Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-30-2008, 12:42 PM
  #51  
Member

 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '08 Mustang GT
Engine: 4.6L
Transmission: º º 0 . . . |-|-|
Axle/Gears: 8.8", 3.55
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

If it's purely a vertical hop of the front wheels, then dead front dampers (struts) are at least part of the problem. Shimmy shows up as a steering wheel rotational vibration and can be started by hitting a dip.

Off the top of my head guess on engine weight difference - about 150 lbs heavier assuming no major aluminum component replacement on either. Or HD block substitution for that matter.


Norm
Old 09-30-2008, 01:28 PM
  #52  
Member
 
Excellegions's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sunrise Fl
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro TBI 5.0
Transmission: Auto
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

150 ilbs should not make a big enough difference to change my suspention I assume, just need to stabilize the problem I already have. I will install the kyb and see what it does for the v6. hopefuly the car will stay the same height with the v8 in and kyb's
Old 09-30-2008, 01:41 PM
  #53  
Member
 
RacerX13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: K.C.MO
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 88 Formula
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

150lbs is enough to make a big difference, and since the V8 is longer the extra weight has more leverage. You're going to need springs.
Old 11-03-2008, 06:22 PM
  #54  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
91_5.7_TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: East Tennesse
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

What engine's in the car now?
Old 11-03-2008, 07:51 PM
  #55  
Member
 
Excellegions's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sunrise Fl
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro TBI 5.0
Transmission: Auto
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

It has the 3.1l v6, with a turbo and the T5 Tranny.
Old 11-03-2008, 08:09 PM
  #56  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
91_5.7_TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: East Tennesse
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

It'll add a couple hundred pounds if I recall correctly. If you have V6 springs, you'll probably need to replace them with V8 ones, at least in the front.
Old 11-03-2008, 10:41 PM
  #57  
Member
 
84imsa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Philippines
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1984 Camaro
Engine: 327
Transmission: TH700-R4
Axle/Gears: 7.5" 3.23 Posi
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

Originally Posted by 91_5.7_TPI
The Pro-Kit is 714in/lbs and the only stock springs stiffer (that I know of) are the Moog 5662s at 748. I'll look more into what is needed for different lowering levels...that seems like a head-ache. Is there any set rule of thumb for that?
Depending on your source of info, 5662's are 748# and 5664's are 707# or vice versa. At any rate (pun intended) the stiffer spring has a wire/bar diameter of 0.765" and the softer one is 0.750". If you buy your springs in person, bring calipers and measure them.

0.015" seems like a tiny difference but it was the usual contact point gap in breaker type ignitions if you are old enough to remember those. So it is measurable.

If you start with a 5660 spring with an stock rate of 598# and cut off 1 full coil, you should get a drop of 1.90" and a new spring rated of 726#.
Old 11-03-2008, 11:00 PM
  #58  
Member
 
84imsa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Philippines
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1984 Camaro
Engine: 327
Transmission: TH700-R4
Axle/Gears: 7.5" 3.23 Posi
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

Originally Posted by vorgath
OK, I may have messed up. Got the front springs out, cut 1/2 coil off, but not 100 percent sure i cut the top of both coils. I MAY have cut 1/2 off top on one of them, 1/2 of bottom on the other one how can I tell for sure ? And IF it happened,I don't think I can just go ahead and cut 1/2 coil again, to "balance it out" .... aaargghh !!!
The springs should have 2 different ends, one tangential and the other square. The tangential end is the one that seems to coil off into space. The square end sort of flattens out and coils in toward the previous coil.

The spring will sit stand erect if set down on the square end. It will fall over if set down on the tangential end. Ergo, if both springs will still stand erect, you're in good shape. Otherwise... uh-oh!

Old 11-04-2008, 02:55 AM
  #59  
Member
 
84imsa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Philippines
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1984 Camaro
Engine: 327
Transmission: TH700-R4
Axle/Gears: 7.5" 3.23 Posi
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

Originally Posted by krisb410
Excellegions,

If you don't have Lower Control Arm Relocation brackets yet, I would get some. The whole purpose of them is to eleminate wheel hop, esp on lowered cars.
Gotta love this TGO! Everyday I learn something new and sometimes get to share something I know!

So, tell me about LCA reloc brackets. What do they look like? How do they work? What is the principle behind their operation?

