Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Wonder Bar Placement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-2006, 08:58 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Meinherr49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mays Landing New Jersey
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Pontiac Formula 350TPI HARDTOP
Engine: 04- 350 Crate Motor with Crane Cam
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt Posi 3.73:1
Wonder Bar Placement

This is a Pic. of a Factory Stock Wonder Bar for 3RD Gen. Camaros . But this Suspension Component can Also be installed in 3RD Gen. Firebirds to . It is installed using the Front Sway Bar Mounts . The After Market Wonder Bars have a THIRD Mounting Hole to connect to the Front Chassis for a More Solid Mount .
Sice I Installed one in my 88 Formula , I have Noticed a Improvement in Handling during High Speed Turns . A Worthy Addition to anyone who wants to Upgrade their Suspensions on their F Body .
Attached Thumbnails Wonder Bar Placement-wonder-bar-placement-front.jpg  
Old 01-28-2006, 09:00 PM
  #2  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Meinherr49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mays Landing New Jersey
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Pontiac Formula 350TPI HARDTOP
Engine: 04- 350 Crate Motor with Crane Cam
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt Posi 3.73:1
Wonder Bar

Here is a PIC. of the After Market Wonder Bar . Powder Coated Red .
Attached Thumbnails Wonder Bar Placement-after-market-wonder-bar.jpg  
Old 01-28-2006, 09:19 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Meinherr49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mays Landing New Jersey
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Pontiac Formula 350TPI HARDTOP
Engine: 04- 350 Crate Motor with Crane Cam
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt Posi 3.73:1
Wonder Bar

And here is a PIC> of a Factory Stock Wonder bar . Notice the Difference ?
Attached Thumbnails Wonder Bar Placement-wonder-bar-front-steering  
Old 01-29-2006, 07:17 AM
  #4  
Moderator

iTrader: (5)
 
JamesC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 19,282
Received 94 Likes on 69 Posts
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Mein,

I'm glad that you've discovered the wonderbar. Many members here run them, stock or after market. Wonderbars, SFC's, and STB's seem to be the principle components for strengthening our cars.

JamesC
Old 01-31-2006, 08:35 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Meinherr49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mays Landing New Jersey
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Pontiac Formula 350TPI HARDTOP
Engine: 04- 350 Crate Motor with Crane Cam
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt Posi 3.73:1
STB's

James , Could you possibly explain the Benefits of having a strut tower brace on a Third Gen . F Body ? Also , what is the difference between the 2 Point Brace and the 3 Point Brace ? On TPI Engines , It seems the STB is a Tight fit , and could effect the ability to Close the hood correctly , especially if the Hood Insulation is on the Car . Just wondering if it would be worth the Money and Effort in installing an STB in my Car to increase it's Performance .
Attached Thumbnails Wonder Bar Placement-hotchkiss-strut-tower-brace  
Old 02-01-2006, 01:34 AM
  #6  
Supreme Member

 
Xophertony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Or-eh-gun
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 2012 Nissan Leaf
Engine: 80-kW AC synchronous electric motor
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: n/a
if you noticed a difference you may want to visualy inspect the area where your steering box mounts to your frame, there may be cracking
Old 02-01-2006, 06:08 AM
  #7  
Moderator

iTrader: (5)
 
JamesC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 19,282
Received 94 Likes on 69 Posts
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
The wonderbar is a preventative measure, IMO, as it protects the gear box area from developing stress cracks. Some members claim that it tightens up the front of the car--I have no opinion there as my IROC came equipped with the piece. STB's and SFC's eliminate flex in our cars' uni-body and generally strengthen its structural integrity. The two-point brace aids in side to side stability (cornering), the three-point aids in front-end flex (the more flex that's eliminated, the better the performance). The first mod I'd advise is SFC's. I believe most members would agree. You might consider a search about the hood issue. That said, whether a STB will fit YOUR car or not may come down to purchasing one and mocking it up.

JamesC
Old 02-01-2006, 12:30 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member
 
Nate86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1999 Saturn SL2
Engine: 4 cylinder
Transmission: 4-speed automatic
I've also heard from other members on the forum that an STB only offers a limited amount of help on a near-stock car (suspension wise) because of the type of strut mounts that came with the cars from the factory. A more solid strut mount, such as Sphon's steel variation, should alleviate this particular problem. In any case, having an STB installed with the stock strut mounts will definately help carve corners better than not having one at all.

