Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-18-2007, 01:54 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Josh R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: Iroc
Engine: 350 4-bolt
Transmission: T5 non-W/C
Axle/Gears: 3.27 Open
HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

My friend has a 2001 Passat, and says that it handles better than my Iroc-Z. I know Irocs could pull .92 g's and his car can only do .81 or around there. Do Irocs still hold there own when it comes to handling vs. new cars?
Old 08-18-2007, 02:14 PM
  #2  
Moderator

iTrader: (5)
 
JamesC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 19,282
Received 94 Likes on 69 Posts
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

Depends, I'd guess. If your IROC is still equipped with 20+ year-old rubber bushings, springs, struts and stocks, and perhaps inadequate tires, the car isn't going to do .92. Replace those things and you'll note a difference--so will your friend.

JamesC

Last edited by JamesC; 08-18-2007 at 02:27 PM.
Old 08-18-2007, 03:55 PM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Josh R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: Iroc
Engine: 350 4-bolt
Transmission: T5 non-W/C
Axle/Gears: 3.27 Open
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

i was talking to someone and they said that the IROC will hold a turn faster and longer, but the passat can probably go from turn to turn a little easier because its lighter and VW's have always been known for their handling. I guess i can agree with that. The IROCs are kinda big and heavy. If anyone else has input on the topic please let me know.
Old 08-18-2007, 04:48 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,666
Likes: 0
Received 50 Likes on 48 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

you should re-do your suspension anyway, its old. Ive found that these old f-bodies handle well, and ive thrown mine around quite a bit and i find it to be very stable, so long as you can keep your foot out of the gas
Old 08-18-2007, 05:08 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Pablo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,257
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: Turbo Buick
Engine: 3.8 V6
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

you should go to an auto x and compare times (assuming you are both competent drivers)

The idea that Thirdgen F bodies handle poorly is a common misconception among euro snobs. They also seem to think every German car made is a good performer in the turns.

If your suspension was at least at stock (new) specs you should kill him. This is assuming you have the top tier suspension components to start with. You won't pull .92 gs on the 15" iroc wheels. (I forgot what year they went to 16x8) Unfortunately the number of F bodies on the road with new suspension components instead of worn out ones is small.
Old 08-18-2007, 05:10 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
91_5.7_TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: East Tennesse
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

Rebuild the suspension with new bushings and (with research) replace certain componets and I feel that you will have a superior handling car.
Old 08-18-2007, 06:17 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,771
Received 375 Likes on 303 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

i got new shocks/springs/lca's/torque arm/panhard bar, wonderbar, etc and mostly new rear bushings as those parts came with new stuff. The car scares me in turns. it will hold them as hard as you want to push it, as long as you dont try to accelerate out, it will spin tire and start fishing. i think its just that my tires are worn. New tires should grip better but the car is just too torquey for those small meats

the car is begging for a front suspension rebuild and new bushings up front tho. the steering is kinda sloppy and quick back to back maneuvers, the car doesnt like it.
Old 08-19-2007, 12:41 AM
  #8  
Senior Member

 
92BLKL98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Powder Springs, Georgia, USA
Posts: 794
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1992 Black Z28 Hardtop
Axle/Gears: 2002 10 bolt w/3:23
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

Rebuild that 15+ year old suspension and you will surprise yourself and more than a few late model owners. Use premium parts and poly bushings. If possible and money alows rebuild both front and rearends. Use adjustable components so you can dial in your suspension. Buy good tires. I have given lessons to a few cocky import owners. These cars can definitely handle but like anything else their parts wear out and need TLC. And, most importantly learn your car and how to drive it.

Last edited by 92BLKL98; 08-19-2007 at 12:54 AM.
Old 08-19-2007, 01:56 AM
  #9  
Senior Member

iTrader: (10)
 
92droptopws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 877
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 90 RS
Engine: 5.0 TBI
Transmission: Slushbox
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

the absolute best cornering car i have EVER owned!
add more HP and you will have those porshe,ferrari and Lambo owners freakin out
Old 08-19-2007, 03:21 AM
  #10  
Member
 
green92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: ANDERSON SC
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 92 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

I have to agree with all that has been said so far. Our cars can burn the road up if your smart and maintain them properly. I just recently rebuilt my front end and upgraded the springs to eibach's all the way around and put lakewood lower arms out back the only 2 things im missing are an adjustable panhard rod and a wonderbar (never knew that the wonderbar existed till i got on here). But my car made a drastic change when i did all this to it.
Old 08-19-2007, 08:21 AM
  #11  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
coolram62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Beaufort South Carolina
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1983 Camaro Z/28
Engine: LU5 305 CFI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: J65/G80/G92-3.23
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

