History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-04-2012 | 09:04 AM
  #1  
!CamaroDave's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Mount Pleasant Michigan
Car: 87 Camaro IROC, 85 IROC Roadste
Engine: 5.7 V8 350 TPI, 383 - Coming Soon
Transmission: 700R4, Turbo 350
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

So I just bought a 89 Camaro Z28 with 305 and has the IROC decals and IROC rims. Front and rear bumpers don't match the car color, they are faded blue compared to the rest of the car. I knew it was too good to be true so I really didn't believe the dude that I bought it from. I checked out the RPO codes and it didn't have the Z28 code which clearly told me its NOT an IROC. It has 16" IROC rims, codes show it should have 15" rims. It has the DX3 code meaning it should NOT have decals, and it has IROC decals from the 85-87 era (black on bottom, silver on top) which is another red flag, if they did it right, the black should of been on top.

This is just from doing some homework online. So im gonna have to take off the decals because I'm not gonna drive around with IROC decals if its not even an IROC lol.

So its definitely a Z28 but not a IROC lol oh well.
Old 12-04-2012 | 09:37 AM
  #2  
Mlanzo's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn NY
Car: 1985 iroc
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: auto
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

Shouldnt you have checked all of that before purchasing? You paid for something that it really isnt!
Old 12-04-2012 | 09:40 AM
  #3  
BADNBLK's Avatar
COTM Editor

iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,098
Likes: 13
From: WINDSOR, CO
Car: 91 Z28, 87 SC, 90 IROC, 92 RS
Engine: LS1, 305 TPI, L98, NADA
Transmission: T56, 700r4's, and NADA
Axle/Gears: 3.89, 3.42, 3.23, NADA
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

Originally Posted by !CamaroDave
I checked out the RPO codes and it didn't have the Z28 code which clearly told me its NOT an IROC.

So its definitely a Z28 but not a IROC lol oh well.
No Z28 RPO, but its def a Z28?
Old 12-04-2012 | 09:47 AM
  #4  
!CamaroDave's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Mount Pleasant Michigan
Car: 87 Camaro IROC, 85 IROC Roadste
Engine: 5.7 V8 350 TPI, 383 - Coming Soon
Transmission: 700R4, Turbo 350
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

It really didn't matter to me if it was an IROC or not. I just wanted T-top v8 lol I only paid 1700 for it. There were a couple other codes showing it had Z28 options. Ive only had RS camaro's in the past and all I wanted was a camaro with a V8 and t-tops lol if its a Z28 then great, if not, then oh well lol
Old 12-04-2012 | 10:01 AM
  #5  
!CamaroDave's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Mount Pleasant Michigan
Car: 87 Camaro IROC, 85 IROC Roadste
Engine: 5.7 V8 350 TPI, 383 - Coming Soon
Transmission: 700R4, Turbo 350
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

Im on this forum to figure out things about my car and help if I need it. If your willing to help me figure out what my car is, then I would appreciate the help.

Last edited by scottmoyer; 12-04-2012 at 05:08 PM.
Old 12-04-2012 | 10:04 AM
  #6  
lozantius82's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: California
Car: 89 Camaro Iroc Z
Engine: 305
Transmission: MK6 World Class T5
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt had 3.45's, now 3.27 gears
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

Check the rpo codes in your center console and Z28 should be present if not its a rally sport. FYI a base model iroc could be had with a L03 tbi engine and 15 double stripe iroc wheels, fog lights, wonder bar, FE2 suspension. Check the engine compartment for 2 black iroc specific braces, one goes from the passenger hood bracket to the cowl and the other goes from the passenger shock tower to the lower frame rail. If those are missing you got your self a fake lol
Good luck buddy! When i was in this cali gen car club i ran into idiots like that all the time!!! Many would claim they had a iroc when its just a plain RS anyways those dumb kids voted me out of there lousy car club lol Screw it!!!
Old 12-04-2012 | 10:10 AM
  #7  
lozantius82's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: California
Car: 89 Camaro Iroc Z
Engine: 305
Transmission: MK6 World Class T5
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt had 3.45's, now 3.27 gears
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

