History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

Lear Siegler seats

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-04-2005, 02:24 PM
  #1  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
buffaloman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Galion, Ohio
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1989 Firebird Fornula 350
Engine: 350 L98 / NOS
Transmission: 4sp Auto
Lear Siegler seats

The 1983 Trans AM MSE#103 I just got has these seat in it. They adjust 6 ways. On the window sticker I see the cost 750.00 back then. Does any one else have these seat in there car? I also have recaro seats in a 1983 Dayton car and the Lear seat are better.
Old 08-04-2005, 07:09 PM
  #2  
Member
 
tagta189's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have them in my 85 ta.They are geat seats,very,very comfortable and with all the adjustments you have on them they really hold you in the seat like you are glued in.
Old 08-04-2005, 07:09 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member
 
kretos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: surrey b.c. canada
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: lb9
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi
have any pics?
Old 08-04-2005, 07:54 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member

 
85 T/A WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,705
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: Recaro Option T/A
Engine: 305 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: 3:27 Borg Warner
Its a choice, comfort or performance, Ill take performance.

If I want comfort I will drive my couch around
Old 08-04-2005, 08:30 PM
  #5  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
buffaloman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Galion, Ohio
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1989 Firebird Fornula 350
Engine: 350 L98 / NOS
Transmission: 4sp Auto
85/TA what do you mean? These seat hold you in the seat. They are performace seats. The sides can be adjusted to suck you right in.
Old 08-04-2005, 09:03 PM
  #6  
Moderator

iTrader: (5)
 
JamesC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 19,282
Received 93 Likes on 68 Posts
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
In my 85 IROC.

JamesC
Attached Thumbnails Lear Siegler seats-drseat.jpg  
Old 08-04-2005, 11:17 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
Dens71TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,123
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
Car: '82 Recaro T/A, '71 Trans Am
Engine: 305CFI/455HO
Transmission: TH700R4/M22
Axle/Gears: 3.23/3.42
Anybody ever notice that Camaros only got a driver's side Lear Siegler seat and Firebirds got them for driver and passenger?

I noticed that on my friends '82 Camaro pace car and I see James C's '85 IROC is the same way too.
Old 08-05-2005, 08:59 AM
  #8  
Junior Member

 
Greg99LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Arlington, TX USA
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2012 Corvette Grand Sport 'vert
Engine: LS3
Transmission: 6L80
Axle/Gears: 2:73
That's correct, they were never offered for the passenger seat in a Camaro.

My first new car, an '83 Z28 had that option.
Old 08-06-2005, 09:32 PM
  #9  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (3)
 
Kevin84Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sonoma CO. CA.
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1984 Camaro Z28
Engine: L69 305 H.O.
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
These are in my 1984 Z28
Old 08-06-2005, 09:32 PM
  #10  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (3)
 
Kevin84Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sonoma CO. CA.
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1984 Camaro Z28
Engine: L69 305 H.O.
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Whoops, Here they are...
Attached Thumbnails Lear Siegler seats-dscf0202.jpg  
Old 08-06-2005, 09:37 PM
  #11  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (3)
 
Kevin84Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sonoma CO. CA.
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1984 Camaro Z28
Engine: L69 305 H.O.
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Here's what they look like out of the car...
Attached Thumbnails Lear Siegler seats-seat1.jpg  
Old 08-07-2005, 04:08 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
DanTheMan_smlk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Greg99LS1
That's correct, they were never offered for the passenger seat in a Camaro.

My first new car, an '83 Z28 had that option.
what was it like back then? Did people like the "new" camaro more than the 2nd gen? Did people like fox bodies more?
Old 08-08-2005, 07:21 AM
  #13  
Junior Member

 
Greg99LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Arlington, TX USA
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2012 Corvette Grand Sport 'vert
Engine: LS3
Transmission: 6L80
Axle/Gears: 2:73
It was cool.....the Camaro and Firebird were very popular, and NO ONE thought that a Camaro of any year was a white trash car in those days. (I blame the late 80's BMW 318i-driving yuppie scum)

If people liked them more than the 2nd Gens, it's mostly because the 2nd Gens had been around so long and that we finally had a new, high-tech Camaro (for that time).

