chevy 283
#1
chevy 283
I have come across an engine I cna get for a good price, just wondering what kidn of power it may have. Its a Chevy 283, punched .030. It has dome pistons and some 76cc 400 heads. Block casting is 3862194, heads are 3951598. Supposed to be about 11:1 with these pistons and heads(kinda high for 76cc heads??)). It's just a shortblock, and I have most necessary stuff to finsih it of, just curious as to what kind of numbers may be possible. I assumer with teh short stroke it will be a hi revving engine, just dont want some drag car engine here LoL.
Edit/Delete Message
Edit/Delete Message
#3
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Posts: 17,167
Likes: 0
Received 136 Likes
on
114 Posts
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Unless you're racing in a class that limits the displacement, why even bother with such a small old engine. GM stopped producing 283's in 1967. The 283 uses a 3" stroke and a 3.875 bore which is only slightly bigger than a 305. Since SBC parts are so interchangable, you'd be better off putting any SBC parts on a 350.
Back in the 60's this engine was a good performance engine but internal designs put it out of any performace or reliabilty range of any of the newer engines.
As for how much power, it depends what parts are used. Cam and heads determine how much power it will make but it is still a very small displacement engine. Even calculating a good engine at one hp per CID doesn't make a lot of power from a small engine. There are V6's that will make more power.
Back in the 60's this engine was a good performance engine but internal designs put it out of any performace or reliabilty range of any of the newer engines.
As for how much power, it depends what parts are used. Cam and heads determine how much power it will make but it is still a very small displacement engine. Even calculating a good engine at one hp per CID doesn't make a lot of power from a small engine. There are V6's that will make more power.
#4
I cna get it for free, just curious as to if it will be a better performance engine than the stock 305 in my 85 T/A. Its a 283 bored .030 with .275 pop ups in it . It currently has some 76 cc 400 heads on it (unsure of valves but assume 1.94/1.5). The cam in is is supposed to be a powermax cam 268*/280* .459"/.486". It would be running a torker II intake, with holley 600 cfm carb on it, and shorty headers 1 5/8. I cna swap the cam, intake, carb no prob. Juts curiousabout the numbers. I would think that 300 HP or so is possible out of it, along with being anble to rev pretty high with the short stroke. This is not being built for racing any classes or anything just a fun car to toy around with. Also not sure what kidn of torque it could put out?
#5
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes
on
34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Originally posted by Big4x4Ride
I cna get it for free
I cna get it for free
just curious as to if it will be a better performance engine than the stock 305 in my 85 T/A. ... being anble to rev pretty high with the short stroke. This is not being built for racing any classes or anything just a fun car to toy around with. Also not sure what kidn of torque it could put out?
A 305 with good rod bolts and a good valve train will rev just as high as a 3" stroke 283.
People need to get these magazine mechanic generalities out of their heads.
#6
as far as the gettign it free part, only reason it is free is because the personthat started building it is no longer around, and one of their family members offered it to me. Just trying to figure out the numbers on it
#7
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Originally posted by Big4x4Ride
as far as the gettign it free part, only reason it is free is because the personthat started building it is no longer around, and one of their family members offered it to me. Just trying to figure out the numbers on it
as far as the gettign it free part, only reason it is free is because the personthat started building it is no longer around, and one of their family members offered it to me. Just trying to figure out the numbers on it
Trending Topics
#8
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Posts: 17,167
Likes: 0
Received 136 Likes
on
114 Posts
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
I've seen a Stock Eliminator Q/SA 68 Impala with a 283 run low 17's. For Q/SA class, that's fast.
#9
#10
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Staunton,illinois
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
ive got a similar 283 in my 66 impala I am building with my son...
If it were me id just take the engine and sell it to someone restoring an old impala or car of the such that wants to have an original era correct engine ....then buy a nice short block for your car...
If it were me id just take the engine and sell it to someone restoring an old impala or car of the such that wants to have an original era correct engine ....then buy a nice short block for your car...
#11
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New Germany, MN
Posts: 949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1986 Iroc
Engine: 5.3
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 9 Inch w/ 3.55
I would rock it just to be different. Plus I think you would have more power due to the fact that 305 heads are junk.
#12
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 94 Trans Am
Engine: LT-!
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Originally posted by five7kid
You sure it was a '68? Last year for the 283 was '67. 307's came out in '68.
You sure it was a '68? Last year for the 283 was '67. 307's came out in '68.
#13
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes
on
34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Yes, I already said that. The question was about a stock class '68 with a 283, not about 327's.
#15
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New COncord Ohio
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 25th anniv. camaro
Engine: 305 tbi
Transmission: 700r4
all he wants is the numbers, i would say 260 sounds about right out of a 283,a guy thats close has 1 with sidepipes off of a vette and it sounds like a v 6 and shoots like a 6 inch flame every time he revs it up,its a nice looking motorand not too bad performing eitherbut i would pick it up,and just hold it for yourself,you can get a pretty penny out of some of em to the right person
#16
Originally posted by grover85
I would rock it just to be different. Plus I think you would have more power due to the fact that 305 heads are junk.
I would rock it just to be different. Plus I think you would have more power due to the fact that 305 heads are junk.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1Aauto
Sponsored Vendors
9
10-19-2016 08:50 AM
1Aauto
Sponsored Vendors
1
10-13-2015 03:06 PM
1Aauto
Sponsored Vendors
0
09-02-2015 01:35 PM