FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Camdenton, Mo/ St. Joseph, Mo
Posts: 588
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 97 Cummins 92 CamaroZ28, 94 GSXR750
Engine: Modded 5.9 , carbed sbc358, modded
Transmission: Nv4500, 700R4 (for now)
Axle/Gears: stock
FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
Flame Throwers as in shooting FIRE out your exhaust (on purpose).
Im putting a flame thrower kit back on my car. I originally had it with my TPI setup, but because of some difficulty in gettin the coils hooked up I abandond it.
The setup up i got has a control box that does will interupt the coil and send power to the coils (extras) to make the spark plugs in my tail pipes work.
My car is in the process of bein converted to Carburated, I am also getting long tube headers w/o air and running no cats ( cat shells slipped over straight pipe).
Some questions I have are what is the most free flowin and best sounding mufflers that I can put on to make it true dual? That will still let the most gas come out to get the largest flames.
I already have the kit. Just need the right muffler combo to give the car power and work best with kit.
I want a good sounding exhaust that screamins mean everytime I get on it. Ive already got a flowmaster 80 series, that I love but since im going to long tubes im gettin rid of it.
Let me know wut you all think.
Im putting a flame thrower kit back on my car. I originally had it with my TPI setup, but because of some difficulty in gettin the coils hooked up I abandond it.
The setup up i got has a control box that does will interupt the coil and send power to the coils (extras) to make the spark plugs in my tail pipes work.
My car is in the process of bein converted to Carburated, I am also getting long tube headers w/o air and running no cats ( cat shells slipped over straight pipe).
Some questions I have are what is the most free flowin and best sounding mufflers that I can put on to make it true dual? That will still let the most gas come out to get the largest flames.
I already have the kit. Just need the right muffler combo to give the car power and work best with kit.
I want a good sounding exhaust that screamins mean everytime I get on it. Ive already got a flowmaster 80 series, that I love but since im going to long tubes im gettin rid of it.
Let me know wut you all think.
#3
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1985 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 305TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
Fire coming out of your exhaust pipes isn't cool. The Fast and the Furious movies lied to you.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Camdenton, Mo/ St. Joseph, Mo
Posts: 588
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 97 Cummins 92 CamaroZ28, 94 GSXR750
Engine: Modded 5.9 , carbed sbc358, modded
Transmission: Nv4500, 700R4 (for now)
Axle/Gears: stock
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
Glasspacks arent the sound im looking for, Im looking for a more throatier. I was thinkin flowmaster 40 series.
I wasnt going off of Fast and the Furious, I was lookin more at Gone in 60 seconds, and the whole rat rod scene.
I wasnt going off of Fast and the Furious, I was lookin more at Gone in 60 seconds, and the whole rat rod scene.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Camdenton, Mo/ St. Joseph, Mo
Posts: 588
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 97 Cummins 92 CamaroZ28, 94 GSXR750
Engine: Modded 5.9 , carbed sbc358, modded
Transmission: Nv4500, 700R4 (for now)
Axle/Gears: stock
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
The kit I have is much like the kit that was shown on the tv show Trucks
Trending Topics
#8
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: california
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1989 Chevrolet Camaro iroc-z
Engine: 350 Tpi
Transmission: t5 Tranny
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VtV61stgfNY&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/VtV61stgfNY&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
#10
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1985 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 305TPI
Transmission: 700R4
#13
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1985 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 305TPI
Transmission: 700R4
#14
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver Island BC
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: None
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
#16
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Clarence, NY
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1984 trans am
Engine: 1979 350
Transmission: 1972 TH-350
Axle/Gears: 7.625 in/3.23
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
I wanted to do this for well over a year for my carbed 350 84 ta. I forgot when/where I heard of the concept for the first time, but it was on a hot rod. Then when I saw the fast and furious, I was disappointed that they would put that on a r!cer. The whole idea of having excess fuel to burn sounds like the core being of a hot rod to me, haha. As soon as I get enough money again, I am going to get one. I was thinking hotlicksexhaust.com. camarokid, what kit do you have?
