Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Which subframe connectors are better-boxed or tubed???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-12-2001 | 07:05 AM
  #1  
JohnnywantsaTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Which subframe connectors are better-boxed or tubed???

I've seen different type of sub-frame connectors,and was wondering which is better. Tubed or boxed???

Thanks

------------------
"A musclecar, by definition, is a powerful and sporty vehicle that must be able to spin its tires at will. The Firebird Trans Am is capable of laying down twin black streaks of rubber several hundred feet long. We wanted to be sure it could, so we did it a half dozen times in the name of automotive science."-MotorTrend
Old 07-12-2001 | 02:59 PM
  #2  
MikeS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
I would think that there are too many factors to simply pick boxed over tubed or the other way around. Wall thickness, tubing diameter/dimensions, and material type play a role in stiffness as well. So, geometry is not the only concern. Seems like the stiffest setup would be one that welds down the entire length of the car, rather than just at points on the front and rear subframes. That leads me to vote for boxed or rectangular tubing. But this is just my opinion. I could do some calculations or whatever to figure what is the stiffest, but dimensions would be pretty arbitrary, so I'd really rather not have to go through all that. Gut feeling says rectangular, although i'm not saying anything against round. Just my opinion here, so take it for what it's worth. I have never had sfc's on either of my thirdgens, so no practical experience with them. Just theory from school coming out here.
Old 07-12-2001 | 07:16 PM
  #3  
89rsragtop's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 412
Likes: 1
From: Long Island, N.Y.
Car: blue
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 6 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi
All things the same tube is stronger than boxed. Far and away the most important things are design and installation.
Old 07-13-2001 | 08:35 AM
  #4  
ede's Avatar
ede
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 14,811
Likes: 1
From: Jackson County
tube is stronger but the box is easier to work with and on a third gen works better i believe, especially if you want to weld it along the full length of the rocker panel.

------------------
ICON Motorsports
1st & 3rd
MM Black Diamond 538 F&AM
Old 07-14-2001 | 08:17 AM
  #5  
89rsragtop's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 412
Likes: 1
From: Long Island, N.Y.
Car: blue
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 6 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi
ede is right tube or boxed is not as important as being able to weld them along the rocker panel. I was lucky on my conv. this area is boxed. When I installed my Kenny Browns SFC they were very tight to the rockers so I could weld them together in a few places along the the lengh of the car. KBs are a tube design and not easy to weld to the rocker so I got help from a pro welder. Bottem line get a design that lays tight to your rocker panel. p.s. Don't get bolt on they are not worth it.

------------------
1989 rs ragtop LO3 KB subframes & towerbrace to hold it together but bone stock
Old 07-17-2001 | 10:02 AM
  #6  
JamesC's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 19,282
Likes: 97
From: Lawrence, KS
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
I've got the Global West tubulars. They welded in fine. E-mail me for pic, if you'd like.

JamesC

------------------
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gta892000
TPI
13
08-11-2019 12:16 PM
75bike
Interior
1
09-20-2015 10:37 PM
ccop
Convertibles
6
09-14-2015 05:13 PM
Nick McCardle
Firebirds for Sale
1
09-10-2015 09:36 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:25 PM.