That said, this is all from what I have read from other members on this board. I have no personal experience with STBs but I plan on installing one on my car in the future.
Old 02-01-2006, 05:53 PM
  #9  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Meinherr49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mays Landing New Jersey
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Pontiac Formula 350TPI HARDTOP
Engine: 04- 350 Crate Motor with Crane Cam
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt Posi 3.73:1
Suspension Up Grades

Thanks Nate for your Imput on this Topic . And James , ALL Pontiac 3RD Gen F Bodies with TPI have the Same Hood Clearence when it comes to Installing a STB . I also have New Hood Insulation Installed in my Formula wich makes things even Tighter Under there . I had to Position my Engine Hood Light off to the Passengers Side of the Inner Hood . When I tried to Position it in the Middle of the Hood , it Hit the TPI Plate , and I could not Close the Hood . My Point is , the STB might Force you to Adjust the Hood Height in order for you to Close the Hood Correctly . That is my main Concern when thinking of getting one for My Particular Car . Welded Sub Framed Connectors are my Next Install I think , and Maybe a Set of Custom Traction Bars . I have a Posi Rear , but on Quick takeoffs , I get that Wheel Hop we all know about . I also have the Stock Torque Arm . I was pondering Up Grading that to . Thanks Again for your response to this post . I appreciate your Advice ..........Mark
Old 02-01-2006, 06:47 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Crusin' 1980's's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 SC Camaro
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700-R4
On the stock wonderbar, there are 3 holes on each side, but on the TDS wonderbar, there are 4 holes....what does the extra hole do?....does it require a sepcial bolt or something?
Old 02-01-2006, 07:55 PM
  #11  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Meinherr49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mays Landing New Jersey
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Pontiac Formula 350TPI HARDTOP
Engine: 04- 350 Crate Motor with Crane Cam
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt Posi 3.73:1
Wonderbar

That extra Hole is for Taking Advantage of a Factory Chassis Hole near the Front Sway Bar . It connects the bar to the Chassis , and Gives it more Strenght . The After Market Wonder Bars are Far Superior to the Stock OEM ones . I Noticed on mine , that I do not have to Brake that Much on Sharp High Speed Turns . The front end is boxed In , and the cars Front End does not Dip into turns like it did before I Installed it .
Attached Images  
Old 02-01-2006, 08:25 PM
  #12  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
sofakingdom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,453
Received 1,837 Likes on 1,397 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
The extra hole is for 82 model cars, that have a different bolt pattern for the sway bar bushings.

The actual amount of force applied to the bar is relatively small, since it has about a 3:1 or 4:1 mechanical advantage on the bending moment that it's designed to counteract; and of course, the force is in the bar's direction of maximum strength, i.e. trying to either lengthen or shorten it. A "beefier" bar is therefore not particularly useful.

Personally, since it's RIGHT ON THE NOSE OF THE CAR, about a foot or more in front of the ball joints, I'd like the lightest thing out there that will get the job done. IMO the stock one is entirely adequate.

The primary thing that it does, is to keep the 2 "ends" of the unibody frame stable with respect to each other. That is, it keeps the whole steering paralellogram (frame, center link, idler arm, Pitman arm) a true parallelogram, instead of being warped into a trapezoid by the forces applied during operation, which bend the unibody "frame" to a different dimension while those other things stay the same. In other words, it keeps the front wheels both pointed together in the proper direction at all times, instead of kind of waving around in the breeze out there. Without it, they invariably either toe way in or way out, and scrub off speed, in turns. I think, looking at tires and how they wear, that they mostly toe in. But I could be wrong about that.

STBs are known to be problematic in these cars, and very specific to the exact motor and intake and hood combo they're installed with as well as the production tolerances of your particular chassis. The TPI Camaros have the most clearance, in general; the carbed Firebirds have the least. But every car is a little bit different.

I doubt that "new" hood insulation will create too very much tighter tolerance than "used" hood insulation. That stuff is less than a quarter inch thick, fully compressed.

Wheel hop = you need LCA relocating brackets. A more solid torque arm will not fix that by itself.
Old 02-01-2006, 08:52 PM
  #13  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Meinherr49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mays Landing New Jersey
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Pontiac Formula 350TPI HARDTOP
Engine: 04- 350 Crate Motor with Crane Cam
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt Posi 3.73:1
Soclose , but Sofa

Thank You for that Lesson on the F Body Suspension Characteristics sofakingdom . LCA Relocating Brackets , And a Upgraded Torque Arm ? Hmmmm..




P.S. and maybe a Pair of These if I Win my Big Super Bowl Bet ? LoL I WISH !
Attached Thumbnails Wonder Bar Placement-aftermarket-camber-castor-mounts.jpg  
Old 02-09-2006, 10:13 AM
  #14  
Junior Member
 
