Real world Vortec TPI performance
#1
Real world Vortec TPI performance
Back in 2002 when Scoggin-Dickey released the Vortec TPI intake base, it seemed like the hyped articles were coming out of the woodwork. The numbers that were published said a stock L98 with no other change then Vortec heads and the SD intake made 305hp (4700rpm) and 395lb feet of torque (3400rpm). They also said that the same engine with a ZZ4 cam and LT4 valve springs made 317hp (4800rpm) and 399lbs feet of torque (3500rpm). Finally they said with the LT4 hot cam, 1.6 roller rockers, 52mm throttle body, Edelbrock runners, made 356hp (4900rpm) and 427lb feet of torque (3800rpm). So now that it's 8 years later, is it safe to assume many people have tried this build up?
Ok, then so where are the rave reports? What kinds of results have people actually gotten from the Vortec TPI combo?
Ok, then so where are the rave reports? What kinds of results have people actually gotten from the Vortec TPI combo?
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1988 Flame Red Trans am GTA
Engine: Forged 355 4 Bolt, FIRST TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: ls1 torsen 3.42 gear
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
i have the build minus the vortec heads.. it feels really really strong bottem end wise considering my car weight 3620 with me in it.... the low end torque is really strong, pulls hard from 0 to 70.... totally murdered a late model fox body mustang with mods out the hole and destroyed a new acura rsx off the line too.... i dont think the 52mm tb is worth it though the stock 48mm will do just fine... i think those numbers are a bit high though..... what they fail to mention is that they fully ported out the vortecbase plates because it flows horribly in stock form....... the standard eldelbrock highflow intake flows better..... thats why i didnt go with the vortec baseplate.... my l98 heads are fine..... i ported my highflow intake out along with supporting mods and my car feels like a different animal from stock...
Last edited by 88fastgta; 01-30-2010 at 08:10 PM.
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1988 Flame Red Trans am GTA
Engine: Forged 355 4 Bolt, FIRST TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: ls1 torsen 3.42 gear
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
thats why i didnt go the vortec route... too much work to get the peformance they got.. those are flywheel numbers anyway... so wheel power would be 285whp by 342wtq... that power number can be done with stock heads with a 3 angle valve job spring/retainer/stud upgrade with the hotcam and a custom tune along with the supporting mods they had.....im not sure how much power improvement vortecs are over iron l98 heads.... im sure its 30 at most but thats not going to make much difference on the street...
Last edited by 88fastgta; 01-30-2010 at 08:16 PM.
#5
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
Is the Scoggin-Dickey Vortec base any different then the Edelbrock Vortec?
How much worse can the Vortec intakes be then the Edelbrock high flow base for standard small block heads? I've got an Edelbrock 3860 baseplate sitting here, checking the ports with a caliper the runner ports are the same size as the stock 91 TPI base. The ports that mate with the heads measure a bit larger, but I bought the intake used and they look more like they've been gasket matched. I'm more then a little disappointed with Edelbrocks idea of a $400 intake manifold.
So then has anyone compared the numbers Vortec's vs iron L98's?
How much worse can the Vortec intakes be then the Edelbrock high flow base for standard small block heads? I've got an Edelbrock 3860 baseplate sitting here, checking the ports with a caliper the runner ports are the same size as the stock 91 TPI base. The ports that mate with the heads measure a bit larger, but I bought the intake used and they look more like they've been gasket matched. I'm more then a little disappointed with Edelbrocks idea of a $400 intake manifold.
So then has anyone compared the numbers Vortec's vs iron L98's?
#6
Supreme Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1988 Flame Red Trans am GTA
Engine: Forged 355 4 Bolt, FIRST TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: ls1 torsen 3.42 gear
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
yeah the edelbrock base fits standard heads where as the sdpc fits only vortecs and gm fast burn heads..... im not sure of the numbers but ive heard that the sdpc flows pretty bad, not much better than stock actually.... i was debating this same thing when i was doing my build... i decided to get the standard edelbrock intake with my modded l98 heads... happy with the results so far...
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1988 Flame Red Trans am GTA
Engine: Forged 355 4 Bolt, FIRST TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: ls1 torsen 3.42 gear
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
not yet.. im suppose to be going to alvin at pcm4less down here in charlotte NC in the spring for a true custom tune and dyno.... it should be pretty close to what the vortec build is at.... what are you doing... are you building a vortec tpi combo.... its a good popular street build.. i just took it a little further and spruced up my bottom end to handle the beating...... it provides plenty of fun on the street and it makes it difficult to loose from a stop when racing...... that combo makes the tpi king on the streets...
Last edited by 88fastgta; 01-30-2010 at 09:11 PM.
