255/50/16 vs 245/45/16 What is your pick?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Heart Land!
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z/28
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T-56 6 speed
255/50/16 vs 245/45/16 What is your pick?
I just completed my tire size surch on this board, and the two sizes in the subject came up the most often for my stock 16x8" Z28 wheels. I am more auto-X than drag race, and since the third gen cars don't have an over steer problem I will use the same size on all four corners. Just want to see what the members are running and how they like them. Thanks for any input!
#2
Member
I use BF's G-Force KDW, which are the stock size of 245/50-16. IMO I wouldn't use a 45 series tire it would look too small. So far I like these out of all the tires I've had.
<img src = "http://home.twcny.rr.com/gta88/DSCF0002.jpg">
<img src = "http://home.twcny.rr.com/gta88/DSCF0002.jpg">
#3
I have tried 245/45 16's once on mine. It handled really well with BFG z-rated Comp t/a's but they did look small and the car was a frikin submarine-lost ground clearance. I went back to 245/50/16's. The car did corner better with the 45's than the 50's but it rides so much better with the 50's. Don't think I would recomend going to 255/50's though, they'll sit wider on the rim and the sidewalls will loss more traction than the 245/50's.
You want a great tire? Try the Firestone Firehawk sz50 EP's. Make sure they are the EP's(Extended performane) and not just the standard sz50's.
Good luck.
You want a great tire? Try the Firestone Firehawk sz50 EP's. Make sure they are the EP's(Extended performane) and not just the standard sz50's.
Good luck.
#4
50 series 245s are going to be around an inch taller then 45 series, which means around half an inch more sidewall to flex. These are ballparks because every tire manufacturer is slightly different in the measuring of their aspect ratios, tread widths, etc. From an auto-x perspective you want a lower sidewall Z rated or better tire, not to mention 245/45 is the stock size for our cars.
#5
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Tucson - MdFormula350 = Post uberWhore
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Sexy
Engine: Stock
Transmission: Slipping
I run 255-50-16 Yokohama tires on the rear of my car, and during *really* agressive cornering (or doing donuts) the tires rub against the inner wheelwell.
#6
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1984 Chevy Camaro
Engine: Built L98
Transmission: T-56 6 speed
I would suggest that you go with the 245 tires instead of the 255. Although the 255 tires are wider then the 245 tires. The thing you have to consider is the sidewalls. With 245's on our 16"x8" rims they already buldge over. With 255 they would buldge over more. Which in turn would make you handle allitle worse. So go with the 245
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 762
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Engine: 305 TPI (LB9)
Transmission: WC T-5
not to mention 245/45 is the stock size for our cars.
umm... make that- 245/50
I agree with AFGT, 50 series tires will ride much better than 45 series, not to mention looking better.
Trending Topics
#8
Originally posted by jRaskell
50 series 245s are going to be around an inch taller then 45 series, which means around half an inch more sidewall to flex. These are ballparks because every tire manufacturer is slightly different in the measuring of their aspect ratios, tread widths, etc. From an auto-x perspective you want a lower sidewall Z rated or better tire, not to mention 245/45 is the stock size for our cars.
50 series 245s are going to be around an inch taller then 45 series, which means around half an inch more sidewall to flex. These are ballparks because every tire manufacturer is slightly different in the measuring of their aspect ratios, tread widths, etc. From an auto-x perspective you want a lower sidewall Z rated or better tire, not to mention 245/45 is the stock size for our cars.
The 45 series tire is great for all out cornering, as most r-compound tires that would work on our cars with a 16 in. rim are 245/45/16. For the street, I would go with the BFG KDW in a size of 245/50/16. Great bang for the buck. If u are just in need of tires for autocrossing, go with Kumos or Housers. Fronts would be 245/45/16, the rears can be 265/45/16. Again, these tires are r-compound tires, not for everyday driving....
Incidentally, I run the BFG KDW at the autocross and came in second for the season. Like I said great tire for the money, around $120 a tire at the tirerack last time I checked.
#9
i'm running 245/45-16 avs intermediates and they handle great but ride is terrible as is the cars ability to track a human hair on the parkway. They don't fill the wheel wells and ride height is sacrificed, if i had to do it again i would get 245/50-16.
#10
Supreme Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Elk Grove Village, IL
Posts: 2,967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 TransAm GTA
Engine: One sweet modified 355 TPI.
Transmission: The kind that shifts....
I was looking into this just now. This has helped alot as I was either looking at Dunlop SP 8000's or BF goodrich G-force KDW tires. Tires sizes were 245/50/16 zr, and at www.tirerack.com they are $116 per tire.
How do the dunlop tires perform against the BF goodrich's?
How do the dunlop tires perform against the BF goodrich's?
#12
Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Camaro Z28 1LE R7U
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: G-Force Dog-Ring T5
Are you planning to run a "R" compound tire?
If so - I recommend the Kumho Victoracer 265/45-16
If you have a choice between 245/50 and 255/50 - go with the 255s
More rubber on the pavement = more grip. Simple as that.
I have done autoX with 245/45 and 255/50 as well as the Kumho 265/45 - and the bigger tire always performs better. More stick.
If so - I recommend the Kumho Victoracer 265/45-16
If you have a choice between 245/50 and 255/50 - go with the 255s
More rubber on the pavement = more grip. Simple as that.
I have done autoX with 245/45 and 255/50 as well as the Kumho 265/45 - and the bigger tire always performs better. More stick.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Damascus, OR, USA
Posts: 850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 383 Miniram AFR195
Transmission: Tremec TKO
Axle/Gears: BW 9 Bolt/3.70
Karl,
Can you run the 265 on the 8" wheel? I thought 255 was as big as you could go.
