ZZ4 w Vortec SC on Overhaulin'?
#1
ZZ4 w Vortec SC on Overhaulin'?
I was originally thinking abou the ZZ4 with some forced induction, but I'm not so sure after seeing Overhaulin' last night.
They only made like 350hp WITH the ZZ4 WITH a Vortec SC setup... WITH A CARB. I was pretty dissappointed with those numbers...
Isn't the ZZ4 crate motor rated at like 400hp NA with just a carb?
I can see some loss thru the tranny, but geez...
They only made like 350hp WITH the ZZ4 WITH a Vortec SC setup... WITH A CARB. I was pretty dissappointed with those numbers...
Isn't the ZZ4 crate motor rated at like 400hp NA with just a carb?
I can see some loss thru the tranny, but geez...
#2
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1984 Z-28
Engine: L69
Transmission: 700-R4
That's all? The ZZ-4 is supposed to come with 355hp and 405 ft/lbs of torque. How much boost were they running? I'm wondering if they set the boost setting WAY too low, so the power made from boost was barely enough to compensate for the parasitic loss. Something doesn't sound right.
#3
Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Burlington KY.
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1999 Z-28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: stock/3.42
they said 7 psi. they also said it should be good for about 150hp gain???????????? (it didnt add up to me either)
#6
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: MI
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: I
Engine: Taunt
Transmission: Mustangs
I thought that was pretty weak too. Everything they got from the supercharger and a little more was lost through the driveline. I think the funniest part is that a team of vortec employees were the ones that hooked it up on the show and got these terrible numbers.
Trending Topics
#8
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chagrin Falls, Ohio
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah those numbers don't seem that off. figure a 15% to 20% drivetrain loss and ideal numbers here
so 350hp ZZ4 stock flywheel
blower hp at flywheel in a fairly ideal situation would be at lets say 80% VE so .80 X 7psi/14.7psi X NA HP = 133hp gain from blower
total output is at 483 flyhweel - the 20% loss = 387
now it was a vortech, so no INTERCOOLER so even though the VE is possible the actually efficieny of the system will be lower than that.
350 at the wheels seems just fine.
so 350hp ZZ4 stock flywheel
blower hp at flywheel in a fairly ideal situation would be at lets say 80% VE so .80 X 7psi/14.7psi X NA HP = 133hp gain from blower
total output is at 483 flyhweel - the 20% loss = 387
now it was a vortech, so no INTERCOOLER so even though the VE is possible the actually efficieny of the system will be lower than that.
350 at the wheels seems just fine.
#9
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: MI
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: I
Engine: Taunt
Transmission: Mustangs
Vortec advertises an average of 46% more horsepower from their SC's on their website. That works out to 415 rear wheel for the ZZ4. A comparable engine (sorta) is the LS1, both make around 350 hp stock. They advertise 494 crank hp with their kit for this engine. That works out to 395 at the wheels. I realize this is apples and oranges here, but they both displace the same and make the same hp, ie very comparable VE's. All these numbers are assuming 20% loss, which is in my opinion more than you should ever see with all things working properly.
The bottom line is the guys from vortec did a crappy job on national tv. How crappy is up to debate, but if it where my company I would have come in above my claimed average increase in power no matter what it took. Trust me, the last thing they were trying to inspire by being on that show was a thread in a forum like this.
Once again I say !
The bottom line is the guys from vortec did a crappy job on national tv. How crappy is up to debate, but if it where my company I would have come in above my claimed average increase in power no matter what it took. Trust me, the last thing they were trying to inspire by being on that show was a thread in a forum like this.
Once again I say !
#10
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chagrin Falls, Ohio
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you'll have to post where they make the claim about the LS1. You are right that it should be simliar but still... their claims are bogus or you aren't comparing the right numbers here. the LS1 kit is only rated at 7psi to get nearly 500 crank hp with no intercooler?
#11
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: MI
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: I
Engine: Taunt
Transmission: Mustangs
http://www.vortechsuperchargers.com/.../appguide.html
I was looking specifically at the kit for the C5 becasue of the similarities it has with the ZZ4.
I was looking specifically at the kit for the C5 becasue of the similarities it has with the ZZ4.
#12
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chagrin Falls, Ohio
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think you can use the vette kit, if only because I think it has an intercooler
the Fbody LS1 kit has with and without and intercooler
without: 418/414
with: 470/462
the vette just has one listed and its:494/473
the difference between the fbody LS1 with intercooler and the vette is about the power output difference of the stock engines... you'll aslso notice the vette kit is 7000...so it deffinately better come with an intercooler for that price.
so take the 418 of the fbody with no intercooler, add 20hp for the zz4 and you're at about 450... 20% loss of 90hp and we're right about where the vortec came out on the show. i know that's running at 1 psi less than the 7psi on the show but all things considered, it didn't perform badly at all.
you can do the same using the escalade 6.0L. stock is 345/380, that's pretty much a zz4 right there. the kit for it only comes with an intercooler and they bump it up to 465/494 on 7-8lbs boost. no intercooler yields lower numbers and we've matched what they got again.
I realize you can't really go exactly back and forth because they are different engines, different setups etc...but these somewhat real world numbers can be used as a benchmark fairly well i would have to say.
the Fbody LS1 kit has with and without and intercooler
without: 418/414
with: 470/462
the vette just has one listed and its:494/473
the difference between the fbody LS1 with intercooler and the vette is about the power output difference of the stock engines... you'll aslso notice the vette kit is 7000...so it deffinately better come with an intercooler for that price.
so take the 418 of the fbody with no intercooler, add 20hp for the zz4 and you're at about 450... 20% loss of 90hp and we're right about where the vortec came out on the show. i know that's running at 1 psi less than the 7psi on the show but all things considered, it didn't perform badly at all.
you can do the same using the escalade 6.0L. stock is 345/380, that's pretty much a zz4 right there. the kit for it only comes with an intercooler and they bump it up to 465/494 on 7-8lbs boost. no intercooler yields lower numbers and we've matched what they got again.
I realize you can't really go exactly back and forth because they are different engines, different setups etc...but these somewhat real world numbers can be used as a benchmark fairly well i would have to say.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Chas91Z28
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Wanted
10
10-22-2015 10:12 AM
monte87cortez
Transmissions and Drivetrain
2
09-26-2015 08:10 PM
350, 60, crate, forced, induction, lb9, overhaulin, supercharged, supercharger, turbocharger, vortec, zz4