My guess is they restore the geometry of the LCA's after lowering. I.e., if they were level with the ground before lowering, they would now be pointed upward to the rear and the brackets would raise the front mounting points. Where do they mount?

Edit-

I have seen the reloc brackets on Hawks' site. I can discern 3 distinct designs and quite a range of prices. Any recommendations?

Edit again -

So they lower the rear mounting points. Does someone have a link to pics of these things installed? I personally would prefer weld-in units.

Is there an ideal angle for the LCA's with the car static at ride height?

Last edited by 84imsa; 11-04-2008 at 03:07 AM.
Old 11-04-2008, 06:17 AM
  #60  
Member

 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '08 Mustang GT
Engine: 4.6L
Transmission: º º 0 . . . |-|-|
Axle/Gears: 8.8", 3.55
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

Originally Posted by 84imsa
If you start with a 5660 spring with an stock rate of 598# and cut off 1 full coil, you should get a drop of 1.90" and a new spring rated of 726#.
Is that 1.90" taken at the spring? If so, the car's ride height will drop about double that number.


Norm
Old 11-04-2008, 08:25 AM
  #61  
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

Originally Posted by 84imsa
Gotta love this TGO! Everyday I learn something new and sometimes get to share something I know!

So, tell me about LCA reloc brackets. What do they look like? How do they work? What is the principle behind their operation?

My guess is they restore the geometry of the LCA's after lowering. I.e., if they were level with the ground before lowering, they would now be pointed upward to the rear and the brackets would raise the front mounting points. Where do they mount?

Edit-

I have seen the reloc brackets on Hawks' site. I can discern 3 distinct designs and quite a range of prices. Any recommendations?

Edit again -

So they lower the rear mounting points. Does someone have a link to pics of these things installed? I personally would prefer weld-in units.

Is there an ideal angle for the LCA's with the car static at ride height?
WOW! You understand the LCARBs 110%!

Spohn LCA Relocation Brackets

Level is bet for all-around driving or autocross/roadracing.
Slightly upwards towards the chassis (rear point being the lower of the 2 mounting points) for drag racing....straight line traction. It all has to do with the geometry between the LCAs & torque arm.

Somebody makes bolt-on ones, but I'll never recommend them to anyone nor take the time to find them & provide a link to them. Only way I would do bolt-on ones, would be to have the ability to put them on at home, then drive to a welder to have them welded on. That's my on LCARBs.

EDIT:
Oh yeah.... https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/susp...arm-angle.html

Last edited by Stephen; 11-04-2008 at 02:19 PM.
Old 11-04-2008, 08:50 AM
  #62  
Member

 
Fords88Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SO CAL
Posts: 497
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Car: '88 Firebird Z20
Engine: 305 TBI w/TBI mods
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

84IMSA here's a couple pics of J&M bolt on LCARB on my 88, they are pretty sturdy and eventually I may tack them in. If you notice at the shock mount there's a bracket there that ties it all together with the other bolts. I mainly drive on the streets so they may be fine just bolted on but if I did autoX or track racing I would deff. weld them in. Norm I used 5660 springs and trimmed 1 full coil and got just about a 2" drop after install. Later.
Attached Thumbnails Lowering/Making an F-Body handle-dsc02547.jpg   Lowering/Making an F-Body handle-dsc02548.jpg  
Old 11-04-2008, 08:52 AM
  #63  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (9)
 
krisb410's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 2,346
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 RS Camaro, 75 L82 Corvette
Engine: LO3, 383 Stroker
Transmission: 700R4, TH400
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 3.23 posi/LS1 discs, stock
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

I have UMI's bolt on LCARBs, put them on about 1 1/2 years ago. Didn't want to weld them on until I did my 4th gen rear swap. Well, when I did the swap this summer, I didn't see the point of getting them welded on. I was gonna get them welded on that week. I'm sure eventually, next time I need something fabricated, I'll have the guy weld them on. But it's on the bottom of my list of things to do. I kinda like the design of the bolt ons anyways, with the extra mounting point.

http://www.umiperformance.com/produc...ategory_id=108
Old 11-04-2008, 08:55 AM
  #64  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

Originally Posted by Norm Peterson
Is that 1.90" taken at the spring? If so, the car's ride height will drop about double that number.


