Sbc 302...
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Boscobel, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Iroc-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 w/ about 7500 miles on rebuild
Sbc 302...
Has anyone ever build a SBC 302 for thier Thirdgen? I've always wanted to do it, wanted to know if anyone has.
BTW, for those of you who dont know, the 302 was only offered in the 67-69 Z28 Camaro. Thats the ONLY car and those are the ONLY years, period (with the exception of 70-70 1/2 because of the overrun production year). The 302 had the standard 327 (and 350) bore and putting a 283 crank in it. VERY high RPM motor (7500 rpm was the common shiftpoint).
I get my info from here
http://www.musclecarclub.com/musclec...istory-1.shtml
BTW, for those of you who dont know, the 302 was only offered in the 67-69 Z28 Camaro. Thats the ONLY car and those are the ONLY years, period (with the exception of 70-70 1/2 because of the overrun production year). The 302 had the standard 327 (and 350) bore and putting a 283 crank in it. VERY high RPM motor (7500 rpm was the common shiftpoint).
I get my info from here
http://www.musclecarclub.com/musclec...istory-1.shtml
Last edited by Rabbitt; 07-02-2004 at 10:11 PM.
#2
your going to open up a serious can of worms with this thread. i say if your going to road race the car, then go for it, for drag racing i think that a 350/383/400 would be better. it can all be done with the right amount of money and r&d. but it's not the easiest way.
i do believe that it has been done though, i mean, a 302 in a thirdgen.
i do believe that it has been done though, i mean, a 302 in a thirdgen.
#5
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: tucson
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Camaro
Engine: 355c.i.
Transmission: th350
Originally posted by ede
this out to get good. always fun to read what people who never saw one when they were on the streets have to say
this out to get good. always fun to read what people who never saw one when they were on the streets have to say
#6
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 4,803
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Z28
Engine: Sb2.2 406
Transmission: Jerico 4 speed
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.60
IMO, between the 302 and 350, it's all about cost vs. output.
But that's just me.
But that's just me.
#7
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Boscobel, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Iroc-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 w/ about 7500 miles on rebuild
meh, i was just curious if anyone on here has done it. I have never met anyone with a 302 in any car besides a 67-69 z/28, just thought it would be neat if i found someone with one, thats all. I would like to have one just because of that fact.
Trending Topics
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stafford CT
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Camaro SC
Engine: LT1 SBC
Transmission: LT1 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Moser 12 Bolt
Personally, I think a 302 would be awesome. Buuuut - I'd do it with a motor that would give you a strong basis to start with. Like an LT1 - that way you'd have good heads and a good induction system in the first place, then you could just go with a nice cam and make sure it breathes. I love the 302 chevy tho, just think of the fun telling a guy you beat him with a 5.0 chevy, and having him bewildered thinking it was a 305. Mwuhahahahahahha
Ty
Ty
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you wanted to do a 302 motor setup; you could do the following.
LT1 - 350ci
L99 crank (3.00") (baby LT1 found in caprices)
combine with proper parts and create a 302 LT1 (was done with an LS1 and made 435hp - see SEMA 2000 ZL1? camaro)
this would let you take advantage of newer technologies, you could add a blower or turbo setup to it.
LT1 - 350ci
L99 crank (3.00") (baby LT1 found in caprices)
combine with proper parts and create a 302 LT1 (was done with an LS1 and made 435hp - see SEMA 2000 ZL1? camaro)
this would let you take advantage of newer technologies, you could add a blower or turbo setup to it.
#12
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes
on
34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Originally posted by Rabbitt
meh, i was just curious if anyone on here has done it. I have never met anyone with a 302 in any car besides a 67-69 z/28, just thought it would be neat if i found someone with one, thats all.
meh, i was just curious if anyone on here has done it. I have never met anyone with a 302 in any car besides a 67-69 z/28, just thought it would be neat if i found someone with one, thats all.
The mild 396 in there now will run circles around it.
Last edited by five7kid; 07-06-2004 at 12:38 PM.
#13
Supreme Member
302s can be pleanty quick. My dad went 12.5 with full exhaust, 5.13 gears and slicks in the 70's at norwalk in his 69 Z28. His shift point was 7250 rpm, *** damn that sbc musta sounded great sreaming at that rpm.
#15
Supreme Member
iTrader: (-1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: Bright Red 91 GTA
Engine: CARBED LT4
Transmission: MK6
That 302 LT1 would be pretty sweet, or a "old" 302 would be cool for road racing or drag racing...but like 57 just said it will pimped off the line, unless you had a M22 or a 3,600 convertor...
