someone else. the truth is, i believe you can (despite popular opinion). you could send your datalogs to someone with a lot of expertise at this and have them burn your chips. over the course of several back and forth adjustments, the chip would end up being "on". the problem is that you'll need to go through that process again after every change you make. it's just too expensive.
Old 02-02-2004, 12:03 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member

 
Dewey316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
yes, i actualy picked up closer to a full second. and 6mph.

it just takes practice, as much as i wish i could tell people mail order works, and that in 4 or 5 chips, you can have a good one, it just doesn't work. i have burned probably 60 chips now, for my stocker. and i am still working at it. you need more than just datalogs, they don't tell the whole story, especialy at WOT, i am getting ready to buy a wideband, i already use a tazzo (g-tech) along with 'how it feels', datalog, and 1/4 mile data from the track. this all plays into it, the butt dyno lies, the datalogging lies, you have to learn how to sort it out using a combination of tools.
Old 02-02-2004, 12:12 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
seanof30306's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,607
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 Formula WS6
Engine: L03 305 TBI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt; 3.42 Posi
Originally posted by Dewey316
yes, i actualy picked up closer to a full second. and 6mph.

it just takes practice, as much as i wish i could tell people mail order works, and that in 4 or 5 chips, you can have a good one, it just doesn't work. i have burned probably 60 chips now, for my stocker. and i am still working at it. you need more than just datalogs, they don't tell the whole story, especialy at WOT, i am getting ready to buy a wideband, i already use a tazzo (g-tech) along with 'how it feels', datalog, and 1/4 mile data from the track. this all plays into it, the butt dyno lies, the datalogging lies, you have to learn how to sort it out using a combination of tools.
what wideband are you going to buy?
Old 02-02-2004, 12:18 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member

 
Dewey316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
probably the inovative, i have a cutout that i am going to install, so i would like ot weld the bung in when i do that
Old 02-02-2004, 12:29 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
seanof30306's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,607
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 Formula WS6
Engine: L03 305 TBI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt; 3.42 Posi
also, dewey, i do believe you can get it pretty right with an offsite chip tuner, as long as they're good enough. there's a guy on here named mike crews with a 383 tpi that's almost into the 11s and makes 400 rwhp, and he's only had around 10 chips burned for his car! his combination is pretty mild, he's only using 3.23 gears and lets the transmission shift itself. he's obviously pretty close to dead on in his tuning to make the numbers he does.

you said you'd burned over 60 chips for your car so far, but wasn't a lot of that learning process? i'd think if someone were an expert, they'd be able to do it with less. i have a buddy who is in a club of crown vic/mercury marauder fanatics. twice a year, this former ford engineer comes to town and sets up appointments at a ford dealership that has a dyno. he does a drivearound datalog, and two dyno pulls and guarantees an improvement in horsepower, driveability and economy or your money back. these guys line up around the block! my buddy has a mustang ecm and intake, gt40 heads, etc on his. picked up 30 hp and 6mpg on the tune. watching the chip guy work, it was obvious that he knew just what to look for and just what to do. wish there was a comparable guy for our cars.

again, i think the person burning those chips makes all the difference in the world. the problem isn't that you can't find someone to do it, it's that every time you make a change, you'll have to start the process over.
Old 02-02-2004, 12:31 PM
  #12  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
DanMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bothell, WA
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 305 V8
I'm actually really looking forward to PROM programming, I'm a programmer by trade, so the thought of being able to program my car seems like a lot of fun. I'm pretty sure I wont have too much trouble getting the datalogging and chip buring stuff set up. However knowing what to change is another thing? How can you tell if you need to advance/retard your timing in a given rpm range? or increase/decrease fuel supply? It's all very mysterious to me at this point.
Old 02-02-2004, 12:38 PM
  #13  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
seanof30306's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,607
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 Formula WS6
Engine: L03 305 TBI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt; 3.42 Posi
Originally posted by DanMac
I'm actually really looking forward to PROM programming, I'm a programmer by trade, so the thought of being able to program my car seems like a lot of fun. I'm pretty sure I wont have too much trouble getting the datalogging and chip buring stuff set up. However knowing what to change is another thing? How can you tell if you need to advance/retard your timing in a given rpm range? or increase/decrease fuel supply? It's all very mysterious to me at this point.
i'm in the same boat, brother! if you go to the diy efi forum, there are lots of guys there who can help. since you're a programmer, you'll be able tun understand the gobbldygoop they respond to your questions with ... something that is still totally beyond me.

