Who has the lowest mileage 3rd Gen
#1
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: Top of the South - Winchester, VA
Car: 1981 & 1983 Camaro Z28
Engine: 81 - 350 (ZZ4 355hp) 83 - 305 LG4
Transmission: auto - 81 - 350 Turbo / 83 - MX4
Who has the lowest mileage 3rd Gen
My 1983 has 6881 miles just wondering who else out there has a super low original mile 82-92 Camaro or Firebird
Last edited by 2BlackZ28s81&83; 11-04-2006 at 04:12 PM.
#3
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,622
Likes: 3
From: Orland Park, IL
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: SLOW carbed ls
Transmission: TH400 with brake, 8" PTC converter
Axle/Gears: moser 9" 4.11
23 miles, of course it could be because I swapped in a autometer speedo with a new odometer though
#4
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 118
Likes: 2
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: LC2
Transmission: GM 2004R
My buddy has a TTA with under 6k miles and I know of three more here in MI with under 100 miles and several with 1k to 5k on them.
There are lots with under 20k and the general consensus is the average TTA has about 36k on her.
There are lots with under 20k and the general consensus is the average TTA has about 36k on her.
#5
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: Top of the South - Winchester, VA
Car: 1981 & 1983 Camaro Z28
Engine: 81 - 350 (ZZ4 355hp) 83 - 305 LG4
Transmission: auto - 81 - 350 Turbo / 83 - MX4
#6
I know a guy that has a Yellow '86 IROC, never titled, with less than 600 miles (I believe it was). It was sent by GM in '85 to the Auto Fair at Charlotte Motor Speedway to be displayed promoting the new IROC model.
Trending Topics
#10
I had a '68 Camaro 396 SS/RS for 16 years. When I sold it in '02 it had 71k and had 41k on it when I bought it. I sold it and bought a '94 Z so I could drive and enjoy. IMO unless you have something extremely rare, drive it, enjoy it.... If not, your missing out on the fun....
#11
Moderator
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 1
From: Schererville , IN
Car: 91 GTA, 91 Formula, 89 TTA
Engine: all 225+ RWHP
Transmission: all OD
Axle/Gears: Always the good ones
I had a '68 Camaro 396 SS/RS for 16 years. When I sold it in '02 it had 71k and had 41k on it when I bought it. I sold it and bought a '94 Z so I could drive and enjoy. IMO unless you have something extremely rare, drive it, enjoy it.... If not, your missing out on the fun....
I like this guy :-)
Drive it beat it maintain it in between, you can restore it for less than a new car :-)
#12
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: Top of the South - Winchester, VA
Car: 1981 & 1983 Camaro Z28
Engine: 81 - 350 (ZZ4 355hp) 83 - 305 LG4
Transmission: auto - 81 - 350 Turbo / 83 - MX4
Looks like all you need is an 89 to complete the series. BW does your 83 have its original battery???? If so can you send me a picture also I would LOVE to have a picture of your car. And do you know what color the original oil filter was???
#14
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
From: Crete, IL 60417
Car: 2004 Chevy Avalanche
Engine: Some that run, some that don't
Transmission: 700R4's, a T-5, and a Turbo 350
Good question, I bought the car almost two years ago and haven't seen it since the day I bought it. I took it straight to storage and that's the last time I've been there. I've actually been planning to go pick it up one of these days so I'll see what it has.
#15
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: elbridge new york
Car: 1988 gta carbed 383
Engine: small block 4bbl
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 g80
my buddy has a 88 iroc,never been titled with 221 miles,still on mso,and never driven other than by him in and out of his garage-he is giving it to his son as graduation present!
#17
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
From: K.C. Mo.
Car: '89 GTA 9,000 MILES
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt
I had a '68 Camaro 396 SS/RS for 16 years. When I sold it in '02 it had 71k and had 41k on it when I bought it. I sold it and bought a '94 Z so I could drive and enjoy. IMO unless you have something extremely rare, drive it, enjoy it.... If not, your missing out on the fun....
#22
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Car: 1989 Pontiac Turbo Trans Am
Engine: Buick 3.8liter Turbo V6
Transmission: 4-speed automatic
My TTA has 1804 miles on her.