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Camdenton, Mo/ St. Joseph, Mo
Posts: 588
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 97 Cummins 92 CamaroZ28, 94 GSXR750
Engine: Modded 5.9 , carbed sbc358, modded
Transmission: Nv4500, 700R4 (for now)
Axle/Gears: stock
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
I found a kit on ebay that I picked up for $35 about a year ago. It came with everything that i needed except for the coil and the plug wires. Its for single or dual and it even gave me two spark plugs. I never got it compltly hooked up, I forgot one wire and I relized that as I was pulling the unit out. But im gunna give her another shot after i get it swapped to carburated and get the longtubes. Mine is supposed to produce up to 8ft flames.
#18
Banned
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
I've always wondered if a fuel injector could be mounted behind the muffler, to be used in a flamethrower exhaust, in FI cars!
#20
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: ms. gulf coast
Posts: 2,403
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 91 R/S , 89 dodge p/u
Engine: L31 GM crate re-cammed , 318
Transmission: T-5 , 4 speed auto
Axle/Gears: 3.42 , ?
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
my only comment/suggestion is , STUPID , STUPID !!!!!
#21
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Trans Am
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
One thing no one has pointed out, is that with an auto you are going to have sh*t ground clearance with duals and how are you going to run it out the back? You will need to be very creative with over the axle pipes because of space or run it underneath the axle and hope for the best.
I think the idea is dumb all the way around and the $35 could have gone towards a book on why carbs are the second dumbest thing you can do to these cars (right behind flame throwers but just in front of multicolored primer).
#22
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Camdenton, Mo/ St. Joseph, Mo
Posts: 588
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 97 Cummins 92 CamaroZ28, 94 GSXR750
Engine: Modded 5.9 , carbed sbc358, modded
Transmission: Nv4500, 700R4 (for now)
Axle/Gears: stock
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
Yes but a primered 3rd gen is not and will never be in any way shape or form, comparable to any Ferrari ever made.
One thing no one has pointed out, is that with an auto you are going to have sh*t ground clearance with duals and how are you going to run it out the back? You will need to be very creative with over the axle pipes because of space or run it underneath the axle and hope for the best.
I think the idea is dumb all the way around and the $35 could have gone towards a book on why carbs are the second dumbest thing you can do to these cars (right behind flame throwers but just in front of multicolored primer).
One thing no one has pointed out, is that with an auto you are going to have sh*t ground clearance with duals and how are you going to run it out the back? You will need to be very creative with over the axle pipes because of space or run it underneath the axle and hope for the best.
I think the idea is dumb all the way around and the $35 could have gone towards a book on why carbs are the second dumbest thing you can do to these cars (right behind flame throwers but just in front of multicolored primer).
#23
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Clarence, NY
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1984 trans am
Engine: 1979 350
Transmission: 1972 TH-350
Axle/Gears: 7.625 in/3.23
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
1bdbrd, What's wrong with having a carb? Not all of us have the money to screw around with TPI and computer BS, let alone a fancy T-56 like yourself. My 84 came with a carbed 350 from a 79 truck. The things a beast. Its easy to work on, its easy to upgrade, and if it breaks, they're everywhere. Admittedly, you can get more power and better mileage from FI, but it comes at a price. For me, the carb gave me the most bang for my buck.
I wanted a muscle car but couldn't afford a first or a second gen. So I got my hot rodded mismatched third gen.
However, if I had a late model TPI to start out with... I wouldn't have changed over unless I were changing engines. Camarokid, seeing as how you have a 92, I would only go to a carb if you were changing engines to an older 350 or an old big block or something like that. What do you have now, a 305? Looking at the stock data, its probably worth just keeping your TPI.
EDIT: I see you have a 5.7, I think you should keep the TPI
BTW: I'm pretty sure I have the 40 series flowmaster, and it sounds deep and throaty. Its a cat back system, not true duals though.
As for those against the flames... Some of us are just born pyros.
I wanted a muscle car but couldn't afford a first or a second gen. So I got my hot rodded mismatched third gen.