and dewey, i've been looking at the lm1 too. will you be able to use the data from that directly, or will you have to do the changes manually? i'm still unclear on this, but don't you use a program written by jprevost that reads your datalogs and adjusts the spark/fuel tables for you accordingly?
Old 02-02-2004, 12:45 PM
  #14  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
seanof30306's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,607
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 Formula WS6
Engine: L03 305 TBI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt; 3.42 Posi
Originally posted by DanMac
I'm actually really looking forward to PROM programming, I'm a programmer by trade, so the thought of being able to program my car seems like a lot of fun. I'm pretty sure I wont have too much trouble getting the datalogging and chip buring stuff set up. However knowing what to change is another thing? How can you tell if you need to advance/retard your timing in a given rpm range? or increase/decrease fuel supply? It's all very mysterious to me at this point.
the first thing you need to do is turn off the speed limiter. mine damn near killed me this weekend!

there's this long, sweeping, increasing radius turn on "the buford connector" near where i live. the previous owner of my car was an autocrosser and had done a lot of suspension work. i've done a little more and it's amazingly stable in high speed cornering. my previous record on this corner was 100. decided to break that at around 3am sunday morning. the speed limiter cut in right in the middle of the tightest part of the corner and i damn near went around!

talk about a surprise!
Old 02-02-2004, 12:53 PM
  #15  
Supreme Member

 
Dewey316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
yes, i use jons program, but that only works at part throttle, in PE mode it won't do squat. it also doesn't adjust timing. that is where the WB, and track data helps. the stock o2 is very inaccurate, so using the WB to nail WOT fuel is a must. timing is best done at the track, give it the timing that gives you the best MPH.
Old 11-23-2009, 02:48 AM
  #16  
Senior Member

 
morrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: simi valley, southern cali
Posts: 865
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Car: 92 Camaro Rs.R
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 300+ Hp 305?

go to chevy thunder.com
Old 11-23-2009, 08:08 AM
  #17  
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Saabster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Greater D.C. area.
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 Camaro RS
Engine: LO3 TBI
Transmission: 700R4 => WC T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open Diff
Re: 300+ Hp 305?

You're right, about 1 hp/cu in is not too hard on a small block. If you want to stay with you LO3 heads (165/140 CFM), you're going to need a cam in nearly the 220 duration (note, this is more than an LT4, more in line with an LT4 HOT cam) and spin it to almost 6500 rpms, and everything in between to support that.

I will repeat what everyone else has said and that's that tuning is really going to make or break this thing. A well tuned stock LO3 with a bolt on exhaust will, IMO, womp on a LT4 cammed up TBI that hasn't been tuned properly. There are many options: chip burning, the excellent EBL system, and megasquirt. All have advantages and disadvantages. I personally am going megasquirt as I believe it has the greatest flexibility, but it also has the greatest initial investment (not $$$, it just takes a lot of knowledge to set one up.)

So no one can really give you exactly what need, you have to look at the knowledge yourself and piece together what you need to get where you want to go. The greatest asset of the small block, it's potential and parts availability, is also it's greatest danger. As the saying goes, it gives you just enough rope to hang yourself.
Old 11-23-2009, 09:23 PM
  #18  
Supreme Member

 
ericjon262's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,537
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 85 2M6, 87 'Bird 88 'burb
Engine: LX9, LG4, L05
Transmission: F23, 700r4, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.63, 2.73, 4.10
Re: 300+ Hp 305?

wow guys, this thread is almost 6 years old.
Old 11-26-2009, 05:17 PM
  #19  
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Saabster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Greater D.C. area.
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 Camaro RS
Engine: LO3 TBI
Transmission: 700R4 => WC T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open Diff
Re: 300+ Hp 305?