Chris
----------
1989 Pontiac Turbo Trans Am #760 (1804 miles)
1988 Chevrolet Corvette 35th Anniversary #1941/2050
1983 Delorean DMC-12
1985 Kawasaki Eliminator ZL900
Chris
----------
1989 Pontiac Turbo Trans Am #760 (1804 miles)
1988 Chevrolet Corvette 35th Anniversary #1941/2050
1983 Delorean DMC-12
1985 Kawasaki Eliminator ZL900
#23
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 4
From: Morganton, NC
Car: '92 T/A WS6 Vert/1956 Chevy Nomad
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4 w/ Transgo Kit
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LSD
Congrats to all your garage queens. I seriously think all your cars are sweet. But my 92 vert has 118,347 on the odo. She's just as pretty as new, and she has had a FUN life with lots of twists, turns, tire squeals, and stoplight-to-stoplight drags. It is a shame to let these cars sit. All you will get is leaky seals all over and a bunch of mechanical problems. And for what? So you can sell it for a little more? Who gives a crap. A car is a CAR, not a trophy (unless you have a vert Formula 350, TTA or a Firehawk)
#24
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Lincoln Nebraska
Car: 86 Z28, 86 Seville, 98 Isuzu Rodeo
Engine: 383, HT4100, & 3.2 V6
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: G92 3.23
Congrats to all your garage queens. I seriously think all your cars are sweet. But my 92 vert has 118,347 on the odo. She's just as pretty as new, and she has had a FUN life with lots of twists, turns, tire squeals, and stoplight-to-stoplight drags. It is a shame to let these cars sit. All you will get is leaky seals all over and a bunch of mechanical problems. And for what? So you can sell it for a little more? Who gives a crap. A car is a CAR, not a trophy (unless you have a vert Formula 350, TTA or a Firehawk)
#25
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 5,958
Likes: 33
From: Hacienda Heights, CA
Car: 90 RS 'Vert, 88 IROC-Z, 88 Firebird
Engine: 305 ci tbi, 305 ci tpi, 350 ci tpi
Transmission: WC-T5, WC-T5, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45, 3.27, 3.27
Easy answer, someone that isn't enjoying their thirdgen. My 88 Formula has 297K. It's been enjoyed a lot before I got it and is still being enjoyed.
Lon
Lon
#29
Moderator
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,197
Likes: 60
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 427 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt / 3.73 TrueTrac
People need to understand what pleases one person, may not please another. I put 700 miles on my car this year, and it was enough for me. Yet other people might need to atleast put 2000 on to enjoy the car.
#30
This thread was opened asking for low mileage cars, not opinions. Everyone has their own reason for owning the cars they own. For those that have high miles, keep your opinions about those of us with low miles, to yourselves and not in this thread. Thanks
#31
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: Top of the South - Winchester, VA
Car: 1981 & 1983 Camaro Z28
Engine: 81 - 350 (ZZ4 355hp) 83 - 305 LG4
Transmission: auto - 81 - 350 Turbo / 83 - MX4
In all eras of Camaro's, the low mile cars are usually the ones left unrestored after the others are gone, think about this guys which would you rather have a bone stock LOW MILE UNRESTORED PERFECT ORIGINAL 69 Yenko Camaro or a restored high mile 69 Yenko. These low mile original cars are actually pieces of Camaro / Firebird History. Remember some day when these cars are being restored (like the first and second gen cars now) someone will need a point of reference to see if thier car is "correct" - We will have the answer. Congrats to all you guys with low mile cars out there, you are a real asset to our hobby and to the future of our hobby.
#33
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 175
Likes: 3
From: Roseville, Ca USA
Car: 1989 20th Anniversary Trans Am
Engine: 3.8 ltr Turbo
Transmission: 200r4
- Dave
#35
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Middletown, RI
Car: 1991 Camaro Rs
Engine: 305
Transmission: T-5
Itd be interesting to see who has the highest miles on original drivetrain...than maybe I could contribute to this thread, then again who knows if their motor or tranny was ever replaced unless theyve owned it from day 1
#38
Moderator
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,242
Likes: 171
From: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/search...on=&max_price=
Follow that thread, there is a 1LE with 89 miles and another with 248 miles...
Neither I would trade for either of my cars.
l8r
John
Follow that thread, there is a 1LE with 89 miles and another with 248 miles...
