0 - 60 feet = 1.55, but 1/4 = 14.18?????
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Southern MD, USA
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
0 - 60 feet = 1.55, but 1/4 = 14.18?????
I find these numbers interesting. I don't think my chip is giving enough on top end. Also, the car was running at 230 farenheit with a full tank of gas and no wieght reduction. What do you guys think? I think it should atleast be in the low 13's and eventually into the 12's if the chip had some more work. With the T56 I shift at 5000rpms and it kicks down to about 4000 rpms. I'm assuming I'm getting the great 60 foot times because the computer is feeding the engine correctly till about 3500 or 4000 and then, the rest of my 1/4 is between 4000 and 5000 rpms. Of course, my computer doesn't give the engine any power there so my acceleration slows significantly. That's what I'm thinkin.
60 - 1.55
330 - 6.199
1/8 - 9.3
1000 - 11.96
1/4 - 14.18
101.87 mph
60 - 1.68
330 - 6.03
1/8 - 9.12
1000 - 11.74
1/4 - 13.95
101.61 mph
670 TBI, cam - .471int .491exh, 3.73 open rear, 3 inch flowmaster, no cat
------------------
88 firebird formula
350 Vortec TBI
214int/224exh, .471int/.491exh
Edelbrock headers
T56 - SIX-speed
open 3.73's
2 1/4 stock catback
I love pissing those LS1's off
My Formula
All your base are belong to us.
60 - 1.55
330 - 6.199
1/8 - 9.3
1000 - 11.96
1/4 - 14.18
101.87 mph
60 - 1.68
330 - 6.03
1/8 - 9.12
1000 - 11.74
1/4 - 13.95
101.61 mph
670 TBI, cam - .471int .491exh, 3.73 open rear, 3 inch flowmaster, no cat
------------------
88 firebird formula
350 Vortec TBI
214int/224exh, .471int/.491exh
Edelbrock headers
T56 - SIX-speed
open 3.73's
2 1/4 stock catback
I love pissing those LS1's off
My Formula
All your base are belong to us.
#2
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,016
Likes: 0
Received 1,921 Likes
on
1,310 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Dang dude! Clicking of 1.55 short times ain't bad. What you got for a suspension?
#3
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Posts: 17,165
Likes: 0
Received 136 Likes
on
114 Posts
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Unless you're dumping the clutch at 5000 rpm and have 26" or smaller tires I doubt those 60 foot times are correct. 3.73 and an open diff might see 1.9 or 1.8's but not 1.5's. Your engine just doesn't produce enough torque for your setup to get those numbers. Go back on another night and try again. It's possible the tracks 60 foot lights were wrong. I've seen it before. The computer gets screwed up and gives all kinds of wierd readings.
A 1.5 60 foot time is good for a car that runs low 11's not high 13's.
------------------
Follow my racing progress on Stephen's racing page
and check out the race car
87 IROC-Z SuperPro ET Bracket Race Car
461 naturally aspirated Big Block
Best ET on a time slip: 11.242 altitude corrected to 10.89
Best MPH on a time slip: 121.52 altitude corrected to 125.89
Altitude corrected rear wheel HP: 497.9
Best 60 foot: 1.546
Racing at 3500 feet elevation but most race days it's over 5000 feet density altitude!
Member of the Calgary Drag Racing Association
87 IROC bracket car, 91 454SS daily driver, 95 Homebuilt Harley
A 1.5 60 foot time is good for a car that runs low 11's not high 13's.
------------------
Follow my racing progress on Stephen's racing page
and check out the race car
87 IROC-Z SuperPro ET Bracket Race Car
461 naturally aspirated Big Block
Best ET on a time slip: 11.242 altitude corrected to 10.89
Best MPH on a time slip: 121.52 altitude corrected to 125.89
Altitude corrected rear wheel HP: 497.9
Best 60 foot: 1.546
Racing at 3500 feet elevation but most race days it's over 5000 feet density altitude!
Member of the Calgary Drag Racing Association
87 IROC bracket car, 91 454SS daily driver, 95 Homebuilt Harley
#4
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Southern MD, USA
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's my point man. My car SHOULD be running high 12's NOT high 13's. Yeah, I know it's TBI and all, but it does have power. If the vortec crate engine is any indication as to how much power I have I will be in the 12's if I get the computer straightened out and the temp down. Not to be a *****, but the numbers had to be correct and my car does have enough torque to do what it needs to do for a 1.55 60 foot time.
