Power Adders Getting a Supercharger or Turbocharger? Thinking about using Nitrous? All forced induction and N2O topics discussed here.

Received new PT88 turbocharger today! Pics w/in

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-08-2001, 02:26 AM
  #51  
Supreme Member
 
89ProchargedROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: chi-town
Posts: 1,711
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by PROCHARGED89Z:
Jim,what is the compression of a GN motor?You will never be able to run 15lbs withouttaking out timing on pump gas on 9.1. </font>
Sure you can....just take out maybe 1-2 degrees of TOTAL TIMING with the electromotive and on pump gas you wont have a problem

Its stated you gain 4% for every compression point so its safe to say the opposite is true also.Jim told me its much better to lower comp.than take out timing.

very true. It is better to lower compression but not in your case because you're not going to be running an enormous amount of boost. So therefore you wouldn't be taking out a lot of timing...like i said, maybe 1-2 degrees at most on the top end


8.1 is nothing,the smog motors from the 70s have comprssions like this ,Eclipse turbos run 7.8 to1 this is a 4 banger more than half the size of my motor,my friend has one,you dont notice anything,as with a Turbo Ta motor that another has transplanted in a 67 chevelle.They just get up and go.I will not run race gas on the street,to expensive,not worth it at all,at this power level,your car is a pig on gas anyway,and race gas doenst last long on the street.Im just going to let the boost do all the work


I just meant to run race gas AT THE TRACK. Then you could turn up the total timing and the boost and go A LOT FASTER

You cannot compare the effciency of different types of motors. In actuality, turbo buick V-6s can run MORE static compression than anything else because i remember reading a report that engineers came to a conclusion a V-6 has design for a turbo motor....hence why they run so well

You can do what you want but with an 8.0:1 compression....you'd be able to run A LOT of boost on pump gas which is fine if that is what you want to do. But more boost puts more strain on everything. If you had compression 8.0:1 i wouldn't be afraid to pump up the psi to about 20-23psi on pump gas

--For you application you should be getting the turbo that has the right efficiency range for your motor. What i mean is, if the turbo you are getting runs best around 15-17psi....make your compression as high as you can (with a little safety margin of maybe 0.5:1) and run pump gas. If the turbo runs best around 20psi...you get the idea

Also if memory serves me correct....dont you have like 9.4:1?

I dont think you can drastically alter your compression by a point and a half by cc the combustion chambers unless right now the are like 76cc...then maybe even a point is pushing it

Also, dont go band-aid and use thicker head gaskets. Not a smart idea. You will screw up the quench area on the motor and actually make your motor MORE PRONE TO DETONATION with LESS compression because the flame has so far to travel

just some more of my .02


Old 11-08-2001, 03:33 AM
  #52  
Senior Member

 
TTA850's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: NY
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2013 C63C
Engine: M156 (P31)
Transmission: 7 speed MCT
Axle/Gears: AMG Limited Slip
I'd drop the compression,it's proven you make more power with lower compression and more boost.

Response off idle has never been a problem for me and(thanks to a good intercooler)I can run 18-19#'s on pump gas although I usually leave it around 16.

The TE-64's sweet spot(so I've been told)is around 25-27psi.In which case he's better off with the lower compression,with 8:1 and some C16 he can wring out 28#'s at the track and cruise with pump gas and 18#'s on the street no problem.Maybe it's just me but I like to see the boost guage up there.

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Also, dont go band-aid and use thicker head gaskets. Not a smart idea. You will screw up the quench area on the motor and actually make your motor MORE PRONE TO DETONATION with LESS compression because the flame has so far to travel</font>
This I agree on,do it right.

One final thought,the Buick guys got lucky. After doing 3 3.8 turbo's I've found these motors have a poor oiling system,along with the tendancy to eat cams,blow the bottom end out(literally out the bottom),and heads with almost no meat that it's amazing they hold boost at all.

Steve

------------------
1989 Turbo Trans Am's #124 and #850
1989 Turbo GTA,600hp 3.8L SFI TURBO
2001 Kawasaki ZX-6R
www.tta850.com
Old 11-08-2001, 10:05 AM
  #53  
Supreme Member
 
89ProchargedROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: chi-town
Posts: 1,711
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by TTA850:
The TE-64's sweet spot(so I've been told)is around 25-27psi.In which case he's better off with the lower compression,with 8:1 and some C16 he can wring out 28#'s at the track and cruise with pump gas and 18#'s on the street no problem.Maybe it's just me but I like to see the boost guage up there.
</font>
then i guess he should drop the compression But by only milling the heads....he isn't going to drop a whole lot unless his cc size is like 64cc right now and *maybe* go up to about 72cc if that is possible with some porting

[This message has been edited by 89ProchargedROC (edited November 08, 2001).]
Old 11-08-2001, 07:04 PM
  #54  
Member
 
pontiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Finland, Europe
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

i think compression ratio around 7:1 is still ok. my friend had a volvo with compression like that, T3, crazy cam (300+ degrees) and DFI. he got 300hp from rear wheels until they couldn't tied it up to dyno tight enough in order to avoid wheel spin. that car had only 2 liter engine and made high 12's with no traction.
engine worked just fine under 4000rpm, like any other volvo. after that needle of VDO meter jumped to 1.5bar (i don't know how much boost did he run). after that up to 6800rpm it was just whoo's and pop's

low compression ratio, crazy cam and lot of boost. that's recipie for nice streetable car.

