Power Adders Getting a Supercharger or Turbocharger? Thinking about using Nitrous? All forced induction and N2O topics discussed here.

Weiand 142 blower on stock 350

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-11-2003, 06:15 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
supermaxxbasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 camaro RS
Engine: soon to be juiced built 357
Transmission: turbo 350
Weiand 142 blower on stock 350

I have a low compression stock 350 and I was wondering if I can slap a weiand 142 blower on it without haveing to build the bottem end. What else is required when adding a blower to a stock engine. How much horsepower can I expect with this blower and some kind of a blower cam and ported and polished 882 heads.
Old 11-11-2003, 08:53 AM
  #2  
Member
Thread Starter
 
supermaxxbasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 camaro RS
Engine: soon to be juiced built 357
Transmission: turbo 350
I am hoping for over 400 ponies but if it requires aftermarket heads then I guess I will put some pro action heads on it. Oh and the compression is around 8.5:1
Old 11-11-2003, 12:20 PM
  #3  
Senior Member

 
sleepybu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: BC Canada
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 81Malibu
Engine: SBC 355
Transmission: TH400
if you have good oil psi, go for it
Old 11-11-2003, 05:25 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
unknown_host's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Medford, Oregon
Posts: 3,245
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1989 Iroc Z L98
If your goal is 400 horsepower, a set of vortec heads, an extreme energy 274 cam and some shim gaskets will get you to your goal without overly stressing your stock bottom end.
Old 11-12-2003, 02:30 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

 
Damon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Philly, PA
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
You'll like the blower. You can get 400HP N/A relatively easy these days but not with anything like the torque of a roots blower- and at a lot lower RPM. The 142 was originally designed to make very mild 350 making about 250HP into a 350HP motor with supplied pulleys. So it's engineering was desgned around adding about 100HP over stock on a mild 350. On my 383 I pulleyed it up and went from about 350HP (n/a) to 450HP (with blower). So 400HP is well within it's capability. Up around 500HP you'll be pretty well maxed out- it jsut can't flow enough air to get much beyond that, in my opinion.

Stay conservative with the timing- 26-28* total (excluding vacuum advance) is a good starting point. Yes, you can probably push it higher than that but the consequences of detonation in a boosted motor are SWIFT AND SEVERE. Stay conservative. And don't ever ever run lean- build a fuel system that capable of feeding well in excess of what a 400HP motor requires.

You'll like the blower. Without any change in rear gear ratio it's "tire smoke on demand" due to the big bump in torque EVERYWHRE IN THE RPM RANGE from the boost.
Old 11-12-2003, 09:09 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

 
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,111
Received 52 Likes on 49 Posts
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
A Crane HMV 278-2 is a good cam for this combo.
Crane cam specs


a friend of mine went low 12's with just such a combo.

A 750cfm carb with a little richer secondary jetting will work well.

I second the advice on conservative ignition timing and
a good fuel system.
use the best available octane gas too.
Detonation must be avoided with stock cast pistons.
Old 11-13-2003, 08:23 AM
  #7  
Member
Thread Starter
 
supermaxxbasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 camaro RS
Engine: soon to be juiced built 357
Transmission: turbo 350
hey thanks guys I like the sound of that better.
Old 02-08-2004, 04:16 PM
  #8  
Member
Thread Starter
 
supermaxxbasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 camaro RS
Engine: soon to be juiced built 357
Transmission: turbo 350
Ok guys time to renew this thread...My engine blew before I could get the blower...well I had to use my blower budget to rebuild it so now its time to start all over...........The engine now has 9;1 compression iwth 76cc heads which I have on there..with Hyper pistons and a 272 crane cam....I am still wanting to do the blower scene cause I think it would really kick butt...:hail: :hail: BUt should I even attempt it with the higher compression..
Old 02-10-2004, 07:53 AM
  #9  
Supreme Member

 
Damon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Philly, PA
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
I was running that blower on a motor with 9.2:1 compression and hypereutectic slugs. I blew it up (ripped the ringlands off a few pistons) BUT I KNOW WHY. I had gotten "greedy" with the ignition timing. I didn't THINK I was in detonation, but obviously I was when I tore the motor down.

If you run modest boost (5 PSI or less) and keep the ignition timing conservative (28* total) and don't ever EVER run lean it will probably last a long time.

Is it even worth doing for 5 PSI? Oh yes. It'll feel like you strapped a rocket to the back of the car. HP maybe only jump by ~75 but the bottom end torque is quite amazing. Not like a nitrous hit but there's a big 'ol heaping helping of torque down there.