------------------
88 firebird formula
350 Vortec TBI
214int/224exh, .471int/.491exh
Edelbrock headers
T56 - SIX-speed
open 3.73's
2 1/4 stock catback
I love pissing those LS1's off
My Formula
All your base are belong to us.
[This message has been edited by Birmass (edited June 23, 2001).]
[This message has been edited by Birmass (edited June 23, 2001).]
------------------
88 firebird formula
350 Vortec TBI
214int/224exh, .471int/.491exh
Edelbrock headers
T56 - SIX-speed
open 3.73's
2 1/4 stock catback
I love pissing those LS1's off
My Formula
All your base are belong to us.
[This message has been edited by Birmass (edited June 23, 2001).]
[This message has been edited by Birmass (edited June 23, 2001).]
#5
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,016
Likes: 0
Received 1,921 Likes
on
1,310 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
hehe. I didn't check your sig and didn't notice the Vortech 350 crate motor. Steven is right... there's no prayer you ran that kind of 60' time. Go back to the track and try again.
#6
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Southern MD, USA
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's actually not a crate motor. I built it myself. It's got the heads with edelbrock carb intake, adapter, and 670 TBI. The cam is also significantly larger. The lift on the vortec is .435int/.460exh. Mine is .471int/.491exh and the crate runs 330HP so I better be around 350 with almost 400LBS of torque.
You guys just can't imagine TBI doing something can you? It'll be a 12 second car with tuning and it will stay TBI .
------------------
88 firebird formula
350 Vortec TBI
214int/224exh, .471int/.491exh
Edelbrock headers
T56 - SIX-speed
open 3.73's
3 inch Flowmaster catback
I love pissing those LS1's off
My Formula
You guys just can't imagine TBI doing something can you? It'll be a 12 second car with tuning and it will stay TBI .
------------------
88 firebird formula
350 Vortec TBI
214int/224exh, .471int/.491exh
Edelbrock headers
T56 - SIX-speed
open 3.73's
3 inch Flowmaster catback
I love pissing those LS1's off
My Formula
#7
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Southern MD, USA
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tell you guys what. I'm a pretty honest guy. I'll be hopefully going to the track this friday again and I'll update you as to what happens. If I'm wrong I'll tell you what it actually ran, but I hope I'm not .
Trending Topics
#8
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,016
Likes: 0
Received 1,921 Likes
on
1,310 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Okay, sounds like a plan Don't get me wrong... I'm not knocking your setup. I'm just giving you my honest impression.
If you do it again I'm going to have to know your secret. I've never seen a stick shift, one-wheel drive, 3.73 geared, full weight, 350 Hp, no roll cage, possibly no subframes, stock suspension vehicle do that. Unless you give me a picture of you pulling one wheel clean off the ground...
If you do it again I'm going to have to know your secret. I've never seen a stick shift, one-wheel drive, 3.73 geared, full weight, 350 Hp, no roll cage, possibly no subframes, stock suspension vehicle do that. Unless you give me a picture of you pulling one wheel clean off the ground...
#9
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Posts: 1,852
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
11 Posts
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 383
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12 bolt-3.73
That 1.55 short time is possible with the right tires and a clutch dump. I've cut a 1.84 with street tires and stock suspension, and a friend with a vigilante and 3.73's cuts 1.6X's all day with drag radials.
Sounds like the motor is falling on it's face and running out of air/fuel at half track. You need some intake and airflow mods bad.
Sounds like the motor is falling on it's face and running out of air/fuel at half track. You need some intake and airflow mods bad.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Mpls, MN USA
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro
Engine: 427 BBC
Transmission: T400
If you are really pulling 1.55 60ft times with an open 3.73, you will be a very rich person selling that secret.
With those short times, you should be 330'ing in the 4.8x range, not 6.x range.
I would say there was something wrong with the 60ft clocks.
Miles
------------------
88 427 Camaro
12.18 @ 113mph 1.75 60ft
Currently installing 3.73's into my 9 bolt (YES,it is a 9 bolt & YES they are 3.73's, not 3.70. 4.11's to follow soon )
www.koolmeister.com
With those short times, you should be 330'ing in the 4.8x range, not 6.x range.