-P
Old 11-09-2001, 02:13 AM
  #55  
Supreme Member
 
89ProchargedROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: chi-town
Posts: 1,711
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by pontiac:

i think compression ratio around 7:1 is still ok. my friend had a volvo with compression like that, T3, crazy cam (300+ degrees) and DFI. he got 300hp from rear wheels until they couldn't tied it up to dyno tight enough in order to avoid wheel spin. that car had only 2 liter engine and made high 12's with no traction.
engine worked just fine under 4000rpm, like any other volvo. after that needle of VDO meter jumped to 1.5bar (i don't know how much boost did he run). after that up to 6800rpm it was just whoo's and pop's

low compression ratio, crazy cam and lot of boost. that's recipie for nice streetable car.

-P
</font>
like i said....you cant compare different motors like this.

They all have different effciencies that will make up for certain losses through technology
Old 11-17-2001, 07:23 PM
  #56  
Junior Member
 
AdioSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 96 Impala SS
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 4L60E
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by PROCHARGED89Z:
They should put up a notice that pops up when you open the power adder section that says.

ATTN:Turbos are custom,they dont work on sock 305tbis with 15 lbs of boost,eclipse turbos dont work either,blah blah blah,

it does get old,just pick up a book about the subject and read(no one seems to do this anymore)Then when you have viable question by all means post them.But for some one to ask the same questions over and over,it almost is comparable to the duel exhaust threads in the exhaust forum.
</font>
Sorry to bring this info back up, but, maybe it's time for a FAQ on this if there isn't one already?

Otherwise, this has been a GREAT thread with lots of info. I've been planning on some sort of power adder for my Caprice and the info here is helping me learn more and more!

------------------
~ Cheston Phillips ~ =Impalaitis ~ = tri9_SS
'96 BBB Impala SS "ADIOSS" & '91 white Caprice 'n0n 9c1' w/L03
Old 11-18-2001, 04:43 AM
  #57  
Member
 
PROCHARGED89Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: FALL RIVER MA USA
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Guido,you have to ask you father to admit you to the crazy house.That combo will be nuts,and when you turn it up with the M block,you had better start wearing depends on a daily basis.

On another note,I saw your cam specs,and my builde,.told me the cam I have know might be good enough. 220 intake 230 exhaust at .050. .510 lift on both ex and intake.Just wondering because I want this done right the first time.I was surprised to see a turbo mustang on his wall that he built the motor for.it runs in the 5.0 classes.Single turbo,347,10 inch tires,7.85 holy crap,and he told me since he switched over to single turbo he had made over 60 passes without even taking the heads off,before on the supercharger he told me(the engine builder)he had the motor apart every event and least once.

------------------
Check out my Hompage,or the beginnings of one.355 dynoed at 400HP at 5800RPM & 410LBFT of TQ,on Motorhttp://www.procharged89z.cz28.com/index.html
Old 11-23-2001, 06:24 PM
  #58  
TGO Supporter

 
B4Ctom1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
hey you got the same k-member as me https://www.thirdgen.org/rides/index...ew&rideid=3980
Old 11-25-2001, 09:54 PM
  #59  
Supreme Member

 
ChillPhatCat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: LaFayette, NY
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '10 Subaru Forester
Engine: 2.5 Boxer
Transmission: 4EAT
Axle/Gears: 4.44
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by a73camaro:

I believe that the Pilgrams told the Indians that they would buy Madhatten Island for $24 dollar.
</font>
Manhattan WAS bought for $24!

BTW That is a monster turbo! I'm interested in what sort of Hp boost you'll be getting...

NICE!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
F-body driver
Transmissions and Drivetrain
17
03-06-2023 11:44 AM
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
3
12-10-2019 07:07 PM
Amillionoh7
LTX and LSX
14
09-11-2015 11:36 AM
NastyEngines
Group Purchases
4
09-08-2015 10:14 AM
TBRays98
Tech / General Engine
6
09-06-2015 05:05 PM



Quick Reply: Received new PT88 turbocharger today! Pics w/in



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:33 AM.