Screw Jack Installation Pics
#1
Screw Jack Installation Pics (updated)
Here are a couple of pics of starting to install the screw jacks in the front of the car
The first pic shows the tops off the original spring pockets cut out (sitting on blue rag) and a new 1/4thick plate welded in place.
The drill is sitting in a bushing that I made up it is in the hole that the screw will pass through. I put the k member back in the car and drilled through the bushings to locate the starter holes for the hole saw to cut the clearance holes for the jack screws.
The next pic shows the plate welded in place from the other side with the nut for the screw jack placed in location.
Finally here is a pic of the K member completed with Screw Jacks installed and ready to go back in the car
It Seems like almost a year since I started this but here is the K Member finally put back in the car. ( Had to completely strip the car fix rust spots and paint engine compartment and inside doors etc before I started to reassemble.
The first pic shows the tops off the original spring pockets cut out (sitting on blue rag) and a new 1/4thick plate welded in place.
The drill is sitting in a bushing that I made up it is in the hole that the screw will pass through. I put the k member back in the car and drilled through the bushings to locate the starter holes for the hole saw to cut the clearance holes for the jack screws.
The next pic shows the plate welded in place from the other side with the nut for the screw jack placed in location.
Finally here is a pic of the K member completed with Screw Jacks installed and ready to go back in the car
It Seems like almost a year since I started this but here is the K Member finally put back in the car. ( Had to completely strip the car fix rust spots and paint engine compartment and inside doors etc before I started to reassemble.
Last edited by Ratchet; 01-15-2004 at 09:03 PM.
#5
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
sweet setup. what springs are you goona use? that should be really nice for setting corner weights
#7
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,964
Likes: 3
From: Norfolk, VA. USA
Car: 86 Trans Am, 88 Formula
Engine: 95LT4, 305TPI
Transmission: T56, T5
Originally posted by MdFormula350
i was going tO ask that also, but didnt want to sound dumb
i was going tO ask that also, but didnt want to sound dumb
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
i assumed those were screws for wieght jacks on the spings, for making slight adjustments to the spring rate.
or for you 'nascar' guys 'wedge' adjustment.
but i may be wrong, hopefully he will post details.
or for you 'nascar' guys 'wedge' adjustment.
but i may be wrong, hopefully he will post details.
#10
Originally posted by Dewey316
i assumed those were screws for wieght jacks on the spings, for making slight adjustments to the spring rate.
or for you 'nascar' guys 'wedge' adjustment.
but i may be wrong, hopefully he will post details.
i assumed those were screws for wieght jacks on the spings, for making slight adjustments to the spring rate.
or for you 'nascar' guys 'wedge' adjustment.
but i may be wrong, hopefully he will post details.
And yes, a hole is being drilled through the front "frame rail" big enough for the bolt to stick through.
With screw jacks, the car can be setup for an oval, auto X, or drag all from a 5 min adjustment under the hood.
The weight jacks allow the ride height to be adjusted simply by cranking the screws up or down. And for the strip you can pre-load the right rear in a matter of minutes.
We're also using KYB AGX all around to make it fully adjustable.
#13
As for Spring rates We are thinking about either
800 front and 170 rear or
900 front and 190 rear.
The first combo will give you 1.5 cycles per second and the second one gives you 1.6 cycles per second.
Anyone got any suggestions?
800 front and 170 rear or
900 front and 190 rear.
The first combo will give you 1.5 cycles per second and the second one gives you 1.6 cycles per second.
Anyone got any suggestions?
#14
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 640
Likes: 1
From: Clifton, NJ
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T-5... in need of slight rebuild
OK, you are going to have to explain that cycles per second thing!
But no matter what, I think it is going to a personal prefference kind of deal.
But no matter what, I think it is going to a personal prefference kind of deal.
#15
There are litterally chapters of books written on cycles per second as it pertains to high performance handling but to put it as short as possible:
cycles per second are how many times in a second a spring goes from compression to rebound and back to rest when the wheel contacts a bump.
the lbs per square inch of the springs as well as the suspension geometry affects the cycles per second of a given chasis.
a bumpy track requires a chasis with cycles per second of around 1 per second while a very flat track or road can have a suspension system that cycles at 3 cycles per second.
if the cycles per second are two high for a given track or road the tires will bounce and loose contact with the road. if the cycles per second are too low then the car will have a lot of body roll a be very lazy.