However, if I had a late model TPI to start out with... I wouldn't have changed over unless I were changing engines. Camarokid, seeing as how you have a 92, I would only go to a carb if you were changing engines to an older 350 or an old big block or something like that. What do you have now, a 305? Looking at the stock data, its probably worth just keeping your TPI.
EDIT: I see you have a 5.7, I think you should keep the TPI
BTW: I'm pretty sure I have the 40 series flowmaster, and it sounds deep and throaty. Its a cat back system, not true duals though.
As for those against the flames... Some of us are just born pyros.
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Camdenton, Mo/ St. Joseph, Mo
Posts: 588
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 97 Cummins 92 CamaroZ28, 94 GSXR750
Engine: Modded 5.9 , carbed sbc358, modded
Transmission: Nv4500, 700R4 (for now)
Axle/Gears: stock
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
Its a 350. I had 1 to many problems with the FI/Computerised crap that I decided to go back to wut i know and that is Carburated. I wouldnt have changed it if I wasnt having so many expensive problems. Plus when I was looking at the engine work I wanted to get done in the future I thought it best/cheapest to convert to carburated. I talked to a speed shop owner who had converted multiple 3rd gens to carb, basically what he said was that;
1. It cheaper to get more power out of it
2. A lot easier to work on.
1. It cheaper to get more power out of it
2. A lot easier to work on.
#25
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ankeny Iowa
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 84 Camaro
Engine: 357
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 4.10's / Strange LSD
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
you can get more power and better mileage from FI,(Quote)
That's half right. You can and almost surly will get better mileage with FI. A well tuned carb will make a bit more power then a FI setup on the same motor. They have proved that time and time again. Of course FI has better drive ability then MOST carbs.
Mark.
That's half right. You can and almost surly will get better mileage with FI. A well tuned carb will make a bit more power then a FI setup on the same motor. They have proved that time and time again. Of course FI has better drive ability then MOST carbs.
Mark.
#26
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Camdenton, Mo/ St. Joseph, Mo
Posts: 588
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 97 Cummins 92 CamaroZ28, 94 GSXR750
Engine: Modded 5.9 , carbed sbc358, modded
Transmission: Nv4500, 700R4 (for now)
Axle/Gears: stock
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
I was having some serious issues and ended up gettin as lil as 8mpg with TPI, so im thinkin ill get better gas milage when i switch to carb after i get it all timed correctly. But before I was having the issues i was gettin 24highway and 18 city with a 350. It was really nice, but when I started lookin parts for my car it was gettin really expensive. That was the main reason I switched to carburated.
#27
Former Sponsor
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
I have a flame thrower set sitting in my garage too, but was waiting to get like an old 49 Ford that I can paint flat black and make an old moonshine type car outta. I'd love to drop a Roush crate motor in one.
All of these tricks flame throwers, suicide doors,shaved handles, interchanging parts from different vehicles.
Those are all old school hot rod tricks the have been around for decades. Check out a street or a rat rod show, you'll see some really cool stuff.
All of these tricks flame throwers, suicide doors,shaved handles, interchanging parts from different vehicles.
Those are all old school hot rod tricks the have been around for decades. Check out a street or a rat rod show, you'll see some really cool stuff.
#28
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
I've installed them before, but don't recommend using any chambered muffler. A glass back or resonator type muffler would be proper choice. It cuts your ignition to the plugs allowing the unburnt fuel to reach the tailpipe. Be ready to change your oil more often due to fuel washing the cylinders and bearings.
#29
Former Sponsor
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
I've installed them before, but don't recommend using any chambered muffler. A glass back or resonator type muffler would be proper choice. It cuts your ignition to the plugs allowing the unburnt fuel to reach the tailpipe. Be ready to change your oil more often due to fuel washing the cylinders and bearings.
