Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
#1201
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 2
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
now that ive calmed myself a lil bit i think im going to order an ms1 v2.2 for 250$ and add the flyback board for 36$ to allow me to keep my peak and hold injectors
thats option #1 at 258$'s
option #2 is a ms1 v 3.57 for 375$ i could get the std ms1 v 3.0 for 365 but ill gladly pay the extra 10$ not to have to solder jumper wires the dip switches are worth the 10$, not to mention i can drop my ms2 cpu into it
option #3 is an ems pro and harness for 400$ shipped basically an ms extra unit on steriods
i want an ms3x but at 700$ i may as well just spend the extra money and pick up a fast or something
thats option #1 at 258$'s
option #2 is a ms1 v 3.57 for 375$ i could get the std ms1 v 3.0 for 365 but ill gladly pay the extra 10$ not to have to solder jumper wires the dip switches are worth the 10$, not to mention i can drop my ms2 cpu into it
option #3 is an ems pro and harness for 400$ shipped basically an ms extra unit on steriods
i want an ms3x but at 700$ i may as well just spend the extra money and pick up a fast or something
#1202
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
Did your MS2 CPU come with your board? I had one I melted down and the CPU its self wasn't quite right after. Just something to keep in mind, if you're going to scorch earth do so fully.
#1203
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 2
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
i dont belive the cpu is bad , as my ms does the same thing with either the ms1 or ms2 cpu installed , i can always grab my buddies ms2 cpu and see if the issue goes away
#1204
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 11,812
Likes: 95
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula, '95 Formula
Engine: LC9 , LT1
Transmission: TKX , 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.50 9" , 3.23 10bolt
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
I have a spare ms2 3.57 complete. Diyautotune unit, less than a year old. Not sure what I'm doing with it. I like the Microsquirt, waaaay better hardware. A lot people have problems with poorly assembled ms2..
-- Joel
#1205
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 2
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
shoot me a price?
#1206
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 11,812
Likes: 95
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula, '95 Formula
Engine: LC9 , LT1
Transmission: TKX , 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.50 9" , 3.23 10bolt
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
I love the MS2extra operating system and tunerstudio, but I really dislike the MS2. It's too much of a science project, with waaay too many components. I also don't dig the DB35 connector.
-- Joe
#1207
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,790
Likes: 391
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
But i thought you were the computer geek? Lol
#1208
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 2
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
ill agree with joe about ms2 vs microsquirt , id rather run the micro as well as its a better unit but unfortunatly it wont work with my setup because im using peak and hold injectors, and the cost of swaping to high-z injectors makes switching to a micro much more costly
i have been using ms since it first came out it is a great unit as long as u dont get one somone half *** assembled like the used unit i bought
i think the only safe bet on a used unit is the v3.57 stuff
i have been using ms since it first came out it is a great unit as long as u dont get one somone half *** assembled like the used unit i bought
i think the only safe bet on a used unit is the v3.57 stuff
#1209
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 11,812
Likes: 95
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula, '95 Formula
Engine: LC9 , LT1
Transmission: TKX , 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.50 9" , 3.23 10bolt
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
No. I'm a software engineer, with a minor in EE.
But even if I enjoyed soldering, which I don't, the way the MS2 is sold is an issue and has been for years. Let me give you some examples:
MS 3.0 board - tooooo many components, not SMT, prone to issues:
I wouldn't even run one of these in a car that I wasn't intending on pushing home.
Then the MS 3.57. It's SMT and way more reliable, but you still have
to add resistors and make little modifications depending on what you want to do:
Then Microsquirt module - fully SMT, used for PNP applications, no modifications required. Just wire it up. Doesn't need any special resistors or anything stupid, everything works out of the box:
They all have the same SOFTWARE functionality, and will drive all the same hardware. Just the Module is more reliable. (like MS3Pro)
Rather than use a MS2 with a DB35 connector and splice my factory harness in, I mounted the Microsquirt module inside a '165 ECM case, and wired it to a delphi 56 connector. It's a plug and play ECM.
