400hp 305
#51
Banned
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,940
Likes: 2
From: Glendale, AZ
Car: 4 Mopars total
Engine: Pentastar power
Transmission: T/F and New Process
Axle/Gears: Three 8 3/4's & one 9 1/4
Originally posted by hot91t/a
its my first muscle car and i want to do something with it
its my first muscle car and i want to do something with it
#53
Something these new guys need to realize is the more you mod a car the less reliable it becomes and the more of a handful it becomes. This was rather a shock to me when i did my first cam swap years back, your trading a lot of creature comfort for power. It becomes more of a pain in the *** to drive. It transforms from a nice reliable smooth running car to a loping, gas guzzling, constantly needing tweaking or fixing because your new power is breaking things or you forgot something kind of car.
My car is pretty quick now, but it took me a while to get used to driving a higher performance carbed car, after comming immediatley from lower performance injected model. Im used to it now and like it but it theres something to be said about a smooth running reliable grocery getter.
My car is pretty quick now, but it took me a while to get used to driving a higher performance carbed car, after comming immediatley from lower performance injected model. Im used to it now and like it but it theres something to be said about a smooth running reliable grocery getter.
#54
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Car: 82 Trans Am T-top, Red
Engine: 305 Crossfire
Transmission: Metric 200
i follow that, the trick is to have 2 different cars, your hott rod and your dick-around-car, or for some people they have 3 cars, they add the mild performance car into that loop.
to each their own
~Nick~
to each their own
~Nick~
#55
TGO Supporter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
If you really want to be different, build a 302 **takes cover from thrown stones**
Even a 302 would cost much less to get 400hp out of than a 305, and its got alot more potential to go further.
NOW, back to reality.... the 305 is a smog motor. It was meant to take Gramma to church in her 5000lb Impala. It was never meant to get her there quickly.
The 350 was designed from the start to be a performance engine specifically for the Camaro back in the 1960s. Its probably the cheapest engine in the world to make 400hp from, and its pretty much bulletproof too.
Even a 302 would cost much less to get 400hp out of than a 305, and its got alot more potential to go further.
NOW, back to reality.... the 305 is a smog motor. It was meant to take Gramma to church in her 5000lb Impala. It was never meant to get her there quickly.
The 350 was designed from the start to be a performance engine specifically for the Camaro back in the 1960s. Its probably the cheapest engine in the world to make 400hp from, and its pretty much bulletproof too.
#57
TGO Supporter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Originally posted by 82crossfireTA
That is correct air_adam.
~Nick~
That is correct air_adam.
~Nick~
#59
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,111
Likes: 52
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
Originally posted by Air_Adam
If you really want to be different, build a 302 **takes cover from thrown stones**
Even a 302 would cost much less to get 400hp out of than a 305, and its got alot more potential to go further.
NOW, back to reality.... the 305 is a smog motor. It was meant to take Gramma to church in her 5000lb Impala. It was never meant to get her there quickly.
The 350 was designed from the start to be a performance engine specifically for the Camaro back in the 1960s. Its probably the cheapest engine in the world to make 400hp from, and its pretty much bulletproof too.
If you really want to be different, build a 302 **takes cover from thrown stones**
Even a 302 would cost much less to get 400hp out of than a 305, and its got alot more potential to go further.
NOW, back to reality.... the 305 is a smog motor. It was meant to take Gramma to church in her 5000lb Impala. It was never meant to get her there quickly.
The 350 was designed from the start to be a performance engine specifically for the Camaro back in the 1960s. Its probably the cheapest engine in the world to make 400hp from, and its pretty much bulletproof too.
Think about what you are saying. When was the last time you saw a 302(3" stroke) crank laying around? A 302 crank is going to cost you a minor fortune, if you can find one. 302 pistons are expensive too, much more expensive than 305 flat tops. The two motors would need the same heads, cam induction, exhaust and preparation to achieve 400hp. The only benefit a 302 has over a 305 is a bigger bore (allows for a larger valve) but a 1.94-1.50" combination is all that's required to get 400hp.
The 305 based motor is hands down much cheaper to build to 400hp than a equal 302ci chev.
A stock 305 block is plenty strong. A forged 350 crank is cheap and easy to find and rebuild. good stock 350 truck "K" rods are plentyfull and more than strong enough for 400hp. 305 hypereutectic flat top pistons are cheap and more than up to the task of 400hp.
Fully ported 416 or 081 305 heads with 1.94-1.50" valves will flow more than enough air for 400hp.
A Crane cams "Saturday night special" cam and lifter/spring kit is just right for this motor. I'd use Crane Kit #110922.