#30
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Camdenton, Mo/ St. Joseph, Mo
Posts: 588
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 97 Cummins 92 CamaroZ28, 94 GSXR750
Engine: Modded 5.9 , carbed sbc358, modded
Transmission: Nv4500, 700R4 (for now)
Axle/Gears: stock
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
The one i got kills the motor. I was hopin to find a good muffler that will work, glass packs are crazy loud but not really throaty, my buddy has dual glass packs on his truck and that thing practically wakes the dead. Im wanting for of something that will sound good rather then just being good for the flame throwers. Something I could compromise with.
#31
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
http://www.thehoffmangroup.com/autol...c=flamethrower
Yes, it can shoot over 20ft of a flame. It gets interesting if you spray some carb cleaner in the muffler on the fiberglass packing. talk about a bang.
#32
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1985 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 305TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
Pretty much my thoughts on the subject. I don't know why anyone would want to do this, then again I never understood why people would buy any number of hideous vehicles like the Pontiac Aztek, the Scion XB, the AMC Gremlin and the Ford Pinto. I also never understood how anyone could hear the sound of a Honda Civic with a grape fruit launcher on the end of it, and describe it as "sounding awesome."
Different strokes I guess.
Different strokes I guess.
#34
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Clarence, NY
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1984 trans am
Engine: 1979 350
Transmission: 1972 TH-350
Axle/Gears: 7.625 in/3.23
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
How do these kits work? Do they cut the plugs so gas goes through the pipes? What keeps the engine running, just its own momentum? And the flame wouldn't be able to be kept up for very long then I guess.
I thought that on a carbed and non-emissions car that there would be enough gas at the end of the pipes to burn. That's what hotlicksexhaust.com led me to believe: "Q: How can this kit work without choking the carb? A: There is generally enough gas the motor doesn't burn to get flames without using a choke." They were the site I was considering buying one from, because the dual kit is 50 bucks cheaper than the autolok kit and comes with plugs and the coil.
I have a manual choke on my car, so I could probably just choke it if I were going to use the flamethrower.
On a side note, because I have a manual choke, I accidentally left it on and drove with it (I need to light up my interior, too bad it doesn't have a light). I only drove like that a bit, but would that damage the engine to run under load like that?
I thought that on a carbed and non-emissions car that there would be enough gas at the end of the pipes to burn. That's what hotlicksexhaust.com led me to believe: "Q: How can this kit work without choking the carb? A: There is generally enough gas the motor doesn't burn to get flames without using a choke." They were the site I was considering buying one from, because the dual kit is 50 bucks cheaper than the autolok kit and comes with plugs and the coil.
I have a manual choke on my car, so I could probably just choke it if I were going to use the flamethrower.
On a side note, because I have a manual choke, I accidentally left it on and drove with it (I need to light up my interior, too bad it doesn't have a light). I only drove like that a bit, but would that damage the engine to run under load like that?
#35
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ontario
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 87 player's trans am a4u (pepsi car
Engine: 305 tpi
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
My question is why? But to each their own, Just make sure you don't light the back of your car on fire. The old school hot rods had STEEL bumpers and such out the a$$end. Be careful. The cheaper way would be to just run wires to the positive side of your starter, then to the switch then to the plugs in the exhaust. But once again I have to ask, WHY?
#36
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Clarence, NY
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1984 trans am
Engine: 1979 350
Transmission: 1972 TH-350
Axle/Gears: 7.625 in/3.23
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
You can kind of see it in the picture on the left; on my car the back pipes stick out past the back of the bumper at least a couple inches, so I am not worried about toasting the bumper or the paint. Thats the way the exhaust was when I got the car. It kind of annoyed me at first, but now I think it looks cool, especially from the side.
As for why... like I said before, some of us are just pyros. Fire is cool. That pretty much sums up my motives there. It certainly isn't on the top of the list, but when the time comes and I have the extra cash to drop down on some flames, I'll get them.
For now though, there is more mods on the list above the flames. I have some more important things to do first once I get a job again.
As for why... like I said before, some of us are just pyros. Fire is cool. That pretty much sums up my motives there. It certainly isn't on the top of the list, but when the time comes and I have the extra cash to drop down on some flames, I'll get them.