The spare MS2 3.57 unit I have was assembled by Diyautotune, and it has all the resistors and mods for HEI, the ADC inputs, etc already done so I trust it. But I still prefer to use the Module on my own vehicle. If it was assembled by someone else, I wouldn't have accepted it.
-- Joe
But even if I enjoyed soldering, which I don't, the way the MS2 is sold is an issue and has been for years. Let me give you some examples:
MS 3.0 board - tooooo many components, not SMT, prone to issues:
I wouldn't even run one of these in a car that I wasn't intending on pushing home.
Then the MS 3.57. It's SMT and way more reliable, but you still have
to add resistors and make little modifications depending on what you want to do:
Then Microsquirt module - fully SMT, used for PNP applications, no modifications required. Just wire it up. Doesn't need any special resistors or anything stupid, everything works out of the box:
They all have the same SOFTWARE functionality, and will drive all the same hardware. Just the Module is more reliable. (like MS3Pro)
Rather than use a MS2 with a DB35 connector and splice my factory harness in, I mounted the Microsquirt module inside a '165 ECM case, and wired it to a delphi 56 connector. It's a plug and play ECM.
The spare MS2 3.57 unit I have was assembled by Diyautotune, and it has all the resistors and mods for HEI, the ADC inputs, etc already done so I trust it. But I still prefer to use the Module on my own vehicle. If it was assembled by someone else, I wouldn't have accepted it.
-- Joe
#1211
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 11,812
Likes: 95
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula, '95 Formula
Engine: LC9 , LT1
Transmission: TKX , 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.50 9" , 3.23 10bolt
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
ill agree with joe about ms2 vs microsquirt , id rather run the micro as well as its a better unit but unfortunatly it wont work with my setup because im using peak and hold injectors, and the cost of swaping to high-z injectors makes switching to a micro much more costly
i have been using ms since it first came out it is a great unit as long as u dont get one somone half *** assembled like the used unit i bought
i think the only safe bet on a used unit is the v3.57 stuff
i have been using ms since it first came out it is a great unit as long as u dont get one somone half *** assembled like the used unit i bought
i think the only safe bet on a used unit is the v3.57 stuff
There is actually two things the MS2 can do that the Microsquirt can't:
1) PWM limiting on the injector drivers
2) Can drive a coil directly. (i.e, no ignition module)
The coil driver can only drive 6 coils though so you still can't do V8 CNP (unless you do wasted spark).
-- Joe
Last edited by anesthes; 07-17-2016 at 12:05 AM.
#1212
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 2
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
The injector drivers on the Microsquirt will run P&H injectors, you are just current limited to 5A. A lot of guys run resistor packs, or P&H driver board (from diyautotune) which is the better way to do it. Even with an MS2 you can toast the injector drivers running 8 low-z injectors if you are not careful.
-- Joe
-- Joe
#1213
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 2
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
There is actually two things the MS2 can do that the Microsquirt can't:
1) PWM limiting on the injector drivers
2) Can drive a coil directly. (i.e, no ignition module)
The coil driver can only drive 6 coils though so you still can't do V8 CNP (unless you do wasted spark).
-- Joe
1) PWM limiting on the injector drivers
2) Can drive a coil directly. (i.e, no ignition module)
The coil driver can only drive 6 coils though so you still can't do V8 CNP (unless you do wasted spark).
-- Joe
theres a few companys making coil drivers that will alow u to do 8-12 cop systems with the ms now, i toyed with the idea but hei works just fine for now
#1214
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 2
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
thanks to joe ill have a new ms2 soon ,
#1215
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 11,812
Likes: 95
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula, '95 Formula
Engine: LC9 , LT1
Transmission: TKX , 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.50 9" , 3.23 10bolt
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
The Micro can run TWO low-z injectors directly, that's it. Any more and you must run a resistor pack per injector, or use logic level and command a P&H board. the MSPnP that diyautotune used to sell was a microsquirt, a P&H board, an IAC board, and a fuel pump relay inside a ECM case. basically the same thing I'm running, but I don't have the P&H board.
The MS3PnP is quite a bit more advanced though, and the flash memory for data logging is awesome.