Neither I would trade for either of my cars.
l8r
John
#43
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh & Allentown PA
Car: 1992 Z28 (Heritage Edition)
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Posi
I had a 92 Rs Heritage w/ 45,111 miles when i bought it...unfortunately a year to the day after i got it, it was totaled in a freak rainstorm. At that time it had 49,xxx miles on it. Most of those miles i put on in that year were driving it to school (my HS was more than 15 miles away from my house...so like 30 miles a day x 5 days a week= 150 miles a week just driving to school. I didnt even drive it in the winter either.
Now i have a 1992 Z28 Heritage that has 29,xxx miles on it. I've only put about 200 miles on the Z28 for a few reasons....
1. I only had it for 3 weeks before i came to college (and believe me, the Z will never set foot inside the city limits of Pittsburgh)
2. Since i'm out of HS, i can pick and choose where to drive it...meaning it only goes to the gym and to friends house, AKA--alot less meaningless miles.
3. I won't drive it when theres even a chance of rain (because its Black, because of what happened the last time i was in the rain with a Camaro, and because it has t-tops)
So needless to say, i'm not gona put too many miles on this.....
Now i have a 1992 Z28 Heritage that has 29,xxx miles on it. I've only put about 200 miles on the Z28 for a few reasons....
1. I only had it for 3 weeks before i came to college (and believe me, the Z will never set foot inside the city limits of Pittsburgh)
2. Since i'm out of HS, i can pick and choose where to drive it...meaning it only goes to the gym and to friends house, AKA--alot less meaningless miles.
3. I won't drive it when theres even a chance of rain (because its Black, because of what happened the last time i was in the rain with a Camaro, and because it has t-tops)
So needless to say, i'm not gona put too many miles on this.....
#44
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, Ohio
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: L98 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.70
My 1988 Trans Am Hardtop 350 has 33,000 miles. I bought it earlier this year with just shy of 31,000 on it. Once I finish the rebuild of the engine, I plan on enjoying it as much as possible during the spring, summer and fall. It's a shame that some people feel a car with 33,000 miles (for example) is more of "automotive history" than a car with 133,000 miles in comparable condition (and trust me, I've seen many, especially at Trans Am Nationals).
A nice Third Gen is a nice Third Gen regardless of what the odometer says. I would never feel the need to tell someone what I think they should do with their car, but my own feelings are as follows:
At TA Nats, I see a TTA with 4000 miles on it, look at it for a minute, scan down the row of identical TTAs with super low mileage, and move to the next row.
I see a black, t-top, all original, unmodified 91 Trans Am that looks SHOW ROOM new inside and out, with 197,000 miles on the clock and my jaw drops to the floor. I pore over every inch of it looking for some evidence that this car has been abused, neglected, etc.....and I don't find any at all. It has simply been _driven_. THOSE cars impress me to no end and thrill me to look at and talk about, and I (and the owners I'm sure) would find it insulting to be told the car is somehow not a piece of history, even in mint condition.
A nice Third Gen is a nice Third Gen regardless of what the odometer says. I would never feel the need to tell someone what I think they should do with their car, but my own feelings are as follows:
At TA Nats, I see a TTA with 4000 miles on it, look at it for a minute, scan down the row of identical TTAs with super low mileage, and move to the next row.
I see a black, t-top, all original, unmodified 91 Trans Am that looks SHOW ROOM new inside and out, with 197,000 miles on the clock and my jaw drops to the floor. I pore over every inch of it looking for some evidence that this car has been abused, neglected, etc.....and I don't find any at all. It has simply been _driven_. THOSE cars impress me to no end and thrill me to look at and talk about, and I (and the owners I'm sure) would find it insulting to be told the car is somehow not a piece of history, even in mint condition.
Last edited by Gunner823; 11-17-2006 at 08:23 PM.
#45
It's a shame that some people feel a car with 33,000 miles (for example) is more of "automotive history" than a car with 133,000 miles in comparable condition (and trust me, I've seen many, especially at Trans Am Nationals).
A nice Third Gen is a nice Third Gen regardless of what the odometer says. I would never feel the need to tell someone what I think they should do with their car, but my own feelings are as follows:
At TA Nats, I see a TTA with 4000 miles on it, look at it for a minute, scan down the row of identical TTAs with super low mileage, and move to the next row.
