Front Spring Insulator
#1
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 186
Likes: 2
From: Tokyo, Japan
Car: 92 camaro convertible z28
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: Swapped from 700R4 to T5
Axle/Gears: Stock Posi. Ratio is not known
Front Spring Insulator
Do front spring insulators have any influence on comfort?
There are several types, stock soft one or hard poly one.
I want to go for a softer one if they make any difference.
There are several types, stock soft one or hard poly one.
I want to go for a softer one if they make any difference.
#2
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 19,282
Likes: 97
From: Lawrence, KS
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Re: Front Spring Insulator
#3
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 186
Likes: 2
From: Tokyo, Japan
Car: 92 camaro convertible z28
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: Swapped from 700R4 to T5
Axle/Gears: Stock Posi. Ratio is not known
#4
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,668
Likes: 50
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: Front Spring Insulator
The stock ones are jus for noise insulation. You can take them out and probanly wont notoce anything different
#5
Re: Front Spring Insulator
how did you got around this dilema? what else did you changed on the suspension?
I went thru some major updates for the front and rear and decided to go with the moog stock (I think) replacement. I doubt any dampening happens thru the compressed thickness of this insulator. some ppl wrap the last coil in electrical tape.
no insulator may transmit some noise, I doubt u'll notice any comfort difference
also, stock spring had a round section at the end where it goes onto the insulator into the k member cup, my prokits were ground flat. I think the insulator may help conform these two shapes one agtainst the other (not that it can really go anywhere with or w/o a sure footing)
I went thru some major updates for the front and rear and decided to go with the moog stock (I think) replacement. I doubt any dampening happens thru the compressed thickness of this insulator. some ppl wrap the last coil in electrical tape.
no insulator may transmit some noise, I doubt u'll notice any comfort difference
also, stock spring had a round section at the end where it goes onto the insulator into the k member cup, my prokits were ground flat. I think the insulator may help conform these two shapes one agtainst the other (not that it can really go anywhere with or w/o a sure footing)
#6
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 4
From: Iowa
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 10bolt w3.42 Torsen
Re: Front Spring Insulator
I have ground control weight jacks and they say not to use an isolator. The weight jacks wouldn't work with an isolator anyway. I can vouch that it's not as bad as you might think without isolators. but its hard for me to tell what made the difference since i upgraded everything at once.
If i had used just regular springs like eibach, moog, or whatever i would use an isolator but i would probably have done the hose slid over the end coil, but OEM rubber would be good too. I can't see any reason to use the harder poly in this application.
If i had used just regular springs like eibach, moog, or whatever i would use an isolator but i would probably have done the hose slid over the end coil, but OEM rubber would be good too. I can't see any reason to use the harder poly in this application.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ambainb
Camaros for Sale
11
04-25-2016 10:21 PM
TA8487
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
08-11-2015 10:02 PM