#9
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
I'm researching... The magazine and catalog write-ups sure hyped the Vortec setup, but what I don't see is the predictable flood of thirdgen.org members doing Vortec build ups. I'm just curious why the Vortec setup and even the Ram Jet don't seem very common on the forum. I haven't seen any numbers to suggest it works, doesn't work, etc. Only what was published in the magazine which could very well be total hogwash.
Personally, I'll probably either leave my car stock, or do a light overhaul, with a rather traditional larger cam, Edelbrock base, AS&M runners, Holley 52mm TB, 24lb injectors, etc. I'm not sure it's worth the trouble to even do that.
Personally, I'll probably either leave my car stock, or do a light overhaul, with a rather traditional larger cam, Edelbrock base, AS&M runners, Holley 52mm TB, 24lb injectors, etc. I'm not sure it's worth the trouble to even do that.
#10
Supreme Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1988 Flame Red Trans am GTA
Engine: Forged 355 4 Bolt, FIRST TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: ls1 torsen 3.42 gear
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
thats becasue most people who do the vortec build are dissapointed because they didnt get the results from the magazine... as stated the base flows poorly and they re worked it quite a bit to get those numbers...
if i were you i would do the following... you will be happy.. PS dont bother with the 52tb...
freshen heads (install manely spring retainers and screw in studs to handle the hot cam)
gm hotcam
1.5 roller rockers
slp runners(port runners)
port plenum
edelbrock lower base
afpr
24lb injectors
slp cold air intake
headers
catback
custom y pipe
custom tune(most important thing)
for a fun daily driver you really dont need heads if your just looking for an overall power boost.... heads are nice but most cant afford the price tag that comes with them.... you can make a stock headed car fast if built right....
you will feel a big increase in torque and horsepower... it will pull much harder all throughout the powerband than stock and your car will have a nice lumpy idle to it and have that sound that everyone likes in a v8... you dont really need heads to get some power... you will like it..
if you wanna go a step further and make that build seem really quick and strong build up the 700r4 and put in a nice stall.... that will enhance that build greatly and make for a super fun addictive daily driver...
here is what my hotcammed tpi engine untuned sounds like
http://www.youtube.com/user/88fastgta#p/u/2/hbsOVEUyEFk
heres what it sounds like tuned by pcmforless
http://www.youtube.com/user/88fastgta#p/u/0/Kij_lxFp8x4
if i were you i would do the following... you will be happy.. PS dont bother with the 52tb...
freshen heads (install manely spring retainers and screw in studs to handle the hot cam)
gm hotcam
1.5 roller rockers
slp runners(port runners)
port plenum
edelbrock lower base
afpr
24lb injectors
slp cold air intake
headers
catback
custom y pipe
custom tune(most important thing)
for a fun daily driver you really dont need heads if your just looking for an overall power boost.... heads are nice but most cant afford the price tag that comes with them.... you can make a stock headed car fast if built right....
you will feel a big increase in torque and horsepower... it will pull much harder all throughout the powerband than stock and your car will have a nice lumpy idle to it and have that sound that everyone likes in a v8... you dont really need heads to get some power... you will like it..
if you wanna go a step further and make that build seem really quick and strong build up the 700r4 and put in a nice stall.... that will enhance that build greatly and make for a super fun addictive daily driver...
here is what my hotcammed tpi engine untuned sounds like
http://www.youtube.com/user/88fastgta#p/u/2/hbsOVEUyEFk
heres what it sounds like tuned by pcmforless
http://www.youtube.com/user/88fastgta#p/u/0/Kij_lxFp8x4
Last edited by 88fastgta; 01-30-2010 at 10:23 PM.
#11
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
haha, it wouldn't have been the first place I'd spend the money but it was given to me. I've already got all the parts I mentioned piled up here, I'm just not in a hurry to put them on the car. I've got several other parts I want to do at the same time, and right now I've got other priorities. Just digging through old magazines got me curious if anyone other then Scoggin-Dickey was really happy with the Vortec TPI setup.
