Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E
#1
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Tijeras, NM
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 Black GTA
Engine: 'close to' stock 5.7 but trending>>
Transmission: 700
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E
Just wondering if anyone has been successfully datalogging an '89 with a $6E using the XtremeALDL and TP5? I've read some posts that say to use TP4 and scannerpro so it can be done, but how about TP5? I just cant get it to connect consistently, maybe 1 out of 10 times and then it disconnects after about a minute or two.
Any help is appreciated - very appreciated.
Any help is appreciated - very appreciated.
#5
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Tijeras, NM
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 Black GTA
Engine: 'close to' stock 5.7 but trending>>
Transmission: 700
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E
The car runs fine, and i can burn chips and make changes that way, but no logging - I do use a Tech1 GM scan tool to watch things in realtime though.
So youre saying its hit and miss with the 165 ECM? Something about their design is on the hairy edge of working right? Nice. I think thats what youre implying because I'm not the only one who's been posting as to how flaky their communication is.
So youre saying its hit and miss with the 165 ECM? Something about their design is on the hairy edge of working right? Nice. I think thats what youre implying because I'm not the only one who's been posting as to how flaky their communication is.
#7
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Tijeras, NM
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 Black GTA
Engine: 'close to' stock 5.7 but trending>>
Transmission: 700
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E
Can the log files generated by TP4 be used in TP5? I Really like TP5 and its flexibility for dashboards, tables, etc.
Trending Topics
#8
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E
I have a few 165 ecm, one I use for a test bench. the 165 is luck of the draw on connection.
I would be curious to know how the 808 $12p. Depending on what .ads you are using you might need to the pause for silence to get rid of the data glitching.
I would be curious to know how the 808 $12p. Depending on what .ads you are using you might need to the pause for silence to get rid of the data glitching.
#9
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Tijeras, NM
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 Black GTA
Engine: 'close to' stock 5.7 but trending>>
Transmission: 700
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E
I have messed with adding the "listen for silence" at the end of the Mode1 macro, have gone from 10-90ms, some joy happened in the 15-25 range but those times when it connected were short lived.
What's the "808 $12p" ?
#10
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E
The 1227808 is a Holden commodore ecm used in austrailia. It is very similar to the 165. The $12p mask is speed density.
http://wbo2.com.au/~techedge.com.au/vehicle/1227808/
http://wbo2.com.au/~techedge.com.au/vehicle/1227808/
#15
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Tijeras, NM
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 Black GTA
Engine: 'close to' stock 5.7 but trending>>
Transmission: 700
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E
TP4 connected once out of 8 tries - and even that for only a minute. I guess it must be my ECM.
I suppose I'm now looking for a 165 ECM that works. Gambling has never been good to me, so anyone have one they want to part with that works for sure?
I suppose I'm now looking for a 165 ECM that works. Gambling has never been good to me, so anyone have one they want to part with that works for sure?
#17
Senior Member
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E
I use the latest ver of TP5, and $6E on my '88 IROC with the 165 ecm. It works ok, not perfect, but good enough for me to get meaningfull data. I tend to like using the most updated version of this software. It has to have the most up to date bug fixes.
#19
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Tijeras, NM
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 Black GTA
Engine: 'close to' stock 5.7 but trending>>
Transmission: 700
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E
Tried to leave a positive feedback for tunedperformance, but URL keeps coming up as fail.
Anyway, Brian is a great guy to deal with. He lent me a 165 ECM that he knew worked and a socketed memcal that I could plug my flash into, and it worked for me. My 165 Ecm was one of those "Luck of the draw" type that doesnt like to datalog. So I bought his at a reasonable price and now I'm happily logging and emulating and hopefully will be able to get the car running at its best. Thanks again Brian!
Anyway, Brian is a great guy to deal with. He lent me a 165 ECM that he knew worked and a socketed memcal that I could plug my flash into, and it worked for me. My 165 Ecm was one of those "Luck of the draw" type that doesnt like to datalog. So I bought his at a reasonable price and now I'm happily logging and emulating and hopefully will be able to get the car running at its best. Thanks again Brian!
#22
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC Z28
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: 3.45 (G92 package)
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E
ok cool. Thanks bud. If not I'm going to hang it up this season and save up for a modern engine management system like XFI.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post