Sorry for the verbal diarea I probably should have never brought this subject up in the first place
cycles per second are how many times in a second a spring goes from compression to rebound and back to rest when the wheel contacts a bump.
the lbs per square inch of the springs as well as the suspension geometry affects the cycles per second of a given chasis.
a bumpy track requires a chasis with cycles per second of around 1 per second while a very flat track or road can have a suspension system that cycles at 3 cycles per second.
if the cycles per second are two high for a given track or road the tires will bounce and loose contact with the road. if the cycles per second are too low then the car will have a lot of body roll a be very lazy.
Sorry for the verbal diarea I probably should have never brought this subject up in the first place
#17
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 640
Likes: 1
From: Clifton, NJ
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T-5... in need of slight rebuild
Well if you are going for a rate between 1 and 3 then it looks like the car will be pretty soft for a race car anyway. I would really like to see how you come up with those numbers. I would think that your shocks and struts would have a huge affect on that rate, and I can't imagine how a formula would be able to compensate for that. Of course if KYB was able to supply you with the constants for their settings then it might be possible.
It sounds like you are going to have one killer setup on your hands. I would recomend the Tokico adjustables instead, but thats only because I use them and have heard that their warantee is pretty good.
It sounds like you are going to have one killer setup on your hands. I would recomend the Tokico adjustables instead, but thats only because I use them and have heard that their warantee is pretty good.
#18
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 801
Likes: 1
From: st. Petersburg, Fla
Car: 83 Z28
Engine: vortec 305 for now
Transmission: 5 speed
Ratchet, I've been looking at your work and it is absolutely fantastic, to be able to fabricate like that is an awesome talent. That being said, you must be really really bored.
#21
Banned
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Car: V6 RS-R Camaro
Engine: 3.5l H.O.
Transmission: manual 700r4
A spring will only cycle as fast as the damper will allow it to. That is why you need a very good raodrace quality shock with high rate racing springs.
You planning on some circle track racing with that car? Why the weight jackers, You have individual wheel scales.
You planning on some circle track racing with that car? Why the weight jackers, You have individual wheel scales.
Last edited by BruteForce; 01-15-2004 at 09:46 PM.
#22
Originally posted by ckeene502
i had 900# springs from global west and they where great to me but i had 185 in the rear all in a 91 z
keene
i had 900# springs from global west and they where great to me but i had 185 in the rear all in a 91 z
keene
How did it ride on the street bumpy or ok? did the car push going into a corner hard ?
#23
Originally posted by BruteForce
A spring will only cycle as fast as the damper will allow it to. That is why you need a very good raodrace quality shock with high rate racing springs.
You planning on some circle track racing with that car? Why the weight jackers, You have individual wheel scales.
A spring will only cycle as fast as the damper will allow it to. That is why you need a very good raodrace quality shock with high rate racing springs.
You planning on some circle track racing with that car? Why the weight jackers, You have individual wheel scales.
Scew jacks allow for adjusting cross weight 50/50 for drag racing and autocross and 58/42 or someplace around there for circle tracks. Rear screw jacks can also be adjusted to give more bite at the drags.
#26
Banned
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Car: V6 RS-R Camaro
Engine: 3.5l H.O.
Transmission: manual 700r4
How then are you going to be able to alter things at the track for setups at the different tiathalon events- you'll have no Idea what you have or what you are changing to experiment without having to drive back to that shop- Hope its close by
food for thought.
Don't get me wrong- its a nice setup- but you will need portable scales to use it.
food for thought.
Don't get me wrong- its a nice setup- but you will need portable scales to use it.
#27
Originally posted by BruteForce
How then are you going to be able to alter things at the track for setups at the different tiathalon events- you'll have no Idea what you have or what you are changing to experiment without having to drive back to that shop- Hope its close by
food for thought.
Don't get me wrong- its a nice setup- but you will need portable scales to use it.
How then are you going to be able to alter things at the track for setups at the different tiathalon events- you'll have no Idea what you have or what you are changing to experiment without having to drive back to that shop- Hope its close by
food for thought.
Don't get me wrong- its a nice setup- but you will need portable scales to use it.