#12
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 10,122
Received 429 Likes
on
369 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
thats becasue most people who do the vortec build are dissapointed because they didnt get the results from the magazine... as stated the base flows poorly and they re worked it quite a bit to get those numbers...
if i were you i would do the following... you will be happy.. PS dont bother with the 52tb...
freshen heads (install manely spring retainers and screw in studs to handle the hot cam)
gm hotcam
1.5 roller rockers
slp runners(port runners)
port plenum
edelbrock lower base
afpr
24lb injectors
slp cold air intake
headers
catback
custom y pipe
custom tune(most important thing)
for a fun daily driver you really dont need heads if your just looking for an overall power boost.... heads are nice but most cant afford the price tag that comes with them.... you can make a stock headed car fast if built right....
you will feel a big increase in torque and horsepower... it will pull much harder all throughout the powerband than stock and your car will have a nice lumpy idle to it and have that sound that everyone likes in a v8... you dont really need heads to get some power... you will like it..
if you wanna go a step further and make that build seem really quick and strong build up the 700r4 and put in a nice stall.... that will enhance that build greatly and make for a super fun addictive daily driver...
if i were you i would do the following... you will be happy.. PS dont bother with the 52tb...
freshen heads (install manely spring retainers and screw in studs to handle the hot cam)
gm hotcam
1.5 roller rockers
slp runners(port runners)
port plenum
edelbrock lower base
afpr
24lb injectors
slp cold air intake
headers
catback
custom y pipe
custom tune(most important thing)
for a fun daily driver you really dont need heads if your just looking for an overall power boost.... heads are nice but most cant afford the price tag that comes with them.... you can make a stock headed car fast if built right....
you will feel a big increase in torque and horsepower... it will pull much harder all throughout the powerband than stock and your car will have a nice lumpy idle to it and have that sound that everyone likes in a v8... you dont really need heads to get some power... you will like it..
if you wanna go a step further and make that build seem really quick and strong build up the 700r4 and put in a nice stall.... that will enhance that build greatly and make for a super fun addictive daily driver...
It pulled my 5,300 lbs Fullsize G20 Conversion Van down the 1/4 mile track in 14.8 seconds at 94 mph despite the stock 1,600 rpm torque converter and 3.08 gears.
The 700r4 was just about wasted at that point as well. It would flare on the 1-2 shift high enough to tag the rev-limiter and the shifted early on the 2-3 upshift. I think 1-2 hit around 6K and 2-3 about 4,600 letting the transmission shift itself.
#13
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 5,680
Likes: 0
Received 114 Likes
on
68 Posts
Car: '90 Trans Am-12.45@110.71
Engine: 355 w/AFR 195's Elem. 400/430 HP/TQ
Transmission: Tremec T-56
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt 3.73
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
I flowed one of those manifolds, indeed it did flow less than a stock TPI mainfold.
The SDPC & the Edelbrock are one in the same. (Edelbrock makes them both)
The #'s
227-236 for the SDPC and the stock TPI 236-240.
The vortec heads flow better than that.
The SDPC & the Edelbrock are one in the same. (Edelbrock makes them both)
The #'s
227-236 for the SDPC and the stock TPI 236-240.
The vortec heads flow better than that.
#14
Supreme Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1988 Flame Red Trans am GTA
Engine: Forged 355 4 Bolt, FIRST TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: ls1 torsen 3.42 gear
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
my edelbrock intake certainely does not feel like the stock intake.... i just dont see how the standard edelbrock intake flow less than the stock..
#16
Supreme Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1988 Flame Red Trans am GTA
Engine: Forged 355 4 Bolt, FIRST TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: ls1 torsen 3.42 gear
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
i hope he is talking about the edelbrok vortec intake and not the edelbrock standard high flow intake.... those are different manifolds but they are made by the same company...... i never heard anyone say that the 3860 intake flows worse than the stocker....
#17
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
sorry to resurrect an old thread (ah 2010, when thirdgens were still 'ironic cool'), but do we now have any Vortec headed SD intake HP numbers or further thoughts about flow characteristics; could they really be poorer than the stock baseplate?
I've gone L31 and my troubled mind was in cruise control about getting a SD intake. However, if they really are that miserable, then I guess I better work on my ventriloquist act and accrue some more benji's (or Lizzie's I suppose over here) for an alternative
I've gone L31 and my troubled mind was in cruise control about getting a SD intake. However, if they really are that miserable, then I guess I better work on my ventriloquist act and accrue some more benji's (or Lizzie's I suppose over here) for an alternative
#18
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
I don't really have anything to add to the topic. I'd still like to hear more from other people that have run the Vortec TPI intake. It stands to reason that the Vortec TPI manifold could be ported the same as the standard TPI Edelbrock base, but you just don't see it done much. I suppose it's well and overshadowed by the LS swaps these days.
I've got an Edelbrock Vortec TPI base, and a regular Edelbrock TPI base on the shelf. Still not sure what I'll end up using, probably something else entirely. Clearly I'm not in a rush to do any of the above. LOL
I've got an Edelbrock Vortec TPI base, and a regular Edelbrock TPI base on the shelf. Still not sure what I'll end up using, probably something else entirely. Clearly I'm not in a rush to do any of the above. LOL
#19
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
thanks
yeah, sounds like the L31 TPI setup never broker out of the niche category and now is quite clearly over the hill.
