can someone explain...
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MN
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Firebird
Engine: 350 tbi
Transmission: 700R4
can someone explain...
ok I was talking with the welding instructor at school (who is the smartest person I know) and I mentioned that I'd like to get headers for my car and he said that its pretty much pointless unless you are running 450hp+. he started talking about the flow requirements of a 350 and how the stock manifolds are enough. my question is can anyone show me the math to prove him wrong? or maybe a dyno sheet showing the difference between headers and no headers.
the only reason I did't call on him right away is he could teach a fluid dynamics class and he is literally a genius.
the only reason I did't call on him right away is he could teach a fluid dynamics class and he is literally a genius.
#3
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,345
Likes: 0
Received 425 Likes
on
326 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Z28racer
For a genious he isnt too bright....
For a genious he isnt too bright....
#4
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MN
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Firebird
Engine: 350 tbi
Transmission: 700R4
lets ignore the fact that he welds, which is a part of his business which is fabrication/repair/anything else. thats after turning wrenches on gas and diesel equipment for 20+ years (and talking having degrees in fluid dynamics, metallugy (sp?)and who knows what else). basically I have no doubt that he knows what he is talking about, which is why I would like something that shows beyond a doubt that headers are benifical (sp?) regardless
#5
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Tampa, FL, USA
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 93 240SX
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.54 R200 IRS
Originally posted by red90bird
lets ignore the fact that he welds, which is a part of his business which is fabrication/repair/anything else. thats after turning wrenches on gas and diesel equipment for 20+ years (and talking having degrees in fluid dynamics, metallugy (sp?)and who knows what else). basically I have no doubt that he knows what he is talking about, which is why I would like something that shows beyond a doubt that headers are benifical (sp?) regardless
lets ignore the fact that he welds, which is a part of his business which is fabrication/repair/anything else. thats after turning wrenches on gas and diesel equipment for 20+ years (and talking having degrees in fluid dynamics, metallugy (sp?)and who knows what else). basically I have no doubt that he knows what he is talking about, which is why I would like something that shows beyond a doubt that headers are benifical (sp?) regardless
As I said, he's a moron, or f'n with you.
#6
Just because he's a "genius" doesn't mean he's a "Car guy"...I mean PERFORMANCE....
I still remember my first Auto shop teacher telling me how it was pointless installing headers, cam, etc in my old Chevelle, as the gains wouldn't be noticeable. LOL
I still remember my first Auto shop teacher telling me how it was pointless installing headers, cam, etc in my old Chevelle, as the gains wouldn't be noticeable. LOL
#7
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MN
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Firebird
Engine: 350 tbi
Transmission: 700R4
I have no doubt that headers are good, but before I tell him that he is wrong I would like to have my facts straight
Trending Topics
#8
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,345
Likes: 0
Received 425 Likes
on
326 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by red90bird
I have no doubt that headers are good, but before I tell him that he is wrong I would like to have my facts straight
I have no doubt that headers are good, but before I tell him that he is wrong I would like to have my facts straight
#9
Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: MN
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 rs
Engine: 250
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock??
ok.. so your try to tell me that... the stock manifolds breath just as good as header and are no need...... HA HA AH AHHA HAHA AHAHA AHA HA AH AH AH...... thats funny cause you ussally make power by making the motor breath.. and by letting the exahust get out easy and fast it make the motor work less to get it out which free's up the HP thats like saying i'm going forma 1 bbl carb to a 4 bbl and wont see any diffence in anything... *** what a moron.. and if he says it is like that tell him to prove it and bring back the evednece to us
#10
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MN
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Firebird
Engine: 350 tbi
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
Just be simple with him. Ask him if he would rather run a marathon breathing out of a straw or a toilet paper tube.
Just be simple with him. Ask him if he would rather run a marathon breathing out of a straw or a toilet paper tube.
everyone: he also said that the stock exaust on new cars flows better than headers...thoughts?
he also said that headers also slow down the velocity of the air and reduce scavaging
#12
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,345
Likes: 0
Received 425 Likes
on
326 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by red90bird
shifty: now thats a good way to put it
everyone: he also said that the stock exaust on new cars flows better than headers...thoughts?
he also said that headers also slow down the velocity of the air and reduce scavaging
shifty: now thats a good way to put it
everyone: he also said that the stock exaust on new cars flows better than headers...thoughts?
he also said that headers also slow down the velocity of the air and reduce scavaging
#13
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Tigard, Oregon
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '86 Berlinetta
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by red90bird
shifty: now thats a good way to put it
everyone: he also said that the stock exaust on new cars flows better than headers...thoughts?
he also said that headers also slow down the velocity of the air and reduce scavaging
shifty: now thats a good way to put it
everyone: he also said that the stock exaust on new cars flows better than headers...thoughts?
