Need GM part # for smog pump delete serpentine belt on 305 LO3
07-23-2002, 02:22 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Derbyshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 camaro rs
Engine: 350
Transmission: T5
Need GM part # for smog pump delete serpentine belt on 305 LO3
I have a 1991 RS with a 350 in place of the LO3. I have removed the smog pump so will reroute the serpentine belt as per the tech article instructions. But the Dayco part # is quoted there. Does anyone know the GM part #?
Thanks.
Andy.
Thanks.
Andy.
07-23-2002, 05:45 PM
#2
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: kansas
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Just look for a belt with a length of 96.7. Thats what I did. That part # thats listed just stands for the length. So just match it up with a different brands length.
07-23-2002, 07:11 PM
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
i dont know about you all but with my serpintine setup i just took the smog pump out and the origional belt still runs fine around the stock routing. Just an inch shorter and it would be perfect.
07-23-2002, 07:18 PM
#5
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
LOL... just looked at teh tech article and i put it on in the same maner w/o even realizing it. Think i had it like that before too. Guess it isnt the stock routing after all.
07-23-2002, 07:29 PM
#6
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
the modifed belt routing in Pablo's article is the stock belt routing. I went out and took a peek at the sticker on my upper radiator support. I dont know why his was routed the way he said it was origionally.
Last edited by dimented24x7; 07-23-2002 at 07:32 PM.
Trending Topics
07-27-2002, 10:20 PM
#11
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Okinawa, Japan
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by dimented24x7
the modifed belt routing in Pablo's article is the stock belt routing. I went out and took a peek at the sticker on my upper radiator support. I dont know why his was routed the way he said it was origionally.
the modifed belt routing in Pablo's article is the stock belt routing. I went out and took a peek at the sticker on my upper radiator support. I dont know why his was routed the way he said it was origionally.
07-28-2002, 10:47 AM
#12
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Dixon, IL
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42
this is funny!!! cause me and hardrock spent quite a few minutes looking at the differences between our stock belt routings
seems like the early lo3s were different
seems like the early lo3s were different
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992 Trans Am
History / Originality
27
05-10-2023 07:19 PM