FYI there is no such thing as a Z28, its either a Rally Sport or Iroc Z!
No dis respect buddy just throwing out facts to you
Old 12-04-2012 | 10:22 AM
  #8  
!CamaroDave's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Mount Pleasant Michigan
Car: 87 Camaro IROC, 85 IROC Roadste
Engine: 5.7 V8 350 TPI, 383 - Coming Soon
Transmission: 700R4, Turbo 350
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

Yea it doesn't have the Z28 code. Ive never had to find out about if its Z28 or IROC models so this is all new to me. Ive done some homework online to see what RPO codes meant and whatever. That is all I needed to know if 89 had Z28 or not. Thanks for the help guys.
Old 12-04-2012 | 10:36 AM
  #9  
White93z34's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Car: 1987 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700r4
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

in 1989 if you had a z28 you had an IROC.
Old 12-04-2012 | 10:39 AM
  #10  
!CamaroDave's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Mount Pleasant Michigan
Car: 87 Camaro IROC, 85 IROC Roadste
Engine: 5.7 V8 350 TPI, 383 - Coming Soon
Transmission: 700R4, Turbo 350
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

Okay. Thanks
Old 12-04-2012 | 11:19 AM
  #11  
cIaRmOaCrZo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 913
Likes: 2
From: greenfield indiana
Car: 86' IROC-Z....and 5 other 3rdgens
Engine: 383 hsr
Transmission: built 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock 3.23, 10bolt
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

85-87 had the rpo of z28 & b4z to be an iroc. 88-90 just had to have z28 to be an iroc.
Old 12-04-2012 | 11:21 AM
  #12  
cIaRmOaCrZo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 913
Likes: 2
From: greenfield indiana
Car: 86' IROC-Z....and 5 other 3rdgens
Engine: 383 hsr
Transmission: built 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock 3.23, 10bolt
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

you may not even have the original arm rest lol. so check the vin under the windshield, and check the vin on the rpo sticker in the glove box
Old 12-04-2012 | 05:19 PM
  #13  
scottmoyer's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,406
Likes: 184
From: Florida
Car: 87 IROC-Z, 82 Pace Car
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

Originally Posted by lozantius82
FYI there is no such thing as a Z28, its either a Rally Sport or Iroc Z!
This is incorrect. In 1989, there was no IROC-Z RPO code. You had an RS or a Z28. All Z28s came with the IROC-Z appearance.
Old 12-04-2012 | 06:20 PM
  #14  
toomany's Avatar
Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 427
Likes: 5
From: Auburn, MI
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

Originally Posted by lozantius82
Check the rpo codes in your center console and Z28 should be present if not its a rally sport. FYI a base model iroc could be had with a L03 tbi engine and 15 double stripe iroc wheels, fog lights, wonder bar, FE2 suspension. Check the engine compartment for 2 black iroc specific braces, one goes from the passenger hood bracket to the cowl and the other goes from the passenger shock tower to the lower frame rail. If those are missing you got your self a fake lol
Good luck buddy! When i was in this cali gen car club i ran into idiots like that all the time!!! Many would claim they had a iroc when its just a plain RS anyways those dumb kids voted me out of there lousy car club lol Screw it!!!
Those are not Iroc specific. My 82 and 83 Z28's had both of them.
Old 12-04-2012 | 07:38 PM
  #15  
lozantius82's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: California
Car: 89 Camaro Iroc Z
Engine: 305
Transmission: MK6 World Class T5
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt had 3.45's, now 3.27 gears
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

In those years they are iroc specific!!! If i was talking about the early Z28's i would have mentioned that buddy.
Old 12-04-2012 | 07:43 PM
  #16  
!CamaroDave's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Mount Pleasant Michigan
Car: 87 Camaro IROC, 85 IROC Roadste
Engine: 5.7 V8 350 TPI, 383 - Coming Soon
Transmission: 700R4, Turbo 350
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

Vin matches the glove box. No biggy lol I got another RS then. Im gonna end up stripping off the decals and put the correct badges on the car. Thanks for everyone's help.
Old 12-04-2012 | 07:43 PM
  #17  
lozantius82's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: California
Car: 89 Camaro Iroc Z
Engine: 305
Transmission: MK6 World Class T5
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt had 3.45's, now 3.27 gears
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