But I'll get it to squeeze into a girdle and leather pants, fashion a combover and do one last gig as I'm invested in the L31 getup now; I think I'll go ahead with the SDPC piece (which I understand to be, for performance intents and purposes, to be the same as the Edelbrock 3817)
Likely I'll be done with the swap tail end of the summer; I'll spot some numbers. Will be an entirely stock L31 and TPI setup paired with a whining T5
yeah, sounds like the L31 TPI setup never broker out of the niche category and now is quite clearly over the hill.
But I'll get it to squeeze into a girdle and leather pants, fashion a combover and do one last gig as I'm invested in the L31 getup now; I think I'll go ahead with the SDPC piece (which I understand to be, for performance intents and purposes, to be the same as the Edelbrock 3817)
Likely I'll be done with the swap tail end of the summer; I'll spot some numbers. Will be an entirely stock L31 and TPI setup paired with a whining T5
#20
Member
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
I've personally been a little curious about the Edelbrock Vortech stuff. The aluminum E-Tec 170 heads are supposed to outflow the SDPC heads. And the Pro Flow XT intake is supposed to put out better numbers than the SR intake with higher average torque.
With An XR276 or a hotcam it would make a nice street combo.
You could almost buy the entire top end for the cost of a set of AFRs.
With An XR276 or a hotcam it would make a nice street combo.
You could almost buy the entire top end for the cost of a set of AFRs.
Last edited by Anti-Venom; 07-01-2018 at 11:59 AM.
#22
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
Pretty sure I read the Pro-Flo won't fit under a stock thirdgen hood, much less a Firebird hood. The GM Ramjet is overpriced, but when you consider what TPI manifolds, aftermarket runners, and so on are going for, it's not that crazy. Even the Mini-ram is affordable when you're looking at $800-1000 for an aftermarket TPI. Seems the only recent developments are EFI units in a package like a 4bbl carb so they'll fit with older cars, but I can't see that kind of setup working as well as multiport injection. Those setups might as well be TBI.
#23
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 5,680
Likes: 0
Received 114 Likes
on
68 Posts
Car: '90 Trans Am-12.45@110.71
Engine: 355 w/AFR 195's Elem. 400/430 HP/TQ
Transmission: Tremec T-56
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt 3.73
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
[quote]It stands to reason that the Vortec TPI manifold could be ported the same as the standard TPI Edelbrock base, but you just don't see it done much.[quote/]
You could port it but you won't get anymore than porting a stock base.
It's been done and also tried to make it a super ported base, with not very good results.
The Edelbrock made into a super ported base can flow over 330 CFM,
The super vortec base barely made 290 CFM. (hours of work including raising the injectors up out of the air stream)
I's too bad they didn't just use the 3860 base and make the changes to make it fit the vortec pattern. The casting is really thin.
see the TPI sticky
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/tpi/...pi-intake.html
You could port it but you won't get anymore than porting a stock base.
It's been done and also tried to make it a super ported base, with not very good results.
The Edelbrock made into a super ported base can flow over 330 CFM,
The super vortec base barely made 290 CFM. (hours of work including raising the injectors up out of the air stream)
I's too bad they didn't just use the 3860 base and make the changes to make it fit the vortec pattern. The casting is really thin.
see the TPI sticky
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/tpi/...pi-intake.html
Last edited by Dyno Don; 07-01-2018 at 10:12 PM.
#24
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
You mean the 7 page sticky that is all over the place and nearly useless since it's not clear and concise? Pretty sure I read through it at one point or another. While I don't mean to discredit it's merits or the efforts that went into it, it's just difficult to absorb, like herding cats. Maybe I'm just not looking in the right place but the thread seems to cover a lot more than the Vortec TPI setup.
The initial question still remains, what results have people had replicating the setup from the magazines? I wanted to know how the Vortec TPI actually works out on the street, not just the numbers. It's been nearly a decade since I started this thread and I still don't have an answer beyond "other setups are better". That doesn't really answer the question.
My goal at that time was to keep the stock appearance while boosting performance. To an extent I still think that'd be nice, but I understand that TPI is a huge limitation at a certain point, and other systems that look completely different can do more with less. Still, I'd like to hear impressions from those who run the Vortec TPI setup. At the end of the day, to really know I'll probably just have to bolt it together and see.
The initial question still remains, what results have people had replicating the setup from the magazines? I wanted to know how the Vortec TPI actually works out on the street, not just the numbers. It's been nearly a decade since I started this thread and I still don't have an answer beyond "other setups are better". That doesn't really answer the question.