I would say there was something wrong with the 60ft clocks.
Miles
------------------
88 427 Camaro
12.18 @ 113mph 1.75 60ft
Currently installing 3.73's into my 9 bolt (YES,it is a 9 bolt & YES they are 3.73's, not 3.70. 4.11's to follow soon )
www.koolmeister.com
#12
Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Ashburn, VA. USA
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What track are you doing this? Capitol Raceway or MIR? My red mustang (danjrus)at MIR gets 1.57 short times and it pulls the wheels off about 6-8 inches. It runs M/T slicks and some suspension mods with a full cage. My son drives and he leaves on the limiter everytime. I don't go to Capitol because there is no traction.
Pete
Pete
#13
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Oklahoma City, OK. USA
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the 60' timers at the track that you ran at were way off like this run that I made at Thunder Valley in Noble Okla.
This run was made before a few of the mods that got me to the 14.3s. If you take a look at the 60ft time you know by everything else that its bogus. I usually get a 2.10 60ft. time.
Look at your 330 ft time on your first listed run -mine is quicker than yours... How is that if you really ran the 1.55?
R/T - .533
60' - <font color="red">1.44</font>
330 - 6.167
1/8 - 9.441
MPH - 75.35
1000 -12.274
1/4 -14.675
MPH - 94.00
A 1.44 60' -I wish!
Some of the other guys running after me got bogus 60' times as well.
-----------------------------------------
Just put the AFPR in today -man thats a big SOTP difference. Hoping for a 13.999 w/a big bag of ice. LOL!
------------------
89 IROC-Z 5.7L
130,000 MILES
2.77 GEARS
K&Ns FILTERS
ALL FREE MODS
FLOWMASTER MUFFLER
PERFORMANCE RESOURCE CHIP
Best 1/4 E.T. 14.37 @ 95 MPH
Best 1/8 E.T. 9.22 @ 76 MPH
Best 60ft. 2.07
[This message has been edited by whiteroc (edited June 25, 2001).]
This run was made before a few of the mods that got me to the 14.3s. If you take a look at the 60ft time you know by everything else that its bogus. I usually get a 2.10 60ft. time.
Look at your 330 ft time on your first listed run -mine is quicker than yours... How is that if you really ran the 1.55?
R/T - .533
60' - <font color="red">1.44</font>
330 - 6.167
1/8 - 9.441
MPH - 75.35
1000 -12.274
1/4 -14.675
MPH - 94.00
A 1.44 60' -I wish!
Some of the other guys running after me got bogus 60' times as well.
-----------------------------------------
Just put the AFPR in today -man thats a big SOTP difference. Hoping for a 13.999 w/a big bag of ice. LOL!
------------------
89 IROC-Z 5.7L
130,000 MILES
2.77 GEARS
K&Ns FILTERS
ALL FREE MODS
FLOWMASTER MUFFLER
PERFORMANCE RESOURCE CHIP
Best 1/4 E.T. 14.37 @ 95 MPH
Best 1/8 E.T. 9.22 @ 76 MPH
Best 60ft. 2.07
[This message has been edited by whiteroc (edited June 25, 2001).]
#14
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Southern MD, USA
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is at capital. I hate to admit it, but there probrably was something wrong with the clocks, but I can dream can't I??
Anyways, I would like to emphasize that this is not really a 14 second car we're talking about here. I've gotten a friend to do about 12 chips so far and it could go all the way up to 100 chips before we even get close. Think of it this way, my 1.55 time probrably isn't right, but my car is DEFINITELY not a 14 or even a high 13 second car. The regular vortec crate motor makes 330HP. I built the motor and I have a bigger cam in it too. I would atleast hope I'll be pushing 350HP with 400lbs of torque. Once I get the tuning doen with the chip there's no way that this is a mid to high 13 second and up car. Remember also that it's a T56 which affects my usable rpms in the 1/4 mile. The car is a work in progress and it needs a lot of work. But I can still dream that it'll do a 1.55 60' .
Anyways, I would like to emphasize that this is not really a 14 second car we're talking about here. I've gotten a friend to do about 12 chips so far and it could go all the way up to 100 chips before we even get close. Think of it this way, my 1.55 time probrably isn't right, but my car is DEFINITELY not a 14 or even a high 13 second car. The regular vortec crate motor makes 330HP. I built the motor and I have a bigger cam in it too. I would atleast hope I'll be pushing 350HP with 400lbs of torque. Once I get the tuning doen with the chip there's no way that this is a mid to high 13 second and up car. Remember also that it's a T56 which affects my usable rpms in the 1/4 mile. The car is a work in progress and it needs a lot of work. But I can still dream that it'll do a 1.55 60' .
