Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Front end Alignment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-01-2006, 12:26 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
rleprechaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lyon,MS
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 TransAm
Engine: 350 Goodwrench
Transmission: 700R-4
Front end Alignment

What are the front end alignment settings for a 1987 TransAM (1) street (2) ultra high preformance street (3) road race?
Old 04-02-2006, 01:03 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Jade Grey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Irmo, SC
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 Pontiac GTA
Engine: 305TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt, 2.73
Here's two links for ya.

https://www.thirdgen.org/newdesign/f...tml#suspension

http://www.fl-thirdgen.org/alignmentspecs.html

HTH
Old 04-02-2006, 08:15 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (45)
 
Stevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 3,970
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: Pair of 92 Z28s
What do some of you other guys do? I have to take my car in for alignment tommaro should i tell him the high performance street specs or just have him align it "the regular way"

Is this all just a matter of how long my tires will last?
Old 04-13-2006, 10:09 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member

 
CamarosRUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Louisville, Ky
Posts: 3,155
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 383
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.08 10 Bolt
ttt
Old 04-13-2006, 11:38 PM
  #5  
COTM Editor

iTrader: (11)
 
BADNBLK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: WINDSOR, CO
Posts: 4,098
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Car: 91 Z28, 87 SC, 90 IROC, 92 RS
Engine: LS1, 305 TPI, L98, NADA
Transmission: T56, 700r4's, and NADA
Axle/Gears: 3.89, 3.42, 3.23, NADA
Originally Posted by §teve
What do some of you other guys do? I have to take my car in for alignment tommaro should i tell him the high performance street specs or just have him align it "the regular way"

Is this all just a matter of how long my tires will last?
A couple of years ago I had the alignment shop use autocross alignment specs on my car. I got these specs from a 82-92 performance book (with red z28 on cover). I felt like this did a great job with handling, but I did not think that the reason why I had the car aligned was because I just lowered it. I recently had the car aligned again, and had them do the "norm", it is so much better than previous. I would recommend a standard alignment unless you really need it.
Old 04-14-2006, 07:28 AM
  #6  
Supreme Member

 
CamarosRUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Louisville, Ky
Posts: 3,155
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 383
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.08 10 Bolt
why was this stock alignment so much better? comfort, tire wear, handling???
Old 04-14-2006, 10:07 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Crusin' 1980's's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 SC Camaro
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700-R4
BADNBLCK, what were the Autocross settings that you had that you didn't like? I was thinking about going with this for an Alignment...I thought it would be a little more aggeessive on the street...

Camber - .5
Caster + 4, + 4.5
Toe 1/16 In
Old 04-14-2006, 11:14 AM
  #8  
Supreme Member

 
CamarosRUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Louisville, Ky
Posts: 3,155
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 383
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.08 10 Bolt
thats EXACTLY what specs im going with. should be agressive for the street but not too bad to kill my tires and still keep some straightline stability
Old 04-14-2006, 12:12 PM
  #9  
COTM Editor

iTrader: (11)
 
BADNBLK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: WINDSOR, CO
Posts: 4,098
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Car: 91 Z28, 87 SC, 90 IROC, 92 RS
Engine: LS1, 305 TPI, L98, NADA
Transmission: T56, 700r4's, and NADA
Axle/Gears: 3.89, 3.42, 3.23, NADA
When I had the autocross settings it felt improved, but I think the improvement I was really feeling was the lowering springs, not the alignment. After getting it straight with factory settings the steering felt more responsive and less tendancy to pull on smooth roads, and even less pull from ruts in the pavement. My car would follow the ruts in roads badly I though mainly from the 275x17s on the front, but it is now improved with factory alignment. As far as what the setting were, I would have to pull out that book and get them for you to compare. I will try and do that for you tonight after work.
Old 04-14-2006, 11:22 PM
  #10  
Member
Thread Starter
 
rleprechaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lyon,MS
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 TransAm
Engine: 350 Goodwrench
Transmission: 700R-4
Alignment

I sure want to know you aggresive settings. I am running in a track day May 20.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
customblackbird
Suspension and Chassis
4
08-15-2021 10:16 PM
Terrell351
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
06-13-2021 01:13 PM
Amillionoh7
Suspension and Chassis
24
05-24-2020 08:01 AM
bellez77
Body
14
09-05-2015 08:39 PM
johanlindgren
Wheels and Tires
5
08-06-2015 03:32 PM



Quick Reply: Front end Alignment



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:53 AM.