You will notice a very nice difference once you install the front steering brace(aka wonderbar).At least it did to me on my '83 Z28.The benefits that come with it(especially releaving stress on the frame at the steering box mounts) every F-body should have come with it from the factory.
Old 08-19-2007, 11:06 AM
  #12  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (10)
 
86NiteRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Somewhere around the South Side of Chicago just crusin' in one of the Niteriders
Posts: 3,242
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 92RS 25th Anniv./88 IROC Z28 Vert
Engine: 305 TBI w/Tpi Air / 305 TPI
Transmission: 700r4/700r4
Axle/Gears: Posi
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

When you add the wonderbar you will notice an improvement, especially if you have a car that twist a lot like the T Top cars.

I love our handling. I too have added many new or updated parts to my suspension and I love the handling. When I drive my sons 2006 Mustang I pend the whole time wishing I was driving my Camaros.
Old 08-19-2007, 11:37 AM
  #13  
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Josh R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: Iroc
Engine: 350 4-bolt
Transmission: T5 non-W/C
Axle/Gears: 3.27 Open
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

yeah. I thought my car would handle better. I just put new tires on it and i have the 16x8 stock rims. The car only has 47,000 miles on it, all though it was sitting for most of those years. The bushings are probably dried out. Does lowering our cars do a lot? I want to get airbags, so i can raise it and lower when i want. I would put lowering springs on it but i like these cars higher up, and where i live i would bottom out on everything.
Old 08-19-2007, 05:32 PM
  #14  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Zepher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Norfolk, VA. USA
Posts: 7,964
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 88 Formula
Engine: 95LT4, 305TPI
Transmission: T56, T5
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

tires and stiff suspension are what you need.
Here are a couple of images from my first try with real race rubber.


Old 08-19-2007, 05:47 PM
  #15  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,771
Received 375 Likes on 303 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

damn that thing is turning hard lol
Old 08-19-2007, 06:02 PM
  #16  
Junior Member
 
OkanaganIroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 Iroc-z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: Modified T-5 World class
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt borg-warner 3.45
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

I don't know much about Imports but when I auto crossed my Iroc I was running the course with the same times as simular year's corvettes. Only when the later years cars came on the track with their tractiopn control and anti-lock brakes did they run faster.
I'd have to agree with Josh R though. the weight difference between the cars does make a difference in their ability to throw themselves into a corner.
Old 08-20-2007, 10:46 AM
  #17  
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Josh R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: Iroc
Engine: 350 4-bolt
Transmission: T5 non-W/C
Axle/Gears: 3.27 Open
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

yeah, thats why i was wondering if having even a lower than stock stance would reduce the tendency for IROCs to "sit" on corners.
Old 08-20-2007, 11:25 AM
  #18  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,771
Received 375 Likes on 303 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

lowering helps...it lowers the center of gravity which eliminates body roll and such.
Old 08-20-2007, 01:36 PM
  #19  
Supreme Member

 
Tobias05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: any clime or place...
Posts: 2,779
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro SC, 1999 Z28
Engine: GMPP 350HO, LS1
Transmission: Built 700r4/EDGE 3200, T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton 7.625, 3.42 Zexel Torsen
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

I've got an 87 Sport coupe, with iroc springs, kyb gr-2 shocks/struts, 36MM hollow front swaybar, poly endlinks front/back, wonderbar, sfcs, tubular lcas, relocation brackets, slp zr1s w/ kumho 711's, quick ratio steering box, and new centerlink, tie rods, idler arm.

working on the ragjoint as we speak.

she handles amazingly, and i didn't end up spending a lot of cash.
Old 08-20-2007, 04:19 PM
  #20  
Supreme Member
 
19doug90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Markham
Posts: 2,494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro
Engine: 355ci
Transmission: TKO-600 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10 bolt
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

stock the irocs are around .78 on the skidpad, however install subframe connectors and it jumps to around .92

obviously if you race a tiny little Vdub on a really small auto cross course he would win, tight cornering it just makes sense that a smaller car will have the advantage.

