Exhaust Post your questions and suggestions about stock or aftermarket exhaust setups. Third Gen exhaust sound files and videos!

best performance and sounding exhaust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-09-2001, 06:43 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
SuperChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Iowa
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
best performance and sounding exhaust

I've been readin the exhaust section for quite some time now and the question of the "best" exhaust system comes to into play but noone really seems to know the answer to the question. I see a big dispute between flowmaster, dynomax, hooker, etc and even mac which i havn't even heard of before. who has the best performance and sounding exhaust on the market? keep in mind i only have about 375-400 dollars to spend. Oh yeah my cars also a 350tpi.
Old 12-09-2001, 07:08 PM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
pauls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heres what I've found out. Apparently,all the aftermarket cat back systems will outflow stock, although some 3rd gens came with 3-in pipe in and out of cat, mandrel bent to muffler, with mandrel bent tailpipes, like my 85 tpi IROC. ,I believe these crossflow stock mufflers flow fairly good because of the fairly large one-inlet/dual- outlet configuration.However, according to cfm ratings, there is lots of variance, for instance, according to the Walker-dyno-max tech line, here are a few ratings they give for comparison purposes, : stock muffler -250/300 cfm, flow-master 80 series (crossflow) about 450/500, Walker dyno-max ultra-flow stainless 585, Walker ultra-flow welded(racing crossflow)940, open pipe,1100. As you can see, ultra-flow WELDED (#17227) would be the way to go. According to their tech line(#1-800-594-9815), this muffler is slightly louder than their stainless ultra-flow (#17266), which is only slightly louder than stock. To top it off you could gut/remove cat for some real flow. Hope this can help answer your questions.
Old 12-09-2001, 07:26 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
SuperChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Iowa
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks actually that did help out, but do you have a catback to go with the muffler?
Old 12-09-2001, 07:31 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
pauls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That would depend on your exact application....try Dyno-max tech line they are very willing to give out part #'s but not prices..they refer you to Summit or Jegs,etc.............
Old 12-09-2001, 07:39 PM
  #5  
Banned
 
un4givin89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Lan Terminal
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Heres my idea for my car, headers w/ str8 pipes back two glass pack mufflers, 3 inch pipes.

------------------
un4givin89


Poor Mans White Face Guages
MikeKey.net - Camaro Enthusiast
Old 12-09-2001, 11:41 PM
  #6  
Member
 
88WS6TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Paul , you said brought up the walker 17227 Ultra Flo welded muffler . Do you have one? Does anyone else have one? I installed one on my car Saturday along with the 44063 and 43248 cat to muffler pipes. The 17227 has very impressive flow numbers and walker is right it is not very loud at all. Alot quiter than I was expecting. I was wondering how this muffler actually performed on cars and if it is any louder with gutted cat and/ or headers.
Old 12-10-2001, 05:21 PM
  #7  
Junior Member
 
pauls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey 88WS5TA, I do not have that muffler yet, however, I'm very curious to know, How does it sound and perform compared to what you had before? Was your prior muffler stock? My 85 IROC TPI has stock muffler ,no headers. It sounded nice,and deep, not real loud before I "modified"the cat. Afterwards, exhaust with stock G.M. muffler got slightly throaty, deeper and has a slight "rap" going up the RPM. Pulls a little harder on top,too. With your ultra-flow, you'd hear more rumble,and unleash more restriction if you "modified" your cat. Typical stock cat flows around 300 C.F.M. MAX, I'm told. If this is true, the cat is like a cork in a otherwise free-flowing system. Good luck, man.
Old 12-10-2001, 06:39 PM
  #8  
Tas
Supreme Member

 
Tas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 4,310
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by un4givin89:
Heres my idea for my car, headers w/ str8 pipes back two glass pack mufflers, 3 inch pipes.

</font>
glass packs suck. https://www.thirdgen.org/messgboard/...ML/003551.html
Old 12-10-2001, 07:55 PM
  #9  
Member
 
88WS6TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Paul, my car had a midas replacement jerry rigged exhaust on it when I bought the car. The exhaust consisted of a 2 1/4" intermeidate pipe it seamed very restrictive. The car struggled to make shift point at 4800. The car also has the original ,convertor (175,000 mi). I can tell a huge difference in performance and I believe the sound at idle is quiter than the stock muffler. At any RPM above idle the sound is awesome, very deep tone but it is not loud by any means. I would reccomend this muffler to anyone that wanted a not so loud exhaust with great flow. I will be modifing cat soon along with a Flowmaster "Y" at the head pipes. This sould give it a little more volume. I would love to hear some more input on this muffler .
If anyone has a Walker 17227 muffler let me know how you like it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
billybob6110
Tech / General Engine
16
09-24-2016 09:50 AM
formula_novice
Exhaust
32
09-05-2015 03:58 AM
db057
Tech / General Engine
4
08-22-2015 08:17 PM
midias
Exhaust
20
08-22-2015 01:42 AM
gta power
Exhaust
1
08-13-2015 06:15 AM



Quick Reply: best performance and sounding exhaust



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:16 AM.