he also said that headers also slow down the velocity of the air and reduce scavaging
#14
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
SIMPLE WAY TO LOOK AT THIS
you don't need headers till your running 450hp right?
so lets see
you don't need heads prolly till your pushing at least 400hp
and forget about the came since that isn't needed till around 350hp or so
and the itnake isn't needed till around 800hp
gears don't do you any good till around 1200hp prolly
boring the block isn't neeed till you make at least 500hp I would say
pistons eh not good till around 600hp
see a common trend here with what he said?
if we followed his advice on not doing something cause it isn't needed till you hit such amoutn of horsepower then we dont' get anywhere
where if we do little pieces here and there we will be able achieve our goals
you don't need headers till your running 450hp right?
so lets see
you don't need heads prolly till your pushing at least 400hp
and forget about the came since that isn't needed till around 350hp or so
and the itnake isn't needed till around 800hp
gears don't do you any good till around 1200hp prolly
boring the block isn't neeed till you make at least 500hp I would say
pistons eh not good till around 600hp
see a common trend here with what he said?
if we followed his advice on not doing something cause it isn't needed till you hit such amoutn of horsepower then we dont' get anywhere
where if we do little pieces here and there we will be able achieve our goals
#15
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by red90bird
he also said that headers also slow down the velocity of the air and reduce scavaging
he also said that headers also slow down the velocity of the air and reduce scavaging
then yes it would reduce scavenging
but if you went from as tock size manifold to a stock size header the header will be a lot more smooth flowing with a little less turbulance or interferance from one pipe to the other
and wha the stock maniofolds are loggers aren't they?
about the worst design you can get due to all the turbulance and pulse timing issues with almost NO scavenging effect
#16
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 Firebird
Engine: 305 LG4
Transmission: THM700R4
I gained 20 hp by getting Edelbrock headers and a high flow cat this is before and after with no other mods done at the same time.
After you take off iron exhaust manifolds give them to your teacher as a chrismas present every good teacher allways needs a paper weight.
Once you take a look at the exhaust manifolds you will laugh at how GM let anything so poorly engineered leave their factory.
After you take off iron exhaust manifolds give them to your teacher as a chrismas present every good teacher allways needs a paper weight.
Once you take a look at the exhaust manifolds you will laugh at how GM let anything so poorly engineered leave their factory.
#17
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
simple.
take a bendy straw and have it straight... point out the air goes thru easily.
now hold it flat, cut 4 windows into the side of the straw, and tape off one end.
obviously, its harder to blow thru. the air has to make a immediate right turn.
nows the fun part. put 4 bendy straws together with big radious bends.. like a header. point out that since they all arnt going into a immediate shared channel you can vari the length to tune it so that one pipes exhaust wave can help scavenge the next cyl.
and the larger radius turns help it flow better.
and with modern thermal coatings, it holds heat better for greater exhaust speed
and you have more flow for when you exceed the abilitys of a factory system...
plus, point out that the formulas hes using does not take into account the friction of the air, bends in the system.
and point out that the air doesnt FLOW thru.. it pulses.....
that ought to get ya started.
take a bendy straw and have it straight... point out the air goes thru easily.
now hold it flat, cut 4 windows into the side of the straw, and tape off one end.
obviously, its harder to blow thru. the air has to make a immediate right turn.
nows the fun part. put 4 bendy straws together with big radious bends.. like a header. point out that since they all arnt going into a immediate shared channel you can vari the length to tune it so that one pipes exhaust wave can help scavenge the next cyl.
and the larger radius turns help it flow better.
and with modern thermal coatings, it holds heat better for greater exhaust speed
and you have more flow for when you exceed the abilitys of a factory system...
plus, point out that the formulas hes using does not take into account the friction of the air, bends in the system.
and point out that the air doesnt FLOW thru.. it pulses.....
that ought to get ya started.
#18
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes
on
34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Once again, it comes down to "the package".
You have a 350 TBI? What heads are on it? If swirlports, then large headers, say 2" primaries for the sake of arguement & overkill, would definitely slow down exhaust flow velocity to the point that those small sodastraw ports would be overwhelmed - low-end torque would be absolutely killed, and the engine would never be able to rev high enough to get the exhaust flow velocity up to the point where it would begin the "scavaging" effect.
However, 1-1/2" primary headers would work very well on such an engine. But, again, it's not one single part that determines the final outcome. If you still have the 2-1/4" TBI exhaust on the car, that will choke off flow and negate most of the benefits of the headers.
And, as usual, the total is not the sum of the parts. If you put on an induction system that should boost the power by 50 HP, but the exhaust holds it back, you won't get the 50 HP increase. By the same token, if you put on an exhaust system that would increase your power by 20 HP with the stock induction, doing both would not increase power by 70 HP, because the 50 HP assumed proper exhaust. Getting a total package of induction, cam, heads, and exhaust may double the power, however, but only when all the parts are properly matched and done together.