but open up a little more space between the cones, or for that matter get out on an actual race track, that little german piece of junk wont touch a camaro when it comes to high speed cornering

and if you want to go even better as everyone already mentioned, poly bushings all around, some eibach sportlines, good shocks, LCA's and relocation brackets, panhard rod and a wonderbar if your car didnt come with one. Youll be amazed what the car can do
Old 08-20-2007, 04:24 PM
  #21  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Zepher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Norfolk, VA. USA
Posts: 7,964
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 88 Formula
Engine: 95LT4, 305TPI
Transmission: T56, T5
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

Poly all around is a no no for cornering. too much bind.
Old 08-20-2007, 04:33 PM
  #22  
Supreme Member
 
19doug90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Markham
Posts: 2,494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro
Engine: 355ci
Transmission: TKO-600 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10 bolt
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

where do you reccomend not using poly?
Old 08-20-2007, 05:28 PM
  #23  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

LCA's on both ends. Use a rod end on one end to eliminate the bind.
The panhard rod has much less tendancy to bind.

I actually finally experienced bind a little while ago, accelerating onto an on ramp, there's a slight bump that only one side of my car feels - hit the bump and it KICKS the rear around like a fishtail, but I wasn't on the gas hard enough for that. It's a strange feeling. I have boxed LCA's with poly/poly. I'll be swapping to aluminum tubular with rod ends on both sidese, and delrin reducers instead.
Old 08-20-2007, 08:43 PM
  #24  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
91_5.7_TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: East Tennesse
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

I wouldn't do Sportlines...they aren't a spring for handling. The Pro-Kit isn't much better, but the Sportline is WAY too soft for the ride height.
And yes, all poly isn't a good idea in a cornering car. It binds in cornering as described above (experienced it quiet a few times).

Here is a link to the LCAs I made to negate the binding of poly and the rough ride of dual rod ends.
Old 08-20-2007, 10:28 PM
  #25  
Senior Member

 
SDIF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 Z/28, 89 RS Race Car
Engine: 305 stock / ZZ4 AFR 195 9.7:1
Transmission: T5 / t10 / Jerico
Axle/Gears: 10blt w 3.42, 9 in w /3.80 DL
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

Put 36 psi in front tires and 28 in the rear.

Then come back and tell us how it turns.
Old 08-20-2007, 11:19 PM
  #26  
Senior Member

 
92BLKL98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Powder Springs, Georgia, USA
Posts: 794
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1992 Black Z28 Hardtop
Axle/Gears: 2002 10 bolt w/3:23
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

My LCA's have poly bushings on the chassis end and spherical bearings on the axle end. I have not experienced any problems with binding with this design LCA. My PHB has poly on both ends. I use the Spohn Torque Arm with spherical bearings on each end. My front end it all poly, if I rebuild the front end again I want to use a tubular "K" member and "A" arms with del-a-lum bushings and possibly a coil over kit. The suspension is noisy at low speeds but to me it is not a problem. The suspension is predictable and it feels good to me. When I rebuilt it two years ago I used all MOOG problem solver components and I was really impressed with the Hotchkis tie rod sleeves, awsome. Install some subframe connectors they help a lot. A wonder bar and strut tower brace is good. When you do these mods you add some weight but it is worth it. Added weight comes from the wonder bar, STB, SFC's, The Spohn T/A and cross member, and heavy duty parts but you can cut weight in other areas to compensate.
Old 08-22-2007, 11:24 PM
  #27  
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Josh R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: Iroc
Engine: 350 4-bolt
Transmission: T5 non-W/C
Axle/Gears: 3.27 Open
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

wait, it says that the irocs pulled .92g's. Was that with or without subframe connectors?
Old 08-23-2007, 10:09 AM
  #28  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (17)
 
compuwiz1937's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,086
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2012 Corvette
Engine: LS3
Transmission: TR6060
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

The suspension setup on these cars is so simple yet so effective. Just because of the suspension work I've done, even though it has a V6, my car is some hellacious fun to drive. So far I've got: V6 1" drop springs (I can't remember the brand, I think it starts with an "I"), KYB GR2 struts, KYB Gas-A-Just shocks, TDS Wonderbar, 24mm rear sway bar, 36mm front sway bar, and 275/40/17 BFG rubber. I've got some UMI SFCs waiting to be installed too. I also want to get a new rag joint. Poly bushings will come when I eventually do an LS1 swap with a tubular k-member and a-arms, not sure about the rears though.
Old 08-23-2007, 12:11 PM
  #29  
Supreme Member
 
19doug90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Markham
Posts: 2,494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro
Engine: 355ci
Transmission: TKO-600 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10 bolt
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