-- Joe
#1216
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 11,812
Likes: 95
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula, '95 Formula
Engine: LC9 , LT1
Transmission: TKX , 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.50 9" , 3.23 10bolt
#1218
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 11,812
Likes: 95
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula, '95 Formula
Engine: LC9 , LT1
Transmission: TKX , 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.50 9" , 3.23 10bolt
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
Hopefully this winter I'll have that all gone through and ready to go.
-- Joe
#1219
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 2
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
heres that coil driver for a v8
http://www.ebay.com/itm/8-cylinder-C...mtr&rmvSB=true
the thing i dont like about wasted spark , is u cant do spark based rev limiting , u can only do fuel cut , which is a big no no on a forced induction motor, that box lets u do standard cop setup so u can use spark cut, i.e rev limiting,2step, and launchcontrol , along with traction control
http://www.ebay.com/itm/8-cylinder-C...mtr&rmvSB=true
the thing i dont like about wasted spark , is u cant do spark based rev limiting , u can only do fuel cut , which is a big no no on a forced induction motor, that box lets u do standard cop setup so u can use spark cut, i.e rev limiting,2step, and launchcontrol , along with traction control
#1220
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 11,812
Likes: 95
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula, '95 Formula
Engine: LC9 , LT1
Transmission: TKX , 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.50 9" , 3.23 10bolt
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
-- Joe
#1221
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 2
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
lol i gota stop spending money on my car , i need to save up 2 grand for upgrades for my mx bike
#1222
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 11,812
Likes: 95
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula, '95 Formula
Engine: LC9 , LT1
Transmission: TKX , 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.50 9" , 3.23 10bolt
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
heres that coil driver for a v8
http://www.ebay.com/itm/8-cylinder-C...mtr&rmvSB=true
the thing i dont like about wasted spark , is u cant do spark based rev limiting , u can only do fuel cut , which is a big no no on a forced induction motor, that box lets u do standard cop setup so u can use spark cut, i.e rev limiting,2step, and launchcontrol , along with traction control
http://www.ebay.com/itm/8-cylinder-C...mtr&rmvSB=true
the thing i dont like about wasted spark , is u cant do spark based rev limiting , u can only do fuel cut , which is a big no no on a forced induction motor, that box lets u do standard cop setup so u can use spark cut, i.e rev limiting,2step, and launchcontrol , along with traction control
You can't do a spark cut with a HEI module anyway, even if you stop commanding advance it will run off the module. (or am I thinking of EDIS?). Now I don't recall.. If you supply +5 to the est, yet don't send it an advance signal will it just never fire the coil?
-- Joe
#1223
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 2
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
You *can* do spark cut, you'll just end up with a wicked backfire eventually haha. You can probably do a retard based rev limit though.
You can't do a spark cut with a HEI module anyway, even if you stop commanding advance it will run off the module. (or am I thinking of EDIS?). Now I don't recall.. If you supply +5 to the est, yet don't send it an advance signal will it just never fire the coil?
-- Joe
You can't do a spark cut with a HEI module anyway, even if you stop commanding advance it will run off the module. (or am I thinking of EDIS?). Now I don't recall.. If you supply +5 to the est, yet don't send it an advance signal will it just never fire the coil?
-- Joe
spark cut works very well with hei, it does not work at all with edis
#1224
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 2
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
and the 450 will still be faster , my problem is i love everything about my 250, from the feel of it to how it handles riding position etc etc , the bike feels like it was made for me compared to all the other bikes ive ridden
i think after the mods though ill be really close to having the power of the 450 on a bike/frame i really like , which is mor eimportant to me then having all the power i want but not feeling right on it
#1225
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
I think you made the right choice trying a whole new system. We'll see how it goes, but the one I had definitely had ghosts in it after I thrashed it.