Norm
Yep, 42% to be exact. I was chiming in to say the same as Norm just did.
Old 11-04-2008, 09:07 AM
  #65  
Member

 
Fords88Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SO CAL
Posts: 497
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Car: '88 Firebird Z20
Engine: 305 TBI w/TBI mods
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

Excellegions did you ever take care of your hopping-bouncing issue. Later.
Old 11-04-2008, 09:41 AM
  #66  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
91_5.7_TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: East Tennesse
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

I think he meant the ride height would lower about 1.90 inches after taking a full coil off the spring. I don't think he meant he was taking that much off the coil. Could be wrong though. I've been thinking about cutting the WS6 springs I have and see if how it compares to my current ProKit in ride height, cornering, and ride.


As for LCARBs, I've got Spohn weld ins on mine.
Old 11-06-2008, 08:46 AM
  #67  
Member
 
84imsa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Philippines
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1984 Camaro
Engine: 327
Transmission: TH700-R4
Axle/Gears: 7.5" 3.23 Posi
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

Originally Posted by Fords88Bird
84IMSA here's a couple pics of J&M bolt on LCARB on my 88<snip>
Thanks again, Fords. When I got the IMSA from the farm, it had all-terrain tires out back and 215/60's up front. At that point, the car pointed about 5 degrees nose down!

I semi-restored the wheels and installed 255/60X15's on the 8" rears and 245/60X15's on the 7" fronts. Those are actually intended for my '70 but I put them back on the '84 just to see how they fit. Now the car sits just about level but there's almost 4" of air between the top of the tires and the bottom of the fender lips. Because the car is almost flat black, it looks like a frightened cat! All that's missing is a puffed up tail sticking straight up from its rear.

Anyway, I finally made room in my garage for it and will stock the garage fridge with beer in order to lure slave labor to the house to help me push it in. Then I will start lowering it.

While researching at the Eaton Springs website, I found instructions and tips on cutting springs. One thing that really caught my attention was a statement that they "never recommend lowering more than 2 inches."

I suspect this has something to do with sending your instant center underground as well as bump steer problems.

So my questions for today are:

1. How low can you go?

2. Are drop spindles preferable (or even available for our cars) as opposed to cutting coils?

I'm now researching bump steer within TGO so I can ask enlightened questions in a couple of days.

Cheers,

Mike

Last edited by 84imsa; 11-06-2008 at 08:50 AM.
Old 11-06-2008, 09:44 AM
  #68  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
racing geek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,525
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 with Edelbrock ProFlow EFI
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 12 bolt 3.73 Eaton posi
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

Drop spindles are preferred because they allow you to lower the front of the vehicle without changing any suspension geometry. There is a company that offers 2" drop spindles for our cars, but I can't remember their name.

I'm not sure how low you can technically go, but make sure you keep ground clearance in mind.

Mike
Old 11-06-2008, 11:07 AM
  #69  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (9)
 
krisb410's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 2,346
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 RS Camaro, 75 L82 Corvette
Engine: LO3, 383 Stroker
Transmission: 700R4, TH400
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 3.23 posi/LS1 discs, stock
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

FYI: Spohn sells a bumpsteer kit.
Old 11-06-2008, 10:21 PM
  #70  
Member
 
84imsa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Philippines
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1984 Camaro
Engine: 327
Transmission: TH700-R4
Axle/Gears: 7.5" 3.23 Posi
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

Originally Posted by racing geek
There is a company that offers 2" drop spindles for our cars, but I can't remember their name.

I'm not sure how low you can technically go, but make sure you keep ground clearance in mind.

Mike
I did some searching and Racecraft has them. They even have them with shorter steering arms for R&P conversions.

http://www.racecraft.com/products.php?cat=46

They're a bit pricey at $550. Has anyone on this thread installed these on his/her car? Earlier today I read a horror story about their K-members written by a Canadian customer. What is the general reputation of Racecraft?

Ground clearance? What is that?

My '70 has about 3" ground clearance at the crossmember and the bottoms of my dual exhaust pipes are nice and shiny from scraping on speed bumps.