Thanks,
-Schultzy
Can you run the 265 on the 8" wheel? I thought 255 was as big as you could go.
Thanks,
-Schultzy
#14
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Heart Land!
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z/28
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T-56 6 speed
This is great! Lots of good info from everyone. I assume "R" compound tires are reeeeally soft, and unsuitable for street? Not DOT? Cost prohibitive because of initial cost and short life?
#15
My bad. I meant 245/50 was the stock tire size.
And the thing you need to be cautious about is that going up to a 255, or a 265, or a 275 does not automatically equal more tire on the ground. If the tires don't match the rim, you're going to end up distorting the tire carcass out of it's originally intended profile. In extreme cases I have no doubt you will be worse off. In cases where we're talking about 10mm size differences, it's more questionable
And the thing you need to be cautious about is that going up to a 255, or a 265, or a 275 does not automatically equal more tire on the ground. If the tires don't match the rim, you're going to end up distorting the tire carcass out of it's originally intended profile. In extreme cases I have no doubt you will be worse off. In cases where we're talking about 10mm size differences, it's more questionable
#16
Originally posted by 86SCBNJ
Stock size for all f-bodies with a 16 in rim is 245/50/16.
Stock size for all f-bodies with a 16 in rim is 245/50/16.
#18
Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Camaro Z28 1LE R7U
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: G-Force Dog-Ring T5
The 265/45-16 was designed by Kumho for the 8" wheel - to be legal for SCCA American Sedan rules.
The "optimal" wheel wifth for the 265/45-16 is 9.5" - but it works very well even on an 8" wheel as it was designed to do.
Several companies make D.O.T. legal "R" compound tires. These tires are designed for racing - and do not last long on the street. They have verry little tread (6/32" for the Kumho) and are generally painfull to drive around on the street. The car will tend to follow every rut in the road - and if the road is wet, Gawd help you!
BFGoodrich, Yokohama, Toyo, and Kumho are the tire companies that come to mind most commonly that make R compound tires (in D.O.T. legal form) but BFG is phasing out their program, and tire availability is very limited. Goodyear also makes a D.O.T. R-tire - but in only select sizes, and again availability is llimited.
Hoosier also makes D.O.T. legal R-tires - but these are much more expensive - and they have virtually NO tread - even when brand new. The Hoosier is also probably the fastest of the R tires - just check out results for SCCA Solo2 Nationals - you will see.
http://www.scca.org/amateur/solo2/na...lts/index.html
None of these R tires should be considered for daily street driving.
If you are looking for a good street tire to use - take your pick of the usual suspects from any of the major manufacturers. They all make respectable tires. Generally the higher the speed rating, the better the tire will perform under hard driving conditions, but of course additional cost goes along with this.
The 255/50-16 will fit just fine on a 8" wheel (16X8) - but if your car is low in the front, there may be some occasions of rubbing.
The reason you can get away with running such a wide tire on only an 8" wheel is that the sidewalls are fairly tall - even on the 265/45-16. This extra sidewall allows the tire to work on a smaller than optimal wheel without sacrificing too much performance. Of course - it is always "best" to run the proper wheel size - but in these cases where you have the opportunity to have more rubber on the ground with the same size wheel - it works.
Hoosier also makes a 275/45-16 that works on the 8" wheel.
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/Compar...tButtonName=Go
look at the "specs" and you will see that the "rim width range" for this tire is 8" to 10" - this tire is also designed to work on a 8" wheel to be legal in A-Sedan.
Any questions??
The "optimal" wheel wifth for the 265/45-16 is 9.5" - but it works very well even on an 8" wheel as it was designed to do.
Several companies make D.O.T. legal "R" compound tires. These tires are designed for racing - and do not last long on the street. They have verry little tread (6/32" for the Kumho) and are generally painfull to drive around on the street. The car will tend to follow every rut in the road - and if the road is wet, Gawd help you!
BFGoodrich, Yokohama, Toyo, and Kumho are the tire companies that come to mind most commonly that make R compound tires (in D.O.T. legal form) but BFG is phasing out their program, and tire availability is very limited. Goodyear also makes a D.O.T. R-tire - but in only select sizes, and again availability is llimited.
Hoosier also makes D.O.T. legal R-tires - but these are much more expensive - and they have virtually NO tread - even when brand new. The Hoosier is also probably the fastest of the R tires - just check out results for SCCA Solo2 Nationals - you will see.
http://www.scca.org/amateur/solo2/na...lts/index.html
None of these R tires should be considered for daily street driving.
If you are looking for a good street tire to use - take your pick of the usual suspects from any of the major manufacturers. They all make respectable tires. Generally the higher the speed rating, the better the tire will perform under hard driving conditions, but of course additional cost goes along with this.
The 255/50-16 will fit just fine on a 8" wheel (16X8) - but if your car is low in the front, there may be some occasions of rubbing.
The reason you can get away with running such a wide tire on only an 8" wheel is that the sidewalls are fairly tall - even on the 265/45-16. This extra sidewall allows the tire to work on a smaller than optimal wheel without sacrificing too much performance. Of course - it is always "best" to run the proper wheel size - but in these cases where you have the opportunity to have more rubber on the ground with the same size wheel - it works.
Hoosier also makes a 275/45-16 that works on the 8" wheel.
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/Compar...tButtonName=Go
look at the "specs" and you will see that the "rim width range" for this tire is 8" to 10" - this tire is also designed to work on a 8" wheel to be legal in A-Sedan.
Any questions??
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LiquidBlue
Wheels and Tires
32
12-10-2019 04:06 PM
RedLeader289
Tech / General Engine
10
05-28-2019 01:47 PM