Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Anyone see the new watts link?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-09-2011 | 10:38 PM
  #101  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone see the new watts link?

You are stuck on the simple movement of the mechanism and are not understanding the dynamics of the chassis movement.

The chassis rotats simply around the FIXED roll center of the watts.

The reverse watts is NOT FIXED and moves up and down link a PHB. So why change it? the only improvement you get (which I question is not an improvement yet others will argue it is) is your RC does not migrate left or right off center yawing the roll axis like a PHB setup does.

The watts and the reverse watts are not the same- I have been saying this same thing how many times now?
Old 03-09-2011 | 11:44 PM
  #102  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone see the new watts link?

Originally Posted by RED_DRAGON_85
first imagine that the bellcrank is axle mounted. in this scenario the axle would be moving up and down and the car body would be stationary.

easy enough.

now picture that the bellcrank is chassis mounted and the chassis is moving around while the axle is fixed.
So how does the car know what is 'fixed' and what is not? Do you send it a memo?

Maybe its just me, but whenever I have analyzed objects and motion, things that are fixed remain fixed, and things that are in motion remain in motion. They dont just switch because you want it to.
Old 03-10-2011 | 12:12 AM
  #103  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone see the new watts link?

Originally Posted by madmax
So how does the car know what is 'fixed' and what is not? Do you send it a memo?

Maybe its just me, but whenever I have analyzed objects and motion, things that are fixed remain fixed, and things that are in motion remain in motion. They dont just switch because you want it to.
Agreed. He is not understanding to look at the setup as to how forces are applied to it, he is just looking at the mechanism for its movement.
Old 03-10-2011 | 02:11 PM
  #104  
89_RS's Avatar
Senior Member

 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 808
Likes: 2
From: Ft Wayne, IN
Car: 2003 F-150
Engine: 4.6L Modular V8
Transmission: 4R70W
Axle/Gears: Ford 8.8"/3.55 LSD
Re: Anyone see the new watts link?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watt%27s_linkage

Watt's linkage is used in the rear axle of some car suspensions as an improvement over the Panhard rod, which was designed in the early twentieth century. Both methods intend to prevent relative sideways motion between the axle and body of the car. Watt’s linkage approximates a vertical straight line motion more closely, and does so while locating the centre of the axle rather than toward one side of the vehicle, as more commonly used when fitting a long Panhard rod.

It consists of two horizontal rods of equal length mounted at each side of the chassis. In between these two rods, a short vertical bar is connected. The center of this short vertical rod – the point which is constrained in a straight line motion - is mounted to the center of the axle. All pivoting points are free to rotate in a vertical plane.

In a way, Watt’s linkage can be seen as two Panhard rods mounted opposite each other. In Watt’s arrangement, however, the opposing curved movements introduced by the pivoting Panhard rods are compensated by the short vertical rotating bar.

The linkage can be inverted, in which case the centre P is attached to the body, and L1 and L3 mount to the axle. This reduces the unsprung mass and changes the kinematics slightly. This is used on Australian V8 Supercars.

Watt's linkage can also be used to prevent axle movement in the longitudinal direction of the car; however, this is more common in racing suspension systems. This application usually involves two Watt's linkages on each side of the axle, mounted parallel to the driving direction.
Let me see if I can break this down for all to understand. Reference the animation in the link.

L2 is the bellcrank & P is the fixed point attached to the chassis. L1 & L3 are the linkages that are moving. The outboard end points of L1 & L3 are moving in an S shaped range of motion and the inboard end points of L1 & L3 are moving laterally toward the center of the axle as the bellcrank rotates.

The inboard lateral movement is of concern because it will cause the axle to move laterally. And by the math of others, it appears to be right at .09" of lateral movement for our cars. Not a whole lot if you ask me.

Seems to me the axle remains in a "fixed" position and the chassis is fixed a specified distance away from the axle thus giving a very constrained & defined roll center to the chassis.
Old 03-10-2011 | 02:43 PM
  #105  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone see the new watts link?