I like to think that the 3rd Gen was the generation where the Camaro grew up.....it finally got fuel injection, overdrive transmissions, four wheel disk brakes, leather interiors, articulated driving seats, and world-class handling.

The only thing about the 82-83 Camaros was the lack of serious horspower, but NOTHING had a lot of HP in those days, even the Corvette or a Ferrari 308. The '83 L69 started the horsepower wars that continue intil this day....

Most of my friends had Camaros, specifically Z28s.....one of my brother's friends had a '83 Mustang GT. It ran good in a straight line, but the handling sucked compared to the Z28, it had rear drum brakes, and worst of all, family car-looking steering wheel, seats, and dashboard. The '87 interior redesign for the Mustang look worlds better....

The Z28 was a much better all-around car, but later on, Ford did a few great things that really appealed to the gearheads, namely the world-class T5 (sooner than the F-bodies), and the 8.8 rear axle. Now as used cars, it makes them easier to handle large amounts of power, but when they were all new cars, they were pretty even in acceleration, despite the present-day opinion.

The Mustang never did handle on the level of an IROC or WS6, though. Magazine tests will show that the F-bodies always badly smoked the Mustang on a road racing track. The Mustang seemed to be set up more for drag racing, as it held a .2 second advantage in ETs on the 305 F-cars, while usually giving up that much to the L98 cars.

Last edited by Greg99LS1; 08-08-2005 at 05:28 PM.
Old 08-08-2005, 09:31 AM
  #14  
Supreme Member
 
91rsowner4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: ohio
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1997 S10
Engine: 4-Cyl 2.2 Liter
Transmission: Automatic
heres this link i found with some usefull info i think they still make the camaro camaro camaro covers https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=249642
Old 08-08-2005, 03:29 PM
  #15  
Banned
 
DanTheMan_smlk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
hey, thanks for the info gregg, i was born in 86 so i dont remember anything from back then.... Ive always liked the camaro and fox body, especially the 90-93 convertibles....the gfx are awesome and i love the boxy styling
Old 08-08-2005, 04:22 PM
  #16  
Moderator

 
scottmoyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,399
Received 180 Likes on 132 Posts
Car: 87 IROC-Z, 82 Pace Car
People in my high school envied those of us that drove newer Z28s. I had an 82 and an 83 during my junior and senior year while the 85 IROC-Z was new and only available to those whose daddy bought the car for them.

During my senior year, there were only 2 Z28s and 2 IROC-Zs and 2 Formulas in my entire school. Very popular cars that didn't carry any negative stigma like today. I agree that the very late 80s and early 90s gave us a bad rep.

For those that remember, would you agree that most people looked at the IROC-Z and as an affordable Corvette? Since we all seem to know what others think of owning a Vette, owning a Camaro was the next best thing!
Old 08-08-2005, 05:37 PM
  #17  
Junior Member

 
Greg99LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Arlington, TX USA
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2012 Corvette Grand Sport 'vert
Engine: LS3
Transmission: 6L80
Axle/Gears: 2:73
I always got a huge kick out of the fact that Car & Driver named the '84 Z28 as the best handling American car, beating the Corvette Z51.....the cars were VERY close in performance at that time.

And it narrowly came in 2nd to the Porsche 944 as the best handling car in America, period.

These cars were HUGELY popular in the mid-80's, and we loved it!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MrPackstin
Interior Parts for Sale
11
10-25-2017 08:09 PM
GageBrand
Interior
3
10-22-2015 02:30 PM
loud91rs
Camaros for Sale
7
10-05-2015 10:05 PM
Briandrex
Interior Parts for Sale
3
10-05-2015 06:20 AM
dbrochard
Interior Parts Wanted
0
09-28-2015 07:40 PM



Quick Reply: Lear Siegler seats



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:35 PM.