Engine Swap Everything about swapping an engine into your Third Gen.....be it V6, V8, LTX/LSX, crate engine, etc. Pictures, questions, answers, and work logs.

Long vs. Short Connecting rods

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-23-2002, 05:52 PM
  #1  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
DTL504's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 84 Z28 Convertible 2 Seater
Engine: Dart Little-M SBC 400
Transmission: Pro-built Automatics 700R4
Axle/Gears: Strange Engineering 3:73
Long vs. Short Connecting rods

This have been a very hard decision to make and I have found something that leans me to getting 6.0in rods

http://www.grapeaperacing.com/GrapeA...rodslength.cfm
Old 07-23-2002, 07:19 PM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
MorgRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To add:
My street 383 CID has 6" rods (not installed yet). My latemodel 360 CID has 6.25 rods. 15 years ago we we're running sub 6" rods.
We have a saying "Trophy girls kiss those with the longest rods"

During hot shoeing remember most of us (exclude saltflats, daytona 500), our motors are spending all it's time accelerating. Engine acceleration won't show up on most dynos, thats why you see on this forum people don't know the difference. Also they are most likely tuning the car for the shorter rod. A longer rod in a given cam timing the torque peak will occur higher in the range, the advantage is more area under the curve as they say.
If your only plan on cam timing too 5500 rpm you probly won't notice a difference. But if 6500 is your peak you can tune for more area under the curve.
Even if the car is no faster, the ring sealing advantage alone is worth the cost on a longer rod build.
Old 07-23-2002, 10:14 PM
  #3  
Moderator
TGO - 10 Year Member
 
AlkyIROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Posts: 17,169
Likes: 0
Received 136 Likes on 114 Posts
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
When I had a 383 it had the 400's 5.56" rod. I was buzzing the engine close to 7000 rpm and ran high 11's with it.

There's nothing wrong with a short rod engine. It's easier to build since there's no clearance machining required. They were building 383's like that for years because there were little to no aftermarket stroker pistons that used longer rods many years ago.

Trouble with using a longer rod in a SBC is the deck height. Installing a longer rod means moving the wrist pin higher in the piston. It's already very close to the oil control rings. If the block deck was higher you could have a longer rod and still have the wrist pin below the ring lands.

BBC engines already have the advantage of longer rods because of the taller deck height compared to SBC. Using a tall deck BBC truck block allows even more rod length.
Old 07-24-2002, 08:03 AM
  #4  
Supreme Member
 
ATOMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Indianapolis IN
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That page was 100% right. Whatever you do don't confuse race engines with street engines. They are two very different critters. Like the page said, different rod combos are done to find 5-10 hp. Your car will change that much on the street depending if it's 85 or 65 degrees out. Most enthusiasts are limited by budget. 6 inch combos are used less so they generally cost more. If you can find some for the 5.7 price then I'd say go for it. Else stick with the stock length.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BRoss99
Electronics
27
12-07-2020 06:50 PM
Reborn756
Tech / General Engine
142
09-04-2015 03:42 AM
gixxer92
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
09-01-2015 04:32 PM
TheExaminer
Cooling
26
08-26-2015 04:59 PM



Quick Reply: Long vs. Short Connecting rods



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:55 PM.