350 to 383
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '82 Trans Am
Engine: 388 5.7L V8
Transmission: T-10
350 to 383
I'm going to bore and stoke my ZZ4 crate to a 383, but I'm slightly confused on which rotating assembly to get. If I bored the engine .30 over would actual engine CID be 383 or 380? And what would include .30 over pistons and rings right? What about rod length and engine stroke? I'm ordering through Summit and those are the questions I don't know the answer to, in order to make sure I'm ordering the right parts.
#2
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
8 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: 350 to 383
If it's a brand-new block, don't bother boring it. Actual CID doesn't make any difference to anyone, so just keep calling it a 383 regardless of the bore. Stroke has to be 3.75" to make it a 383. Stick with 5.7" rods, in street engines there's not enough benefit in anything longer to make it worth the hassle.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 00 SSEi / 94 C4
Engine: 231 / 383
Transmission: 4T65E / ZF 6sp
Axle/Gears: 2.93 / Dana 44 3:45
Re: 350 to 383
From what I learned.. it is much harder to balance the rotating assembly with 5.7 rods
Also the 6.0 combo is much lighter and less rotating weight... Equals power & quicker reving
Also the 6.0 combo is much lighter and less rotating weight... Equals power & quicker reving
#4
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
8 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: 350 to 383
No
Depending on part selection there can be some weight savings, and the longer rod gives longer dwell at the top of the stroke. There's also reduced longetivity and increased rod angle, poorer ring sealing, and generally increased cost.
Depending on part selection there can be some weight savings, and the longer rod gives longer dwell at the top of the stroke. There's also reduced longetivity and increased rod angle, poorer ring sealing, and generally increased cost.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 00 SSEi / 94 C4
Engine: 231 / 383
Transmission: 4T65E / ZF 6sp
Axle/Gears: 2.93 / Dana 44 3:45
Re: 350 to 383
Sorry its way more complicated then you saying NO... 6.0 rods have a better bob weight ratio over 5.7 rods Also the shorter 5.7 rods on a 383 conversion.. have been proved to have incorrect thrust angle on the piston. lingenfelters testing states 5.85 rods will be the best combo for a 383.. 6.0 rods have gained around 25 hp over 5.7 rods
#7
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
8 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: 350 to 383
It's exactly that complicated. Start balancing your cranks yourself and you'll see.
Yes, there's lots of monkey-spank about the superiority of long rods. It's all true on high-performance engines, and all not worth the effort and expense on street builds.
Yes, there's lots of monkey-spank about the superiority of long rods. It's all true on high-performance engines, and all not worth the effort and expense on street builds.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
3
12-10-2019 07:07 PM
IROCZDAVE (88-L98)
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
11-19-2015 07:03 AM