I see a black, t-top, all original, unmodified 91 Trans Am that looks SHOW ROOM new inside and out, with 197,000 miles on the clock and my jaw drops to the floor. I pore over every inch of it looking for some evidence that this car has been abused, neglected, etc.....and I don't find any at all. It has simply been _driven_. THOSE cars impress me to no end and thrill me to look at and talk about, and I (and the owners I'm sure) would find it insulting to be told the car is somehow not a piece of history, even in mint condition.
A nice Third Gen is a nice Third Gen regardless of what the odometer says. I would never feel the need to tell someone what I think they should do with their car, but my own feelings are as follows:
At TA Nats, I see a TTA with 4000 miles on it, look at it for a minute, scan down the row of identical TTAs with super low mileage, and move to the next row.
I see a black, t-top, all original, unmodified 91 Trans Am that looks SHOW ROOM new inside and out, with 197,000 miles on the clock and my jaw drops to the floor. I pore over every inch of it looking for some evidence that this car has been abused, neglected, etc.....and I don't find any at all. It has simply been _driven_. THOSE cars impress me to no end and thrill me to look at and talk about, and I (and the owners I'm sure) would find it insulting to be told the car is somehow not a piece of history, even in mint condition.
Again, this is not a thread about peoples opinions of low mile cars! Any more opinions, and this thread will be locked.
I'm not trying to be a jerk, but for years, there are plenty of people speaking their opinions about "How can you not drive it?" People own cars for different reasons. I challenge any one of the highly opininated people to spend more than normal to buy an extremely low mile car and not change their thoughts of how often it gets driven. We don't tell the guys modifying their cars or the ones with high mileage that they need to park the car do we?!
I think we all agree that a high mile car in mint condition says alot for the car and the owner. No dispute there. I recently saw an 83 Monte Carlo SS at a show that had 5100 miles on the odometer. The car was gorgeous and then I find that the car was just restored and has 105100 on it. I would prefer to not have to restore a car to get it mint again, but this Monte stood out. It goes to show that you can drive them and then restore them or you can keep the miles low. IT'S THE OWNERS CHOICE!
Last edited by scottmoyer; 11-19-2006 at 06:42 AM.
#46
AMEN! To each their own ...
Again, this is not a thread about peoples opinions of low mile cars! Any more opinions, and this thread will be locked.
I'm not trying to be a jerk, but for years, there are plenty of people speaking their opinions about "How can you not drive it?" People own cars for different reasons. I challenge any one of the highly opininated people to spend more than normal to buy an extremely low mile car and not change their thoughts of how often it gets driven. We don't tell the guys modifying their cars or the ones with high mileage that they need to park the car do we?!
I think we all agree that a high mile car in mint condition says alot for the car and the owner. No dispute there. I recently saw an 83 Monte Carlo SS at a show that had 5100 miles on the odometer. The car was gorgeous and then I find that the car was just restored and has 105100 on it. I would prefer to not have to restore a car to get it mint again, but this Monte stood out. It goes to show that you can drive them and then restore them or you can keep the miles low. IT'S THE OWNERS CHOICE!
I'm not trying to be a jerk, but for years, there are plenty of people speaking their opinions about "How can you not drive it?" People own cars for different reasons. I challenge any one of the highly opininated people to spend more than normal to buy an extremely low mile car and not change their thoughts of how often it gets driven. We don't tell the guys modifying their cars or the ones with high mileage that they need to park the car do we?!
I think we all agree that a high mile car in mint condition says alot for the car and the owner. No dispute there. I recently saw an 83 Monte Carlo SS at a show that had 5100 miles on the odometer. The car was gorgeous and then I find that the car was just restored and has 105100 on it. I would prefer to not have to restore a car to get it mint again, but this Monte stood out. It goes to show that you can drive them and then restore them or you can keep the miles low. IT'S THE OWNERS CHOICE!
#47
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 175
Likes: 3
From: Roseville, Ca USA
Car: 1989 20th Anniversary Trans Am
Engine: 3.8 ltr Turbo
Transmission: 200r4
Again, this is not a thread about peoples opinions of low mile cars! Any more opinions, and this thread will be locked.