Chuck what was the MPH on that run...
my grandpa has a 68 Z with the DZ and rockcrusher with 4.10's..2nd owner and has been for almost 30 years pretty sweet car...
the only mods hes done to the original motor was stiffer valve springs and ran 12.8's@109
Chuck what was the MPH on that run...
my grandpa has a 68 Z with the DZ and rockcrusher with 4.10's..2nd owner and has been for almost 30 years pretty sweet car...
the only mods hes done to the original motor was stiffer valve springs and ran 12.8's@109
#16
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Originally posted by ede
this out to get good. always fun to read what people who never saw one when they were on the streets have to say
this out to get good. always fun to read what people who never saw one when they were on the streets have to say
#17
SImply because it is a 302, doesnt mean it is gonna be capable of 7500 RPM runs. Any motor can make those RPMs when built properly, and make much more power than the 302 doing it. Its definately a cool way to go if you dont mind getting smoked by the 350's.
#18
TGO Supporter
Originally posted by kevinc
Only 302 Chevy I've seen was in a 1st gen Camaro, just caught a glance at it as I blew past it on the road course at Memphis...two years in a row...
Only 302 Chevy I've seen was in a 1st gen Camaro, just caught a glance at it as I blew past it on the road course at Memphis...two years in a row...
#20
Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: nova scotia,canada
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 irocz
Engine: 406
Transmission: th400
Axle/Gears: 4.10
i know a guy with a 302 in a 79 z28 drag car 300hp heads stock .490 solid lift cam 12:1 compression 5000stall 5.13 gears 29.5 tall tires converter,runs 12.5s@105 1.7 60ft 3000 pound car.revs high but i like my 400sb toqure better
#21
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
The '70 (or '70.5 if you want) only had the 350. No 302s were carried over from the '69.
I like the 302 just for the reason that its unique. And they can be scary fast... just look at the ones in the fox body Mustangs.
But this is the way I see it... the '69 302 and '70 LT-1 were built with all the same parts except the crank. Same heads, rods, intake, carb, exhaust, pistons, cam, etc etc...
The LT-1 was rated at 360hp and the Z28 was rated at 290. Both are said to be under-rated, but still. A 70 HP difference? You can't argue with that!
I like the 302 just for the reason that its unique. And they can be scary fast... just look at the ones in the fox body Mustangs.
But this is the way I see it... the '69 302 and '70 LT-1 were built with all the same parts except the crank. Same heads, rods, intake, carb, exhaust, pistons, cam, etc etc...
The LT-1 was rated at 360hp and the Z28 was rated at 290. Both are said to be under-rated, but still. A 70 HP difference? You can't argue with that!
#22
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Boscobel, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Iroc-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 w/ about 7500 miles on rebuild
rumor has it that the 302, when put on the dyno, would give up closer to 400hp.
#23
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes
on
34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Originally posted by Air_Adam
The '70 (or '70.5 if you want) only had the 350. No 302s were carried over from the '69.
The '70 (or '70.5 if you want) only had the 350. No 302s were carried over from the '69.
But this is the way I see it... the '69 302 and '70 LT-1 were built with all the same parts except the crank. Same heads, rods, intake, carb, exhaust, pistons, cam, etc etc...
The LT-1 was rated at 360hp and the Z28 was rated at 290. Both are said to be under-rated, but still. A 70 HP difference? You can't argue with that!
Originally posted by Rabbitt
rumor has it that the 302, when put on the dyno, would give up closer to 400hp.
rumor has it that the 302, when put on the dyno, would give up closer to 400hp.
#24
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
The angle plug heads were not stock on the LT1. They were a factory ugrade part, but the cars were never put together at the factory with them.
The 302 and LT-1 used the same heads. The pistons were also had the same dome design (shoulda worded it better before).
The LJ 302 and the LT-1 both used pink rods. Best factory rods at the time. The LT-1 cam was the optional cam on the 302. That cam in the 302 was a dealer upgrade part, but it came with the LT-1 from GM.
The 302 and LT-1 used the same heads. The pistons were also had the same dome design (shoulda worded it better before).
The LJ 302 and the LT-1 both used pink rods. Best factory rods at the time. The LT-1 cam was the optional cam on the 302. That cam in the 302 was a dealer upgrade part, but it came with the LT-1 from GM.
#25
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes
on
34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
At least the first year all LT-1's had the angle plug heads, from what I recall. They smogged the poor thing after that, not sure what heads it got before they finally let it die with what little dignity was left.
#26
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: denison tx
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 camaro
Engine: 454
Transmission: th400
i have a 327 short block and a 283 short block the 283 has a hole in one of the cylenders but the crank could be turned email if intersted:lala:
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gixxer92
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
9
05-18-2017 11:20 AM
darwinprice
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
17
10-11-2015 11:51 PM
92rsvortec350
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
19
10-09-2015 09:39 AM
Damon
Tech / General Engine
8
09-26-2015 04:29 PM