Last edited by 84imsa; 11-06-2008 at 10:27 PM.
Old 11-07-2008, 12:20 AM
  #71  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (3)
 
Kevin84Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sonoma CO. CA.
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1984 Camaro Z28
Engine: L69 305 H.O.
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

Originally Posted by Fords88Bird
84IMSA here's a couple pics of J&M bolt on LCARB on my 88, they are pretty sturdy and eventually I may tack them in. If you notice at the shock mount there's a bracket there that ties it all together with the other bolts. I mainly drive on the streets so they may be fine just bolted on but if I did autoX or track racing I would deff. weld them in. Norm I used 5660 springs and trimmed 1 full coil and got just about a 2" drop after install. Later.
Is the car jacked up in your two pictures? It looks like your LCA's are now at an angle instead of horizontal. It even appears that if the brackets weren't there, it would be perfect.
Old 11-07-2008, 12:46 AM
  #72  
Member

 
Fords88Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SO CAL
Posts: 497
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Car: '88 Firebird Z20
Engine: 305 TBI w/TBI mods
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

Kevin, yeah car was on stands thats why they look that way. Later.
Old 11-07-2008, 12:59 AM
  #73  
Member

 
Fords88Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SO CAL
Posts: 497
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Car: '88 Firebird Z20
Engine: 305 TBI w/TBI mods
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

84IMSA member UDAMON has drop spindles. Later.
Old 11-07-2008, 06:52 AM
  #74  
Member
 
Excellegions's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sunrise Fl
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro TBI 5.0
Transmission: Auto
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

No, I have yet to correct my hopping problem, however the car has been parked for a couple of months as I try to tune the bin file in the ecm for boost. I have purchased a set of KYB AGX Shocks and Struts from ebay for $390, and I got my hands on a used set of Lakewood Traction Action Lift Bars for $30. I have yet to install it all.

I KNOW . . . . Lakewood Traction Action Lift Bars isn't everyones first choice, just about everyone has something bad to say about them, but, $30 dude! Im going to trow them all on and see what the car does, if I ever get the tuning right.
Old 11-07-2008, 04:30 PM
  #75  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (10)
 
blacksunshine'91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 2,426
Likes: 0
Received 165 Likes on 119 Posts
Car: '91 GTA, '92 T/A Convertible
Engine: GTA: 350 w/Vortec heads, T/A: 305
Transmission: Pro-built 700R4
Axle/Gears: GTA: 3.27, T/A: 2.73
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

Originally Posted by JADIII35
...In regards to "lowering" how important is the "Bump-Steer Kit"?
Thanks guys!
I wouldn't say they are absolutely required, but in my personal experience I would say that if your car is lowered then I highly recomend them. After I lowered my car I had issues with my car jumping around and getting squirly from the grooves in the road and downright screwy when braking hard. After I got the Baer bumpsteer kit installed I haven't had any steering issues. I personally think they are a great investment for a lowered car.
Old 12-03-2008, 10:25 PM
  #76  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
91_5.7_TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: East Tennesse
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

There is a thread in which Dean goes into bumpsteer a little. But I'm not sure where it is. You might find your answer there.
Old 12-04-2008, 06:09 PM
  #77  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
S10GUY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: small town in NY
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: VR6 jetta for commuting
Engine: VR6
Transmission: 5spd ZF lsd
Axle/Gears: ?
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

wow theres alot more to lowering a car the right way then i thought. But since i just cruise my 84 z/28 i think ill keep it simple. i dont race or autox it. I just want it to look good so i was thinking of buying eibach sportlines and calling it good. or does any one suggest i go farther? Remeber its just a cruiser that wants to look good. you coull say my car is a poser
Old 12-04-2008, 06:16 PM
  #78  
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

Do it for "free" & just cut your springs. Don't listen to their young crowd that hears all the horrible stories about cutting spring WRONG. And ask them if they know more than Chip Foose, who cuts springs to this day!

Do it right & your wallet will be thicker than theirs & your car will work just as good as theirs.

I cut the springs on my previous 2 autocross cars with ZERO problems & will cut my GTA springs when it gets warmer outside.
Old 12-04-2008, 07:48 PM
  #79  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
S10GUY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: small town in NY
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: VR6 jetta for commuting
Engine: VR6
Transmission: 5spd ZF lsd
Axle/Gears: ?
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

how many coils for a 2" drop? id be willing to try it.
Old 12-04-2008, 07:56 PM
  #80  
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

As far as how far to cut for a certain amount of drop...A lot of that depends on WHICH springs you have. On the 90, we hadWS6 springs. On the 92, they were the stock RS springs.

Both cars were used in autocross, obviously the 90 more than the 92.

90RS.html

92RS.html
Old 12-04-2008, 08:48 PM
  #81  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
91_5.7_TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: East Tennesse
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

This is from another thread on the Forum. Might be usefull

I found 28 Moog coil springs that have inside diameters of 4.080 to 4.090 inches and installed heights from 10.50 to 12.00 inches.