My goal at that time was to keep the stock appearance while boosting performance. To an extent I still think that'd be nice, but I understand that TPI is a huge limitation at a certain point, and other systems that look completely different can do more with less. Still, I'd like to hear impressions from those who run the Vortec TPI setup. At the end of the day, to really know I'll probably just have to bolt it together and see.
#25
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
A Vortec headed engine tops out around 320whp with a HSR and full bolt-ons while using a stock cam.
To find the info you want look at stock headed LT1s that have been cammed. The LT1 head flow and Vortec head flow is basically the same.
To find the info you want look at stock headed LT1s that have been cammed. The LT1 head flow and Vortec head flow is basically the same.
#26
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 5,680
Likes: 0
Received 114 Likes
on
68 Posts
Car: '90 Trans Am-12.45@110.71
Engine: 355 w/AFR 195's Elem. 400/430 HP/TQ
Transmission: Tremec T-56
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt 3.73
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
My goal at that time was to keep the stock appearance while boosting performance. To an extent I still think that'd be nice, but I understand that TPI is a huge limitation at a certain point, and other systems that look completely different can do more with less. Still, I'd like to hear impressions from those who run the Vortec TPI setup. At the end of the day, to really know I'll probably just have to bolt it together and see.
#27
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
sidebar; looks like the C4 guys haven't had too much trouble fitting the pro-fly XT:
https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...ro-flo-xt.html
#28
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans am
Engine: 305 tuned port
Transmission: 700r4
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
thats why i didnt go the vortec route... too much work to get the peformance they got.. those are flywheel numbers anyway... so wheel power would be 285whp by 342wtq... that power number can be done with stock heads with a 3 angle valve job spring/retainer/stud upgrade with the hotcam and a custom tune along with the supporting mods they had.....im not sure how much power improvement vortecs are over iron l98 heads.... im sure its 30 at most but thats not going to make much difference on the street...
#29
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
If you want stock looking with performance, why not go with one of these for a few $ more than the vortec base?
https://firstfuelinjection.com
And you can get it in any head format you like... Vortec or otherwise. Comes with not just the base but the throttle body, plenum, runners, and base. For less than $1k.
GD
https://firstfuelinjection.com
And you can get it in any head format you like... Vortec or otherwise. Comes with not just the base but the throttle body, plenum, runners, and base. For less than $1k.
GD
#30
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
Originally Posted by Drew
My goal at that time was to keep the stock appearance while boosting performance. To an extent I still think that'd be nice, but I understand that TPI is a huge limitation at a certain point, and other systems that look completely different can do more with less.
- Rob
#31
Member
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
Pretty sure I read the Pro-Flo won't fit under a stock thirdgen hood, much less a Firebird hood. The GM Ramjet is overpriced, but when you consider what TPI manifolds, aftermarket runners, and so on are going for, it's not that crazy. Even the Mini-ram is affordable when you're looking at $800-1000 for an aftermarket TPI. Seems the only recent developments are EFI units in a package like a 4bbl carb so they'll fit with older cars, but I can't see that kind of setup working as well as multiport injection. Those setups might as well be TBI.
The stealth ram you have to trim the hood brace to clear the TB, but it's an even taller intake.
#33
Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: United States of America
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: Firebird
Engine: LG4
Transmission: Auto
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
This is indeed discouraging. I have an L31 just waiting to be dropped in. I want to keep the stock TPI look. I dont have an intake manifold yet, and with edelbrock discontinuing the standard centerbolt manifold years ago, it looks like they go for more used on ebay then a new vortec manifold that's still available from SDPC. I'd hate to have to buy standard heads when I have perfectly fine vortecs already.
So $400 for the vortec manifold.
-or-
About $500 for the hi flo edelbrock manifold + $1xxx for heads. How much HP difference would there be?
So $400 for the vortec manifold.
-or-
About $500 for the hi flo edelbrock manifold + $1xxx for heads. How much HP difference would there be?
Last edited by firestorm; 10-28-2018 at 06:23 PM.
#34
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,901
Received 913 Likes
on
600 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
I ported the snot out of a vortec tpi base several yrs ago but ended up selling it to someone on this forum I think.
it should have flowed pretty well, way better than stock.
would like to know if it ever got put to use.
it should have flowed pretty well, way better than stock.
would like to know if it ever got put to use.
#35
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
This is indeed discouraging. I have an L31 just waiting to be dropped in. I want to keep the stock TPI look. I dont have an intake manifold yet, and with edelbrock discontinuing the standard centerbolt manifold years ago, it looks like they go for more used on ebay then a new vortec manifold that's still available from SDPC. I'd hate to have to buy standard heads when I have perfectly fine vortecs already.
So $400 for the vortec manifold.