Originally Posted by 89_RS
The linkage can be inverted... This... changes the kinematics slightly
Its not fiction, its just reality.
Old 03-10-2011 | 03:09 PM
  #106  
89_RS's Avatar
Senior Member

 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 808
Likes: 2
From: Ft Wayne, IN
Car: 2003 F-150
Engine: 4.6L Modular V8
Transmission: 4R70W
Axle/Gears: Ford 8.8"/3.55 LSD
Re: Anyone see the new watts link?

Originally Posted by madmax
Its not fiction, its just reality.
Care to point out where I said anything else to the contrary? I was only trying to explain how it was working. Don't think for one second that I don't know that something is being changed here.

Either quote me correctly or don't quote me at all. If there is one thing I absolutely hate, its people trying to put words in my mouth!
Old 03-10-2011 | 04:20 PM
  #107  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone see the new watts link?

Easy now, that is for the person who revived this post to "correct" it as if there was anything wrong to begin with.
Old 03-10-2011 | 11:12 PM
  #108  
89_RS's Avatar
Senior Member

 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 808
Likes: 2
From: Ft Wayne, IN
Car: 2003 F-150
Engine: 4.6L Modular V8
Transmission: 4R70W
Axle/Gears: Ford 8.8"/3.55 LSD
Re: Anyone see the new watts link?

Originally Posted by madmax
Easy now, that is for the person who revived this post to "correct" it as if there was anything wrong to begin with.
Oops Sorry about that.
Old 03-11-2011 | 01:33 AM
  #109  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone see the new watts link?

S'ok. I'm seeing how that could be confusing.
Old 03-11-2011 | 07:49 AM
  #110  
89_RS's Avatar
Senior Member

 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 808
Likes: 2
From: Ft Wayne, IN
Car: 2003 F-150
Engine: 4.6L Modular V8
Transmission: 4R70W
Axle/Gears: Ford 8.8"/3.55 LSD
Re: Anyone see the new watts link?

I know from a cost/benefit analysis that its not really worth in on our cars since a PHB is so much cheaper, but it seems to me that it'd be great for a street & AX/Road Course car.

Expensive beyond belife: yep. Awesome as all get out: hell yeah. Since when has cost detered someone from doing something in the name of cool?
Old 03-11-2011 | 05:10 PM
  #111  
RED_DRAGON_85's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,298
Likes: 2
From: Norfolk VA
Car: 85 Camaro IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: open rear, 3.42 gears
Re: Anyone see the new watts link?

if all you care about is a blingy rear end location mechanism, then i suggest a mumford linkage.
the coolest one i have seen so far is a WOB link. extremely simple for the bling factor.
keep your ratios of the long and short links 2:1 and you will get the most linear movement
Old 03-12-2011 | 08:37 AM
  #112  
89_RS's Avatar
Senior Member

 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 808
Likes: 2
From: Ft Wayne, IN
Car: 2003 F-150
Engine: 4.6L Modular V8
Transmission: 4R70W
Axle/Gears: Ford 8.8"/3.55 LSD
Re: Anyone see the new watts link?

Originally Posted by RED_DRAGON_85
if all you care about is a blingy rear end location mechanism, then i suggest a mumford linkage.
the coolest one i have seen so far is a WOB link. extremely simple for the bling factor.
keep your ratios of the long and short links 2:1 and you will get the most linear movement
Thats not all I care about. Packaging, ease of install, and maintaining the existing structural integrity of the rear subframe are important to me as well. Until somebody makes a bolt-on Mumford Linkage, I'll stick with the Watts Linkage.

Now, Deans design was a great step in the right direction for a bolt-on Mumford, but IMHO, he compromised on how he braced the driver side mount. The PHB brace on our car runs from the passenger side chassis PHB mount to the drivers side rear subframe over the axle which triangulates the rear subframe. In his setup, the mount for the Mumford runs parallel to the axle and is located by a drop-down from the drivers side which boxes the chassis, making it terrible in resisting torisonal forces.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
3rd gen money
Electronics
6
10-11-2019 09:57 PM
Ed1LE
Suspension and Chassis
8
09-30-2018 09:14 AM
oil pan 4
Fabrication
2
10-06-2015 11:56 AM
SavingPvtEric
Electronics
1
09-29-2015 05:59 PM
raymondandretti
Electronics
1
09-27-2015 06:43 PM



Quick Reply: Anyone see the new watts link?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17 AM.