I'm not trying to be a jerk, but for years, there are plenty of people speaking their opinions about "How can you not drive it?" People own cars for different reasons. I challenge any one of the highly opininated people to spend more than normal to buy an extremely low mile car and not change their thoughts of how often it gets driven. We don't tell the guys modifying their cars or the ones with high mileage that they need to park the car do we?!
I think we all agree that a high mile car in mint condition says alot for the car and the owner. No dispute there. I recently saw an 83 Monte Carlo SS at a show that had 5100 miles on the odometer. The car was gorgeous and then I find that the car was just restored and has 105100 on it. I would prefer to not have to restore a car to get it mint again, but this Monte stood out. It goes to show that you can drive them and then restore them or you can keep the miles low. IT'S THE OWNERS CHOICE!
I'm not trying to be a jerk, but for years, there are plenty of people speaking their opinions about "How can you not drive it?" People own cars for different reasons. I challenge any one of the highly opininated people to spend more than normal to buy an extremely low mile car and not change their thoughts of how often it gets driven. We don't tell the guys modifying their cars or the ones with high mileage that they need to park the car do we?!
I think we all agree that a high mile car in mint condition says alot for the car and the owner. No dispute there. I recently saw an 83 Monte Carlo SS at a show that had 5100 miles on the odometer. The car was gorgeous and then I find that the car was just restored and has 105100 on it. I would prefer to not have to restore a car to get it mint again, but this Monte stood out. It goes to show that you can drive them and then restore them or you can keep the miles low. IT'S THE OWNERS CHOICE!
Well put. Enjoy them any way you want to!
- Dave
#48
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: Top of the South - Winchester, VA
Car: 1981 & 1983 Camaro Z28
Engine: 81 - 350 (ZZ4 355hp) 83 - 305 LG4
Transmission: auto - 81 - 350 Turbo / 83 - MX4
Whether you restore or preserve they are BOTH hard tasks believe me I have done both. I restored to 990 point quality a 1958 Impala and 992 point 67 Camaro. It took years and thousands of dollars. My 83 scored 986 and is not restored, losing points for incorrect battery -4 incorrect oil filter -10. I will tell you that 83 is harder to keep in its condition because if I need to replace a belt, hose or whatever, Its not off to the repro shop - its NOS or nothing. Basically it is hard to keep an ALL original car, ALL orginal.
#49
i drive my car as least as possible for a few reasons. One is about insurance. if the car gets wrecked and its not my fault, the insurance company will only give my blue book value (like $3000) for the car, then i would be quite screwed out of a few thousand dollars. Another is because the more you drive it, the closer you get to some mechanical failure lol. The more you drive it the more parts get worn and your frame gets weak etc. I also dont want to wreck the car myself. it gets dirty when u drive it. there are plenty of reasons why to NOT drive a car.
now my car has 86k miles on it. its OK milage, but its not very low. thats one of the big reasons i dont drive it cause i get a bad feeling inside every time the odometer goes from 80k-81k, 81-82 etc. i bought the car in june 05 with 80k miles and i feel ive done a decent job keeping miles off of it seeing as its my primary daily driver. my dad lets me borrow his car sometimes so that helps.
but if i had a car with 30k-50k miles, i would drive the **** out of it. it would be almost worry free driving for many years. if i had a low milage 3rd gen i would drive it all the time and not worry about the miles untill it got up to 70k or so.
you guys are real lucky to have such low milage cars, hold on to them
now my car has 86k miles on it. its OK milage, but its not very low. thats one of the big reasons i dont drive it cause i get a bad feeling inside every time the odometer goes from 80k-81k, 81-82 etc. i bought the car in june 05 with 80k miles and i feel ive done a decent job keeping miles off of it seeing as its my primary daily driver. my dad lets me borrow his car sometimes so that helps.
but if i had a car with 30k-50k miles, i would drive the **** out of it. it would be almost worry free driving for many years. if i had a low milage 3rd gen i would drive it all the time and not worry about the miles untill it got up to 70k or so.
you guys are real lucky to have such low milage cars, hold on to them
#50
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
From: THE QUADS
Car: FBODYS
Engine: ALWAYS 8'S
Transmission: ALWAYS MENTAL
Axle/Gears: RUSTY AND BRAND NEW
My 90 just turned over the 300,000 mile mark. I think it still has about 700,000 miles left on it. So at 300K I think it is low milage.
All on stock original drivetrain too.
All on stock original drivetrain too.