Originally Posted by Josh R
wait, it says that the irocs pulled .92g's. Was that with or without subframe connectors?
i read a chevy high performance article once that said its like .78 from the factory, and then they installed sfc's and it went up to .92

our cars are so soft that from the factory the whole car twists instead of the suspension actually being able to do its job. Tighten the car up and the suspension can actually be effective

on a side note our cars also turn about .04 better to the left then to the right
Old 08-23-2007, 12:24 PM
  #30  
Senior Member

iTrader: (4)
 
atc3434's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Weedsport, NY
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1986 Camaro SC
Engine: Bolt-on/cam 305
Transmission: 700R4 w/ 2500stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10bolt Posi
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

The car in my signature would outhandle a Passat w/o breaking a sweat. So would any halfway maintained IROC car w/ decent rubber. Whoever mentioned the smaller cars auto-x so much better is right, but only to a point, there are plenty of bigger, rwd cars that can auto-x very well, third gen Camaro's and Corvettes being two of the big ones, the rwd Nissans also handle very well. The 3rd gen is supposedly a better handling car than the later 4th and 5th gen Camaros, a fact which even most 4th and 5th gen owners will agree with. Take a car like the 350Z, an decently built suspension on a 3rd gen can be just as much car from a handling perspective as that car is capable of.
Old 08-23-2007, 02:10 PM
  #31  
Supreme Member

 
antman89iroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: huntsville, al
Posts: 1,440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 IROC
Engine: 6.8 HSR N2O
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: 9" Moser 3.50 True trac
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

Originally Posted by atc3434
The 3rd gen is supposedly a better handling car than the later 4th and 5th gen Camaros
Did I miss something? By 5 gen do you mean 98+ LS1?
Old 08-23-2007, 03:20 PM
  #32  
Member
 
green92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: ANDERSON SC
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 92 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

Im with you antman, I thought all 4th gen covered 93 up ive never heard of 98 up beign a 5th gen
Old 08-23-2007, 03:40 PM
  #33  
Member

 
Rayvan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '89 Formula WS6 N10 No T-Tops
Engine: LB9 225HP
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:45BW
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

Originally Posted by 19doug90
i read a chevy high performance article once that said its like .78 from the factory, and then they installed sfc's and it went up to .92

our cars are so soft that from the factory the whole car twists instead of the suspension actually being able to do its job. Tighten the car up and the suspension can actually be effective

on a side note our cars also turn about .04 better to the left then to the right
I have a C&D from 1989 where they tested a Firbird Formula WS6 at .89 G
Old 08-23-2007, 07:34 PM
  #34  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
91_5.7_TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: East Tennesse
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

4th Gens run from 93-02. The 5th gens are the new cars that are going on sale in 09.

I need to get SFCs for my car. And it sucks that the car turns better to the left than the right....how many Interstate exits exit to the left.
Old 08-23-2007, 10:14 PM
  #35  
Senior Member

iTrader: (4)
 
atc3434's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Weedsport, NY
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1986 Camaro SC
Engine: Bolt-on/cam 305
Transmission: 700R4 w/ 2500stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10bolt Posi
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

I am making assumptions about the 5th gen, 2009 model. I'm assuming while being a reasonable handling car, it will be bigger, and heavier, much like the GTO on maybe a little less wheelbase. The LT1-LS1's would be 4th gens (to me).
Old 08-24-2007, 12:21 AM
  #36  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
92rs85berlintta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: check under the car
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: White 25th Anniversary RS
Engine: lt1
Transmission: t56
Axle/Gears: 4:10
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

being a huge VW fan and owning a few I can say with confidence a luxury car called a passat has nothing on a fresh set of bushing in a Z. Luxury hell yea, race car hell no. Passats are wide, thats all they have going for them in that dept.
Old 02-19-2008, 07:02 PM
  #37  
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Josh R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: Iroc
Engine: 350 4-bolt
Transmission: T5 non-W/C
Axle/Gears: 3.27 Open
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

Just to add to this thread. My friend wrecked is Passat taking a turn to fast. It understeered and went straight into a tree. My friends a relatively good driver to. So much for German Engineering.

Now hes got an Acura RSX Type-S. I hoping to out handle that car. Idk though cause its a darn tight ride.
Old 02-19-2008, 07:12 PM
  #38  
Senior Member

iTrader: (13)
 
mike_c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fallston, Maryland
Posts: 520
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt 3.70
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

Originally Posted by Josh R
Just to add to this thread. My friend wrecked is Passat taking a turn to fast. It understeered and went straight into a tree. My friends a relatively good driver to. So much for German Engineering.