For now though, there is more mods on the list above the flames. I have some more important things to do first once I get a job again.
#40
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Camdenton, Mo/ St. Joseph, Mo
Posts: 588
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 97 Cummins 92 CamaroZ28, 94 GSXR750
Engine: Modded 5.9 , carbed sbc358, modded
Transmission: Nv4500, 700R4 (for now)
Axle/Gears: stock
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
Hahaha most of them were for retarded reasons, like liscence plate covers(twice), not having a front plate on(twice), doing 51 in a 50 by a state trooper, driving with LED lights under my dads truck. Now i do have some stupid ones like recklass driving in the school parkin lot. (parking lot was empty all 3 times but still wasnt smart on my half, dif cop everytime though). Most of the times it was for little stupid things that cops were just tryin to find a reson to pull me over for. The few that were for serious stuff I was just respectful and polite. Prbly not the smartest thing to do bc they would end up searching my car for anything illegal on there such as the lack of cats or the no emissions equitment. I really dont even know if im goin to run the exhuast out the back or in front of the rear tires yet. And if I do run it out the sides then i wont put the flamethrower kit on
#41
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: WPB FL
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
I'd love to see a wenkel with a flame thrower kit since they already shoot out flames stock if you gut the cat and rev it on backfire.
Last edited by RU1NER; 01-04-2010 at 08:17 PM.
#42
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTYwhYOOff8 Now you cant tell me that aint bad-***. Love the idea bro!
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NJ UNION
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 firebird
Engine: V6
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10 open 3.42
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
i had flame throwers and got in all kinds of trouble
some honda was tailgating me to the point all i seen was his face in my rear-view so he got a melted bumper, a other time was in my high school parking lot fire dept & police teachers thinking my car was on fire lol
good times ....
what i say is do it right and don't go crazy like i did OFF ROAD USE means OFF public road period lol
some honda was tailgating me to the point all i seen was his face in my rear-view so he got a melted bumper, a other time was in my high school parking lot fire dept & police teachers thinking my car was on fire lol
good times ....
what i say is do it right and don't go crazy like i did OFF ROAD USE means OFF public road period lol
#44
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Camdenton, Mo/ St. Joseph, Mo
Posts: 588
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 97 Cummins 92 CamaroZ28, 94 GSXR750
Engine: Modded 5.9 , carbed sbc358, modded
Transmission: Nv4500, 700R4 (for now)
Axle/Gears: stock
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
Exactly as long as you arnt stupid for it you shouldnt really get in any trouble. Plus u can bs and say it was a back fire
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Temple City, CA
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: V8 305 TBI
Transmission: W/C T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
Sounds like a dumb idea. A waste of money.
Sadly enough I was about 12 when fast and the furious came out, and I truly believed for a while that flames come out of the tailpipe when using nitrous.
Sadly enough I was about 12 when fast and the furious came out, and I truly believed for a while that flames come out of the tailpipe when using nitrous.
#48
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28,64ImpalaSS4094spd,67 Galaxy
Engine: Dart 415Profiler hd,cmprlrs,Hlly750
Transmission: Built 700R4, 3200 stall
Axle/Gears: 3:89 Moser 9"
#49
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Edmonton, Alberta.
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1988 Pontiac Trans Am GTA.
Engine: 385 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 3.70 Wavetrac
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
just throw a spark plug in the tail pipe. Ive heard that's all flamethrower kits are, aren't they?
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Stone Mtn., GA
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 90 Camaro RS
Engine: V6 3.1 MFI
Transmission: 4 Speed Auto 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: FLAME THROWERS. comments/suggestions
sounded like a cool idea till i saw someone do it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrM9PrMysHY
Not bad-*** just sad. The top secret crap at the end is pathetic and also really smart to cover up his times cause no one can say it's not a fast car. Never seen someone not want to show there times unless there crappy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrM9PrMysHY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTYwhYOOff8 Now you cant tell me that aint bad-***. Love the idea bro!
Last edited by RS Reaper; 01-05-2010 at 12:36 PM.