Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Steel vs. Chrome Moly

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-16-2008, 06:28 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
paulisgod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: everywhere
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: GM
Engine: v8
Transmission: slushboxes
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Steel vs. Chrome Moly

I wanted to know if I should pay for the chrome moly or would I be ok with the steel. Is chrome moly lighter? Is that the only advantage? Looking to get adjustable LCA's and adjustable torque arm from hawks. Looking to use spohn cause I have the spohn subframes and love em! Is BMR better?
Old 09-16-2008, 06:56 PM
  #2  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Steel vs. Chrome Moly

Moly will only be lighter if they used less material ie:thinner wall tubing. Same volume of steel and chromoly = same weight.
I dont know that any of them weld the material properly, even though they state otherwise, so I'll say the steel will give you less chance of failure.

Chromoly is stronger, in some respects. Thats why you can get away with thinner tubing, if its all put together correctly. They may not reach it (and I havent seen it in failed parts yet) but too thin and the tubing will fail regardless of it being stronger.
Old 09-16-2008, 07:15 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
paulisgod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: everywhere
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: GM
Engine: v8
Transmission: slushboxes
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Steel vs. Chrome Moly

So should I go with Chrome Moly, or with the steel? Is it worth another $125 for a chrome moly torque arm compared to a steel torque arm?
Old 09-16-2008, 08:53 PM
  #4  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Steel vs. Chrome Moly

Personally, no. I dont think its worth the cost and risk involved that it was made right... and the weight savings if any will be minimal. If you're trying to save every ounce then yes, otherwise stick with the steel.
Old 09-16-2008, 09:19 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
paulisgod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: everywhere
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: GM
Engine: v8
Transmission: slushboxes
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Steel vs. Chrome Moly

Bingo! That's the answer I was looking for. Thanks. I know Spohn makes good stuff but I don't think it is worth the weight savings either. Any other opinions.
Old 09-16-2008, 09:38 PM
  #6  
Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Camaro5690's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Western Mass
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 Camaro/89 Merkur XR4Ti
Engine: 5.0 305 LG4/2.3 Turbo (180hp/205tq)
Transmission: TH700R4 with Shift Improver Kit/T-9
Axle/Gears: 3.42LT1 Rear/3.64
Re: Steel vs. Chrome Moly

Ive heard that Chrome Moly takes stress differently than steel. Like Chrome Moly when damaged once, will completely break if it gets damaged again, where as steel would bend. Not sure on the validity on this though. I believe there maybe a post about it on here somewhere,
Old 09-16-2008, 10:25 PM
  #7  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Steel vs. Chrome Moly

Chromoly has a higher carbon content and is more brittle than a mild steel. When it breaks it doesnt yield and then work harden and then eventually snap over its loading cycle, it just snaps once it yields.
Old 09-16-2008, 11:02 PM
  #8  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
paulisgod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: everywhere
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: GM
Engine: v8
Transmission: slushboxes
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Steel vs. Chrome Moly

I'm going to order steel components tomorrow from spohn unless someones says otherwise.
Old 09-18-2008, 09:40 AM
  #9  
Banned
 
UMI Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Philipsburg, Pa
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Re: Steel vs. Chrome Moly

Please keep us in mind as well, we over a variety of products for the 3rd generation car including the torque arm. I think you will like our prices as well

www.umiperformance.com

Chrome Moly like mentioned has a higher tensile and yield strength than mild steel. This allows us as manufacturers to use thinner wall tubing to reduce weight but still maintain strength. The price increase of Chrome Moly is the material itself along with the fabrication time it takes when using it. Chrome Moly must be TIG welded due to heat and can not be MIG welded like mild steel... this increases time in building the item. Also it requires preheating before welding where mild steel does not.

If I can help anymore please ask. Thank you!
Ryan
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
skirocz28
Members Camaros
10
11-12-2015 07:52 PM
Chiknhawk
Exterior Parts Wanted
1
10-15-2015 09:51 AM
dbrochard
Exterior Parts for Sale
5
10-10-2015 01:03 PM
LT1Formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
7
10-08-2015 08:34 PM
meeklay812
Camaros for Sale
1
10-01-2015 03:46 PM



Quick Reply: Steel vs. Chrome Moly



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:16 AM.