AEM 30-0300 Wideband Conversion Equation
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
AEM 30-0300 Wideband Conversion Equation
Hello,
Tuning the $6E and using a aem 30-0300 wideband. Tunerpro's reading is off from what the gauge reads.
Does anyone mind looking at the conversion equation and seeing if it is correct?
Thanks.
Tuning the $6E and using a aem 30-0300 wideband. Tunerpro's reading is off from what the gauge reads.
Does anyone mind looking at the conversion equation and seeing if it is correct?
Thanks.
#2
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 0
Received 225 Likes
on
211 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Re: AEM 30-0300 Wideband Conversion Equation
Try this equation:
AFR = X * 0.046569 + 7.3125
The 7.3125 comes from the AEM doc. Then to convert the ADC counts to volts is 5V / 255 * ADC counts (X).
Then multiply by 2.375 (from the AEM doc):
(5 / 255) * 2.375 = 0.046569
RBob.
AFR = X * 0.046569 + 7.3125
The 7.3125 comes from the AEM doc. Then to convert the ADC counts to volts is 5V / 255 * ADC counts (X).
Then multiply by 2.375 (from the AEM doc):
(5 / 255) * 2.375 = 0.046569
RBob.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Re: AEM 30-0300 Wideband Conversion Equation
I changed the equation and synced the tunerpro log up to a video I took in the car and it is pretty close. I will test in car and see if I can visually see any difference.
#4
Re: AEM 30-0300 Wideband Conversion Equation
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Re: AEM 30-0300 Wideband Conversion Equation
On mine I spoofed the gauge output into the ECM using 4 AAA batteries (4.5V source) and a potentiometer such that I could set specific voltages and then see what tunerpro reports. That way I can do it in the driveway and verify the equation (safer and more accurate than trying to do it while driving glancing back and forth between the gauge and TP.)
#6
Re: AEM 30-0300 Wideband Conversion Equation
Oops.. I meant 3 AAA batteries not 4.
But yeah, I got the reporting accuracy in TP extremely accurate by doing that.
The most accurate method would be to spoof the actual sensor into the gauge and test the whole system.
but I figure I'm probably within the realm of reason to assume the gsuge is reporting accurately.
But yeah, I got the reporting accuracy in TP extremely accurate by doing that.
The most accurate method would be to spoof the actual sensor into the gauge and test the whole system.
but I figure I'm probably within the realm of reason to assume the gsuge is reporting accurately.
#7
Junior Member
Re: AEM 30-0300 Wideband Conversion Equation
I played with this a bit. Try this out looks damn close to me.
Trending Topics
#9
Member
Join Date: Aug 2021
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes
on
25 Posts
Car: 1938 Chevrolet
Engine: ZZ 502
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: Ford 9 3:70
Re: AEM 30-0300 Wideband Conversion Equation
Found the answer for the AEM 30-4110. Moates has the formula
A/F at 4.99 Volts is 19.98
A/F at 0.00 volts is 10.00
Span is 19.98 less 10.00 or 9.98
Span divided by ADC Counts (255)
9.98 / 255 = .0391372549
(X*.0391372549) + 10.00
A/F at 4.99 Volts is 19.98
A/F at 0.00 volts is 10.00
Span is 19.98 less 10.00 or 9.98
Span divided by ADC Counts (255)
9.98 / 255 = .0391372549
(X*.0391372549) + 10.00
#10
Senior Member
Re: AEM 30-0300 Wideband Conversion Equation
If interested, Appendix B of the S_AUJP v7 documentation contains by part number the conversion equations for most all of the popular WBo2 controllers. In the MUST READ ME FIRST file attached here: https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/diy-...ml#post6437472
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
chevy1500z71
Miscellaneous Third Gen Items!
12
05-31-2008 03:56 PM