hp guess from trap speed..
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Z28 1LE
Engine: 350
Transmission: T5
hp guess from trap speed..
just curious guys, but how much horse you think I'm pulling if I'm doing 106mph with 3.27 gears and a T-5 behind a 350 in a Camaro that weighs 3470lbs WITH a 190lb driver? thanks!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Spring, TX, USA
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
106? ****. Thats pretty damn fast. Thats probably what, a low 13?
I hit a 14.0 @ 97.5...
So I'd guess a 13.1-13.3 ish could hit a 106mph. Hmm. I'm really kinda shooting in the dark here. You need an ET to go with your trap speed. However, I would guess youve got over 300 on the ground, so 330-350 on the crank.
Just a guess though.
I hit a 14.0 @ 97.5...
So I'd guess a 13.1-13.3 ish could hit a 106mph. Hmm. I'm really kinda shooting in the dark here. You need an ET to go with your trap speed. However, I would guess youve got over 300 on the ground, so 330-350 on the crank.
Just a guess though.
#3
Supreme Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1993 Ford Mustang
Engine: 5.0L
Transmission: T5
With the right suspension, you can run 12's with a 106 mph trap speed. My guess in a 3500 lb car would be about 350 - 370 at the flywheel.
#5
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Posts: 17,169
Likes: 0
Received 136 Likes
on
114 Posts
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
I'm assuming 3470 is with the driver so that's the total weight going down the track.
3470 pound car running 106 mph = 322.55 RWHP
With a proper setup, it should be running high 12's.
I'm also assuming you ran in Mission so you are either running at or sometimes below sea level air conditions.
3470 pound car running 106 mph = 322.55 RWHP
With a proper setup, it should be running high 12's.
I'm also assuming you ran in Mission so you are either running at or sometimes below sea level air conditions.
Last edited by AlkyIROC; 04-29-2002 at 08:17 PM.
#6
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pasadena, MD
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '87 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 385 HSR
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Originally posted by Stephen 87 IROC
I'm assuming 3470 is with the driver so that's the total weight going down the track.
3470 pound car running 106 mph = 322.55 RWHP
With a proper setup, it should be running high 12's.
I'm assuming 3470 is with the driver so that's the total weight going down the track.
3470 pound car running 106 mph = 322.55 RWHP
With a proper setup, it should be running high 12's.
#7
Supreme Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: hp guess from trap speed..
Originally posted by age
just curious guys, but how much horse you think I'm pulling if I'm doing 106mph with 3.27 gears and a T-5 behind a 350 in a Camaro that weighs 3470lbs WITH a 190lb driver? thanks!
just curious guys, but how much horse you think I'm pulling if I'm doing 106mph with 3.27 gears and a T-5 behind a 350 in a Camaro that weighs 3470lbs WITH a 190lb driver? thanks!
that is definately a 12second mph. what was your 60' ? if you can get a 1.75 or better you will be golden
later
tim
Trending Topics
#8
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Posts: 17,169
Likes: 0
Received 136 Likes
on
114 Posts
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
My formulas are all racing formulas. They're based on a power to weight ratio. It takes so much power to the ground to move so much weight so fast. I stand on my calculations.
It also has a lot to do with weather conditions gearing and weight transfer. While his street car may be able to run low 12's and equally heavy Stock Eliminator car is probably in the high 10's. There's not much difference allowed in the engine but cam choice (lift restricted), gearing and weight distribution makes these cars a lot faster than a street version that weighs the same.
Since we only know his speed and not his ET we don't know how good his gearing is. If it was geared to max out at the 1/4 mile then the mph is good. If the gearing needs to be adjusted so that the engine maxes out at the 1/4 mile then the mph will decrease. I've seen 12.00 cars running between 104 and 117 mph. The 117 mph shows more HP but they both run the same ET because of gearing.
It also has a lot to do with weather conditions gearing and weight transfer. While his street car may be able to run low 12's and equally heavy Stock Eliminator car is probably in the high 10's. There's not much difference allowed in the engine but cam choice (lift restricted), gearing and weight distribution makes these cars a lot faster than a street version that weighs the same.
Since we only know his speed and not his ET we don't know how good his gearing is. If it was geared to max out at the 1/4 mile then the mph is good. If the gearing needs to be adjusted so that the engine maxes out at the 1/4 mile then the mph will decrease. I've seen 12.00 cars running between 104 and 117 mph. The 117 mph shows more HP but they both run the same ET because of gearing.
#9
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Z28 1LE
Engine: 350
Transmission: T5
hey guys, thanks for the replies... my et's were about a 13.4... but mind you that it was my first time drag racing, and I was riding on nearly bald 265/50/16 BFG Radials.
Stephen, yea.. I was at Mission Raceway... I'm not sure about how altitude affects 1/4 mile performance. So, I'm just taking my numbers at face value..
NJ Speeder: I can't remember my 60's, but both that and my R/Ts were BAD
oh yea.. and I have the stock final drive gear ratio (3.27s.. or 3.23s?). Which leads me to my other question... if going to 3.42s or 3.73s would INCREASE my mph (does it? I'm not sure), then how is the trap speed an indication of hp?
Obviously I'm new to the concepts of drag racing.. so please forgive me if I'm asking dumb questions. thanks guys!
Stephen, yea.. I was at Mission Raceway... I'm not sure about how altitude affects 1/4 mile performance. So, I'm just taking my numbers at face value..
NJ Speeder: I can't remember my 60's, but both that and my R/Ts were BAD
oh yea.. and I have the stock final drive gear ratio (3.27s.. or 3.23s?). Which leads me to my other question... if going to 3.42s or 3.73s would INCREASE my mph (does it? I'm not sure), then how is the trap speed an indication of hp?
Obviously I'm new to the concepts of drag racing.. so please forgive me if I'm asking dumb questions. thanks guys!
Last edited by age; 05-01-2002 at 12:55 AM.
#10
First of all, R/T has absolutely nothing to with ET or MPH. The clock starts timing E/T when the car actually moves, so your R/T could be a perfect .500 or 20 mins and your E/T would still be 13.40 That's one of the most common myths about drag racing, and like you said, you're new to it, so its not fault. One other thing you may not know is when you're trying to get you're best ET, stage as shallow as you possibly can. When you turn on the "prestage" light, bump the car up very slowly and the instant you see the "stage" light come on STOP! don't go up any further. A lot of people think going up further makes the track shorter, but it actually hurts your ET a little. Staging shallow actually gives a slight "running start" before the clock starts. But as far your car goes, that is pretty quick. Do a little suspension work, and get some slicks and that baby be 12 bound all day long. My brother's truck runs 12.40's at 106, so you definetly got enough MPH to get you there, you just gotta get it hooked up.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
darwinprice
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
17
10-11-2015 11:51 PM