#1226
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 2
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
yes it is i actually have a rather large personal btc mining farm and it just keeps expanding , the bad part is i need 2x the hashrate i had before as the reward in btc just got cut in half. i was making really good money up until the halving , though im still making good money now
joe also had a relay board and cable to go with the ms system but i couldnt afford it atm and i need an ecm asap , so i made a deal with him to buy the relay board and cable in a week or so , when i get that im going to rewire the entire car
#1227
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
Originally Posted by anesthes
Rob must be sleeping, otherwise he would be telling you to buy an EBL
-- Joe
-- Joe
Originally Posted by project89
would have considered it if i had a stock harness for the car, but a stock jy harness is crazy exspensive...
#1228
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 11,812
Likes: 95
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula, '95 Formula
Engine: LC9 , LT1
Transmission: TKX , 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.50 9" , 3.23 10bolt
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
Cool!
One of the biggest problems with MS, as I pointed out earlier, is hardware problems due to assembly.
The second problem, which I'll admit, is the documentation is not very straight forward. Unless you really know what you are doing you can get frustrated very quickly. This compounded with the fact that two operating systems exist (B&G and MSextra) with different feature sets, yet documentation doesn't always cite which OS they are referring to when discussing functionality.
But in reality, for every EBL out there (which I suspect is less than 100 units total) there is about a thousand happy Megasquirt owners.
It's unfortunate that you have to user Tunerpro and WUD with it though. Even I'd find the EBL more tolerable if there was a better GUI. No matter what ECU you are tuning, Tunerpro is an epic POS - you've got to admit.
-- Joe
Too much trouble with the MS systems from what we've seen, and what's funny is members think I am basing that info from this website when I am not. The Turbo Buick board for example has crazy tech with the stock ECM's, and the MS threads that are started inevitably go nowhere because there aren't enough users to comment. You will always read MS3 Pro, yada yada yada, but the threads are dead after the first couple of posts. Not going to try and sell you on the EBL system Dave because you know it speaks for itself, but if you ever did I would have a harness shipped over to you the next day if you needed. Hell, I just got home a few hours ago only to find a EBL datalog/bin from a member sent to me in my email, dialing himself in rather quickly from what I can see, and he is soon to be boosted to boot. This is the difference that lurking members will see when comparing, they see what works, and what doesn't. They'll see the potential promises of one, and the actual performance of the other. This is obviously not directed towards you Dave because you are like a brother to me...
The second problem, which I'll admit, is the documentation is not very straight forward. Unless you really know what you are doing you can get frustrated very quickly. This compounded with the fact that two operating systems exist (B&G and MSextra) with different feature sets, yet documentation doesn't always cite which OS they are referring to when discussing functionality.
But in reality, for every EBL out there (which I suspect is less than 100 units total) there is about a thousand happy Megasquirt owners.
It's unfortunate that you have to user Tunerpro and WUD with it though. Even I'd find the EBL more tolerable if there was a better GUI. No matter what ECU you are tuning, Tunerpro is an epic POS - you've got to admit.
-- Joe
#1229
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 2
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
Cool!
One of the biggest problems with MS, as I pointed out earlier, is hardware problems due to assembly.
The second problem, which I'll admit, is the documentation is not very straight forward. Unless you really know what you are doing you can get frustrated very quickly. This compounded with the fact that two operating systems exist (B&G and MSextra) with different feature sets, yet documentation doesn't always cite which OS they are referring to when discussing functionality.
But in reality, for every EBL out there (which I suspect is less than 100 units total) there is about a thousand happy Megasquirt owners.
It's unfortunate that you have to user Tunerpro and WUD with it though. Even I'd find the EBL more tolerable if there was a better GUI. No matter what ECU you are tuning, Tunerpro is an epic POS - you've got to admit.
-- Joe
One of the biggest problems with MS, as I pointed out earlier, is hardware problems due to assembly.
The second problem, which I'll admit, is the documentation is not very straight forward. Unless you really know what you are doing you can get frustrated very quickly. This compounded with the fact that two operating systems exist (B&G and MSextra) with different feature sets, yet documentation doesn't always cite which OS they are referring to when discussing functionality.
But in reality, for every EBL out there (which I suspect is less than 100 units total) there is about a thousand happy Megasquirt owners.
