Engine Swap Everything about swapping an engine into your Third Gen.....be it V6, V8, LTX/LSX, crate engine, etc. Pictures, questions, answers, and work logs.

LS1 - LT1 Swap Weights?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-10-2004, 07:57 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Adrenaline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Rafael, California
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
LS1 - LT1 Swap Weights?

Just wondering for you swapers, what your car weighed before and after.
So how much did the LT1 add or drop, same with the LS1, the 6 speed, ect.. ect.. just wondering what the difference is after the swap. (obviusly the power is worth the weight gan :-D )
Old 06-11-2004, 01:45 AM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (53)
 
FLYNLOW92rs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Both the LT1 and LS1 weigh less then a SBC

The LS1 is about 150 pounds lighter, and it raised my car about .5-1"

The LS1 is an all aluminum engine

As far as weights are concerned, for a general estimate on stock engines it's like this......

SBC>LT1>LS1
Old 06-11-2004, 05:40 AM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Adrenaline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Rafael, California
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
Any actual weights.
anyone weigh there cars?
thank you tho, flynlow
Old 06-11-2004, 11:03 AM
  #4  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (53)
 
FLYNLOW92rs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Adrenaline
Any actual weights.
anyone weigh there cars?
thank you tho, flynlow
Umm, I don't think anyone with an LS1 has weighed there car before and after.....But you take a the stock weight of your car just minus 145-150 pounds from it.......Maybe some with an LT1 will chime in and tell what their car weighs....

For reference

The LT1 is approx 80-90 pounds lighter then your average thirdgen engine, and the LS1 is 65-70 pounds lighter then your LT1

Is there a specific reason you are looking for actual numbers?? Prehaps we can help in other ways since weighing your entire car is not something that gets posted often
Old 06-11-2004, 07:08 PM
  #5  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Adrenaline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Rafael, California
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
i was jsut curios what the weight gain/drop would be if i ended up doing the conversion. It looks like im just gunna have the motor i built (355) shiped to me, and ill look for a T-56 to swap in all at the same time.

is a 350 heavier or lighter than the 305 TBI

how do you go about moving the center of gravity, ect. i want the car to handle like its on rails. i have a lot of work to do first, but i just like to look in the long run...
Old 06-11-2004, 07:16 PM
  #6  
Supporter/Moderator
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,355
Likes: 0
Received 427 Likes on 329 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Most Gen 1 motors will wiehg about the same, so your 305 TBI and 350 will be about identical. A 305 block is a hair heavier but not by much. Lowering your car is a great way to change the center of gravity.
Old 06-13-2004, 01:03 PM
  #7  
Member

 
Drastius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Hinton, Alberta. Canada
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 Camaro Z28
Engine: Caprice LT1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23
85 Camaro Z28, Caprice Iron Head LT1, 4L60 E transmission, 3/4 tank of gas.

3380 pounds.
Old 06-16-2004, 03:34 PM
  #8  
Senior Member

 
Drakar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Drastius
85 Camaro Z28, Caprice Iron Head LT1, 4L60 E transmission, 3/4 tank of gas.

3380 pounds.
W/driver or w/o?
Old 06-16-2004, 04:15 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member
 
pasky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Originally posted by Drastius
85 Camaro Z28, Caprice Iron Head LT1, 4L60 E transmission, 3/4 tank of gas.

3380 pounds.
Nice that must mean mine must be lighter than that. Don't auto trannies weigh 145+ lbs. I also have aluminum heads so I must be in the 3200 range.
Old 06-16-2004, 06:55 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
scottland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '82 Z28
Engine: 350HO
Transmission: M4
Originally posted by FLYNLOW92rs
Both the LT1 and LS1 weigh less then a SBC

SBC>LT1>LS1
LT1's and LS1's are SBC's

but anyway, LT1's wouldn't nessicarily weigh any less than a GENI SBC. there are plenty of GENI's that have aluminum heads, and in that case, the weight difference is probably none existant.
Old 06-17-2004, 03:10 PM
  #11  
Senior Member

 
Drakar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by scottland
LT1's and LS1's are SBC's

but anyway, LT1's wouldn't nessicarily weigh any less than a GENI SBC. there are plenty of GENI's that have aluminum heads, and in that case, the weight difference is probably none existant.
The amount of aluminum headed FACTORY SBC 1's has got to be far far less then the amount of IRON headed ones, but basically you can look at it this way.

L98/LB9> LT1 > LS1

and that being all F-body ones, you throw in a B-body LT1 like me and you get ..... IRON Heads which almost negate any weight savings ..... basically Im saving a bit on the Intake vs my old iron LG4 intake.
Old 06-17-2004, 05:08 PM
  #12  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Z28ricer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Tampa, FL, USA
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 93 240SX
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.54 R200 IRS
Originally posted by pasky
Nice that must mean mine must be lighter than that. Don't auto trannies weigh 145+ lbs. I also have aluminum heads so I must be in the 3200 range.
T56's weigh about 138 alone.
Old 06-17-2004, 05:26 PM
  #13  
Supreme Member
 