Damn, that always gets me.
Old 11-29-2009, 09:17 PM
  #20  
Member

 
CamKid1992's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: O'Fallon Mo.
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1992 Camaro
Engine: HSR 355, afr 195s, xfi280, Holley e
Transmission: t-5
Axle/Gears: Braced 10 bolt Auburn and 3.73s
Re: 300+ Hp 305?

not sure if you still need help but i got me a pair of trickflow 23 heads for my 305 new cam 412 lift headers exhaust and a very good tune with a hypertech chip and im around 310 im sure i forgot something o and msd ignition.
Old 11-30-2009, 09:32 AM
  #21  
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Saabster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Greater D.C. area.
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 Camaro RS
Engine: LO3 TBI
Transmission: 700R4 => WC T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open Diff
Re: 300+ Hp 305?

What sort of duration and intake are you running? Also, 310 measured where?

Last edited by Saabster; 11-30-2009 at 09:53 AM.
Old 11-30-2009, 03:02 PM
  #22  
Member

 
CamKid1992's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: O'Fallon Mo.
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1992 Camaro
Engine: HSR 355, afr 195s, xfi280, Holley e
Transmission: t-5
Axle/Gears: Braced 10 bolt Auburn and 3.73s
Re: 300+ Hp 305?

after posting this last night i was curious and got it dynoed today. it pulled 327.8 at the rear wheels.. the intake is the holly/weind stealth ram with adj fuel rail. here is the link to my cam

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/LUN-54742/
Old 11-30-2009, 03:32 PM
  #23  
Supreme Member

 
ericjon262's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,537
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 85 2M6, 87 'Bird 88 'burb
Engine: LX9, LG4, L05
Transmission: F23, 700r4, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.63, 2.73, 4.10
Re: 300+ Hp 305?

Originally Posted by josh006
...the intake is the holly/weind stealth ram...
Thats TPI not TBI. imprssive none the less that you made 327 HP out of a 305.
Old 11-30-2009, 04:14 PM
  #24  
Supreme Member

 
thomas1976's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: West-Central
Posts: 2,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 Trans am
Engine: built 360 TBI
Transmission: built 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10bolt/3.23
Re: 300+ Hp 305?

Isent it HSR?
Old 11-30-2009, 05:45 PM
  #25  
Member

 
CamKid1992's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: O'Fallon Mo.
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1992 Camaro
Engine: HSR 355, afr 195s, xfi280, Holley e
Transmission: t-5
Axle/Gears: Braced 10 bolt Auburn and 3.73s
Re: 300+ Hp 305?

true never thought it like that and i had the tbi for a long time. with the edelbrook intake and you can get a bigger truck throttle body im sure you could get close.
Old 12-17-2009, 07:50 AM
  #26  
Junior Member
 
kodiak27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: crystal river fl
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 rs camaro / 88 5.0 gt stang
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: 300+ Hp 305?

how did u get a series 40 muffler when it only has one in and 1 out i think u used a series 80
Old 12-17-2009, 10:54 AM
  #27  
Supreme Member

 
ericjon262's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,537
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 85 2M6, 87 'Bird 88 'burb
Engine: LX9, LG4, L05
Transmission: F23, 700r4, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.63, 2.73, 4.10
Re: 300+ Hp 305?

Originally Posted by kodiak27
how did u get a series 40 muffler when it only has one in and 1 out i think u used a series 80

or just ran a single exhaust and not a fake dual!
Old 12-17-2009, 04:31 PM
  #28  
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Saabster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Greater D.C. area.
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 Camaro RS
Engine: LO3 TBI
Transmission: 700R4 => WC T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open Diff
Re: 300+ Hp 305?