91'ss''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 RS -- "SS"
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: WC T5
just wondering...why did oyu put an IROC sway bar ont he front of your Formula? the formula i bought for parts (mainly the WS6 suspension to put under my RS) had a 36 mm swaybar vs the IROC 34 mm... anyways, i noticed on my RS after installing a factory wonderbar, that not only was there slightly less body roll, but it also seemed to have a quicker steering response. my dad and i figure that it's because the wonderbar keeps both sides of the fram from twisting as much when turning, so all the steering linkages and stuff don't flex and bend as much resulting in quicker-responding steering.
Old 02-09-2006, 12:10 PM
  #15  
Moderator

iTrader: (2)
 
lonsal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Hacienda Heights, CA
Posts: 5,958
Received 32 Likes on 26 Posts
Car: 90 RS 'Vert, 88 IROC-Z, 88 Firebird
Engine: 305 ci tbi, 305 ci tpi, 350 ci tpi
Transmission: WC-T5, WC-T5, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45, 3.27, 3.27
Originally posted by sofakingdom
The extra hole is for 82 model cars, that have a different bolt pattern for the sway bar bushings...
Actually, Meinherr49 had it right. The extra hole takes advantage of existing bolts in the frame. The different bolt pattern of the 1982 model year is solved by the long angled slot. That slot will accept the tab of the 1983-92 bushing retainer brackets and also accomodates the straight pattern of the early 1982 model year bushing retainer brackets.

[i]I'd like the lightest thing out there that will get the job done...[/B]
Agreed. I went slightly beefier on the center bar (1.00" OD x .120" wall vs .75" of stock) when I redesigned the bar. As mentioned in the product description, my aftermarket brace weighs 3.7 lbs. For comparison GM's wonderbar weighs 3 lbs. The reason why other manufacturers of the brace use 1.25" OD x .120" wall DOM isn't so much for added strength as it is for economic reasons. It is less expensive to purchase and stock one size of tubing. In many cases other manufacturers use the same tubing for other products, such as an aftermarket torque arm.

Lon
Old 10-13-2010, 04:10 AM
  #16  
Senior Member

iTrader: (8)
 
DiabloWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Fernando valley-Lancaster,CA
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '86 TRANS-AM WS6
Engine: 1989 355 TPI L98
Transmission: TH700R-4
Axle/Gears: BorgWarner 9 bolt/ 3.27
Re: Wonder Bar Placement

im gona get a wonder bar for my 86 WS6 trans-am and i would like to see if any one knew what was the RPO on the wonder bar
Old 10-13-2010, 08:46 AM
  #17  
Supreme Member

 
DJP87Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,771
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 1987 Black IROC-Z (SOLD)
Re: Wonder Bar Placement

Originally Posted by black-bandit
im gona get a wonder bar for my 86 WS6 trans-am and i would like to see if any one knew what was the RPO on the wonder bar
No RPO as far as I know, it was just a engineering change adding that stamped metal support on IROC models. The hype and name came later when some people thought it was a handling item on IROC's.
Old 10-13-2010, 01:51 PM
  #18  
Senior Member

iTrader: (8)
 
DiabloWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Fernando valley-Lancaster,CA
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '86 TRANS-AM WS6
Engine: 1989 355 TPI L98
Transmission: TH700R-4
Axle/Gears: BorgWarner 9 bolt/ 3.27
Re: Wonder Bar Placement

oh alright....so now its gona make my WS6 handle even better thanks IROC-Z
Old 10-14-2010, 02:15 AM
  #19  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Pablo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,257
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: Turbo Buick
Engine: 3.8 V6
Re: Wonder Bar Placement

So much BS concerning this wonder bar. If you want to make your car handle get tires, shocks, springs, and bushings and a proper alignment. Tubular this and that has its place but these parts are VASTLY overrated here on TGO. I see people with this stuff rolling on monroe shocks, stock springs, and uniroyal tires. I don't care if you have a space frame chassis, without proper shocks, springs, and tires, the car is going to handle like poo.
There's not one tubular aftermarket part on my car (for now) and I would gladly put it up against any of the best handling cars on TGO. Chassis rigidity is important, but it's benefits are extremely overrated here.
Old 10-14-2010, 07:48 PM
  #20  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (15)
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,665
Likes: 0
Received 50 Likes on 48 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: Wonder Bar Placement

Originally Posted by Pablo
So much BS concerning this wonder bar. If you want to make your car handle get tires, shocks, springs, and bushings and a proper alignment. Tubular this and that has its place but these parts are VASTLY overrated here on TGO. I see people with this stuff rolling on monroe shocks, stock springs, and uniroyal tires. I don't care if you have a space frame chassis, without proper shocks, springs, and tires, the car is going to handle like poo.
There's not one tubular aftermarket part on my car (for now) and I would gladly put it up against any of the best handling cars on TGO. Chassis rigidity is important, but it's benefits are extremely overrated here.
^i agree completely with this.

Now the wonderbar, steering brace, ect, does have a legitimate purpose and helps a real issue with frame stress at the steering box when using larger front tires. I have one on both my cars, just for that reason.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BrianChevy
Wheels and Tires
10
08-08-2019 02:16 PM
BrianChevy
Wheels and Tires
5
10-13-2015 12:33 PM
darwinprice
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
17
10-11-2015 11:51 PM
loud91rs
Camaros for Sale
7
10-05-2015 10:05 PM
meeklay812
Camaros for Sale
1
10-01-2015 03:46 PM



Quick Reply: Wonder Bar Placement



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:58 AM.