It's unfortunate that you have to user Tunerpro and WUD with it though. Even I'd find the EBL more tolerable if there was a better GUI. No matter what ECU you are tuning, Tunerpro is an epic POS - you've got to admit.
-- Joe
heres the good 3.57 board manual
http://www.msextra.com/doc/pdf/MS2V357_Hardware-3.3.pdf
#1230
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,790
Likes: 391
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
Ms3 pro is a completely different system from what i am reading. Its a complete box so no hardware assembly. Scott Clark uses it on pro stock cars and everything in between. Seems to be a great system.
It just scares me because the bad stuff i always heard about the other megasquirt stuff over the years
It just scares me because the bad stuff i always heard about the other megasquirt stuff over the years
#1231
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 2
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
Ms3 pro is a completely different system from what i am reading. Its a complete box so no hardware assembly. Scott Clark uses it on pro stock cars and everything in between. Seems to be a great system.
It just scares me because the bad stuff i always heard about the other megasquirt stuff over the years
It just scares me because the bad stuff i always heard about the other megasquirt stuff over the years
all the assembled and self assembled units i have done mysef have never had an issue , streetlethal helped me do my very first ms many years ago on my v6 , we had that thing up running boosted from scratch in about an hour, that was an ms1 2.2 unit i think the v3.0 board had just recently come out when i did my very first one on the v6
ms3/3x and ms3pro are a long way from what the system started as
#1232
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 11,812
Likes: 95
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula, '95 Formula
Engine: LC9 , LT1
Transmission: TKX , 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.50 9" , 3.23 10bolt
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
Ms3 pro is a completely different system from what i am reading. Its a complete box so no hardware assembly. Scott Clark uses it on pro stock cars and everything in between. Seems to be a great system.
It just scares me because the bad stuff i always heard about the other megasquirt stuff over the years
It just scares me because the bad stuff i always heard about the other megasquirt stuff over the years
The MS3 is a daughtercard that sticks into a 3.57 board. I could have purchased an MS3 CPU and installed it in the 3.57 ECU that is now going to Project89.
https://www.diyautotune.com/product/...hterboard-kit/
For $220, you can upgrade the MS2 to a fully functional MS3. But you still have the db36 connector, the big *** case, the relay board, etc. (I know I know, I'm the most picky person on the planet)
The MS3pro is based on the MS3 module. Just like the Microsquirt module (that I run) that was used for the MsPNP, the MS3 module is a complete SMT design from scratch with no junk:
https://www.diyautotune.com/product/ms3-pro-module/
You could stick an Ms3 module in a '165 case with a D56 header and make a plug and play MS3 thirdgen ECU. This is the whole point of it's existance.
The MS3 pro is basically it inside a weathertight case, with an Ampseal connector.
-- Joe
#1233
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 631
Likes: 7
From: Massachusetts
Car: 86' IROC
Engine: Supercharged 350
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
MAF systems are more accurate than MAP systems no doubt. They likely use both because they have to conform to emissions and CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) puts the noose around every manufacturers neck.
#1234
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 631
Likes: 7
From: Massachusetts
Car: 86' IROC
Engine: Supercharged 350
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
You can't do a spark cut with a HEI module anyway, even if you stop commanding advance it will run off the module. (or am I thinking of EDIS?). Now I don't recall.. If you supply +5 to the est, yet don't send it an advance signal will it just never fire the coil?
-- Joe
-- Joe
#1235
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 2
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
anyways cars on back burner for a lil bit to my hand heals up , just hoping my hand will be good enough for me to race my dirtbike in a harescramble in nevada on the 27th of aug
not even taking my car to the parade this weekend , probably head out to vegas in oct or november when it starts to cool down.
when my hand heals up a bit ill get the car back out and driving though
#1236
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
Ms2 worked good for me. I spent about 4 evenings after work soldering everything together. I made the engine harness over a weekend. I did the wizard thing, input all my parameters and it fired up into a nice idle, first time I hit the key. I was triggering it with an msd digital 7/crank trigger. Controlled spark with dig.7, and fueling with the ms2. Never had a reliability issue with it.
Physical size of the ms2 box is about 25% smaller than a ls pcm.