A base 350 is no more a "performance motor" than a base 305. It is no more "bulletproof" either.
This motor is no more harder or expensive to build than a 400hp 350.
#60
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by F-BIRD'88
A base 350 is no more a "performance motor" than a base 305. It is no more "bulletproof" either.
This motor is no more harder or expensive to build than a 400hp 350.
A base 350 is no more a "performance motor" than a base 305. It is no more "bulletproof" either.
This motor is no more harder or expensive to build than a 400hp 350.
about time someone who knows what they are talking about..
#61
A base 350 is no more a "performance motor" than a base 305. It is no more "bulletproof" either.
A base 350 is no more a "performance motor" than a base 305. It is no more "bulletproof" either.
This motor is no more harder or expensive to build than a 400hp 350.
A base 350 is no more a "performance motor" than a base 305. It is no more "bulletproof" either.
This motor is no more harder or expensive to build than a 400hp 350.
"Take a 400 hp 305, put all those same parts on a 350 and make 450hp. Just aint worth it to build one."
#62
Originally posted by nsimmons
Something these new guys need to realize is the more you mod a car the less reliable it becomes and the more of a handful it becomes. This was rather a shock to me when i did my first cam swap years back, your trading a lot of creature comfort for power. It becomes more of a pain in the *** to drive. It transforms from a nice reliable smooth running car to a loping, gas guzzling, constantly needing tweaking or fixing because your new power is breaking things or you forgot something kind of car.
My car is pretty quick now, but it took me a while to get used to driving a higher performance carbed car, after comming immediatley from lower performance injected model. Im used to it now and like it but it theres something to be said about a smooth running reliable grocery getter.
Something these new guys need to realize is the more you mod a car the less reliable it becomes and the more of a handful it becomes. This was rather a shock to me when i did my first cam swap years back, your trading a lot of creature comfort for power. It becomes more of a pain in the *** to drive. It transforms from a nice reliable smooth running car to a loping, gas guzzling, constantly needing tweaking or fixing because your new power is breaking things or you forgot something kind of car.
My car is pretty quick now, but it took me a while to get used to driving a higher performance carbed car, after comming immediatley from lower performance injected model. Im used to it now and like it but it theres something to be said about a smooth running reliable grocery getter.
#63
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 4
From: Western Ky
Car: Z/28..39 Plymouth truck in progress
Engine: S/B
Transmission: Manual
Originally posted by nsimmons
Something these new guys need to realize is the more you mod a car the less reliable it becomes and the more of a handful it becomes. This was rather a shock to me when i did my first cam swap years back, your trading a lot of creature comfort for power. It becomes more of a pain in the *** to drive. It transforms from a nice reliable smooth running car to a loping, gas guzzling, constantly needing tweaking or fixing because your new power is breaking things or you forgot something kind of car.
Something these new guys need to realize is the more you mod a car the less reliable it becomes and the more of a handful it becomes. This was rather a shock to me when i did my first cam swap years back, your trading a lot of creature comfort for power. It becomes more of a pain in the *** to drive. It transforms from a nice reliable smooth running car to a loping, gas guzzling, constantly needing tweaking or fixing because your new power is breaking things or you forgot something kind of car.
#65
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 36
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Originally posted by flrtin1
OK I am going to chime in ........You can have a 500hp+hp 305 that gets 22mpg on 93 octane gas has excellent street manners and is 100% reliable its not that hard.
OK I am going to chime in ........You can have a 500hp+hp 305 that gets 22mpg on 93 octane gas has excellent street manners and is 100% reliable its not that hard.
A dose of reality is in order here.
400 HP is asking too much of a 305 if you expect decent gas mileage, good street manners, and reliability. If you want all that, swap in an LS1 - it'll be cheaper.
#67
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 0
From: Salem, NH
Car: 1999 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10 Bolt
Originally posted by F-BIRD'88
Think about what you are saying. When was the last time you saw a 302(3" stroke) crank laying around? A 302 crank is going to cost you a minor fortune, if you can find one. 302 pistons are expensive too, much more expensive than 305 flat tops. The two motors would need the same heads, cam induction, exhaust and preparation to achieve 400hp. The only benefit a 302 has over a 305 is a bigger bore (allows for a larger valve) but a 1.94-1.50" combination is all that's required to get 400hp.
The 305 based motor is hands down much cheaper to build to 400hp than a equal 302ci chev.
A stock 305 block is plenty strong. A forged 350 crank is cheap and easy to find and rebuild. good stock 350 truck "K" rods are plentyfull and more than strong enough for 400hp. 305 hypereutectic flat top pistons are cheap and more than up to the task of 400hp.