There was no Z28 in the years of 88 to 90 just the RPO code Z28 that triggered the iroc z appearance package!!! Like i said no such thing as a plain jain Z28 just Iroc Z and RS!!!!
Old 12-04-2012 | 07:51 PM
  #18  
lozantius82's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: California
Car: 89 Camaro Iroc Z
Engine: 305
Transmission: MK6 World Class T5
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt had 3.45's, now 3.27 gears
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

Hey a 89 RS is one sweet car bro!!! I have one my self and it was a decent runner in stock form! You can upgrade it later anyways so don't think you got ripped off cause you got a lot of car for the money you paid.
Old 12-04-2012 | 08:12 PM
  #19  
!CamaroDave's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Mount Pleasant Michigan
Car: 87 Camaro IROC, 85 IROC Roadste
Engine: 5.7 V8 350 TPI, 383 - Coming Soon
Transmission: 700R4, Turbo 350
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

Yup I loved my 89 RS I had, this car that I just bought reminds me ALOT of the one I had, but this one has the V8 which makes it a WHOLE LOT better than that 2.8 V6 lol

I don't think I got ripped off, I think i got a good deal. I talked the guy down from 2200 and got it for 1700. It just makes me mad that someone out there was stupid enough to try and make it something it wasn't and totally did it wrong lol
Old 12-04-2012 | 09:08 PM
  #20  
scottmoyer's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,406
Likes: 184
From: Florida
Car: 87 IROC-Z, 82 Pace Car
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

Originally Posted by lozantius82
There was no Z28 in the years of 88 to 90 just the RPO code Z28 that triggered the iroc z appearance package!!! Like i said no such thing as a plain jain Z28 just Iroc Z and RS!!!!
Please stop spewing incorrect information. From 1985-1987, there were two options, the Z28 and the Z28 with the IROC-Z option package (RPO B4Z). In 1988, Chevy reduced the model lineup from 5 different Camaro models to two, the Sport Coupe and the Z28. You did not go into any dealership and order an IROC-Z, you ordered a Z28. The RPO for the IROC-Z in 1988-1990 was the Z28. You could purchase a Z28/IROC-Z as base as previous year's entry level Z28s, or as loaded as previous year's top level IROC-Zs.

People come to this website to be educated and you keep speaking incorrect information. Please know the answer before you respond. If you don't know an answer, please ask. That's what we're here for. Your statement above makes absolutely no sense when you state that there was no Z28, only the Z28 RPO. If it has the RPO Z28, then it's a Z28!!!

Last edited by scottmoyer; 12-04-2012 at 09:11 PM.
Old 12-04-2012 | 10:42 PM
  #21  
Motown's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 613
Likes: 5
From: Michigan
Car: 1985 IROC-Z
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MD8
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

Hey !CamaroDave, are you sure you didnt buy your car from this guy?


https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/hist...4385-iroc.html

Seems there is a lot of IROC faking lately...
Old 12-04-2012 | 10:51 PM
  #22  
InfernalVortex's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,498
Likes: 26
From: Macon, GA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Vortec headed 355, xe262
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.70
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

Originally Posted by lozantius82
There was no Z28 in the years of 88 to 90 just the RPO code Z28 that triggered the iroc z appearance package!!! Like i said no such thing as a plain jain Z28 just Iroc Z and RS!!!!
I know what you're saying, and for your purposes you are right. But technically the RPO code is "Z28", and it automatically triggered the IROC package. It helps to think of the IROC package as an "upgrade" to the Z28, and then after 87 feature creep just let all Z28s get the upgrade package... or parts of it depending on how well-optioned the car is.

As we all know, you can get an Iroc with some really, really low level options so the appearance package itself isnt really worth worrying about in the big picture.
Old 12-04-2012 | 11:46 PM
  #23  
lozantius82's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: California
Car: 89 Camaro Iroc Z
Engine: 305
Transmission: MK6 World Class T5
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt had 3.45's, now 3.27 gears
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

Originally Posted by scottmoyer
Please stop spewing incorrect information. From 1985-1987, there were two options, the Z28 and the Z28 with the IROC-Z option package (RPO B4Z). In 1988, Chevy reduced the model lineup from 5 different Camaro models to two, the Sport Coupe and the Z28. You did not go into any dealership and order an IROC-Z, you ordered a Z28. The RPO for the IROC-Z in 1988-1990 was the Z28. You could purchase a Z28/IROC-Z as base as previous year's entry level Z28s, or as loaded as previous year's top level IROC-Zs.