#15
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: 645hp/656 ft lb Blown 383
Transmission: 700-R4 3,000 stall
Axle/Gears: 3.55 moser 12-bolt
There is a BIG difference between a 1.8 60 and a 1.5. You'd need mid 11's to hit a 1.5. As far as the motor goes, check my sig, I should be making more power, but only hit 13.5's. These cars have por ability to get thte power to the ground, because of the rest of the driveline. So don't expect 12's. You can probably get mid 13's and maybe even mid/low thirteens, but realize that a 13.2 would take roughly 70 hp more than you are making now. Also, you'd probably need atleast 106 mph, to hit a time like that at the very least. Godd, luck, I'm sure it'll pull a mid 13. That's not bad at all.
------------------
SUPERCHARGED 87 GTA: Blk/Gld w/Superam, 355cid Trickflows, forged pistons 9.5:1. Auto 2,600 stall, 3.45 9 bolt disc, Best time & mph (Naturally Aspirated): 13.567 @ 101.900 w/ a poor 60ft. Best mph: 104.3 *This car is 100% NYS emissions legal, w/ all emissions controls!* "If you want to have a fast car, hang out w/ those who do!"
http:// www.community.webtv.net/munks87/JustinsGTApage.com
VORTECH S-TRIM, INSTALLATION IN PROGRESS: 10 & 15 LB> PULLEYS, CUSTOM HKS RACE BYPASS, CUSTOM DUCTING W/ COLD AIR, SWAPPING TO SERPENTINE, & MANY EXTRAS! BEST TIME: 11'S I GUESS. WE'LL SEE IN SPRING!
------------------
SUPERCHARGED 87 GTA: Blk/Gld w/Superam, 355cid Trickflows, forged pistons 9.5:1. Auto 2,600 stall, 3.45 9 bolt disc, Best time & mph (Naturally Aspirated): 13.567 @ 101.900 w/ a poor 60ft. Best mph: 104.3 *This car is 100% NYS emissions legal, w/ all emissions controls!* "If you want to have a fast car, hang out w/ those who do!"
http:// www.community.webtv.net/munks87/JustinsGTApage.com
VORTECH S-TRIM, INSTALLATION IN PROGRESS: 10 & 15 LB> PULLEYS, CUSTOM HKS RACE BYPASS, CUSTOM DUCTING W/ COLD AIR, SWAPPING TO SERPENTINE, & MANY EXTRAS! BEST TIME: 11'S I GUESS. WE'LL SEE IN SPRING!
#16
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Southern MD, USA
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks Justin. We'll see what I can do to get it down there. This stuff can be frustrating at times, but if you succeed it's all worth it. I'm gonna keep trying and if I can't hit 12's by messing around with what I've got then I'll add something else on to get it there . But no nitrous!
#17
Occasionaly you can get what we call a rear wheel start. Did this one time with the pro bracket car and pulled a 1.08 60 foot when it really only pulles 1.48. That info was useful though cause now we know where the car is at 0.40 into the run. Incase we want to juice it while the chassis is at 100% weight transfer.
#18
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1984 Chevy Camaro
Engine: Built L98
Transmission: T-56 6 speed
wow you lucky bastard! When I was hitting 14.9 my best 60' time was 2.4! **** 1.5...If only I could do that. Probably hit low 14's. Hell...maybe high 13's? hey a guy can dream. =D
------------------
Chris
91 RS 305 TBI
Eternal Rev
------------------
Chris
91 RS 305 TBI
Eternal Rev
#19
Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Amarillo TX usa
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yea i got a time slip once that said i pulled a 1.02 60 foot time and a 3.7 1/4 mile pass @ 101 mph. That was a really good pass. but i thought i was going to brake out so i hit the brakes wich brought my mph down from 400 mph to just over 100 in 10 feet. dude the clocks we messed up. You are not coming off the line well at all to run those et's at that mph.
