Fender Height: What's Yours?
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alberta (formerly Ontario)
Posts: 9,306
Received 690 Likes
on
577 Posts
Fender Height: What's Yours?
Just a question asked out of curiosity although the answers might serve as an interesting data base. This may have been asked elsewhere but I haven't seen anything in a compiled list.
For the record, list your fender height and what you have for suspension mods and tire diameter.
Knowing the stock height would be helpful. Any showroom cars out there?
My heap has Intrax springs (called lowering springs but I can't say how much under stock they might be).
Tires are BFG Sport Comp 2 with a 245/50/16 front at 25.7" and 255/50/16 rear at 26.1" (so says Tire Rack).
Fender heights are 25 1/8" front and 26 1/8" (+/-).
For the record, list your fender height and what you have for suspension mods and tire diameter.
Knowing the stock height would be helpful. Any showroom cars out there?
My heap has Intrax springs (called lowering springs but I can't say how much under stock they might be).
Tires are BFG Sport Comp 2 with a 245/50/16 front at 25.7" and 255/50/16 rear at 26.1" (so says Tire Rack).
Fender heights are 25 1/8" front and 26 1/8" (+/-).
Last edited by skinny z; 07-29-2018 at 11:30 AM.
#3
Supreme Member
Re: Fender Height: What's Yours?
I have drop zone lowering springs, Front fender 25-3/4 and rear is 28".
Front tire is a MT sportsman 28x7.50x15 (28" dia) and the rear tires MT Sportsman ST 275/60/15 (28.1" Dia but mine are aired down to 24psi so they are 27" dia)
UMI tubular a-arms
UMI adjustable pan hard bard
Founders panhard bar reloction kit
UMI Adjustable torque arm
Lakewood rear control arms
UMI lower control arm relocation bracket
Lakewood 70/30 front strut and lakewood 50/50 rear shocks
Front tire is a MT sportsman 28x7.50x15 (28" dia) and the rear tires MT Sportsman ST 275/60/15 (28.1" Dia but mine are aired down to 24psi so they are 27" dia)
UMI tubular a-arms
UMI adjustable pan hard bard
Founders panhard bar reloction kit
UMI Adjustable torque arm
Lakewood rear control arms
UMI lower control arm relocation bracket
Lakewood 70/30 front strut and lakewood 50/50 rear shocks
Last edited by 84 z28; 07-01-2018 at 03:56 PM.
#4
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,077
Likes: 0
Received 1,941 Likes
on
1,325 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Fender Height: What's Yours?
I have weight jacks so I can make whatever height I want. I've run lower and higher. These numbers seem to keep the car from sledding except I still need to avoid large speed bumps. Everything is tucked up pretty well under the car.
Front: 25 3/4" arch height with a 255/40-17 Nitto NT05 tire , 800 lb/inch springs
Rear: 26 3/4" arch height with a 275/40-17 ET Street S/S drag radial , 150 lb/inch springs
About 1.5" air gap between tire and wheel arch.
Front: 25 3/4" arch height with a 255/40-17 Nitto NT05 tire , 800 lb/inch springs
Rear: 26 3/4" arch height with a 275/40-17 ET Street S/S drag radial , 150 lb/inch springs
About 1.5" air gap between tire and wheel arch.
Last edited by QwkTrip; 07-01-2018 at 01:50 PM.
#6
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,077
Likes: 0
Received 1,941 Likes
on
1,325 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Fender Height: What's Yours?
Looks like a fair number for the ET Streets. Mine are at 25.5" but I've used up some rubber. Straight edge and tape measure says the Nittos are shorter at 24.5" on a 17x9 wheel. There's about 3500 miles on the front tires. I'm on the 3rd set of rear tires in the same timeframe.
(FYI - Nittos are known to be on the small side, height and width)
(FYI - Nittos are known to be on the small side, height and width)
Last edited by QwkTrip; 07-01-2018 at 03:20 PM.
#7
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Alabama
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 87 Firebird, 89 Trans Am
Engine: 406, LB9
Transmission: T56, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Torsen, 2.73 Posi
Re: Fender Height: What's Yours?
I'm running Vogtland springs and 275/40R17 BFG Sport Comp 2 tires currently. My fender heights are as follows:
DF: 26.125" DR: 26.25"
PF: 26.5" PR: 26.5"
You can see in my install thread where I've tracked their height over time.
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/susp...g-install.html
DF: 26.125" DR: 26.25"
PF: 26.5" PR: 26.5"
You can see in my install thread where I've tracked their height over time.
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/susp...g-install.html
Trending Topics
#8
Re: Fender Height: What's Yours?
