Engine Swap Everything about swapping an engine into your Third Gen.....be it V6, V8, LTX/LSX, crate engine, etc. Pictures, questions, answers, and work logs.

chevy 283

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-19-2005, 04:09 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Big4x4Ride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
chevy 283

I have come across an engine I cna get for a good price, just wondering what kidn of power it may have. Its a Chevy 283, punched .030. It has dome pistons and some 76cc 400 heads. Block casting is 3862194, heads are 3951598. Supposed to be about 11:1 with these pistons and heads(kinda high for 76cc heads??)). It's just a shortblock, and I have most necessary stuff to finsih it of, just curious as to what kind of numbers may be possible. I assumer with teh short stroke it will be a hi revving engine, just dont want some drag car engine here LoL.
Edit/Delete Message
Old 11-19-2005, 04:47 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

 
kevinc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Wouldn't be a good engine to put in a Camaro/Firebird if you wanted to go fast.
Old 11-19-2005, 08:22 PM
  #3  
Moderator
TGO - 10 Year Member
 
AlkyIROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Posts: 17,167
Likes: 0
Received 136 Likes on 114 Posts
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Unless you're racing in a class that limits the displacement, why even bother with such a small old engine. GM stopped producing 283's in 1967. The 283 uses a 3" stroke and a 3.875 bore which is only slightly bigger than a 305. Since SBC parts are so interchangable, you'd be better off putting any SBC parts on a 350.

Back in the 60's this engine was a good performance engine but internal designs put it out of any performace or reliabilty range of any of the newer engines.

As for how much power, it depends what parts are used. Cam and heads determine how much power it will make but it is still a very small displacement engine. Even calculating a good engine at one hp per CID doesn't make a lot of power from a small engine. There are V6's that will make more power.
Old 11-21-2005, 05:37 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Big4x4Ride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I cna get it for free, just curious as to if it will be a better performance engine than the stock 305 in my 85 T/A. Its a 283 bored .030 with .275 pop ups in it . It currently has some 76 cc 400 heads on it (unsure of valves but assume 1.94/1.5). The cam in is is supposed to be a powermax cam 268*/280* .459"/.486". It would be running a torker II intake, with holley 600 cfm carb on it, and shorty headers 1 5/8. I cna swap the cam, intake, carb no prob. Juts curiousabout the numbers. I would think that 300 HP or so is possible out of it, along with being anble to rev pretty high with the short stroke. This is not being built for racing any classes or anything just a fun car to toy around with. Also not sure what kidn of torque it could put out?
Old 11-21-2005, 05:57 PM
  #5  
Moderator

iTrader: (14)
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Originally posted by Big4x4Ride
I cna get it for free
Worst reason in the world to get it.
just curious as to if it will be a better performance engine than the stock 305 in my 85 T/A. ... being anble to rev pretty high with the short stroke. This is not being built for racing any classes or anything just a fun car to toy around with. Also not sure what kidn of torque it could put out?
No, no, and no. Wouldn't be better performing than the 305; for the street the low reving 305 would be better than a high reving 283; and the 283 would put out less torque than the 305 because it is a smaller engine.

A 305 with good rod bolts and a good valve train will rev just as high as a 3" stroke 283.

People need to get these magazine mechanic generalities out of their heads.
Old 11-21-2005, 07:17 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Big4x4Ride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
as far as the gettign it free part, only reason it is free is because the personthat started building it is no longer around, and one of their family members offered it to me. Just trying to figure out the numbers on it
Old 11-21-2005, 07:33 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member

 
kevinc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Originally posted by Big4x4Ride
as far as the gettign it free part, only reason it is free is because the personthat started building it is no longer around, and one of their family members offered it to me. Just trying to figure out the numbers on it
Take the freebie, and sell it on eBay to someone that doesn't have benefit of the valid advice you're getting here.
Old 11-21-2005, 08:04 PM
  #8  
Moderator
TGO - 10 Year Member
 
AlkyIROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Posts: 17,167
Likes: 0
Received 136 Likes on 114 Posts
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
I've seen a Stock Eliminator Q/SA 68 Impala with a 283 run low 17's. For Q/SA class, that's fast.
Old 11-23-2005, 04:09 PM
  #9  
Moderator

iTrader: (14)
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
You sure it was a '68? Last year for the 283 was '67. 307's came out in '68.
Old 12-01-2005, 07:06 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member
 
THEGENERAL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Staunton,illinois
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
ive got a similar 283 in my 66 impala I am building with my son...

If it were me id just take the engine and sell it to someone restoring an old impala or car of the such that wants to have an original era correct engine ....then buy a nice short block for your car...
Old 12-02-2005, 01:08 AM
  #11  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
grover85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New Germany, MN
Posts: 949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 Iroc
Engine: 5.3
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 9 Inch w/ 3.55
I would rock it just to be different. Plus I think you would have more power due to the fact that 305 heads are junk.
Old 12-02-2005, 08:29 AM
  #12  
Junior Member
 
NHRA427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 94 Trans Am
Engine: LT-!
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Originally posted by five7kid
You sure it was a '68? Last year for the 283 was '67. 307's came out in '68.
Last year of small journal 327 was 67, they made big journal 327s in 68 and 69.
Old 12-02-2005, 10:29 PM
  #13  
Moderator

iTrader: (14)
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Yes, I already said that. The question was about a stock class '68 with a 283, not about 327's.
Old 12-03-2005, 12:01 AM
  #14  
Junior Member
 
NHRA427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 94 Trans Am
Engine: LT-!
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.42
My bad. i was talking in another thread about 327s. small vs big journal. sorry
Old 12-07-2005, 10:00 PM
  #15  
Member
 
cam92rs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New COncord Ohio
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 25th anniv. camaro
Engine: 305 tbi
Transmission: 700r4
all he wants is the numbers, i would say 260 sounds about right out of a 283,a guy thats close has 1 with sidepipes off of a vette and it sounds like a v 6 and shoots like a 6 inch flame every time he revs it up,its a nice looking motorand not too bad performing eitherbut i would pick it up,and just hold it for yourself,you can get a pretty penny out of some of em to the right person
Old 12-08-2005, 09:00 AM
  #16  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
mw66nova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Harford County, MD
Posts: 13,572
Received 26 Likes on 21 Posts
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
Originally posted by grover85
I would rock it just to be different. Plus I think you would have more power due to the fact that 305 heads are junk.
depends on the heads. if you have the 416's or 081's, your not doing too bad. i went 13.03@103mph with bonestock 416's on my 305.
Old 12-08-2005, 01:35 PM
  #17  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Big4x4Ride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
scratched the idea of using the 283, building a 350 instead
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1Aauto
Sponsored Vendors
9
10-19-2016 08:50 AM
z28venezuela
Auto Detailing and Appearance
10
10-24-2015 08:15 PM
1Aauto
Sponsored Vendors
1
10-13-2015 03:06 PM
1Aauto
Sponsored Vendors
0
09-10-2015 02:02 PM
1Aauto
Sponsored Vendors
0
09-02-2015 01:35 PM



Quick Reply: chevy 283



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:30 AM.