-or-
About $500 for the hi flo edelbrock manifold + $1xxx for heads. How much HP difference would there be?
So $400 for the vortec manifold.
-or-
About $500 for the hi flo edelbrock manifold + $1xxx for heads. How much HP difference would there be?
https://firstfuelinjection.com/
#36
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
I copied the build either Super Chevy or Chevy High Performance did with a 305.
90 Iroc w/ T5, vortec heads shaved .030, SD intake, ported upper, smog delete, afpr, headers, 3" catback, new injectors from South Bay, tune from PCM of NC, MSD 6A, air foil
anything not listed is stock
run on an 1/8th in cool weather with ET Streets and a mild leave, it ran several 8.60's, very fun to drive, also does not die at 4500 rpm, pulls strong to 5500, I have since bought a second SD intake for later use. Hope this helps.
90 Iroc w/ T5, vortec heads shaved .030, SD intake, ported upper, smog delete, afpr, headers, 3" catback, new injectors from South Bay, tune from PCM of NC, MSD 6A, air foil
anything not listed is stock
run on an 1/8th in cool weather with ET Streets and a mild leave, it ran several 8.60's, very fun to drive, also does not die at 4500 rpm, pulls strong to 5500, I have since bought a second SD intake for later use. Hope this helps.
The following users liked this post:
rednblackrs (08-10-2020)
#37
Supreme Member
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
I copied the build either Super Chevy or Chevy High Performance did with a 305.
90 Iroc w/ T5, vortec heads shaved .030, SD intake, ported upper, smog delete, afpr, headers, 3" catback, new injectors from South Bay, tune from PCM of NC, MSD 6A, air foil
anything not listed is stock
run on an 1/8th in cool weather with ET Streets and a mild leave, it ran several 8.60's, very fun to drive, also does not die at 4500 rpm, pulls strong to 5500, I have since bought a second SD intake for later use. Hope this helps.
90 Iroc w/ T5, vortec heads shaved .030, SD intake, ported upper, smog delete, afpr, headers, 3" catback, new injectors from South Bay, tune from PCM of NC, MSD 6A, air foil
anything not listed is stock
run on an 1/8th in cool weather with ET Streets and a mild leave, it ran several 8.60's, very fun to drive, also does not die at 4500 rpm, pulls strong to 5500, I have since bought a second SD intake for later use. Hope this helps.
#38
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
Through a 4x4 drivetrain, 700r4, mild cams.
- 355cid lightly ported iron vortec, edelbrock tpi vortec base edelbrock hi flow runners, ported oem plenum, ported stock tb 255hp at the wheel.
- 385cid afr vortec heads, first vortec intake, 310 to the wheels.
- 355cid lightly ported iron vortec, edelbrock tpi vortec base edelbrock hi flow runners, ported oem plenum, ported stock tb 255hp at the wheel.
- 385cid afr vortec heads, first vortec intake, 310 to the wheels.
#39
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 1990 G92 IROC Z Miniram
Engine: 388cu 6.4 Liters
Transmission: G-Force T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Gears
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
I did it with my sons 91 Z28 355ci. Ported the base and heads with bigger valves, ZZ9 TPIS cam and ported Edelbrock Runners. 700R4 Trans with 3.42 gears. It made 292whp@4700/370wtq@4000. It would have made more but the tuner had to keep pulling timing out because it kept pinging. The compression was over 10.1. It needed to be around 9.1 to be more efficient. But it ran pretty good for what it was.
#40
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
Resurrection!
I installed a Blueprint 355 - dyno rated at 397 crank HP (came with Dyno sheets) into an 87 IROC. Got it on my dyno today...... This is running the SDPC Vortec base (stock), stock 87 TPI, and stock headers / exhaust.
Performance is..... Honestly it's laughable..... 202 RWHP, and 263 RWTQ.
This was just to get it on the road. The L98 was rod knocked.
There ya go. SDPC Vortec base is almost certainly worse than stock as Dyno Don flowed it to be. It's ridiculously bad in fact.
GD
I installed a Blueprint 355 - dyno rated at 397 crank HP (came with Dyno sheets) into an 87 IROC. Got it on my dyno today...... This is running the SDPC Vortec base (stock), stock 87 TPI, and stock headers / exhaust.
Performance is..... Honestly it's laughable..... 202 RWHP, and 263 RWTQ.
This was just to get it on the road. The L98 was rod knocked.
There ya go. SDPC Vortec base is almost certainly worse than stock as Dyno Don flowed it to be. It's ridiculously bad in fact.
GD
Last edited by GeneralDisorder; 10-02-2020 at 12:43 AM.
#41
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
Resurrection!