Plus the cool sound of the blower winding up through the gears. Unearthly noise. Unmistakable. And fun.
Old 02-10-2004, 02:21 PM
  #10  
Member
Thread Starter
 
supermaxxbasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 camaro RS
Engine: soon to be juiced built 357
Transmission: turbo 350
hey thanks guys...I will prolly end up putting in some forged pistons for peace of mind..lol..Can someone tell me how much HP the bottem end of the motor can take...cause I am gonna try and make upwards of 400hp with this motor and I just need to know if I should replace the bottem end..thanks
Old 02-10-2004, 02:51 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member

 
flrtin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Western Ky
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: Z/28..39 Plymouth truck in progress
Engine: S/B
Transmission: Manual
Going with the forged pistons is the best selection imo, also try to stay away from chrome moly rings they are a harder material than the dutile iron rings and are more prone to shattering with any type of detination. Another suggestion would be to get a timing retard like MSD offers so you can stay retarded when doing just normal driving also a 6k rpm limit will go a long way with stock crank and rods. One other thing to watch is your octane level it needs to go up in colder weather becase air density on a blown motor is affected much more with cold air than on a N/A motor

EDIT: I would try to stay under 8:5.1 with the cr

Last edited by flrtin1; 02-10-2004 at 02:59 PM.
Old 02-10-2004, 06:29 PM
  #12  
Supreme Member

 
Damon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Philly, PA
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Just remember that ANY piston will eventually fail under detonation. Forged slugs jsut take longer to kill. The real answer is to never encounter detonation. I'll take hyper slugs, lower compression and no detonation over forged slugs, higher compression and borderline detonation any day of the week.

8.5:1 might sound dismally low for compression but for a roots blower engine with iron heads it's not. It also won't be a "dog" down low crusing around at part throttle like you might think. Attention paid to the ignition advance curve makes a pretty big difference in my limited expereince with these motors.
Old 02-11-2004, 11:29 AM
  #13  
Supreme Member

 
flrtin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Western Ky
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: Z/28..39 Plymouth truck in progress
Engine: S/B
Transmission: Manual
This is from holleys tech section it is good info on what to use when you are planning on building a blower motor and why low static CR is important



Table 1 shows that you obviously can't try to run 10 pounds of boost on a 9.0:1 compression ratio engine. This gives you an effective compression ratio of 15.1:1, way beyond our 12:1 figure. If you are building your engine from scratch, it is a good idea to try to build it with a relatively low compression ratio, such as 7.5 or 8.0:1. It is fairly easy to change the boost to get the best combination of performance and power, but it is extremely difficult to change the compression ratio, especially if you want to lower it. Additionally, you will make more total power with a low compression, high boost engine than you will with a high compression, low boost engine.

(I could not get the table to paste here so go to this link and look at TABLE 1)

http://www.holley.com/HiOctn/TechSer...fo/SCTech.html

The above chart shows the effective compression ratio of your engine, which combines the static compression ratio with the amount of supercharger boost. Note that for most street applications with 92 octane pump gas, you should keep your effective compression ratio below about 12.0:1.

Last edited by flrtin1; 02-11-2004 at 12:39 PM.
Old 02-11-2004, 05:01 PM
  #14  
Member

 
fbody83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1983 firebird S/E
Engine: Built 350
Transmission: 700r4
882 heads suck as well, no flow. They are prone to cracking as well.
Old 02-16-2004, 04:43 PM
  #15  
Member
Thread Starter
 
supermaxxbasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 camaro RS
Engine: soon to be juiced built 357
Transmission: turbo 350
Does anyone have a pic of this type of blower in the camaro...
Old 02-16-2004, 04:49 PM
  #16  
Supreme Member

 
flrtin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Western Ky
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: Z/28..39 Plymouth truck in progress
Engine: S/B
Transmission: Manual
check my web site I had the B&M 144 on my car from 1986 till 1990
Old 02-16-2004, 06:53 PM
  #17  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
unknown_host's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Medford, Oregon
Posts: 3,245
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1989 Iroc Z L98
Originally posted by flrtin1
check my web site I had the B&M 144 on my car from 1986 till 1990
Whatd it run out of curiousity?
Old 01-27-2020, 02:22 AM
  #18  
Junior Member
 
Cross R Jeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Weiand 142 blower on stock 350

My apologies for intruding, but i too hv a gen 3 / 95'-Z28 fxn to do a motor swap frm LT1 to LS1 or LS2 Wh like LS6 HEADS or sum...but my quest is I also hv a 94' Chevy Blazer Silverado 4x4 wh a 6" fabtech lift, & the motor don't smoke, burn oil, leak wh about 218,000 mi on orig. motor 5.7L 350 V-8...So how would that B&M142 wrk out on my truck? Overkill or badass?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Military Clone
Power Adders
0
07-01-2010 07:46 PM
Mike305RS
Power Adders
5
02-03-2008 04:27 AM
ColdGTA
Power Adders
15
02-10-2004 12:19 PM
Hype
Tech / General Engine
2
02-25-2003 12:34 PM
PIMPINPHIL
Power Adders
7
01-04-2003 07:21 PM



Quick Reply: Weiand 142 blower on stock 350



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:26 AM.