People come to this website to be educated and you keep speaking incorrect information. Please know the answer before you respond. If you don't know an answer, please ask. That's what we're here for. Your statement above makes absolutely no sense when you state that there was no Z28, only the Z28 RPO. If it has the RPO Z28, then it's a Z28!!!
Sure I am not gonna argue with you, i am fully aware its a Z28 but the finish product emblems, apearance package says Iroc z!!! Not Z28 but Iroc z!
Who was talking about the 85 to 87 models??! Not me! I was talking about the 88 to 90 Iroc z's and Rally Sports that were the only two models, and not the 5 previous models that chevy consolidated for the 88 model year! I also know that in the dealers brochure has only two models and the iroc z is a stand alone model not a upgrade off the z28 like it was in the previous years. I know exactly what i am talking about and maybe you should stop nitpicking my comments over such a petty thing. I expect a moderator to be a little for tactful with his words, so if you don't like my comments than band me!!! But i stand my ground!!!
Old 12-04-2012 | 11:54 PM
  #24  
lozantius82's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: California
Car: 89 Camaro Iroc Z
Engine: 305
Transmission: MK6 World Class T5
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt had 3.45's, now 3.27 gears
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

Originally Posted by InfernalVortex
I know what you're saying, and for your purposes you are right. But technically the RPO code is "Z28", and it automatically triggered the IROC package. It helps to think of the IROC package as an "upgrade" to the Z28, and then after 87 feature creep just let all Z28s get the upgrade package... or parts of it depending on how well-optioned the car is.

As we all know, you can get an Iroc with some really, really low level options so the appearance package itself isnt really worth worrying about in the big picture.
Thanks!!! I was fully aware that a Iroc is a glorified Z28 with several levels to choose from, and RPO Z28 triggers Iroc z. At least you were cool about ,and i respect that. All i wanted to do was help this guy figure out if he had a Iroc or a RS but instead i triggered the RPO code "Cat fight" with scott
Old 12-05-2012 | 12:19 AM
  #25  
1983Chimaera's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 568
Likes: 7
From: San Antonio, Tx
Car: 1988 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: LB9 (305 TPI)
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Positraction
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

The only way to stop the rash of fake IROCs is to actually pursue charges against some of these sellers for fraud, which is exactly what it is. They are selling a misrepresented item, in this case an automobile. It's the same as someone trying to pass off a classic V6 Camaro doctored up as an RS/SS clone. If they represent the car as anything but a clone or replica, it's a crime. Unfortunately, until people are willing to press the issue, it will keep happening.
Old 12-05-2012 | 06:26 AM
  #26  
eseibel67's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,328
Likes: 8
From: Kitchener, ON
Car: 1988 GTA
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

Fraud? Maybe, or the seller might actually think it's an IROC because the owner previous to him put IROC stickers on it. With used cars, it's the buyer's responsibility to verify the car before he hands over the cash.
Old 12-05-2012 | 07:43 AM
  #27  
afremont's Avatar
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,004
Likes: 1
Car: 90 IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

Why do you keep insinuating (without explanation) that the non B4Z IROCs are just an "appearance" package without "some of the upgrades"? What specifically are you talking about? My FSM clearly says that RPO Z28 for 1990 is the IROC Z Option, not just a Z28. You keep implying that the later ones aren't real IROCs. What upgrades are missing?
Old 12-05-2012 | 08:02 AM
  #28  
!CamaroDave's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Mount Pleasant Michigan
Car: 87 Camaro IROC, 85 IROC Roadste
Engine: 5.7 V8 350 TPI, 383 - Coming Soon
Transmission: 700R4, Turbo 350
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

Originally Posted by Motown
Hey !CamaroDave, are you sure you didnt buy your car from this guy?


https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/hist...4385-iroc.html

Seems there is a lot of IROC faking lately...
Nope that's a little ways from Grand Rapids, Michigan lol. It might of been my responsibility to check it over but Im not a guy that has to have all original and be precise with details on cars. I fell in love with the car so I bought it lol it really doesn't matter to me that its not an IROC because I knew it was too good to be true. I never fall into those kinda deals lol
Old 12-05-2012 | 08:04 AM
  #29  
!CamaroDave's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Mount Pleasant Michigan
Car: 87 Camaro IROC, 85 IROC Roadste
Engine: 5.7 V8 350 TPI, 383 - Coming Soon
Transmission: 700R4, Turbo 350
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

