Engine Torque Damper - an interesting concept
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Engine Torque Damper - an interesting concept
My DD is an Acura CL Type S. This car has a problem going through engine mounts. They last about 50k miles. The front and rear mounts (transverse engine) are hydraulic and stiffen at full throttle. Under load the front mount is in tension and the rear is in compression. The side mount seems to take transverse loads.
When I replaced the front and side mount this weekend I also installed an engine torque damper from Ingalls. This is basically a fluid filled damper that dampens the motions of the engine. The advertised benefits are reduced wheel hop (front wheel drive), less engine movement, better shifts (auto), longer engine mount life.
I must say I was a bit skeptical. And I can't comment on wheel hop (never had any) or on mount life yet. But I must say the I am very impressed with how good the tranny is shifting. Shifting is quicker and firmer after the addition of the damper.
I began thinking how nice it would be to add one to the Camaro. Why not just use poly engine mounts? Well I have been down that road and could not stand the extra vibrations. By comparison the engine damper is invisible. The damper should help with throttle response as well.
If you want to see proof that this thing is actually taking load, about half way through this video, look at the flex on the left hand (body side) bracket near the bolt. I will fix this by adding stiffeners to the bracket.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/perdoch/10786162914/
John
When I replaced the front and side mount this weekend I also installed an engine torque damper from Ingalls. This is basically a fluid filled damper that dampens the motions of the engine. The advertised benefits are reduced wheel hop (front wheel drive), less engine movement, better shifts (auto), longer engine mount life.
I must say I was a bit skeptical. And I can't comment on wheel hop (never had any) or on mount life yet. But I must say the I am very impressed with how good the tranny is shifting. Shifting is quicker and firmer after the addition of the damper.
I began thinking how nice it would be to add one to the Camaro. Why not just use poly engine mounts? Well I have been down that road and could not stand the extra vibrations. By comparison the engine damper is invisible. The damper should help with throttle response as well.
If you want to see proof that this thing is actually taking load, about half way through this video, look at the flex on the left hand (body side) bracket near the bolt. I will fix this by adding stiffeners to the bracket.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/perdoch/10786162914/
John
#3
Supreme Member
Re: Engine Torque Damper - an interesting concept
My toyota had one factory. I took it out and replaced it with a solid one and it seemed to reduce wheel hop at the expense of vibration.
#4
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH350 for now
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Engine Torque Damper - an interesting concept
Neat idea but I think there is a cheaper easier way. I never had to do it on my Camaro but I had a Monza (H-Body) with the Buick V6 and a four speed. It would break mounts (motor and tranny) all the time (abuse).
I used the old school racer trick of a heavy steel chain mounted between the frame rail and the motor (bolted into one of the accessory holes in the head) on the "lifting" side of the motor. The chain had no slack in it when the motor was off but at the same time it was not under load. It limited how much the motor could torque over under heavy acceleration, as the motor tried to torque over the chain limited the movement. It did not add any vibration.
Completely solved the broken mount(s) issues and looked to pretty much do what that thing is doing for about $5...
I used the old school racer trick of a heavy steel chain mounted between the frame rail and the motor (bolted into one of the accessory holes in the head) on the "lifting" side of the motor. The chain had no slack in it when the motor was off but at the same time it was not under load. It limited how much the motor could torque over under heavy acceleration, as the motor tried to torque over the chain limited the movement. It did not add any vibration.
Completely solved the broken mount(s) issues and looked to pretty much do what that thing is doing for about $5...
#5
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Engine Torque Damper - an interesting concept
Neat idea but I think there is a cheaper easier way. I never had to do it on my Camaro but I had a Monza (H-Body) with the Buick V6 and a four speed. It would break mounts (motor and tranny) all the time (abuse).
I used the old school racer trick of a heavy steel chain mounted between the frame rail and the motor (bolted into one of the accessory holes in the head) on the "lifting" side of the motor. The chain had no slack in it when the motor was off but at the same time it was not under load. It limited how much the motor could torque over under heavy acceleration, as the motor tried to torque over the chain limited the movement. It did not add any vibration.
Completely solved the broken mount(s) issues and looked to pretty much do what that thing is doing for about $5...
I used the old school racer trick of a heavy steel chain mounted between the frame rail and the motor (bolted into one of the accessory holes in the head) on the "lifting" side of the motor. The chain had no slack in it when the motor was off but at the same time it was not under load. It limited how much the motor could torque over under heavy acceleration, as the motor tried to torque over the chain limited the movement. It did not add any vibration.
Completely solved the broken mount(s) issues and looked to pretty much do what that thing is doing for about $5...
#6
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Posts: 17,165
Likes: 0
Received 136 Likes
on
114 Posts
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Re: Engine Torque Damper - an interesting concept
I have two of those on my Harley because it uses rubber mounts on the engines. It reduces a lot of the harmonic vibrations.
Don't have anything like that on the car though. Front and rear motor plates keep everything stiff. If you want to eliminate excessive movement from the engine, you need to do with a solid mount.
Don't have anything like that on the car though. Front and rear motor plates keep everything stiff. If you want to eliminate excessive movement from the engine, you need to do with a solid mount.
#7
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH350 for now
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Engine Torque Damper - an interesting concept
Not my style, but that would limit maximum motion. The damper will of course dampen the motion rather than stop it all together. And it will dampen both directions while you would need 2 chains to achieve that. I am looking at this as a feel item rather than simply to make the mounts last longer.
As for the other direction, unless you are down gearing/compression braking very hard I think you will be surprised how little it is needed. Big stress is under throttle.
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Engine Torque Damper - an interesting concept
Yup, deceleration control is desired as well. I am a big fan of engine braking. It happens all over the track and I do it on the street as well.
#9
#10
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Engine Torque Damper - an interesting concept
You are of course correct, it is rubber, per the manufacturer's website. That fact alone does nothing to change anything else about this conversation.
Last edited by JamesC; 11-15-2013 at 06:29 PM. Reason: Back to topic
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
84z96L31vortec
Tech / General Engine
7
08-20-2017 12:16 AM
84z96L31vortec
North East Region
1
08-10-2015 08:27 PM