I decided to test out the eBay Lowtek springs, and I have to say I'm very impressed so far!
Front fenders sit about 26 1/4"
Rear fenders sit about 26 3/4"
The ride is pretty close to stock feeling, so not overly stiff, and I love the way the car sits.
Front fenders sit about 26 1/4"
Rear fenders sit about 26 3/4"
The ride is pretty close to stock feeling, so not overly stiff, and I love the way the car sits.
#10
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: CT
Posts: 2,814
Received 290 Likes
on
169 Posts
Car: 1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.0 Liter 4-BBL V8 High Output
Transmission: 5-Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Fender Height: What's Yours?
Factory Stock With OE Size P215/65R15 Goodyear Eagle Gt's. 27.5"
#15
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alberta (formerly Ontario)
Posts: 9,306
Received 690 Likes
on
577 Posts
Re: Fender Height: What's Yours?
Thought I'd throw in a spread sheet with some of the replies. I've tacked it on to the first post. It's nothing more than a reference as there are many arguments as to why this information is useless.
Nonetheless, it's posted here for all eternity.
Nonetheless, it's posted here for all eternity.
#16
Re: Fender Height: What's Yours?
Front fender height 26.0"
Rear fender height 26.625"
Front tires 245/45/17 Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 25.7 tire height
Rear tires 275/40/17 Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 25.7 tire height
Eibach Sportline Springs, rear isolators removed and replaced by heater hose.
Rear fender height 26.625"
Front tires 245/45/17 Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 25.7 tire height
Rear tires 275/40/17 Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 25.7 tire height
Eibach Sportline Springs, rear isolators removed and replaced by heater hose.
#17
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alberta (formerly Ontario)
Posts: 9,306
Received 690 Likes
on
577 Posts
Re: Fender Height: What's Yours?
There are plenty of variables that can add to the results. I hadn't considered the isolators being one of them but I suppose they do contribute.
#18
Supreme Member
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: NJ
Posts: 4,350
Received 299 Likes
on
235 Posts
Car: 92 Firebird
Engine: 4.8 LR4
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 Bolt
Re: Fender Height: What's Yours?
If you measure ride height properly, the tire size is irrelevant and eliminates all those related variables
#19
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alberta (formerly Ontario)
Posts: 9,306
Received 690 Likes
on
577 Posts
Re: Fender Height: What's Yours?
It's not a question of ride height. It's a question of fender height.
And fender height is what you see when you're looking at the car.
I'm in complete agreement with you regarding what's "proper" and what isn't.
This isn't a scientific thread, as posted (read post #1), it's simply one of conversation.
And fender height is what you see when you're looking at the car.
I'm in complete agreement with you regarding what's "proper" and what isn't.
This isn't a scientific thread, as posted (read post #1), it's simply one of conversation.
#22
Supreme Member
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: NJ
Posts: 4,350
Received 299 Likes
on
235 Posts
Car: 92 Firebird
Engine: 4.8 LR4
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 Bolt
Re: Fender Height: What's Yours?
If you went from the hub center to the fender, that would be a better benchmark for anyone with a Camaro, then the tire size, pressure, temperature, DA and level-ness of the car would have no bearing on your measurement. As you're going now, any and all of those things affect the "fender height". So someone trying to figure out where X suspension parts with a car with the same options can figure out what the "fender height" might be and the tires are irrelevant. I have brought this up in the past and people get angry
#23
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,077
Likes: 0
Received 1,941 Likes
on
1,325 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
#25
Supreme Member
#27
Supreme Member
#28
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,077
Likes: 0
Received 1,941 Likes
on
1,325 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Fender Height: What's Yours?
Scooter's message is quite easy to understand. If you have better terminology that would provide more clarity then just say so. But don't be a twit by keeping on the path you're on.
#29
Supreme Member
Re: Fender Height: What's Yours?
I understood exactly what he said in post 22 about " fender height" in which I never quoted or asked him to elaborate, I quoted something entirely different which he was talking about "ride height" and tires are irrelevant. But only a twit cant distinguish between the two, btw most consider "ride height" from the rocker or ground fx to the ground
#30
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,077
Likes: 0
Received 1,941 Likes
on
1,325 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Fender Height: What's Yours?
It was all in the same train of thought.
It really doesn't pay to get smart with me. I'm too old and crafty for you.
It really doesn't pay to get smart with me. I'm too old and crafty for you.
#32
Re: Fender Height: What's Yours?
I understood exactly what he said in post 22 about " fender height" in which I never quoted or asked him to elaborate, I quoted something entirely different which he was talking about "ride height" and tires are irrelevant. But only a twit cant distinguish between the two, btw most consider "ride height" from the rocker or ground fx to the ground
Yes this post is useless because it lacks so many variables. Its funny how I am probably the only person who will everr read this thread and know exactly the differences on every car in this spread sheet and how usleless that is to anyone else reading this.