Originally Posted by eseibel67
Fraud? Maybe, or the seller might actually think it's an IROC because the owner previous to him put IROC stickers on it. With used cars, it's the buyer's responsibility to verify the car before he hands over the cash.
If I was looking for a certain car and had lots more money to buy one with, then ya I would definitely do my homework and make sure its 100% accurate. In this case, I wanted a Camaro with T-tops and a V8 that RAN lol and I found it for a good price.
Old 12-05-2012 | 08:09 AM
  #30  
!CamaroDave's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Mount Pleasant Michigan
Car: 87 Camaro IROC, 85 IROC Roadste
Engine: 5.7 V8 350 TPI, 383 - Coming Soon
Transmission: 700R4, Turbo 350
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

Well we found out it is in fact an RS, so I appreciate all the help and sorry I caused so much of an uproar on this issue. Lol Thanks guys
Old 12-05-2012 | 10:05 AM
  #31  
InfernalVortex's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,498
Likes: 26
From: Macon, GA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Vortec headed 355, xe262
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.70
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

Originally Posted by afremont
Why do you keep insinuating (without explanation) that the non B4Z IROCs are just an "appearance" package without "some of the upgrades"? What specifically are you talking about? My FSM clearly says that RPO Z28 for 1990 is the IROC Z Option, not just a Z28. You keep implying that the later ones aren't real IROCs. What upgrades are missing?
The difference between an IROC and a Z28 in earlier years was basically wheels and a different paint scheme. I think the reg Z28s didnt get a wonderbar either, since that was to my knowledge only a necessity due to the wider tires (as far as GM was concerned at least).

After 88, the base z28s with the L03's, and LG4's and F41 and open diffs and highway gears etc... they were all "IROCs" just like the G92 L98 cars. Was just saying that the individual options on the car make more of a difference than the sticker on the door , since the IROC-Z badging didn't necessarily mean it had the good stuff inside. You still had to have an IROC to get a TPI engine (from 88-90) and all the good performance options, but you could also get an IROC without them, and even without the IROC wheels apparently as Scott Moyer schooled me the other day.

A little more poking around and it seems like any engine option you could get in a Z28, you could get in an IROC, and anything in an iROC could be found in a Z28. So it really does look like the only difference is the wheels and the wonderbar and maybe some weird obscure combinations and permutations of special options. In 85 and 86 a Z28 could get G92. in 87 it was for IROCs only. And then after that it's all a wash.

Mostly an appearance package at the end of the day i suppose, but it does get really confusing year to year with the silly subtle stuff GM did back then with the excessive option levels and weird combinations.

Last edited by InfernalVortex; 12-05-2012 at 10:13 AM.
Old 12-05-2012 | 12:59 PM
  #32  
scottmoyer's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,406
Likes: 184
From: Florida
Car: 87 IROC-Z, 82 Pace Car
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

Originally Posted by lozantius82
Sure I am not gonna argue with you, i am fully aware its a Z28 but the finish product emblems, apearance package says Iroc z!!! Not Z28 but Iroc z!
Who was talking about the 85 to 87 models??! Not me! I was talking about the 88 to 90 Iroc z's and Rally Sports that were the only two models, and not the 5 previous models that chevy consolidated for the 88 model year! I also know that in the dealers brochure has only two models and the iroc z is a stand alone model not a upgrade off the z28 like it was in the previous years. I know exactly what i am talking about and maybe you should stop nitpicking my comments over such a petty thing. I expect a moderator to be a little for tactful with his words, so if you don't like my comments than band me!!! But i stand my ground!!!

I was talking about 85-87 to help distinguish the difference between the Z28 and the IROC-Z. Most people believe and state that the Z28 went away in 1988 and returned in 1991. You said it yourself in post #7. You then said it again a few posts later. I'm not nitpicking your posts. I'm doing what a moderator does and verifies that the information being given out is accurate and not BS. I was very tactful in my first response to you, but you continued to say incorrect things.

Why is it that every time someone disagrees with a moderator, they throw out the "ban me" comment? That's just being stupid!! Do you guys really think that moderators on TGO are power hungry and can't be reasoned with? You've obviously been on too many childish boards if that's what you're used to prior to TGO. Grow up guys. We can all learn from each other. The OP asked about his car, so we need to provide him the most accurate info we can. That's what the History forum is about.