Originally Posted by ericjon262
or just ran a single exhaust and not a fake dual!
I'm going to do that, so half the exhaust doesn't have to turn nearly 180 degrees.
Old 12-17-2009, 11:58 PM
  #29  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
dimented24x7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Re: 300+ Hp 305?

Flowmaster has a base 3" exhaust for thirdgens that has just a single, hide-away stock type rear exit on the drivers side (I assume this is the one referenced above). I have it on my car with a hooker maximum flow muffler instead. The flowmaster 30 series (or whatever it comes with now) that came with it was a bit restrictive.
Old 01-02-2010, 05:01 PM
  #30  
Junior Member

 
steven hecker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 GTA
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Re: 300+ Hp 305?

did you use the Hypertech 122362 - Hypertech ThermoMaster Computer Chips or was it a different model chip?
Old 01-07-2010, 08:35 PM
  #31  
Member

 
CamKid1992's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: O'Fallon Mo.
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1992 Camaro
Engine: HSR 355, afr 195s, xfi280, Holley e
Transmission: t-5
Axle/Gears: Braced 10 bolt Auburn and 3.73s
Re: 300+ Hp 305?

just for the record if your going to beef up a 305 with 300+ hp you could put the 335 stroker in it. or you will need some kind of bottom end i did not and had 327hp and well i spun a rod bearing. just make sure you have a strong bottom end.
Old 01-07-2010, 09:42 PM
  #32  
Supreme Member

 
ericjon262's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,537
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 85 2M6, 87 'Bird 88 'burb
Engine: LX9, LG4, L05
Transmission: F23, 700r4, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.63, 2.73, 4.10
Re: 300+ Hp 305?

Originally Posted by josh006
just for the record if your going to beef up a 305 with 300+ hp you could put the 335 stroker in it. or you will need some kind of bottom end i did not and had 327hp and well i spun a rod bearing. just make sure you have a strong bottom end.

why stroke a 305, that has got to be the biggest waste of money I have ever heard of, you can by running 350's all day for cheaper than just the stroker kit.
Old 01-09-2010, 12:39 AM
  #33  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 10,119
Received 427 Likes on 368 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: 300+ Hp 305?

Originally Posted by josh006
just for the record if your going to beef up a 305 with 300+ hp you could put the 335 stroker in it. or you will need some kind of bottom end i did not and had 327hp and well i spun a rod bearing. just make sure you have a strong bottom end.
I have no problems running the under-dog engines and making them run very well.

My stock bottem end held over 350 RWHP on a NA 305 and constant 6,500 rpm abuse.....A properly setup STOCK bottem end has NO issue holding power. Just make sure the bearings have the proper clearance, the rotating assembly is well balanced, and you have some arp rod bolts. Maybe they put jello in the L03 bottem end, but I doubt it is much different than the L30 lower end my engine started out as.

My older 305 was built better than the L30 lower-end was stock for stock.

I have had my fair share of lower-end problems, but most of the problems are from using fatigued parts or parts that were not up to the application. Out of round, out of balance, thin casting, stuff like that.

I just found the limit of my stock Dodge 4.7 lower end..... At about 280 RWHP and 6,500 rpm, it fatigued a rod, which let go at about 3,500 while driving around town. A light bang and a small screech later...I was on a tow truck. I was able to make it out-run stock Hemis fairly easily though. 0-60 in 8.5 secs from a heavy 5,500 lbs quad cab.. Still had the stock clutch fan, stock exhaust manifolds, and stock catalyst on it even.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MmE3qRAtaXc

Last edited by Fast355; 01-09-2010 at 12:49 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pjsparts
Tech / General Engine
6
09-17-2015 01:28 PM
Ranbo108
Tech / General Engine
14
09-09-2015 12:20 PM
383cam
Electronics
5
09-09-2015 06:01 AM
rsrookie
Camaros for Sale
0
09-05-2015 07:08 PM
Formula_88AE
Engine Swap
1
09-03-2015 01:47 PM



Quick Reply: 300+ Hp 305?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:17 PM.