With that said...My car was 24 3/4 fronts, 25 1/8" rears and 25.7 " tires....and never ever rubbed...Why? because of so many variables your heads would explode.
#33
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alberta (formerly Ontario)
Posts: 9,306
Received 690 Likes
on
577 Posts
Re: Fender Height: What's Yours?
With all due respect to those that have posted and dissed this thread,please READ the first post. Then re-read it. If you have decent reading comprehension then you will understand that I am after one thing , and one thing only and that is the fender height of your third gen.
That's it.
I don't care how you got there. If you have have anti-gravity pods and thrust vectors on each corner, if I want to know, I will ask.
Read the first post again. Fender heights.
That's it.
I don't care how you got there. If you have have anti-gravity pods and thrust vectors on each corner, if I want to know, I will ask.
Read the first post again. Fender heights.
#34
Re: Fender Height: What's Yours?
I know for sure that stock factory ride height is higher than that, especially in an early car that sat higher than the later cars (for sure the 82-84, maybe later cars sat higher than the later cars), especially if on the OE 215/65-15 (about 26.1" tall) tires.
My '87 which has factory tags on the springs sits the closest to stock that I've seen and I joke that the car is a 4x4. The front suspension is completely stock and is currently on 265/40-17 Firestone Firehawk Wide Ovals (25.3" tall) sits 28.25" on the driver's side and 28.5" on the passenger (my passenger side fender has the jack point smashed probably causing the discrepancy:
Driver's side
Passenger's side, shot at a weird angle but is measured straight.
With early 26.1" tall tires that would be a fender height of 28.65 and 28.9" and with later 25.7" tall tires that would still be a fender height of 28.45 and 28.7" I'd be very comfortable saying that later cars had a factory fender height of ~28.5-28.75" and I wouldn't be surprised if the early 3rd gens were at 29"
The rear on my car isn't a good example for a factory number. I still have the unmolested rear springs but I swapped Moser 9" ford in it which looks like it has taller spring pockets so I pulled the rear spring isolators out to compensate, ending up sitting slightly lower than stock. On matching 295/35-18 tires (26.1" tall, matching factory 15" tire heights), both sides of mine sit at an even 29", and I'm pretty sure that is a little short of the factory rear height. I'm betting that the early cars on 15's were at 29.5" or maybe a little more and the later cars on 16's were at right around 29" or a little more.
Passenger side, I didn't bother uploading the driver's side since it's literally identical.
The car is slightly lighter than stock which could result in slightly higher ride height but it's still 3460# which is still within the factory weight range for these cars. It's also an '87, 31 years old so there has to be some sag in the springs, just not as much as typical. The 2 combined likely end up being a wash.
FWIW, I just had the original front right strut explode (covered everything in hydraulic fluid and oiled down the brake on that side), so I'll be pulling the front suspension apart sometime soon and will be able to confirm all factory parts, but as far as I can tell EVERYTHING in the front suspension is factory, it doesn't even appear to ever have been aligned (and the tie rod sleeves are seized).
Here is a pic to show how high this thing sits. You have to remember that these things were designed in the late 70's, when even sports cars had more ground clearance than most modern cars. This thing has more clearance by a couple of inches than my 2012 Taurus SHO:
My '87 which has factory tags on the springs sits the closest to stock that I've seen and I joke that the car is a 4x4. The front suspension is completely stock and is currently on 265/40-17 Firestone Firehawk Wide Ovals (25.3" tall) sits 28.25" on the driver's side and 28.5" on the passenger (my passenger side fender has the jack point smashed probably causing the discrepancy:
Driver's side
Passenger's side, shot at a weird angle but is measured straight.
With early 26.1" tall tires that would be a fender height of 28.65 and 28.9" and with later 25.7" tall tires that would still be a fender height of 28.45 and 28.7" I'd be very comfortable saying that later cars had a factory fender height of ~28.5-28.75" and I wouldn't be surprised if the early 3rd gens were at 29"
The rear on my car isn't a good example for a factory number. I still have the unmolested rear springs but I swapped Moser 9" ford in it which looks like it has taller spring pockets so I pulled the rear spring isolators out to compensate, ending up sitting slightly lower than stock. On matching 295/35-18 tires (26.1" tall, matching factory 15" tire heights), both sides of mine sit at an even 29", and I'm pretty sure that is a little short of the factory rear height. I'm betting that the early cars on 15's were at 29.5" or maybe a little more and the later cars on 16's were at right around 29" or a little more.
