Wait for gen V or go ls
#1
Wait for gen V or go ls
I’m looking to do an engine swap in my 88 iroc im wondering if i should go with the ls since it is tried and trued with a lot of aftermarket support or just wait until the gen v motors gain more support and become well known
Any suggestions?
Any suggestions?
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (15)
Re: Wait for gen V or go ls
Many members on this site will tell you from experience that it's better to have a motor in the car and enjoy driving it rather than it collecting dust in the garage.
#3
COTM Editor
Re: Wait for gen V or go ls
Personally I think the modern LS gen iv engine platform will go down as the best swap engine ever.
Great power to weight ratio, easy fit, great reliability, broad aftermarket support, and incredible power potential.
The other thing is you can do all this with an easy to modify fuel, air, spark, and ECM system in configuration that suits you best. ie a certified GM EROD to a holley ECM where you can add options galore with/without drive by wire, etc
I think the gen v LT platform is great and has allowed new production vehicles to meet regulatory requirements with great power, but not sure what advantage it really offers to the swapper. ie just for instance in the end is direct injection fueling of any benefit or just a lot of unneeded complexity and reliability hit in the engine swap situation... however lots of people like to do something different so I am all for that too, just some thoughts
Great power to weight ratio, easy fit, great reliability, broad aftermarket support, and incredible power potential.
The other thing is you can do all this with an easy to modify fuel, air, spark, and ECM system in configuration that suits you best. ie a certified GM EROD to a holley ECM where you can add options galore with/without drive by wire, etc
I think the gen v LT platform is great and has allowed new production vehicles to meet regulatory requirements with great power, but not sure what advantage it really offers to the swapper. ie just for instance in the end is direct injection fueling of any benefit or just a lot of unneeded complexity and reliability hit in the engine swap situation... however lots of people like to do something different so I am all for that too, just some thoughts
#4
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,077
Likes: 0
Received 1,941 Likes
on
1,325 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Wait for gen V or go ls
I think the LS swap is still more attractive than the LT1 swap.
First, let's not kid ourselves.... the LT1 is still ridiculously expensive. You can make an LS run circles around it for the same amount of money. LT1 engine tuning is a lot more difficult than LS. The electrical side of the swap is more difficult. The nuts and bolts side of the swap is more difficult.
There are a few LT1 swap threads on this site and every one I have seen hasn't gone beyond "I bought an LT1". I suspect in each case if they had gone the LS route they would have done something already. Almost anybody can do an LS swap these days. The LT1 swap is probably still at the "advanced" skill level where a person has to be willing to figure things out for themselves, or pay big bucks to have it done for them.
First, let's not kid ourselves.... the LT1 is still ridiculously expensive. You can make an LS run circles around it for the same amount of money. LT1 engine tuning is a lot more difficult than LS. The electrical side of the swap is more difficult. The nuts and bolts side of the swap is more difficult.
There are a few LT1 swap threads on this site and every one I have seen hasn't gone beyond "I bought an LT1". I suspect in each case if they had gone the LS route they would have done something already. Almost anybody can do an LS swap these days. The LT1 swap is probably still at the "advanced" skill level where a person has to be willing to figure things out for themselves, or pay big bucks to have it done for them.
Last edited by QwkTrip; 02-23-2018 at 09:11 AM.
#5
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
12 Posts
Car: '16 Camaro SS, '88 IROC
Engine: 6.2 Gen V
Transmission: 6 spd TR6060
Re: Wait for gen V or go ls
I'm one of the LT swaps in progress and what has been said is basically correct. There is just not enough vendor support for what is out there. There is enough to get the swap done but be prepared to do some custom work on your own.
Sure, the Gen V will fit with no problem but not the TR-6060 and maybe the 10 speed automatic. The trans output flange is close to the torque arm. Just the output flange alone requires a custom driveshaft. If you got a Gen V engine without the trans, then a T56 Magnum would eliminate the output flange. A custom driveshaft would still be needed.
The other problem is headers. No one makes them yet. It looks like I can modify the stock exhaust manifolds to fit but it still will required some custom work.