------------------
90 IROC l98
last season best corected 13.62 @102
mods
full exhaust, AFPR, pulley, jet stage 1 chip, billet servo, 52mm throttle body, slp runners and some 1.6 RR's and a few other little things.
243 RWHP and 342 RWTQ with hot engine and 90 octain fuel
------------------
90 IROC l98
last season best corected 13.62 @102
mods
full exhaust, AFPR, pulley, jet stage 1 chip, billet servo, 52mm throttle body, slp runners and some 1.6 RR's and a few other little things.
243 RWHP and 342 RWTQ with hot engine and 90 octain fuel
#20
Your 1/4 mile speed indicates about 240 HP and I don't believe that you have a true 1.55 60'. This is especially true with a T56 vs an automatic.
------------------
Hank
87'IROC Z28
Hanks 87 IROC
------------------
Hank
87'IROC Z28
Hanks 87 IROC
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Illinois, Chicago
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">wow you lucky bastard! When I was hitting 14.9 my best 60' time was 2.4! **** 1.5...If only I could do that. Probably hit low 14's. Hell...maybe high 13's? hey a guy can dream. =D</font>
------------------
1990 G92 5spd LB9 - 3.42 80,000 miles
Accel Ignition/Wires (8.8mm), Advanced Timing, TB Bypass, Ported and Gasket Matched Plenum, Synthetic Motor Oil, 160 Thermo, TPIS Airfoil, K&N Air Filters, Centerforce I Pressure Plate and Clutch, Edelbrock TES Headers, Dual Cats, Edelbrock RPM Series Catback, Homemade Ram Air, Bosch +4 Platinum Plugs
14.4 @ 94mph w/2.0622 60ft (w/o headers and catback)
14.426 @ 96.19mph w/2.167 60ft(w/headers and catback)
#23
Low 10's...uh...It would take a little more than 1.5's to get there, unless it were a 9 sec car, with a traction problem. Low 10sec 60' times are generally more like low 1.4's or high 1.3's. My friend's 89 Mustang LX runs 10.11 @ 137.85 and he's pulling a 1.378 60' Stephen87IROC is running 11.20's (10.80's alt. corrected) and he's pulling 1.54 My car is running 11.60 @ 114.56 and I'm very close to 1.5's with a 1.622 but it's still way faster than 14's
------------------
82 Z28 383, Ported 215cc Dart Iron Eagle Heads 72 cc Comb. Chambers, Comp custom grind Hyd roller cam, Speed Pro .250" domes, Wheeler Motorsports 4340 I beam rods, Eagle 5140 steel crank, Weiand Team G intake, Holley 830 DP, hedman headers
Trans: Turbo 350 w/ 4000 stall -- Rearend 7.5 w/ Richmond 4.10's, Auburn Minispool
Best ET:11.60 @ 114.56, w/ a 7.34 1/8 @ 93.50, and a 1.622 60'
89 RS, L03 305, Hypertech Chip,cat delete, Dynomax exhaust,K&N open element Filter,160 stat, MSD coil --Trans:700R4 Corvette Servo -- Rearend: 7.5 GM 3.42 w/ posi-lock
Bassett Racing
[This message has been edited by Basett_Racing (edited July 04, 2001).]
------------------
82 Z28 383, Ported 215cc Dart Iron Eagle Heads 72 cc Comb. Chambers, Comp custom grind Hyd roller cam, Speed Pro .250" domes, Wheeler Motorsports 4340 I beam rods, Eagle 5140 steel crank, Weiand Team G intake, Holley 830 DP, hedman headers
Trans: Turbo 350 w/ 4000 stall -- Rearend 7.5 w/ Richmond 4.10's, Auburn Minispool
Best ET:11.60 @ 114.56, w/ a 7.34 1/8 @ 93.50, and a 1.622 60'
89 RS, L03 305, Hypertech Chip,cat delete, Dynomax exhaust,K&N open element Filter,160 stat, MSD coil --Trans:700R4 Corvette Servo -- Rearend: 7.5 GM 3.42 w/ posi-lock
Bassett Racing
[This message has been edited by Basett_Racing (edited July 04, 2001).]
#24
Oh yea. Sorry. We had between 1.42 and 1.53 and we had the timing cut back trying to kill torque. You know some of that brackett stuff. Most of the guys just want to go faster but we always went more rounds.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RedLeader289
Tech / General Engine
10
05-28-2019 01:47 PM