Most of the time, headers will increase power over a factory cast iron manifold system. It all needs to be matched to complement the entire power train system, that's all.
You have a 350 TBI? What heads are on it? If swirlports, then large headers, say 2" primaries for the sake of arguement & overkill, would definitely slow down exhaust flow velocity to the point that those small sodastraw ports would be overwhelmed - low-end torque would be absolutely killed, and the engine would never be able to rev high enough to get the exhaust flow velocity up to the point where it would begin the "scavaging" effect.
However, 1-1/2" primary headers would work very well on such an engine. But, again, it's not one single part that determines the final outcome. If you still have the 2-1/4" TBI exhaust on the car, that will choke off flow and negate most of the benefits of the headers.
And, as usual, the total is not the sum of the parts. If you put on an induction system that should boost the power by 50 HP, but the exhaust holds it back, you won't get the 50 HP increase. By the same token, if you put on an exhaust system that would increase your power by 20 HP with the stock induction, doing both would not increase power by 70 HP, because the 50 HP assumed proper exhaust. Getting a total package of induction, cam, heads, and exhaust may double the power, however, but only when all the parts are properly matched and done together.
Most of the time, headers will increase power over a factory cast iron manifold system. It all needs to be matched to complement the entire power train system, that's all.
#19
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: E.B.F. TN
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Tree Huggers
Engine: Do Not
Transmission: Appreciate Me.
How to disprove this apparent MENSA card carrying member?
It's called a dynamometer.
dy·na·mom·e·ter
Pronunciation: "dI-n&-'mä-m&-t&r
Function: noun
Etymology: French dynamomètre, from Greek dynamis power + French -mètre -meter
1 : an instrument for measuring mechanical force
2 : an apparatus for measuring mechanical power (as of an engine)
You can then proceed to tell him that when this apparatus shows an increase from one part or another, it is generally accepted that said part swap indeed increases the power output of the test subject.
As this has been the case countless times after the installation of headers, I think I would want him to prove to me that headers would indeed be worthless.
We won't get into fluid dynamics, acoustics et al. No need.
It's called a dynamometer.
dy·na·mom·e·ter
Pronunciation: "dI-n&-'mä-m&-t&r
Function: noun
Etymology: French dynamomètre, from Greek dynamis power + French -mètre -meter
1 : an instrument for measuring mechanical force
2 : an apparatus for measuring mechanical power (as of an engine)
You can then proceed to tell him that when this apparatus shows an increase from one part or another, it is generally accepted that said part swap indeed increases the power output of the test subject.
As this has been the case countless times after the installation of headers, I think I would want him to prove to me that headers would indeed be worthless.
We won't get into fluid dynamics, acoustics et al. No need.
#20
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lombard Il
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 Formula
Engine: 383 vortec tpi
Transmission: t56 woot
Well the most obvious thing I can think of to throw into this is that an exhaust manifold has right angles in it, and a header has smooth bends. Im sure if you explained this to "captian fluid dynamics" he would figure out pretty fast why headers rule and exhause manifolds are garbage.
#21
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lafayette IN
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 173 CI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: open 3.42's
Originally posted by sellmanb
it's true somewhat. In 98-02 F-bodies, the stock manifolds are just as good as headers, if not better... some people have put headers on them and actually lost power. Now that's only one example of it... he cant honestly sum up ALL MANIFOLDS as being as good as headers by a couple examples.
it's true somewhat. In 98-02 F-bodies, the stock manifolds are just as good as headers, if not better... some people have put headers on them and actually lost power. Now that's only one example of it... he cant honestly sum up ALL MANIFOLDS as being as good as headers by a couple examples.
#22
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MN
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Firebird
Engine: 350 tbi
Transmission: 700R4
boy did I open a can of worms :D
anyway I appreciate the input from everyone. I'm looking forward to seeing the instructor again so I can tell him most of this.
five7kid, yep its a 350tbi from a 89 half ton p/u; the engine is in need of an overhauld and some various new parts (including heads).
rx7, I hve to say you make your point very well, I'll have to mention somthing along those lines.
five7kid, yep its a 350tbi from a 89 half ton p/u; the engine is in need of an overhauld and some various new parts (including heads).
rx7, I hve to say you make your point very well, I'll have to mention somthing along those lines.
#23
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Salem, NH
Posts: 1,855
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1999 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10 Bolt
when my car was stock and i put on 1.5" primary dynomax shorties i went from 15.1 @ 93.25 to 14.6 and quicker at 95.5mph (same weather) in the fall in 35* air i hit 13.9 @ 97.
there was definitly a big improvement when i changed over to headers and they were the ****tiest headers and y pipe u could get for our cars.
there was definitly a big improvement when i changed over to headers and they were the ****tiest headers and y pipe u could get for our cars.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
robster66
Electronics
2
05-24-2009 07:30 PM