Fully ported 416 or 081 305 heads with 1.94-1.50" valves will flow more than enough air for 400hp.
A Crane cams "Saturday night special" cam and lifter/spring kit is just right for this motor. I'd use Crane Kit #110922.
A base 350 is no more a "performance motor" than a base 305. It is no more "bulletproof" either.
This motor is no more harder or expensive to build than a 400hp 350.
Think about what you are saying. When was the last time you saw a 302(3" stroke) crank laying around? A 302 crank is going to cost you a minor fortune, if you can find one. 302 pistons are expensive too, much more expensive than 305 flat tops. The two motors would need the same heads, cam induction, exhaust and preparation to achieve 400hp. The only benefit a 302 has over a 305 is a bigger bore (allows for a larger valve) but a 1.94-1.50" combination is all that's required to get 400hp.
The 305 based motor is hands down much cheaper to build to 400hp than a equal 302ci chev.
A stock 305 block is plenty strong. A forged 350 crank is cheap and easy to find and rebuild. good stock 350 truck "K" rods are plentyfull and more than strong enough for 400hp. 305 hypereutectic flat top pistons are cheap and more than up to the task of 400hp.
Fully ported 416 or 081 305 heads with 1.94-1.50" valves will flow more than enough air for 400hp.
A Crane cams "Saturday night special" cam and lifter/spring kit is just right for this motor. I'd use Crane Kit #110922.
A base 350 is no more a "performance motor" than a base 305. It is no more "bulletproof" either.
This motor is no more harder or expensive to build than a 400hp 350.
also for anyone looking to do some minor mods to their 305 i suggest PMing a man by the name of Tim Burgess on this message board. he put a TPIS cam in his 305 and ported the stock heads and well he runs in the high twelves at 109mph.
#68
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 4
From: Western Ky
Car: Z/28..39 Plymouth truck in progress
Engine: S/B
Transmission: Manual
Originally posted by five7kid
That's why it's been done so many times...
A dose of reality is in order here.
400 HP is asking too much of a 305 if you expect decent gas mileage, good street manners, and reliability. If you want all that, swap in an LS1 - it'll be cheaper.
That's why it's been done so many times...
A dose of reality is in order here.
400 HP is asking too much of a 305 if you expect decent gas mileage, good street manners, and reliability. If you want all that, swap in an LS1 - it'll be cheaper.
The 305 I built for a friend in 02 has 10,000 trouble free mi, it's just at 500hp and gets 18mpg
Now everyone isn't going to want what we have thats why I said you need to figure out what you want before you start but to say it can't be done or a 305 can't handle that much hp is misleading also once again it's not that hard
#70
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 4
From: Western Ky
Car: Z/28..39 Plymouth truck in progress
Engine: S/B
Transmission: Manual
Don't have any.....don't need any
If you are that interested you can come on the 1500 miles of the power tour we both are going to do next year and watch it on the track or you could of been there for the 800 miles we did this year
If you are that interested you can come on the 1500 miles of the power tour we both are going to do next year and watch it on the track or you could of been there for the 800 miles we did this year
Last edited by flrtin1; 12-06-2004 at 03:11 PM.
#72
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 4
From: Western Ky
Car: Z/28..39 Plymouth truck in progress
Engine: S/B
Transmission: Manual
The pics are the first ones on the page
Pictures
And I am also not trying to be rude I just don't like seeing blanket statements like "you can't do that" they are misleading for inexperienced members I would rather see people say "to do that would need to..........."
Pictures
And I am also not trying to be rude I just don't like seeing blanket statements like "you can't do that" they are misleading for inexperienced members I would rather see people say "to do that would need to..........."
Last edited by flrtin1; 12-06-2004 at 03:24 PM.
#74
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by flrtin1
The pics are the first ones on the page
Pictures
And I am also not trying to be rude I just don't like seeing blanket statements like "you can't do that" they are misleading for inexperienced members I would rather see people say "to do that would need to..........."
The pics are the first ones on the page
Pictures
And I am also not trying to be rude I just don't like seeing blanket statements like "you can't do that" they are misleading for inexperienced members I would rather see people say "to do that would need to..........."
thats sweet ....
where are you from flrtin1?
#76
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by tommyt
I thought we were talking about NA motors in this topic...
Why didn't You guys build NA 400HP 305s
for street use ?
I thought we were talking about NA motors in this topic...
Why didn't You guys build NA 400HP 305s
for street use ?