#28
Banned
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Car: V6 RS-R Camaro
Engine: 3.5l H.O.
Transmission: manual 700r4
Originally posted by johnyIROC
You don't see NASCAR crews putting the car on scales during a pit stop. You can set the baseline on the scales... and then small adjustments are made by how the car feels.
You don't see NASCAR crews putting the car on scales during a pit stop. You can set the baseline on the scales... and then small adjustments are made by how the car feels.
It would serve much better to adjust the car by a panhard adjustment device rather than messing with front end wedge change- thus changing front traction charateristics through playing with front ride height on-the-fly. Better done through rear wedge adjustment or panhard roll center height.
Every time you dial those FRONT weightjacks, you had better reset you steering geometry or you will not be competitve- you would be better finding a good allaround height & handling position and leave it there.
Last edited by BruteForce; 01-16-2004 at 02:06 AM.
#30
Originally posted by BruteForce
Not if he's making drastic wedge changes from circletrack to drag to autocross all in one day while trying to remain competitive.
It would serve much better to adjust the car by a panhard adjustment device rather than messing with front end wedge change- thus changing front traction charateristics through playing with front ride height on-the-fly. Better done through rear wedge adjustment or panhard roll center height.
Every time you dial those FRONT weightjacks, you had better reset you steering geometry or you will not be competitve- you would be better finding a good allaround height & handling position and leave it there.
Not if he's making drastic wedge changes from circletrack to drag to autocross all in one day while trying to remain competitive.
It would serve much better to adjust the car by a panhard adjustment device rather than messing with front end wedge change- thus changing front traction charateristics through playing with front ride height on-the-fly. Better done through rear wedge adjustment or panhard roll center height.
Every time you dial those FRONT weightjacks, you had better reset you steering geometry or you will not be competitve- you would be better finding a good allaround height & handling position and leave it there.
Last edited by johnyIROC; 01-16-2004 at 11:13 AM.
#31
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
From: Ontario
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 406
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
As for Spring rates We are thinking about either
800 front and 170 rear or
900 front and 190 rear.
The first combo will give you 1.5 cycles per second and the second one gives you 1.6 cycles per second.
Anyone got any suggestions?
800 front and 170 rear or
900 front and 190 rear.
The first combo will give you 1.5 cycles per second and the second one gives you 1.6 cycles per second.
Anyone got any suggestions?
The work looks good guys. Looking forward to racing with you this next summer
#33
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
From: Ontario
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 406
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
Our spring size is pretty common so most motorsport shops will be able to hook you up. Otherwise Ground Control distributes Eibach and Suspension Springs Specialists springs for pretty much any rate you could want.
#34
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 2
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Thanks for the name brands.
I only have one local motor speed shop, clear on other side of town, and are not to friendly, and have to order everything.
I doubt you know any online places since you get them local?
I only have one local motor speed shop, clear on other side of town, and are not to friendly, and have to order everything.
I doubt you know any online places since you get them local?
#35
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
From: Ontario
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 406
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
#36
hay rachet...i felt the car handled great. i ran stock wheels with 245/50/16 bfg comp zr's in front and255/50/16 comp t/a r1's in rear. i drove the car on the street and loved it. i also had the global west track link, solid bushings in front and herb adams solid lca's and panhard rod. but i also had kyb shocks....wish i had something alittle better. the car is gone but i still have all the uspension stuff on my 89 i am building . i want the weight jacks in the front but dont know if they will clear my headers.
keene
keene
#37
thanks for the tips on the spring rates. That magic number sure seems to be around 850lbs.??? i thinks um ah yeah thats the ticket 850lbs ?? me thinks.
As for screw jacks hitting on the headers: If you get your car set up to the ride height you want and measure the amount of interference with headers etc. (There shouldn't be any with our set up) you can then just cut that much off of the screw and eliminate the interference while still allowing for a significant amount of adjustment. Even if the screws are flush with the frame rail there is still about .75 of an inch adjustment available.
Ric
As for screw jacks hitting on the headers: If you get your car set up to the ride height you want and measure the amount of interference with headers etc. (There shouldn't be any with our set up) you can then just cut that much off of the screw and eliminate the interference while still allowing for a significant amount of adjustment. Even if the screws are flush with the frame rail there is still about .75 of an inch adjustment available.