Wiring does not look to be a problem. There are vendors out there offering harnesses. I am leaning toward the Chevrolet Performance control kit since it includes everything you need.
It all depends on how much work you want to do. There are tons of info for the LS swaps with vendors providing every single thing needed. It is up to you to determine if you want something easy or something different. I like the challenge
Fits good
Sure, the Gen V will fit with no problem but not the TR-6060 and maybe the 10 speed automatic. The trans output flange is close to the torque arm. Just the output flange alone requires a custom driveshaft. If you got a Gen V engine without the trans, then a T56 Magnum would eliminate the output flange. A custom driveshaft would still be needed.
The other problem is headers. No one makes them yet. It looks like I can modify the stock exhaust manifolds to fit but it still will required some custom work.
Wiring does not look to be a problem. There are vendors out there offering harnesses. I am leaning toward the Chevrolet Performance control kit since it includes everything you need.
It all depends on how much work you want to do. There are tons of info for the LS swaps with vendors providing every single thing needed. It is up to you to determine if you want something easy or something different. I like the challenge
Fits good
#6
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 400 ci LS3
Transmission: Jerico DR4
Re: Wait for gen V or go ls
Headers are the only major issue that I see standing in the way of a Gen V LT swap. As soon as someone makes a large primary (2" or more) full length header, I'm yanking my LS and installing a Gen V LT - it's by far, the best mass produced pushrod V8 ever built.
#7
Supreme Member
iTrader: (15)
Re: Wait for gen V or go ls
But why? You can easily make all the power you could use on the street from an LS engine with a cam swap and if that's not enough you can buy a turbo kit and have a car that can go 8 seconds in the quarter mile on a stock bottom end LS 5.3. LS1tech just had an article about a drag truck that did just that.
Trending Topics
#8
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
12 Posts
Car: '16 Camaro SS, '88 IROC
Engine: 6.2 Gen V
Transmission: 6 spd TR6060
Re: Wait for gen V or go ls
But why? You can easily make all the power you could use on the street from an LS engine with a cam swap and if that's not enough you can buy a turbo kit and have a car that can go 8 seconds in the quarter mile on a stock bottom end LS 5.3. LS1tech just had an article about a drag truck that did just that.
#9
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: DFW
Posts: 582
Received 200 Likes
on
142 Posts
Car: 90 Formula 350
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Dana 44 3.54
Re: Wait for gen V or go ls
#10
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
12 Posts
Car: '16 Camaro SS, '88 IROC
Engine: 6.2 Gen V
Transmission: 6 spd TR6060
Re: Wait for gen V or go ls
I thought the same thing. Buy a set of LS headers and change the head flange. I don't have a welder so, for now, that is out. When I did my initial research, I bought some LS and GenV exhaust gaskets to compare. LS are round, Gen V are oval. My LT1 came out of a Camaro. The exhaust manifolds look like they will fit with some modifying. So far, the drivers side looks to be a little close to the lower control arm bushing. Heating and bending about 1/2" should do it. I have not tried the passenger side yet. That looks tighter.
Gen V top, LS Bottom
Left
Right
Gen V top, LS Bottom
Left
Right
#12
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,077
Likes: 0
Received 1,941 Likes
on
1,325 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Wait for gen V or go ls
I think the LT1 has exhaust and intake ports swapped around. Might have a problem with fore-aft alignment.
#13
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 400 ci LS3
Transmission: Jerico DR4
Re: Wait for gen V or go ls
You are 100% correct, the valves are also splayed. Edelbrock moved the exhaust port claiming the factory unit is flawed from a design perspective. It will be interesting to see if they found power in that.
#14
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,077
Likes: 0
Received 1,941 Likes
on
1,325 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Wait for gen V or go ls
Edelbrock hasn't exactly pushed the envelope of the LS world. I wouldn't think they would be the go-to people for LT1 either.... especially cylinder heads.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wishmaster's87IROC
Tech / General Engine
2
11-25-2000 07:24 PM