#77
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 4
From: Western Ky
Car: Z/28..39 Plymouth truck in progress
Engine: S/B
Transmission: Manual
I thought we were talking about NA motors in this topic...
Why didn't You guys build NA 400HP 305s
#78
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
how many miles per year do you put on it ??
what did it run at the track (best time)?
what did it run at the track (best time)?
#79
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 4
From: Western Ky
Car: Z/28..39 Plymouth truck in progress
Engine: S/B
Transmission: Manual
where are you from flrtin1?
#80
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Hungary
Car: 87 T/A
Engine: built NOS 350
Transmission: manual 700r4
About power handling, I agree. Its a smallblock, it will take what any smallblock with 2 bolt mains will (not going into wall thicknesses and other details here)
The big argument in this thread seems to be not the 305s ability to hold 400HP, rather, its ability to MAKE 400HP for street use, without nitrous and blower.
Nice car, BTW...
The big argument in this thread seems to be not the 305s ability to hold 400HP, rather, its ability to MAKE 400HP for street use, without nitrous and blower.
Nice car, BTW...
#81
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by flrtin1
Just up the road from you in Peoria. The last time we were in Staunton I about got my *** bit by that huge dog at the car sales place along 55 lol
Just up the road from you in Peoria. The last time we were in Staunton I about got my *** bit by that huge dog at the car sales place along 55 lol
you ever make it down this way in your car again youll have to let me know id like to see it in person .
looks like you put alot of hard work into it
#82
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 4
From: Western Ky
Car: Z/28..39 Plymouth truck in progress
Engine: S/B
Transmission: Manual
how many miles per year do you put on it ??
what did it run at the track (best time)?
back to topic I am off my box now sorry lol
#83
Originally posted by flrtin1
low 13's trapping in the low teens
low 13's trapping in the low teens
Last edited by anondude13; 12-06-2004 at 03:59 PM.
#84
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 36
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Originally posted by flrtin1
back to topic I am off my box now sorry lol
back to topic I am off my box now sorry lol
The last time it was at the track was 88 I haven seen those slips for about 15yrs but if I remember right it was low 13's trapping in the low teens that was with the B&M 144, stock heads, HEI and 215's on the rear
What documentation can you offer for the 22 mpg claim?
Never mind, that's off-topic...
#85
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 4
From: Western Ky
Car: Z/28..39 Plymouth truck in progress
Engine: S/B
Transmission: Manual
For reference purposes only, I'm pushing 3880 lbs down the track in sub-13 seconds at 102 mph in the '57, which calculates out to around 400 FWHP, 325 RWHP.
my car has had over 55,000mi with over 400hp on it and has over 500hp currently
Last edited by flrtin1; 12-06-2004 at 04:44 PM.
#86
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 15
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
This stupidity just won't go away, will it?
I notice the guy that asked the original question hasn't participated very much.... maybe some of this pointless wrangling that's off the topic has got him as disgusted as it has me.... ya think??
Anybody can stick a blower on anything, especially if it's FI, and make huge power numbers. That's mind-numbingly trivial. It's beyond amusing to see somebody that thinks they "know" something about "building" motors just because they can stick a blower (or nitrous for that matter) on one and make it go faster. Hell, you can even do that to a Honduh, and make it run with decent V8s (not LG4s or L03s....); doesn't take much knowledge or skill, or a motor that's particularly powerful to begin with.
In any case, the original poster asked about "high HP" (whatever that might mean to whomever) out of his 305; with the following specific info: So, IMHO it's time to quit spanking off about how fast you made your 305 by huffing it, and answer the post at hand, and realize that if you stuck the same blower on some other car that was otherwise identical except it had a bigger motor, it would blow your 305's doors off, and we wouldn't have to put up with it any more.
I notice the guy that asked the original question hasn't participated very much.... maybe some of this pointless wrangling that's off the topic has got him as disgusted as it has me.... ya think??
Anybody can stick a blower on anything, especially if it's FI, and make huge power numbers. That's mind-numbingly trivial. It's beyond amusing to see somebody that thinks they "know" something about "building" motors just because they can stick a blower (or nitrous for that matter) on one and make it go faster. Hell, you can even do that to a Honduh, and make it run with decent V8s (not LG4s or L03s....); doesn't take much knowledge or skill, or a motor that's particularly powerful to begin with.