Physical size of the ms2 box is about 25% smaller than a ls pcm.
#1237
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
Originally Posted by project89
when my hand heals up a bit ill get the car back out and driving though
Originally Posted by DIGGLER
Never had a reliability issue with it.
But it isn't as user friendly, which leads to the problems, which is the main complaint...
#1238
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 11,812
Likes: 95
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula, '95 Formula
Engine: LC9 , LT1
Transmission: TKX , 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.50 9" , 3.23 10bolt
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
The new Holley stuff is nice too, but the fuel table bing DC based is a little strange for me. I guess at the end of the day though nobody cares what the number actually is or means, simply that they are getting the appropriate AFR they intend.
-- Joe
#1239
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
It's possible that its' code got better, which is to be expected with any firmware over time. A joint and collaborative open source venture was the problem in the beginning, too much for users to absorb, very little tech supplied for the needy and lost users, and those who had the tuning tech felt a little too privy to share the tuning tech, so the confused users inevitably went with something else that they could use, something more practical for them.
#1240
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,790
Likes: 391
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
The new Holley stuff is nice too, but the fuel table bing DC based is a little strange for me. I guess at the end of the day though nobody cares what the number actually is or means, simply that they are getting the appropriate AFR they intend.
#1241
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
The problem I've found was conflicting documentation between B&G code and MSextra, but as far as the GUI being user friendly, I find it very easy to use. Almost like an apple product.
The new Holley stuff is nice too, but the fuel table bing DC based is a little strange for me. I guess at the end of the day though nobody cares what the number actually is or means, simply that they are getting the appropriate AFR they intend.
-- Joe
The new Holley stuff is nice too, but the fuel table bing DC based is a little strange for me. I guess at the end of the day though nobody cares what the number actually is or means, simply that they are getting the appropriate AFR they intend.
-- Joe
That said their documentation has gone down hill over the years. I built a Megashift for my 4L80E, and it was flat out riddled with errors. Not only that but there are design flaws in the VSS input circuit that cause it to generate noise. A 50 cent IC did a far better job after retrofitting it in.
#1242
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 11,812
Likes: 95
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula, '95 Formula
Engine: LC9 , LT1
Transmission: TKX , 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.50 9" , 3.23 10bolt
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
Something I have noticed with the B&G vs Extra configurations is that not only the code varies but they may have different ways of doing the exact same thing. HEI using MS1 Extra runs a circuit to "turn on" the timing control with the PCB vs the MS-2 which uses a relay for the reference stuff.
vs: http://megasquirt.free.fr/sources/MS.../ms2/spare.htm
Basically, you are using a relay to switch the +5 vref to the ignition module when the key is in the run position, but not crank.
With using a spare port, you can instead turn the +5 vref on when RPM is greater than say 300 rpm.
On the Microsquirt Module and MS3-module, we jumper +5v to a spare input pin (19), which the software then can switch as an output on pin 44.
The relay method to me is just extra stuff to fail. But 99.9% of people find that page in the documentation and do it that way.
That said their documentation has gone down hill over the years. I built a Megashift for my 4L80E, and it was flat out riddled with errors. Not only that but there are design flaws in the VSS input circuit that cause it to generate noise. A 50 cent IC did a far better job after retrofitting it in.
-- Joe
#1243
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 1
From: garage
Engine: 3xx ci tubo
Transmission: 4L60E & 4L80E
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
Something I have noticed with the B&G vs Extra configurations is that not only the code varies but they may have different ways of doing the exact same thing. HEI using MS1 Extra runs a circuit to "turn on" the timing control with the PCB vs the MS-2 which uses a relay for the reference stuff.
That said their documentation has gone down hill over the years. I built a Megashift for my 4L80E, and it was flat out riddled with errors. Not only that but there are design flaws in the VSS input circuit that cause it to generate noise. A 50 cent IC did a far better job after retrofitting it in.
That said their documentation has gone down hill over the years. I built a Megashift for my 4L80E, and it was flat out riddled with errors. Not only that but there are design flaws in the VSS input circuit that cause it to generate noise. A 50 cent IC did a far better job after retrofitting it in.