Passenger side, I didn't bother uploading the driver's side since it's literally identical.
The car is slightly lighter than stock which could result in slightly higher ride height but it's still 3460# which is still within the factory weight range for these cars. It's also an '87, 31 years old so there has to be some sag in the springs, just not as much as typical. The 2 combined likely end up being a wash.
FWIW, I just had the original front right strut explode (covered everything in hydraulic fluid and oiled down the brake on that side), so I'll be pulling the front suspension apart sometime soon and will be able to confirm all factory parts, but as far as I can tell EVERYTHING in the front suspension is factory, it doesn't even appear to ever have been aligned (and the tie rod sleeves are seized).
Here is a pic to show how high this thing sits. You have to remember that these things were designed in the late 70's, when even sports cars had more ground clearance than most modern cars. This thing has more clearance by a couple of inches than my 2012 Taurus SHO:
#35
Re: Fender Height: What's Yours?
If you went from the hub center to the fender, that would be a better benchmark for anyone with a Camaro, then the tire size, pressure, temperature, DA and level-ness of the car would have no bearing on your measurement. As you're going now, any and all of those things affect the "fender height". So someone trying to figure out where X suspension parts with a car with the same options can figure out what the "fender height" might be and the tires are irrelevant. I have brought this up in the past and people get angry
Since people are posting fender lip heights and tire size/height it's easy enough to use those 2 numbers to compare. You could take the spreadsheet and add some columns that show what it would be with a standard size tire (either the 26.1" that the car was designed with in mind or the 25.7" that most got/people shoot for) or even calculate a lip to hub center height. I may take the spreadsheet and do something like that with it later.
#36
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alberta (formerly Ontario)
Posts: 9,306
Received 690 Likes
on
577 Posts
Re: Fender Height: What's Yours?
You could take the spreadsheet and add some columns that show what it would be with a standard size tire (either the 26.1" that the car was designed with in mind or the 25.7" that most got/people shoot for) or even calculate a lip to hub center height. I may take the spreadsheet and do something like that with it later.
In my case I'm 2.373" and 1.375" (front and rear) under what was posted as original.
Your information regarding stock is height has yet to be added to that list.
#37
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Double Bratville
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 0
Received 43 Likes
on
31 Posts
Car: '89 Formula
Engine: LS2
Transmission: 4L65E
Axle/Gears: MW 3.42 12 Bolt
Re: Fender Height: What's Yours?
I was out in the backyard a couple weeks ago. RHR doesn't need no stinking fenders . The boys were out playing in the marbles, though .
Just to add: 26.75" front and 27.25" rear with rear ear of adj a-arm extended a wee bit.
Just to add: 26.75" front and 27.25" rear with rear ear of adj a-arm extended a wee bit.
#38
Re: Fender Height: What's Yours?
I think what you describing is already a component of the spreadsheet. Included is the difference between the "stock" fender height posted (along with the tire diameter).
In my case I'm 2.373" and 1.375" (front and rear) under what was posted as original.
Your information regarding stock is height has yet to be added to that list.
In my case I'm 2.373" and 1.375" (front and rear) under what was posted as original.
Your information regarding stock is height has yet to be added to that list.
FWIW, the lowest I've gone is on my '83 Crossfire TA, and that was 24-7/8" even on a 26.1" tire F (235/60-15 on stock 15" wheels) and 25-5/8" with a 27.1" (255/60-15's) and nothing rubbed, but everything was very close on the front.
That one was usually raced on 245/60-15 Hoosier slicks on 15x8" corvette rally wheels on the front and rear (the fender heights were about 25-1/8" and 25-3/8") and just barely showed signs of rubbing on the very outside edge of the top of the inner fender liner (like you would see that the rubber touched the plastic, but not hard enough to rub marks into either, just a clean spot.
It was occasionally run on 245/50-16 Hoosier slicks (should be 25.7" tall) on 16x9" knockoff corvette rally wheels which put the fender heights at 24-5/8" and just a hair under 25" in the back. That didn't rub anywhere but was slower than on the taller 15's.
That one didn't have a rubbing problem but ground clearance was tight. My girlfriend at the time borrowed the car and called me from a gas station because she was stuck on one of the inground gas tank filler caps and I had 2 occasions where I smashed the transmission pan on a bump in the road (This thing was my daily driver in college).
This thing was lowered by cutting the stock WS6 springs till I had the spring rates that I wanted and then experimenting with different spring isolators till the ride height was usable (originally the night I first cut the front springs I drove it home sitting on the bump stops).
#39
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alberta (formerly Ontario)
Posts: 9,306
Received 690 Likes
on
577 Posts
Re: Fender Height: What's Yours?