Spring rates (unmodified):
5660 - 598#
5662 - 748#
5664 - 707#

Applying the spring rate formula from my previous post, I came up with the resultant spring rates for 1" and 2" drops after cutting these springs:

Spring Rates (1" drop):
5660 - 659#
5662 - 825#
5664 - 780#

Spring Rates (2" drop):
5660 - 735#
5662 - 919#
5664 - 869#

919# Better make sure your dentures are glued in securely!



Based on the stock installed height of these springs, here is how much lower the springs would be per full coil cut:

5660 - 1.90"
5662 - 2.04"
5664 - 1.80"

So it looks like approximately a 1" drop per half coil cut for these three part numbers.
You'll be well advised to get some sort of upgrade in the shock/strut department even for a cruiser. The ride will probably suffer a bit without good shocks.
Old 01-24-2009, 07:25 AM
  #82  
Junior Member

 
Frank D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: St Leonard, MD
Posts: 16
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 Z28
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700
Axle/Gears: Yes
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

Good gouge and did not think about someone asking the same queston every month!!! That can get old.... so thanks for the response. I have about 160 K on the car so I am going to get the shocks/springs and sway bars in the same package and replace the bushings as needed. I cleaning up the differential and was wondering if you had tweeked your rear end at all. I have it out a thought now is a good time if I am going to do it. Also any thoughts on drives shaft? One last question? Is that your white '91? Nice ride! I will be looking for a convertable after this one. Planet.
Old 01-24-2009, 08:19 AM
  #83  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
91_5.7_TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: East Tennesse
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

I wrote this hoping it would be stickied so people can see it when they come on to ask similar questions, but it never was. Another member and myself are writing a more complete version, so we'll see how that goes.
What size are the bars you have? Replacing them isn't always something you have to do. If they are small, and you want to replace them, make sure to keep your stockers- they are a good tuning tool. I replaced my factory 2.73 open/drum brake rear end with a rear from a 95 Z28 3.23posi/disk. I've heard replacing the stock drive shaft with a aluminum one from LS1 car (98-02) is a good idea. Frees up a few extra horsepower and eliminates some vibration. I've not done it, but I want to.
Yeah, that's my car. It's in the body shop getting some front end damage repaired right now. Click on my sig pic for a link to my CarDomain if you want.
Old 01-24-2009, 11:37 PM
  #84  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
racing geek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,525
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 with Edelbrock ProFlow EFI
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 12 bolt 3.73 Eaton posi
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

I'm not sure exactly how much will be gained in a thridgen, but I read about someone with a 4thgen switching from the steel driveshaft to the 3" aluminum piece and the dyno results showed an increase of 3 hp and 5 ft/lbs. The person said that after driving the car, they noticed a huge difference in throttle response and that the car didn't vibrate nearly as much when they took it up to 80+mph.

Food for thought,
Mike
Old 01-25-2009, 07:21 AM
  #85  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (17)
 
compuwiz1937's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,086
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2012 Corvette
Engine: LS3
Transmission: TR6060
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

Originally Posted by racing geek
I'm not sure exactly how much will be gained in a thridgen, but I read about someone with a 4thgen switching from the steel driveshaft to the 3" aluminum piece and the dyno results showed an increase of 3 hp and 5 ft/lbs. The person said that after driving the car, they noticed a huge difference in throttle response and that the car didn't vibrate nearly as much when they took it up to 80+mph.

Food for thought,
Mike
That's probably true because the aluminum shaft decreases turning mass. However, the difference in throttle response and less vibration is probably because his u-joints on his old shaft were worn out.
Old 01-29-2009, 12:24 AM
  #86  
Supreme Member

 
blyth18md's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Western Maryland
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 82z28
Engine: 406
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle

Whats the taper on our tie rods?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Silver Spear
South East Region
18
12-04-2015 09:59 PM
88SS6SPEED
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
7
11-11-2015 07:05 AM
Nervous2
Firebirds for Sale
2
10-08-2015 10:53 PM
Numbah-1
Transmissions and Drivetrain
8
10-02-2015 08:27 AM
ndndndnd
Transmissions and Drivetrain
4
09-28-2015 08:00 AM



Quick Reply: Lowering/Making an F-Body handle



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:28 PM.