pasky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
I shoved it on a scaled here, was 123.4 lbs. Suck it.
Old 06-17-2004, 06:20 PM
  #14  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Z28ricer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Tampa, FL, USA
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 93 240SX
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.54 R200 IRS
Originally posted by pasky
I shoved it on a scaled here, was 123.4 lbs. Suck it.
Sure you did, silly homo, you probably drained it for a few hours just to be able to claim it was lighter. Not to mention your scale is probably off
Old 06-17-2004, 06:23 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
scottland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '82 Z28
Engine: 350HO
Transmission: M4
who cares? its like 10 pounds difference, you could get almost that by not eating the whole day.
Old 06-17-2004, 06:42 PM
  #16  
Supreme Member
 
pasky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Originally posted by Z28*****
Sure you did, silly homo, you probably drained it for a few hours just to be able to claim it was lighter. Not to mention your scale is probably off
Yea, 3.8 quarts of liquid is gonna push on 20 lbs. Then again, every scale in florida is the most accurate, hell every clock for that matter and the most important thing I forgot, your word is almighty.

EDIT: A 4L60E weighs about 200 #'s.

Last edited by pasky; 06-17-2004 at 07:50 PM.
Old 06-17-2004, 07:43 PM
  #17  
Supreme Member
 
pasky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Just did some research, just about everywhere i check the weight of a T-56 comes out to 125 #'s.

BTW, think I found a picture of z28*****, maybe this is why yours weighed "138". Stop riding that shifter!!!
Attached Thumbnails LS1 - LT1 Swap Weights?-ricer.jpg  
Old 06-17-2004, 09:22 PM
  #18  
Member

 
Drastius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Hinton, Alberta. Canada
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 Camaro Z28
Engine: Caprice LT1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Yea 3380 without driver
Old 06-18-2004, 04:47 PM
  #19  
Supreme Member

 
blyth18md's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Western Maryland
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 82z28
Engine: 406
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: 3.23
3296 shipping weight

1945 front
1351 rear

60/40 ratio in 82 but after a tank of gas and driver things could shift a bit


(just found rpo list today has the front/rear breakdown on it, compared it to my invoice "SW")

this is the weight with the lg4 and auto tranny and quite a few options
Old 06-18-2004, 05:08 PM
  #20  
TGO Supporter

 
Air_Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Just for reference, a typical SBC weighs around 500lbs.
Old 06-18-2004, 06:40 PM
  #21  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (53)
 
FLYNLOW92rs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by scottland
LT1's and LS1's are SBC's
splitting hairs.....

I think 99.9% of the board was able to interpret what i was saying.....
Old 06-18-2004, 11:17 PM
  #22  
Member
 
fisherbody86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: under the hood
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 92 Z28 heritage
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: T-5
the pic of that guy riding that trans has me is the funniest thing I have seen in a while. And every post by pasky has me laughing my **** off.
Old 06-19-2004, 09:24 PM
  #23  
Supreme Member
 
pasky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
*shrug*, he is the type of guy to tell you what is best and its his way or the highway so he treats everyone as if they have a lower intellgence when its him with the I.Q. you can trip over, prove him wrong and he makes some dumbass excuse like the one you saw above about my scale being off .

Last edited by pasky; 06-19-2004 at 09:51 PM.
Old 06-20-2004, 02:17 PM
  #24  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
7plagues's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UofA(Tucson), AZ
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 92 Precision Red Firebird
Engine: v6->357 vortec xe262h rpm intake
Transmission: t5-> t56
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 3.42s
If an lt1 or ls1 was swaped into a v6 thirdgen would you need to replace the shocks?
Old 06-23-2004, 11:29 PM
  #25  
Supreme Member
 
pasky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
If thier worn. I'd be more worried about springs.
Old 11-29-2004, 10:46 AM
  #26  
Junior Member
 
Peteracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am running a SCCA car with a Gen1 SBC , with aluminum intake,heads,water pump and underdrive billet pulleys.

and a muncie M-21 transmission with aluminum bellhousing.

I wonder If i could save some weight swapping this set up If i swap in a LS1 backed with a T-56.

I know the LS1 is lighter, and the T-56 is heavier, I dont want to run a muncie with a LS-1 .

Can someone tell me if there is any weight savings according to their experiences

Peter
Old 11-29-2004, 05:36 PM
  #27  
Supporter/Moderator
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,355
Likes: 0
Received 427 Likes on 329 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Peteracer
I am running a SCCA car with a Gen1 SBC , with aluminum intake,heads,water pump and underdrive billet pulleys.

and a muncie M-21 transmission with aluminum bellhousing.

I wonder If i could save some weight swapping this set up If i swap in a LS1 backed with a T-56.

I know the LS1 is lighter, and the T-56 is heavier, I dont want to run a muncie with a LS-1 .

Can someone tell me if there is any weight savings according to their experiences

Peter
An LS1 weighs 100lbs less then a aluminum headed Gen I or II motor. Even if the T56 leaves you with the same weight it will be much closer to the center of the car.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
customblackbird
Suspension and Chassis
4
08-15-2021 10:16 PM
1984HO
LTX and LSX
20
03-19-2021 11:59 AM
lt1z350
Suspension and Chassis
5
08-28-2015 05:57 AM
NBrehm
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
08-25-2015 11:49 PM
sreZ28
Engine Swap
4
08-14-2015 07:48 PM



Quick Reply: LS1 - LT1 Swap Weights?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:12 PM.