Dealer brochures and documentation are not always correct either. GM has documented in many places that the 350 TPI engine is the B2L. This is incorrect. GM engines start with an "L". They outsource document writing and many things get misdocumented. A brochure referring to the model as an IROC-Z is not accurate. It would be like referring to a blue car as the blue model. The IROC-Z was appearance from 1988-1990, not a sub model.

afremont, I never said that the non B4Z cars aren't real IROC-Zs. I said that they aren't an option anymore. They are still Z28s with the IROC-Z appearance. All Z28s now come with the standard IROC-Z options. Prior to 1988, all IROC-Zs came with 16" wheels, upgraded suspension, tighter steering, etc. The Z28 from 85-87 did not. The '88 Z28 still came standard with 15" rims, with 16" as optional. You got bent out of shape when I said that previous years the IROC-Z was an upgrade and the newer 88+ cars could be had as basic as the earlier Z28s. The 88+ cars could be as basic as was available in 1988 to include the 15" rims, the small V8, cheap seats, etc. The majority of everything else is now standard. Granted, you could get an 87 IROC-Z with the LG4 and cheap seats, but it still came as an upgrade option on the Z28.
Old 12-05-2012 | 02:45 PM
  #33  
1983Chimaera's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 568
Likes: 7
From: San Antonio, Tx
Car: 1988 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: LB9 (305 TPI)
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Positraction
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

The easiest way to state it is thus: All IROC-Zs are Z28s. Not all Z28s are IROC-Zs.
Old 12-05-2012 | 03:20 PM
  #34  
Caveman305's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 18
From: Newburg, MD
Car: '89 RS, '89 Iroc
Engine: L03, LB9
Transmission: 700r4, T5
Axle/Gears: 2.73, 3.08
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

Exactly, an iroc-z is an "international race of champions" Z28

As stated from 85-87 you could buy a Standard z28 or an Iroc-z28(each having option lists to choose from)

From 88-90 ordering a z28 automatically got you the iroc styling No additional rpo was need to verify it being an iroc but they still came in various options

91-92 Iroc styling was not an option hence no iroc wheels or decals

The z28 never left as all irocs are z28's
Old 12-05-2012 | 04:25 PM
  #35  
1983Chimaera's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 568
Likes: 7
From: San Antonio, Tx
Car: 1988 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: LB9 (305 TPI)
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Positraction
Re: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!

Exactly. In 1988 Chevy realigned the Camaro available models and pared it down to Sport Coupe (standard with Z28/IROC style ground effects) and did away with the Z28 as a separate model, combining it with the IROC-Z and lowering some of the available options on the base IROC-Z to distance between the top model. The 16" IROC-Z alloy wheels became optional, with the base 15" 5 spoke Camaro wheel becoming the standard. All received the Z28 RPO code, but the B4Z code was retired. This did not make the IROC-Zs from '88-'90 "lesser" IROC-Zs, it just reflected a change in RPO coding. You could still have a fully optioned 5.7L L98 TPI IROC-Z that was every bit as decked out and performed as well if not better than the earlier B4Z cars. Just as in 91-92 you could get a B4C that was mechanically identical to a 91-92 Z28 (themselves identical to the earlier IROC-Zs, save for having gone to speed density TPI), but was badged as an RS.

My point is you're arguing semantics.
Old 12-07-2012 | 11:37 PM
  #36  
jordanandrewkay's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Conroe,Tx
Car: 1991 T/A GTA H/T
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Posi
Originally Posted by !CamaroDave
Well we found out it is in fact an RS, so I appreciate all the help and sorry I caused so much of an uproar on this issue. Lol Thanks guys
its okay happens all the time. its usually pretty entertaining. lol.


Posted from Thirdgen.org App for Android
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bellez77
Body
14
09-05-2015 08:39 PM
Ducati900ss
Camaros for Sale
1
09-02-2015 09:05 AM
trevor1010
Engine Swap
1
08-26-2015 02:41 PM
trevor1010
DIY PROM
1
08-24-2015 11:29 AM
mustangman65_79
Body
3
08-11-2015 03:17 PM



Quick Reply: Someone tried to fake IROC, total FAIL!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 AM.