Updated the spreadsheet and added a title.
This should keep things in perspective. It's a visual thing. Not scientific.
Now if a science discussion breaks out, then I'm all for it. But remember the thread's intent.
Thanks.
But now, it needs to be determined what exactly was the stock fender height?
This should keep things in perspective. It's a visual thing. Not scientific.
Now if a science discussion breaks out, then I'm all for it. But remember the thread's intent.
Thanks.
But now, it needs to be determined what exactly was the stock fender height?
Last edited by skinny z; 07-29-2018 at 11:31 AM.
#40
Supreme Member
Re: Fender Height: What's Yours?
As 83 cross fire said, it depends on the year. I know mine stock was pushing all of 28" or more
Updated the spreadsheet and added a title.
This should keep things in perspective. It's a visual thing. Not scientific.
Now if a science discussion breaks out, then I'm all for it. But remember the thread's intent.
Thanks.
But now, it needs to be determined what exactly was the stock fender height?
This should keep things in perspective. It's a visual thing. Not scientific.
Now if a science discussion breaks out, then I'm all for it. But remember the thread's intent.
Thanks.
But now, it needs to be determined what exactly was the stock fender height?
Last edited by 84 z28; 07-29-2018 at 11:40 AM.
#41
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alberta (formerly Ontario)
Posts: 9,306
Received 690 Likes
on
577 Posts
Re: Fender Height: What's Yours?
That's fine. This is hardly scientific. It's more of a conversation piece as I have mentioned.
#42
Supreme Member
iTrader: (15)
Re: Fender Height: What's Yours?
In the front I have the UMI Weight Jacks (http://umiperformance.com/catalog/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=6_479&products_id=1113) they originally came with an 850# front spring with a free height of 8" but I switched to a set of Eibach 950# 9.5" free height springs (https://eibach.com/us/i-904-conventi...nt-spring.html) since the 3/4" extended ball joints I ran [Howe 22429 +3/4" (4.16" total height)] caused me to fully extend the weight jack just to get the fender height to a usable measurement for the street. My fender Height at the front is 26.5". On all four wheels I have a 17" wheel with 275/45/ZR17 tires. The rear is 25 7/8" and I am using a 200 # spring from AFCO (https://www.speedwaymotors.com/AFCO-...sku=106514-200)
For you guys that are running front fender heights < 26" how much suspension travel do you have? Are these cars that only are driven to car events like shows, AutoX or a dragstrip? Do you have streets you can't drive down or parking lots you can't turn into because of a curb angle or a speed bump?
EDIT: corrected the rear height
For you guys that are running front fender heights < 26" how much suspension travel do you have? Are these cars that only are driven to car events like shows, AutoX or a dragstrip? Do you have streets you can't drive down or parking lots you can't turn into because of a curb angle or a speed bump?
EDIT: corrected the rear height
Last edited by Tibo; 12-09-2018 at 09:14 AM.
#43
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,077
Likes: 0
Received 1,941 Likes
on
1,325 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Fender Height: What's Yours?
For you guys that are running front fender heights < 26" how much suspension travel do you have? Are these cars that only are driven to car events like shows, AutoX or a dragstrip? Do you have streets you can't drive down or parking lots you can't turn into because of a curb angle or a speed bump?
Front suspension travel is fine. Rear suspension travel is woefully insufficient and constantly hitting the bump stops. I can't do anything about it until I get different wheels that tuck the tires further under the fenders.
Last edited by QwkTrip; 12-08-2018 at 10:05 PM.
#44
Re: Fender Height: What's Yours?
Vogtland lowering springs on 1990 Formula WS6 (~18,000 miles). Stock wheel/tire (245/50-16).
Measuring to bottom edge of fender:
Before: FL: 27-5/8"; FR: 27-7/8"; RL: 27-13/16"; RR: 28-1/8"
After: FL: 26-9/16"; FR: 26-3/4"; RL: 26-5/8"; RR: 27"
FWIW, I'm pretty happy with height, stance and ride. Front seems to be about the same; rear seems a little firmer. I'm also running KYB AGX adjustable shocks/struts.
#45
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alberta (formerly Ontario)
Posts: 9,306
Received 690 Likes
on
577 Posts
Re: Fender Height: What's Yours?
Nice before and after pics. What were the springs advertised as drop amount? If it was an inch, they nailed it.
I'll update the list accordingly.
I'll update the list accordingly.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
indy82tx
Transmissions and Drivetrain
2
04-08-2002 03:24 PM
GEO Metro Mauler
Aftermarket Product Review
10
07-23-2001 12:06 AM