Now hes got an Acura RSX Type-S. I hoping to out handle that car. Idk though cause its a darn tight ride.
There's some irony for you.
Old 02-19-2008, 08:20 PM
  #39  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
91_5.7_TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: East Tennesse
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

You'll be able to do it. Just do the right mods and don't cheap out. Or, you could buy my car.
Old 02-19-2008, 08:36 PM
  #40  
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Josh R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: Iroc
Engine: 350 4-bolt
Transmission: T5 non-W/C
Axle/Gears: 3.27 Open
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

haha I would if i could afford it. Your car is damn nice. I like the 91-92 lowered but not my style lowered (85-90), which is a bummer cause i don't want to put the newer ground effects on. Im gonna do everything i can from the stock ride height. Mostly frame stiffening upgrades and bushings.

Speaking of frames, should i do inner SFC and outer SFC??? I was considering it, i want my car to be rock solid. I was going to also try and find a strut bar and new wonderbar.
Old 02-19-2008, 09:04 PM
  #41  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
91_5.7_TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: East Tennesse
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

Thank you. I wish I didn't have as much in it as I do. I can never sale the thing, I'd loose my hiney... especially after I finish the LS1 swap.

You can do plenty from the stock ride height. Just replace the bushings/steering linkages, get some Moog IROC replacement springs, a good set of shocks, some sticky tires, SFCs, wonder bar, upgrade the sway bars ( I reccomend getting a selection of GM bars), etc.
I have a set of Spohn SFCs, just haven't installed them yet. I've not heard anything bad about them, but some people prefer other brands. To my thinking, the outer SFC would offer more stiffness for the car.
Old 02-19-2008, 10:44 PM
  #42  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
racing geek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,525
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 with Edelbrock ProFlow EFI
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 12 bolt 3.73 Eaton posi
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

I'm surprised to see this thread is still going after seeing how old it is. Anyway, I would think that even with 15+ year old bushings you could take a Passat.

I plan on replacing most bushings in the front of my IROC with poly and swapping in some koni yellows and some race rubber (leaning towards Kuhmo)for the coming autox season. I came in 9th out of about 200 people for the stock class in my region so I think I faired well in my bone stock IROC and my dads dodge dakota sport (used for first half of season because I didnt have my car yet... I'm still 16).

--------------------
A little off topic but with 6 year old tires (still origanal from factory) and stock everything on my dads truck, I still experianced some major body roll...
HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?-license-delete-1-1.jpg

Last edited by racing geek; 02-20-2008 at 04:03 PM.
Old 02-20-2008, 08:37 AM
  #43  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
91_5.7_TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: East Tennesse
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

Nice job coming in 9th, especially with a stock car.
With all my mods, I blew majorly last time I auto-x. I'd only done it once before and my rear bar (the 25) caused major throttle-oversteer. That kinda killed the times. I still was about 3 or 4 seconds slower than the fastest car there, and they run all the time. The course is open every Tuesday and Thursday during the summer along with the drag strip. I need to swap out the 25mm rear bar for a 24 or 21 and give it another go... after some more practice.
Old 02-21-2008, 02:13 AM
  #44  
Supreme Member

 
stingerssx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: So. Cal, L.A.
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '88 Firebird Formula 350
Engine: Built 383 TPI
Transmission: Built 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt, 3.27:1 Posi
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

I don't mean to be negative, but from the factory, a non-performance suspension (IE not WS6 or 1LE) pulled .86g where a fourth gen pulled .88g with stock suspension. WS6 pulled .89g for the third gen. Fourth gen WS6 was .92g. But with a little work, (stiffer sway bars, wonder bar, lower profile tires, and an alignment) the third gen WS6 could do 1.0g. Adding struts & shocks, LCA's, urathane bushings, larger wheels and lowering it would bring you around .121g.

I can't say that the stiffer the spring the better. Your friend with the Passat will have a better ride quality and being able to handle pretty well due to progressive rate springs. It will have more initial body roll than your Iroc, but having the softer springs keeps the tire in contact with the road. If you have a perfectly flat, tight turn track (Autocross) then the stiffer spring the better. But streets in real life are not smooth. This is what the suspension was created for.