I installed a Blueprint 355 - dyno rated at 397 crank HP (came with Dyno sheets) into an 87 IROC. Got it on my dyno today...... This is running the SDPC Vortec base (stock), stock 87 TPI, and stock headers / exhaust.
Performance is..... Honestly it's laughable..... 201 RWHP, and 263 RWTQ.
This was just to get it on the road. The L98 was rod knocked.
There ya go. SDPC Vortec base is almost certainly worse than stock as Dyno Don flowed it to be. It's ridiculously bad in fact.
GD
I installed a Blueprint 355 - dyno rated at 397 crank HP (came with Dyno sheets) into an 87 IROC. Got it on my dyno today...... This is running the SDPC Vortec base (stock), stock 87 TPI, and stock headers / exhaust.
Performance is..... Honestly it's laughable..... 201 RWHP, and 263 RWTQ.
This was just to get it on the road. The L98 was rod knocked.
There ya go. SDPC Vortec base is almost certainly worse than stock as Dyno Don flowed it to be. It's ridiculously bad in fact.
GD
how is blueprint rating these engines? Cause that sounds like pure gross sae type numbers from the 60s
#42
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
I don't know the specifics but it's definitely without accessories I'm sure. Probably open long tubes..... Every trick in the book I'm sure.
First engine from them lost rod bearings three hours into testing/tuning. They said "#6 and #7 rod bearings were too tight" and paid the freight, and my R&R labor. Sucked but they took care of it.
It's got their in-house aluminum heads. As-cast. No CNC work evident.
Cheap Chinese oil pan doesn't properly clear the stock Y pipe so had to clearance the Y pipe a bit where it snakes around the pan - that likely doesn't help anything but didn't want to void any warranty by swapping it out.
I don't think any bone stock TPI car is going to get 202 to the wheels. Some were 235 crank but through an Auto like this I don't believe any of them would hit 202 at the wheels with 100% stock exhaust, intake, etc. 15% drivetrain loss is like 199..... And Dyno Don did say he flow tested the SDPC part and it was worse than stock....
But you are right. I did a 70 GTO with a Pontiac 400 recently. The owner was pretty shocked when his precious put down 235 RWHP. LOL
GD
First engine from them lost rod bearings three hours into testing/tuning. They said "#6 and #7 rod bearings were too tight" and paid the freight, and my R&R labor. Sucked but they took care of it.
It's got their in-house aluminum heads. As-cast. No CNC work evident.
Cheap Chinese oil pan doesn't properly clear the stock Y pipe so had to clearance the Y pipe a bit where it snakes around the pan - that likely doesn't help anything but didn't want to void any warranty by swapping it out.
I don't think any bone stock TPI car is going to get 202 to the wheels. Some were 235 crank but through an Auto like this I don't believe any of them would hit 202 at the wheels with 100% stock exhaust, intake, etc. 15% drivetrain loss is like 199..... And Dyno Don did say he flow tested the SDPC part and it was worse than stock....
But you are right. I did a 70 GTO with a Pontiac 400 recently. The owner was pretty shocked when his precious put down 235 RWHP. LOL
GD
Last edited by GeneralDisorder; 10-02-2020 at 12:51 AM.
#43
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,077
Likes: 0
Received 1,941 Likes
on
1,325 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
So the moral of the story is if anybody has a Blueprint engine then start making bets right away. Money in the bank!
#44
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,901
Received 913 Likes
on
600 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
That sounds about right.. I think I saw a dyno back in the day where a stock off the line aluminum headed L98 put out 3-350 fwhp with a carb on it. Longtubes and no front accessories
#45
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 1990 G92 IROC Z Miniram
Engine: 388cu 6.4 Liters
Transmission: G-Force T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Gears
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
A stock 90-92 5.7 IROC made 202whp with the stock dual cat exhaust system. Run smog headers with dual cats and it will make 240whp and also 3in Magnaflow cat-back exhaust
#46
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
GD
#47
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
been documented that the stock base flows 220cfm dont even know why youd port a base to over 300cfm when once you put runners on it it will flow much less and what head are you using that needs over 300cfm?
i have messed with alot of intakes over the years but never have yet to mess with the vortec tpi base one day though one thing that the haters need to understand about this injector being in the way is go look at the FIRST intake base there injector boss is all up in the runner path here is a pic
#48
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
I need to follow this resurrected thread...I have a brand new S-D TPI Vortec manifold I bought 3 years ago, with the intent to drop L31 heads on my ‘88 L98...
Most information I found back in the day seemed to indicate HP at the crank in the 290-300 HP range, but the real improvement was supposedly torque, at around 400 foot-pounds, with a somewhat flatter torque curve, and roughly the same power falloff as the stock L98 above 5000 RPM.