They try to add in jumper wires for different trigger source for crank and cams. Confuses everyone.
The hardware grounding scheme was suspect from the get go and caused a lot of problems. I think this is one of the biggest problems people have even today. I don't think it was thought out well enough for large coils with high dI/dT rates. Puts noise on all the inputs and "random" trigger errors, input errors, resets.
The VR ckt is always been flaky. Simple MAX9924-27 part would fix all that but I think they don't do it due to sourcing the part.
#1244
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 1
From: garage
Engine: 3xx ci tubo
Transmission: 4L60E & 4L80E
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
MS 3.0 board - tooooo many components, not SMT, prone to issues:
I wouldn't even run one of these in a car that I wasn't intending on pushing home.
Then the MS 3.57. It's SMT and way more reliable, but you still have
to add resistors and make little modifications depending on what you want to do:
They all have the same SOFTWARE functionality, and will drive all the same hardware. Just the Module is more reliable. (like MS3Pro)
Rather than use a MS2 with a DB35 connector and splice my factory harness in, I mounted the Microsquirt module inside a '165 ECM case, and wired it to a delphi 56 connector. It's a plug and play ECM.
The spare MS2 3.57 unit I have was assembled by Diyautotune, and it has all the resistors and mods for HEI, the ADC inputs, etc already done so I trust it.
-- Joe
The microsquirt is great for using an HEI module input or hall effect sensor or any logic level input, using saturated injectors, and PWM idle controll. If you want different then it is back to wipping out the soldering iron and a bag-o-parts.
Assembly is dependent upon the builder. No different than getting brakes put on a car, or a custom turbo setup fabbed. Good builders do it right. A bad operator the wave soldering machine is going to mess up the SMT boards. Heck, I have seen guys around here build turbo manifolds using a torch and brazing on flanges........you don't want that guy fabbing a turbo setup. Just as you don't want someone with equivalent skills soldering an MS board.
Yeah, the DB connectors suck. I never understood why this connector was chosen other than for the first prototype is was cheap and widely available. It should have been changed out before they started trying to sell hardware.
The microsquirt, MS3, MS2, MS1 are all decent hardware and software. Each has an optimal application. The tuning software is light years better than what is available for the OEM GM PCMs.
I think project89 will be happy with a new properly built unit.
#1245
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 11,812
Likes: 95
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula, '95 Formula
Engine: LC9 , LT1
Transmission: TKX , 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.50 9" , 3.23 10bolt
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
True, but the add-on circuit for the stepper is only about $6 and takes 10 minutes. If you don't wanna make it, you can buy a pre-made one for about $28. You are correct though, the Microsquirt can't do more than two P&H injectors without resistors or a P&H expansion board.
I'm not aware of any ignition inputs it is missing? The only other missing feature, as you mentioned, is the ignition output is logic only (it can't drive a coil, it must use an ignition module or a logic type coil like an LS2 coil).
The 3.0 module however is quite a bit better than the MS2 module, no doubt.
The big difference is the original MS stuff, the self assembly, etc is geared towards geeks who are skilled in electronics. A guy wrenching on the weekend thinking he's gonna save a buck by soldering together his first ECM is going to have issues, get frustrated, then complain about it on the forums. It doesn't help that the developers are elitest ****** who treat people like they are idiots when they have a "simple problem".
But if you pay twice as much or more, I'm sure holley tech support will kiss your rear
-- Joe
#1246
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 2
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
surprise update !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
cars going in for a repaint , if u guys think the last color was cool wait till its done this time
cars going in for a repaint , if u guys think the last color was cool wait till its done this time
#1250
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 11,812
Likes: 95
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula, '95 Formula
Engine: LC9 , LT1
Transmission: TKX , 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.50 9" , 3.23 10bolt
Re: Single turbo 352 iroc 1000hp or bust the grand finale
I don't know how you get such good paint jobs with all that dust out there. I blew my shop out with a leaf blower, tarped the walls and everything, and STILL got dirt in my paint.
-- Joe