pics of tubular k-members installed???

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

01-03-2007, 02:31 PM

#101

V8Rumble

Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)

Join Date: Feb 2006

Location: 39.84N 105.11W

Posts: 1,547

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Car: '89 Trans Am GTA

Engine: WAS 350 - now L92 (alum. 378/6.2L)

Transmission: WAS 700R4, now a built T56

Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt

It figures that I'd find the exception to the rule...

No offense intended, I just figured that anyone who was serious enough to look into getting a tubular x-mem would've already done all of the "basic" stuff. My bad...

Reply Like

01-03-2007, 05:31 PM

#102

LilJayV10

Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)

Join Date: Jan 2001

Location: Evansville,IN,USA

Posts: 2,025

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Car: 89' T/A, 00' Firehawk

Engine: 406 Roller

Transmission: TH700R4 w/2800 stall

Axle/Gears: 3.23 Posi

Quote:

Originally Posted by young82z28

Does any one have the tubular k-member and a-arms with a lt1 swapped in. Just wondering as I had to notch the k-member for clearance of the ac compressor. Thanks

I was wondering the same thing.

Also, was there any problem with the P/A K member and spohn a arms?

Reply Like

01-04-2007, 11:35 AM

#103

MrDude_1

Supreme Member

Join Date: Jun 2001

Location: Charleston, SC

Posts: 9,550

Likes: 0

Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Car: 91 Camaro Vert

Engine: 02 LS1, HX40

Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6

Quote:

Originally Posted by V8Rumble

It figures that I'd find the exception to the rule...

No offense intended, I just figured that anyone who was serious enough to look into getting a tubular x-mem would've already done all of the "basic" stuff. My bad...

i just didnt see the point of putting in SFCs when you need a rollbar to be legal with a stock (ls1) motor... and a rollcage with the planned drivetrain...