I own a ‘93 LT1 Corvette, while Chevrolet rated it at 300 HP, I’ve always been disappointed at the 340 foot-pounds of torque they rated the ‘93 Corvette at, which IIRC, is within the range reported for stock L98 F-bodies back in the day.
From what I’m hearing here, the improvement with the S-D base and L31 heads may have been a bit...optimistic.
Most information I found back in the day seemed to indicate HP at the crank in the 290-300 HP range, but the real improvement was supposedly torque, at around 400 foot-pounds, with a somewhat flatter torque curve, and roughly the same power falloff as the stock L98 above 5000 RPM.
I own a ‘93 LT1 Corvette, while Chevrolet rated it at 300 HP, I’ve always been disappointed at the 340 foot-pounds of torque they rated the ‘93 Corvette at, which IIRC, is within the range reported for stock L98 F-bodies back in the day.
From what I’m hearing here, the improvement with the S-D base and L31 heads may have been a bit...optimistic.
#49
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
I need to follow this resurrected thread...I have a brand new S-D TPI Vortec manifold I bought 3 years ago, with the intent to drop L31 heads on my ‘88 L98...
Most information I found back in the day seemed to indicate HP at the crank in the 290-300 HP range, but the real improvement was supposedly torque, at around 400 foot-pounds, with a somewhat flatter torque curve, and roughly the same power falloff as the stock L98 above 5000 RPM.
I own a ‘93 LT1 Corvette, while Chevrolet rated it at 300 HP, I’ve always been disappointed at the 340 foot-pounds of torque they rated the ‘93 Corvette at, which IIRC, is within the range reported for stock L98 F-bodies back in the day.
From what I’m hearing here, the improvement with the S-D base and L31 heads may have been a bit...optimistic.
Most information I found back in the day seemed to indicate HP at the crank in the 290-300 HP range, but the real improvement was supposedly torque, at around 400 foot-pounds, with a somewhat flatter torque curve, and roughly the same power falloff as the stock L98 above 5000 RPM.
I own a ‘93 LT1 Corvette, while Chevrolet rated it at 300 HP, I’ve always been disappointed at the 340 foot-pounds of torque they rated the ‘93 Corvette at, which IIRC, is within the range reported for stock L98 F-bodies back in the day.
From what I’m hearing here, the improvement with the S-D base and L31 heads may have been a bit...optimistic.
if you can get the heads for cheap and your inclined to do the work than go for it at the bear minimum port match the intake to the heads and tear drop the injector bungs inside the SD base but if i wanted a noticeable gain i would also do the cam as the articles state
#50
Re: Real world Vortec TPI performance
I need to follow this resurrected thread...I have a brand new S-D TPI Vortec manifold I bought 3 years ago, with the intent to drop L31 heads on my ‘88 L98...
Most information I found back in the day seemed to indicate HP at the crank in the 290-300 HP range, but the real improvement was supposedly torque, at around 400 foot-pounds, with a somewhat flatter torque curve, and roughly the same power falloff as the stock L98 above 5000 RPM.
I own a ‘93 LT1 Corvette, while Chevrolet rated it at 300 HP, I’ve always been disappointed at the 340 foot-pounds of torque they rated the ‘93 Corvette at, which IIRC, is within the range reported for stock L98 F-bodies back in the day.
From what I’m hearing here, the improvement with the S-D base and L31 heads may have been a bit...optimistic.
Most information I found back in the day seemed to indicate HP at the crank in the 290-300 HP range, but the real improvement was supposedly torque, at around 400 foot-pounds, with a somewhat flatter torque curve, and roughly the same power falloff as the stock L98 above 5000 RPM.
I own a ‘93 LT1 Corvette, while Chevrolet rated it at 300 HP, I’ve always been disappointed at the 340 foot-pounds of torque they rated the ‘93 Corvette at, which IIRC, is within the range reported for stock L98 F-bodies back in the day.
From what I’m hearing here, the improvement with the S-D base and L31 heads may have been a bit...optimistic.
70/49 139/105 190/137 227/151 239/160 229/162
083 your 88 heads 100-600 lift
44/41 101/82 155/125 182/137 196/140 202/141
trick flow 195
51/58 136/98 191/136 230/163 253/177 254/190
i personally never got into the vortec craze back then or now b/c their iron heavy heads most of the budget guys i know run trickflow 1200 for the pair of assembled heads with 195cc runner better exhaust flow and 25lbs lighter you can get them a bit cheaper if you use summit or jegs coupons
the thing about the SD base is its the only way w/o welding to get the tpi or super ram on a raised runner head
Last edited by BHR; 11-28-2020 at 10:08 PM.