In any case, the original poster asked about "high HP" (whatever that might mean to whomever) out of his 305; with the following specific info:
w/o nitrous or a supercharger
#87
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 4
From: Western Ky
Car: Z/28..39 Plymouth truck in progress
Engine: S/B
Transmission: Manual
lol bring it on...... and unlike you I don't think I know everything and there is only one way (your way) to do it
And if you (which you do a lot) want to spout your experience you might find out there are other people on here that might know a thing or two also
Judging from some e-mails and PM's I have got I think I am understanding why alot of the people with hands on experience don't bother to post anymore
And since it had been a month before I posted since the original poster had been here I assume you are addressing that toward someone else
And if you (which you do a lot) want to spout your experience you might find out there are other people on here that might know a thing or two also
Judging from some e-mails and PM's I have got I think I am understanding why alot of the people with hands on experience don't bother to post anymore
And since it had been a month before I posted since the original poster had been here I assume you are addressing that toward someone else
Last edited by flrtin1; 12-06-2004 at 05:57 PM.
#88
Originally posted by RB83L69
This stupidity just won't go away, will it?
I notice the guy that asked the original question hasn't participated very much.... maybe some of this pointless wrangling that's off the topic has got him as disgusted as it has me.... ya think??
Anybody can stick a blower on anything, especially if it's FI, and make huge power numbers. That's mind-numbingly trivial. It's beyond amusing to see somebody that thinks they "know" something about "building" motors just because they can stick a blower (or nitrous for that matter) on one and make it go faster. Hell, you can even do that to a Honduh, and make it run with decent V8s (not LG4s or L03s....); doesn't take much knowledge or skill, or a motor that's particularly powerful to begin with.
In any case, the original poster asked about "high HP" (whatever that might mean to whomever) out of his 305; with the following specific info:So, IMHO it's time to quit spanking off about how fast you made your 305 by huffing it, and answer the post at hand, and realize that if you stuck the same blower on some other car that was otherwise identical except it had a bigger motor, it would blow your 305's doors off, and we wouldn't have to put up with it any more.
This stupidity just won't go away, will it?
I notice the guy that asked the original question hasn't participated very much.... maybe some of this pointless wrangling that's off the topic has got him as disgusted as it has me.... ya think??
Anybody can stick a blower on anything, especially if it's FI, and make huge power numbers. That's mind-numbingly trivial. It's beyond amusing to see somebody that thinks they "know" something about "building" motors just because they can stick a blower (or nitrous for that matter) on one and make it go faster. Hell, you can even do that to a Honduh, and make it run with decent V8s (not LG4s or L03s....); doesn't take much knowledge or skill, or a motor that's particularly powerful to begin with.
In any case, the original poster asked about "high HP" (whatever that might mean to whomever) out of his 305; with the following specific info:So, IMHO it's time to quit spanking off about how fast you made your 305 by huffing it, and answer the post at hand, and realize that if you stuck the same blower on some other car that was otherwise identical except it had a bigger motor, it would blow your 305's doors off, and we wouldn't have to put up with it any more.
You callin my boy stupid??? maybe he strayed off topic but what he has done works and BTW most people in the know realize that you don't Just slap on a blower. There are alot of things that go along with it to set it up right. This guy is full of knowledge that can be helpfull to everybody so lay off Jack...
and for the record... I'd like to see you take an identical car with a bigger motor with a blower and beat him. I doubt you would have the skill to compete...
#89
Originally posted by ADV1
You callin my boy stupid??? maybe he strayed off topic but what he has done works and BTW most people in the know realize that you don't Just slap on a blower. There are alot of things that go along with it to set it up right. This guy is full of knowledge that can be helpfull to everybody so lay off Jack...
and for the record... I'd like to see you take an identical car with a bigger motor with a blower and beat him. I doubt you would have the skill to compete...
You callin my boy stupid??? maybe he strayed off topic but what he has done works and BTW most people in the know realize that you don't Just slap on a blower. There are alot of things that go along with it to set it up right. This guy is full of knowledge that can be helpfull to everybody so lay off Jack...
and for the record... I'd like to see you take an identical car with a bigger motor with a blower and beat him. I doubt you would have the skill to compete...
You know, I have had differences with RB, but I dont think you know what the hell you are talking about. He has been building fast cars since before you were born.
I'm guessing that you guys are so good Boyd Coddington has you on speed dial huh? I bet you spend all of your time at the track, fixing peoples cars, because you are the king of race engines. This is getting to be as bad as the 327-350 debate. Let me guess the 327 is better, right?
#90
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 36
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Well, I think this has gone on long enough. I was ready to do this a couple of weeks ago, but I thought perhaps it may retain some redeeming qualities, and I've attempted time after time to get it back on topic, but it just isn't happening.
So, it is now time to say,
"Goodnight, Gracie..."
So, it is now time to say,
"Goodnight, Gracie..."
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post