So to keep the tire touching the ground, you want a firm spring, but not to stiff. My Formula has Eibachs with Tokico Illuminas and it's too stiff for the street. And on the freeway, sometimes the back come out. The 11O Pasadena freeway here is an old tight freeway (the first in the nation) so it was made for a top speed of about 50mph. I can almost go faster in my wifes Civic than in my bird. But we also have a mountain road called Angeles Crest Hwy that connects L.A. to Palmdale. On that road, I can go pretty fast. Almost keep up with the crotch rockets, but they still spank me. It gets pretty scarry at 100mph around a turn, then hitting a small dip.
Old 02-22-2008, 07:56 AM
  #45  
Member

iTrader: (5)
 
luke4907's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: WPB, FL
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: '89 Trans Am GTA
Engine: TPI350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: BW 3.27s
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

Originally Posted by Josh R
Just to add to this thread. My friend wrecked is Passat taking a turn to fast. It understeered and went straight into a tree. My friends a relatively good driver to. So much for German Engineering.

Now hes got an Acura RSX Type-S. I hoping to out handle that car. Idk though cause its a darn tight ride.
I'd recommend not driving anywhere within 50 miles of your friend while he's driving. I'd also stay out of any vehicles where he's behind the driver seat.
Old 02-22-2008, 09:54 AM
  #46  
Senior Member

iTrader: (4)
 
atc3434's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Weedsport, NY
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1986 Camaro SC
Engine: Bolt-on/cam 305
Transmission: 700R4 w/ 2500stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10bolt Posi
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

Originally Posted by stingerssx
I can almost go faster in my wifes Civic than in my bird.

I have a hard time believing that one... I can't see a Civic out-handling a stock f-body, let alone one with respectable suspension upgrades... The Civic probably feels more stable, but I'm sure the Bird is actually able to corner signifigantly quicker. Althought, you didn't mention the rubber you're running... crappy tires w/ an aggresive suspension are a sure ticket to instability when the limits are tested.

Last edited by atc3434; 02-22-2008 at 09:58 AM.
Old 02-22-2008, 10:07 AM
  #47  
Moderator

iTrader: (5)
 
JamesC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 19,282
Received 94 Likes on 69 Posts
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

According the the Camaro White Book, for what it's worth, the IROC in 85 "was capable of .92g's in skidpad tests and seven-second 0-60 times, all in showroom trim."

JamesC
Old 02-22-2008, 03:56 PM
  #48  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
customblackbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: northern New Jersey
Posts: 4,649
Received 57 Likes on 40 Posts
Car: 87 TA clone
Engine: 70/70 Turbo 5.3 LS
Transmission: bullet proof 2004R
Axle/Gears: ford 8.8, 3.55 gears
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

there was an article in CHP they upgraded a IROC with all the suspenion upgrades. poly, strut brace, Sub frames, blisten shocks, hotckins springs, LCA, and panhard rod. cant remember of tq arm. but they put on some 16x9's and this thing outhandled, ferrarri, porshe, new ZO6's, masserartii, s2000, etc it wooped them in shalom, skidpad, and g's. i think it pulled over 1.00 G in the turns. they said it was freaky how this thing dominated.

ive got almost everything done in my SIG, except, strut brace and tq arm(tq arm shorty jegster have goin in with new motor and custom strut brace. and 6 pt cage) and ive outhandled BMW's and mercedes AMG's a few times. as said before just dont gas it comin out of the corners or ur @ss end will swing around. prob with out cars is that they are light in the rear, and TPIs are tq lil b@stards

my car is the best handling car ive been in including my bros 68 vette that has a 30,000$ suspension top notch.
Old 02-22-2008, 05:11 PM
  #49  
Supreme Member

 
v10viper04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NY sucks
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 84' Corvette, 96' Caprice
Engine: LT1, L99
Transmission: T-56, 4L60e
Axle/Gears: 3.07 POSI, 2.93 Open
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

what exactly is diff in an IROC setup suspension compared to an RS? And waht is the wonderbar? any pics of it? is it like a strong replacement for a swaybar?
Old 02-22-2008, 05:42 PM
  #50  
Moderator

iTrader: (5)
 
JamesC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 19,282
Received 94 Likes on 69 Posts
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Re: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?

Originally Posted by v10viper04
And waht is the wonderbar? any pics of it? is it like a strong replacement for a swaybar?
The Wonderbar reinforces the steering box area and is a separate piece from the sway. Here's an after market version (in black):

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/atta...what-36mm2.jpg

JamesC


Quick Reply: HOw do Irocs compare in handling to new cars?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:38 AM.