Ric
#38
Originally posted by BruteForce
Not if he's making drastic wedge changes from circletrack to drag to autocross all in one day while trying to remain competitive.
It would serve much better to adjust the car by a panhard adjustment device rather than messing with front end wedge change- thus changing front traction charateristics through playing with front ride height on-the-fly. Better done through rear wedge adjustment or panhard roll center height.
Every time you dial those FRONT weightjacks, you had better reset you steering geometry or you will not be competitve- you would be better finding a good allaround height & handling position and leave it there.
Not if he's making drastic wedge changes from circletrack to drag to autocross all in one day while trying to remain competitive.
It would serve much better to adjust the car by a panhard adjustment device rather than messing with front end wedge change- thus changing front traction charateristics through playing with front ride height on-the-fly. Better done through rear wedge adjustment or panhard roll center height.
Every time you dial those FRONT weightjacks, you had better reset you steering geometry or you will not be competitve- you would be better finding a good allaround height & handling position and leave it there.
Back to your comments though. You make some good points. The car is set up with 4 screw jacks. one at each corner of the car. There is an adjustable panhard bar in it with a solid bushing on the chasis side and a spherical rod end on the rear end mount. Got some other adjustable goodies also. The plan is not to jack the front end around ridiculously to get wedge into the car. All adjustments will be used as appropriate to the handling problem being addressed.
Ric
#39
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 896
Likes: 1
From: Coquitlam, BC
Car: 86\92 Mutant
Engine: 355CI 430HP
Transmission: T-5 with mods
Axle/Gears: 7.625", Eaton Posi, 3.73
Just a comment on spring rates and MFGs. I autocross my car and have got the suspension very well sorted.
I just changed all of the suspension setup on my car to use proper racing Hypercoils. I was using Suspension Specialists rear springs purchased through Ground Control.
I am not at all happy with the Suspension Specialists springs. Having rate checked my old springs ( they speced out at 170lb\in ), I ordered 175lb\in Suspension Specialist springs from Ground Control ( to go with their adjustable ride height collars ). The SS springs were way softer than my old 170lb\in springs. I'd think that this was a one off...except that a friends SS rear springs also seemed very soft.
Either way the problem has been corrected. We are now using Hypercoils all around. I have just install a set of 200lb\in Coil - Overs in the back. The car feels much better now. Before it felt very soft and droopy in the rear with the SS springs.
Now that I have the SS springs out of the car, I am going to take them over to my buddy's race shop and rate check them. I will post the results tomorrow....but I'm thinking they're going to be far shy of 175 lb\in.
BTW...car now has some very nice ride height adjusters front and raer. Not weight jackers...but far cheaper. Front height adjusters were $39.95 each. Front Hypercoils were $38.99 each and Rear Hypercoils Coil-Overs were $48.88 each.
Hypercoils are big race spring mfgs. Extremely good quality. Very popular with the Nascar crowd.
I just changed all of the suspension setup on my car to use proper racing Hypercoils. I was using Suspension Specialists rear springs purchased through Ground Control.
I am not at all happy with the Suspension Specialists springs. Having rate checked my old springs ( they speced out at 170lb\in ), I ordered 175lb\in Suspension Specialist springs from Ground Control ( to go with their adjustable ride height collars ). The SS springs were way softer than my old 170lb\in springs. I'd think that this was a one off...except that a friends SS rear springs also seemed very soft.
Either way the problem has been corrected. We are now using Hypercoils all around. I have just install a set of 200lb\in Coil - Overs in the back. The car feels much better now. Before it felt very soft and droopy in the rear with the SS springs.
Now that I have the SS springs out of the car, I am going to take them over to my buddy's race shop and rate check them. I will post the results tomorrow....but I'm thinking they're going to be far shy of 175 lb\in.
BTW...car now has some very nice ride height adjusters front and raer. Not weight jackers...but far cheaper. Front height adjusters were $39.95 each. Front Hypercoils were $38.99 each and Rear Hypercoils Coil-Overs were $48.88 each.
Hypercoils are big race spring mfgs. Extremely good quality. Very popular with the Nascar crowd.
Last edited by Chickenman35; 01-19-2004 at 03:31 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post